Hand Block Printing – Mendh Ki Chapai of Jaipur, Rajasthan,
Introduction Mendh ki chapai is a resist style of printing that was practised locally in the town of Sanganer for the tribal Meena, Jat and Mali women. The wax resist enjoyed a similarity with dabu printing (Bagru village near Jaipur is famed for it), but unlike dabu which utilises mud as the resist, Mendh Ki Chappai utilised the more complex and ardous process of using beeswax as the resist material. The other special feature of the mendh was the fragrance of the fabric which was printed using beeswax/Mendh, a pleasant aroma, which was retained by the fabric for several washes. The beeswax for resist was procured from the forests, sourced from the Bhil tribal’s in exchange for money or goods, clothes or grain. In brief, the wax resisted the printed area and traditionally the colour palette was of a deep red combined with an indigo or black. With the first colour being wax resisted being the deep red colour, followed by the indigo or black colour, either in the indigo vat or mineral black colour. The origin and practise of Mendh printing is not clearly traceable, even though a very extensive library search was undertaken, but it seems to be unique to Sanganer as any information available mentions this geographic area. Sanganer is a famous printing centre and have recently acquired it geographical indication act of the small delicate floral spread that has famed the small town of printing. Sanganer is home to chippa community of printers and dyers. Chippa literally meaning the person who prints with the communities who are engaged in printing on cloth called chippas. The printing community was earlier in Amer who were brought and settled in Sanganer by Sawai Raja Jai Singh ji when his capital shifted to Jaipur. The printing settlement was near the banks of River Saraswati which is also called as Dravyavati. It is said that the waters of this river had such special qualities that it brought extra brightness in the colours, thus the colours produced in the Sanganer region had differentiable brightness. Sadly the river turned into a small canal and soon the water levels went down and the river has now completely dried up. The water supply is through motor, pumps and the water tanks. With more than 1000 families in the business of printing, the town of Sanganer is actively growing. The town contributes to the huge amounts of export of printed textiles to Asian, European and American countries. Other than the famous Sanganeri style of printing, mendh- wax resist style of printing was dominantly used for the local market. When the fine buti textile spread was used majorly for the exports and foreign markets, the bold and sharp prints were used for the local tribals. The tribal prints were resist dyed on a thick cotton cloth with floral butis on the spread of cloth namely phardas.
Stepwise Process of Printing with Mendh Resists Pre-preparations:
  • The grey fabric is washed and bleached in the sun. To enhance bleaching the fabric is also bleached chemically with hydrogen peroxide. Traditionally no chemical bleaching was done and the fabric was bleached in entirety by the sun rays. The grey fabric is procured from Erode in Tamil Nadu.
  • The sun bleached fabric is dried in the sun. The process is known as sukhai in the local language. The process of printing is a time-consuming process as after every step washing and drying is necessary. Process of washing is known as pachdai and drying of fabric is sukhai.
  • The bleached fabric is then mordanted with harada. The process takes at least an hour. It is clearly known that natural dyes do not have affinity for the textiles. So the textile has to be made receptive to dye absorption - This process of mordanting the textiles is also known as pila karna or harada dyeing. Drying is followed.
PHASE I Printing: Sanganeri style
  • The fabric is printed in the usual style of Sanganer printing. In this printing two types of colours are used - red or black.The red colour printing paste is also known as begar. (Alum+ Gum+ Water+ Geru)The black colour printing paste is known as syahi. (Iron nails+ Jaggery+ Water are decomposed for 30 days, till it starts smelling foul)
  • The fabric is washed and dried again.
PHASE II Printing for resist
  • The fabric is now ready for the first resist printing phase. The ready mendh (Andoli ka Tel (1kg) + Cheed ka Tel ( ½kg) + Bee Wax (½ kg) + Paraffin Wax (½ kg)) in the earthen vessel or iron vessel known as mardiya is put over the heating coal. The temperature of about 65 degrees C is required for printing the wax.
  • A wet cloth is put over the paatiya (Printing table). This is a very important step in the wax printing because this helps to cool off the wax on the fabric.
  • The drying after wax printing is also done in shade or the wax may melt on the fabric.
Dyeing
  • The fabric is then dyed in indigo. Two dips in indigo vat produces green colour while the 4-5 dips produce a darker indigo colour.
After treatment
  • The fabric is again dried in shade and then washed in hot water to remove the wax. The process of removing wax is known as ukala. Along with the hot water some soda khar is added for cleaning.
  • The textile is given a final wash, rinsed and dried
The entire process for printing finishes in 15-20 days as every step in the process requires rinsing and washing.  
Tools used in the Printing Process Paatiya- the printing table is designed according to the ergonomics. The printers stand while working and print on the padded table. The table is padded with jute and cloth for resiliency, the fabric to be printed is stretched on it to await the application of the block. Traditionally wax printing was done on the floor. Since it requires application of hot wax a bed of wet sand was prepared 2” high over which the fabric was laid. Sand is used as a bed for resiliency and it was kept wet for the applied wax to dry as soon as it is stamped on the textile. Wooden or Metal hand blocks are used for the printing. One is the buti block and other is mendh block that is used to resist the printed pattern. Brush to clean the block after printing. The wax sticks to the block which is removed by this brush. A burner to heat the wax which is fed with coal provides the required, even heat. The earthen vessel containing wax is put over the burning coal. The wax has to be heated continuously while the resist printing is being done. Earthen/Metal vessel (maardiya) – This is the vessel for keeping wax. It is either metal or earthen pot that can be heated while printing is carried on. There are other vessels for bleaching, washing and cleaning.     Indigo vats, gloves and a wooden stick- Indigo vat is known as maat/math. A 9-10 feet deep pitcher in the ground whose diameter is big enough to immerse the fabric and the free movement is a vat.
Colour palette Mendh printing uses red, black and blue as primary colours. Different shades are obtainable by varying the quantity of the dye used. The red printing paste is known as begar, Black as syahi and indigo is aasmani or ‘like the sky’. Begar, syahi and aasmani remain the three basic colours of mendh printing.The colours used in the past were purely vegetable colours and they were much more colour fast as compared to the currently used chemical dyes. Unlike the chemical colours used today they did not fade in the sun or bleed in the wash. The colours were pleasing and soothing to the eye and emitted a peculiar fragrance of its own. Red sandal, Henna leaves, Pomegranates skin, Onion skin, Ratanjot, Tesu flower, Majistha wood, bark of babul tree and Indigo are the few vegetable colours that are used in dyeing and printing. The black is colour is obtained by rusty iron scraps and decomposing jaggery mixture which is stored for days. The decomposition causes a foul smell. It was a very distinctive smell and the dyers presence could be smelt from a distance. Their hands are completely coloured black due to dyeing of fabric with no protective gear.
Traditional Designs The design vocabulary for the Mendh ki Phardas was derived from nature and the surroundings. The time-honoured motifs have been inspired from the flowers, leafs, shrubs, creepers, vines and plants, a stylised variant of day to day life.The most universal buti was the dhaniya/coriander leaf motif and chaubundi. The widely used traditional designs are lati, nathdi, panja, vegetable creepers, gulab buti/rose flower, suya ka buta, daakh bel, machhi or pandi, kele ka buta, pataasi, turi, nargis, budauli, bevda, panchklya.The designs come out sharp not only because of the colour but due to the fineness of the blocks. The shades of red, black and blue, and the fine sharp lines of the motifs together create the distinctive characteristic of mendh printing.
Uniqueness Or The Reason For Decline
Cloth Hand woven fabric with a relatively low cotton count with substance and thickness enough to keep cool in summer and warmth in the cold. This special fabric was known as reja, thick coarse cotton cloth with the toughness to bear the daily rough wear. This tough fabric required special processing for it to be able to accept and retain colour, to a brightness and depth that was acceptable to the client. The processes of printing as followed for finer textiles was not sufficient for the reja, as the coarse thick fabric did not readily accept or retain the colours from this process. The beeswax in mendh ki chappai sank into the thick fabric, allowing it to retain the original richness of the colour resisted, while simultaneously allowing for repeated dips in the indigo or/and black dyes. The whole 5 square feet textile was used to make ghaaghras/lehengas. The phardas were yellow or jummerdi in colour. The Mali women wore lehenga of blue and red fabric, on which butas of coriander leaves, betel leaves, chaubundi etc were printed. They wore green dupattas with the motifs of dhaniya and chaubundi. While the Meena and other peasant classes wore yellow pharda. Jat women only wore red and black coloured chundaris.

Replaced now by machine made textiles that now provide the main base for printing, the printer no longer needs to follow the demanding process of printing with mendh. The machine made reja cloth has become much more popular among the peasant communities of Jat, Mali and Meena women. The traditional consumers are no more wearing the mendh printed phardas. The reason perhaps is the availability of cheaper fabrics and the less demand for traditionally printed textiles. Presently there is no knowledge about the use of these products by these communities.

This change in base textiles usage has removed the necessity of using a wax resist process for printing. Removing distinctions in the type of blocks used, bringing uniformity to the processes that were earlier clearly defined, with printers specialising in techniques required for different clients, their individual pockets and base textile requirements. Blocks The mendh printing requires very fine blocks for printing in order that the resisted prints appear defined with greater clarity. Wooden or metal blocks have both been used in printing mendh. The blocks for mendh/beeswax printing are preferably made of metal, as the wax can be easily removed from the metal block. Though wooden blocks can also be used but they require extensive cleaning every time. The blocks are of three types – gad/background, rekh/outline and data/filler. These are the main buti blocks. The blocks for resist mendh are separate and need to have the same fineness and quality as for the buti block.

The metal blocks being expensive compared to the wooden blocks and the preparation time lengthier is not used by the printing industry any more for any type of printing.

Naturally perfumed The special ingredients like Bees wax and cheed ka ras used in the printing of pharada gave them a special fragrance that was retained by the cloth even after several washes. The bhils used to trade the wax (from the jungles of Madhya Pradesh) with food fodder and money. The sourcing of material was not a difficulty as the exchange used to happen all year round. The tribals were nomadic and travelled through Rajasthan, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh exchanging the products of forest with food.

There has been a ban on the forest products due to black marketing and unnecessary deforestation and resource exploitation. Such bans have caused the crunch in raw material available and shooting up the price twice as much it was earlier.

Conclusion Of all the possible situations of prise rise of raw material, changing consumer buying behaviour, ardous printing procedure, and ban on some raw materials there is one problem that ties them all and that is the ignorance of people. This particular craft had been ignored in every aspect of its existence. Without proper intervention from either the craftsmen or the government the survival of the craft could not have been possible. The myriad possibilities of revenue that the direct style of printing was fetching the craftsmen they couls easily completely neglected the craft of local importance. The government negligence on providing no provisions for raw materials that have been otherwise banned aggravated the problems. And with the wide possible choices of fabric at much cheaper rates gave more buying power to the consumers in every promising way. Mass produced fabric have removed the differentiable community characteristics that were prominent through their clothing. Uniformity in the mass produced fabric has washed out the distinctness of individual fabric requirements across castes and communities. The rapidly changing patterns of the industry have caused the craftsmen to lose their ingenuity to the traditional styles.

Hand Screen Printing of Delhi,
Hand screen printing is a common technique that has been carried out for years in the textile pockets of the country. It is essentially a stencil process. An open mesh fabric is used to hold in place the 'islands' of the stencil design through which inks are forced using a flexible blade of rubber or polyurethane called a squeegee.

History of Hand Screen Printing Screen printing is not a very old process. Some of the earliest applications can be found in medieval Japan. It appeared in Europe in the 18th century, particularly in France for stenciling patterns on to fabric In the 19th century it remained a simple process using fabrics like organdy stretched over wooden frames. Only in the twentieth century did the process become mechanized, usually for printing flat posters, packaging and fabrics. It became widely used to print colored wallpaper as a cheaper alternative to printing with wooden blocks.

Regions Known For Hand Screen Printing in India
  • Gujarat : Ahmedabad , Surat, Deesa, Kutch , Mandvi, Dhamadka, Mundra, Anjar, Jamnagar,Surendernagar, Jetpur, Vadodara
  • Maharashtra : Bombay
  • Delhi
  • Haryana : Faridabad
  • Rajasthan : Jaisalmer and Barmer, Jaipur, Sanganer, Bagroo, Pali
The Gujarat region has been one of the great textile exporting regions of the country. The patterns were usually applied by block printing. Originally there were three types of hand printing – ajrakh, block and screen. The block printed and screen-printed designs produced in Ahmedabad comprise a variety of floral sprays and simulated bandhani (tie-and-dye) on a red background. The floral prints have a strong Persian influence.

The first stage in the process of screen printing is the procurement of the fabric straight from the mills. Screen printing can be done on a whole range of fabrics. It can be done on cotton, jute, silk, polyester and any many more. The below mentioned fabrics are the most common used for screen printing -

  • Sheeting (Markeen) 20/20 is the most commonly used fabric for printing. 20/20 is the yarncount by which the fabric is recognized, locally called the ‘taana-baana’ or warp-weft count. Thefabric construction of this sheeting is 60/60.
  • Canvas is also used in large quantities mainly for home furnishings. The yarn count is again20/20 and fabric construction is 100/120.
  • Voile is available in various thicknesses. The thinnest voile of 70/90 count is used aslining. The 80/80 voile and 100/100 voile are the good quality fabric for garments.
There are two main type of dyes used for printing:
  • Vat dyes
  • Pigment dyes
Vat dyes are reasonably transparent and so secondary and tertiary colours can be made by the successive printing of one color on top of another. There is greater control on the results when printing light to dark colours. These dyes yield the softest hand (the "hand" is the feel of the fabric) and maintain the fabric's luster. The color goes through a chemical reaction and actually becomes part of the fabric. These are mainly used for Discharge and Procion printing processes. Vat dyes are liquid dyes. The following are also required:
  • ink modifiers/ reducer - to adjust the viscosity of the ink
  • extender - to retard drying speed if printing a big run
  • solvent - to clean up with after the printing is over
Pigment dyes are much more economical to use. Pigments are generally more lightfast, and give greater color control. Pigment dyes are applied like a coating on the cloth (i.e.) the dye does not seep into the cloth as in Vat dyes. Hence, the color of the pigment must be a tone darker than the base cloth color to get best results. There are three types of pigments in use:
  • Transparent: These are "low solids" pigments: when the fabric is dry there is very littleresidue left on the fabric. They most closely simulate the look and feel of dye prints. They arevery transparent, which means that a color printed on top of a colored ground will be affected bythe color of the ground fabric. The transparent pigments have very limited use on darkgrounds.
  • Opaque: These are "high solids" pigments: when the fabric is dry there is lots of residueleft on the fabric. They cause the fabric to be stiffer than the transparent pigments. However,they can be used to print light colors on dark grounds. Opaque pigments will soften when washed,and are not as harsh on the hand as a plastisol ink.
  • Metallic: These are “high solids” and relatively opaque. To achieve a metallic look, it isnecessary that the metallic pigment remain on the fabric after printing. They are often made upof plastics, mica, and natural oxides.
The pigment dyes could be oil based or water based. Oil based dyes are readily available. The water-based paste has to be made with a ratio of 2 kg paste dissolved in 80 l of water. 2% of glycerin or pen oil and retarder are also added for good color slippage and even spread of color while screening. The inks and dyes need to be stored so that they do not freeze, or they will break down and be useless. Raw Material Procurement 

The raw fabrics are mainly procured from large textile mills in Ahmedabad; Century Mills and Anglo French Mills in Pondicherry; Tirupati Mills and others from Bombay and Rajasthan. All the three main fabrics procured: sheeting, canvas and voile are 100% cotton. They are called as ‘Gray’ fabrics before the pre-dyeing stage. They are stored in the ‘Gray room’ where the fabric is first checked on lighted glass tables for any kind of defect before it is sent for dyeing.

Tools Used Wooden table: A screen printing wooden table 18 m long (the longer the better) consists of a printing surface:a smooth table top or sheet of plywood with hinge clamps (gittis) attached. The ply surface iscovered with a jute fabric cover and a thick cloth to make the surface smooth. Below the ply is alayer of asbestos.   Steam boiler: The boiler is connected through pipes, which run below the wooden tablebetween the asbestos sheet layer, and the printing surface. The heat produced by the boiler andtransferred through the pipes keeps the table warm, hence speeding up the drying process and alsoenhancing the color tones. Usually the heat provided is between 30-40 degrees C. It depends onthe kind of design: a dense design needs a higher temperature.   Screens: The screen consists of a frame of wood or metal, stretched with mesh (jaali)made of monofilament polyester nylon fibers. The mesh count is simply the number of threads perlinear inch that are woven into the mesh, and is usually determined by the type of ink to be usedfor printing. Generally a mesh count of 16/64 is used. Finer mesh will allow a thinner inkdeposit. This is a desirable effect when printing very fine detail and halftones. Typically afine mesh should be 200-260 threads per inch. Water based inks work best on finer mesh. These aregenerally used in graphic and industrial printing. Course mesh will give a heavier ink deposit.This type of screen is used for flatter, open shapes. Typically a course screen mesh will be160-180 threads per inch. These are generally used in textile printing.Wood frames have been replaced by metal because they do not warp with water. The most commonly used types of wood are cedar and pine. Pine is preferred because it is more water resistant while it is light-weight. Metal frames are made out of aluminum or steel. Aluminum is generally preferred because it is light-weight yet sturdy. There are some applications where steel is preferred such as in very large printing frames used for long printing runs. Screens should be as big as possible. Smaller screens are less expensive, but they are very hard to use. The margin between each side of the design and the inside of the frame should be at least 1/3 of the image size. So for e.g. for a design of size 18 x 24-in., the inside dimension of the screen should be 30 x 40-in. 1/3 of 18 = 6, so the top and bottom margins must be 6 in. each; 1/3 of 24 = 8, so the left and right margins must be 8 in. each; 18 + 6 + 6 = 30; and 24 + 8 + 8 = 40. This is the minimum size.   Squeegees: A squeegee is a rubber blade gripped in a wooden or metal handle, which ispulled across the top of the screen. It pushes the ink through the mesh onto the surface of thecloth to be printed. Good squeegee blades print better and last longer. They come in variousdegrees of hardness. Medium hardness is the best. The longer the squeegee, the more difficult itis to print with, so it is always better to print with the squeegee running parallel to theshorter dimension of the screen. However, the squeegee should be at least 2 inches longer thanthe widest design to be printed.
 

The Process of Hand Screen Printing The process of screen printing is of two main types:

Technique Based:
  1. Table printing: Table printing method is none other than hand screen printing where woodenor metal screens are used and printing is done manually.
  2. Flat-belt printing: Flat belt printing is when the table is moving and the screen is set in a position.
  3. Rotary printing: An automated form of hand screen printing, Rotary screen printing works onthe same principle, but the screen is wrapped onto a cylinder that can be rotated, and the inksare applied from inside the cylinder with a squeegee.
Dye Based:
  1. Pigment printing: It is like a coating of color on the fabric surface. The color does notseep into the cloth, hence its best done on a light colored base. The color fastness is very lowbut it is a much easier and faster process of printing. Pigment printing is used most for homefurnishings where the cloth does not have to be washed too often.
  2. Discharge printing: This process "extracts" the dye present in the fabric and replaces itwith the dye in the ink. The value of this process is that it gives the softest hand possible tothe fabric after printing and the color fastness is very good. Printers use it on dark fabrics togive them a hand similar to that possible on light fabrics with regular inks. After printing, thefabric is placed into or runs through a drying chamber where the old dye "steams" out and isreplaced.
All the steps involved in both ways of printing are the same except the treatment of the fabric after printing is done. Delhi and Faridabad areas are known for pigment and discharge printing. The big mills in Ahmedabad use the rotary method of printing. Surat and Bombay regions use the pigment technique in abundance. The process of hand screen printing (discharge printing) has the following steps:   Art work/ Design The artwork or designs to be printed are either provided by the agencies placing the order with the textile unit or are supplied by the printers themselves based on traditional designs found in the region. They may also be inspired by designs published in various books or magazines, the latest forecasts predicting the color stories and print /graphic directions or from an existing line. Once the artwork is ready, one needs to color-separate the design so that different screens can be made for each color. Color separating a design from the original artwork means breaking down the design by color into a number of separate designs, from which screens/masters are made. The separations are printed over each other in layers, to create the original design. There are a number of ways to achieve color separations:
  • Using artwork pens to trace the design and draw on an overlay sheet
  • Taking a number of photocopies and blocking the unwanted portions
  • Computer scanned imaging & graphic color separation
The most common technique used is the first one.   By Hand: Tracing the Design This process is best performed using a lighted glass table, where light shines through the design, highlighting the areas to be copied. A separate tracing paper is used for each new layer/color separation such that each color is on its own piece of tracing sheet. When the sheets are superimposed on each other the original design is created. The ink used is opaque and completely black. The black areas of the tracing sheet are where the ink, of any color, will pass through the screen.Gray areas will give unpredictable results. Line thickness and fineness of detail are limited by the fabric to be printed on, screen mesh used, inks used, and other minor factors.  

By Hand: Blocking the Design By taking multiple copies of the original design, each separation is created by blocking out parts on each layer. This process is more accurate than tracing the design as each design is identical. However, blocking requires more thought and delicate separation, as complex designs (5 colours or more) can get confusing.

Transferring the Design Onto Screens Step 1 Preparation A metal frame of the size of the artwork is pulled out. Red lacquer is applied over the frame to prevent it from rusting over time. Then the mesh is stretched over the frame and nailed to hold it in position and red lacquer is applied again Step 2 Cleaning the mesh After the screen is stretched on the frame, there are still many dust particles adhered on the screen even though they are not visible to the naked eye. Hence the screen is washed with soap and left to dry. Step 3 Mixing the screen emulsion Photo screen emulsion is mixed with sensitizer (ammonium dichromate) before using. This is because they have a longer shelf life before they are combined. The ratio is 10:1 (e.g. in 1 kg emulsion put 10 g sensitizer). This is done in a dark environment. A thick coating of the emulsion is then applied on the screen and left to dry under the fan for almost an hour till it completely dries. Step 4 Photo Stencil Exposure A separate screen is made for each color in the artwork such that when all of them placed over each other would create the original design. Once the coating has dried, the positive film is placed on the camera table. Then the screen is placed in the exact position for a mirror image to be taken. The camera (lighted table) is switched on and the screen is exposed to the light for 1.25 minutes. The exposure time could vary depending on the design. The light does not pass through the black/opaque areas and the rest of the screen gets exposed. The exact design may not be visible completely till the emulsion is washed off. Step 5 Screen Washout The screen is taken to the washout stand and a jet of water is used to wash off the emulsion till the screen mesh is visible.
Step 6 The Final Touch Up When the screen is dry, a final touch up is done using a brush and emulsion to avoid ink leak out during printing. Any pin-holes that are visible when looking at the screen with the light behind are also touched up. The four sides of the frame are then sealed using an adhesive tape, so as to provide extra protection.Ideally the screen should be used for printing after three days.
Step 7 Printing and Cleaning After printing, if water based ink was used for printing, water can be used to clean the frame directly. However if the ink was oil based, it needs to be cleaned with solvent. Around 10,000 m of cloth can be printed using a screen. Over time the screen may deteriorate and need to be replaced.
Dyeing Dyeing is an important part of the process of screen printing. It may be done on a small scale(where the artisans dye the fabric in small tubs), or in dyeing units (where the process is more or less automated). There are four main types of dyeing: Tub dyeing, Jigger dyeing, Winch dyeing and Jet dyeing. The most commonly used technique is Jigger dyeing. Here the cloth is wrapped around the jigger flat and it keeps rolling out into the dye color bath. It can be a hand jigger or an automated power jigger. Dyeing is done according to the weight of the cloth. The color dilution is 2-3% i.e. if the fabric to be dyed weighs 10 kg, the water required would be 100 kg and the dye color mixed would be 2-3 kg. Three main types of dyes are used:
  1. Direct dyes
  2. Procion dyes
  3. Ramazol dyes
Direct dyes are much easier to use and the dyeing process is faster. The color seepage is fast. However, the colors are not fast. Procion dyes have better color fastness, although the processing time is much longer.Both these dyes are used for plain solid dyeing of fabric only. Ramazol dyes have the best color fastness and these can be used for both plain dyeing as well as printing. They are more expensive than the other two and are locally purchased from Delhi. These are dry powder dyes. The dyed fabric is washed in a caustic soda bath to remove all the impurities in color before it is sent to the store room from where dyed fabric is issued for printing.
Setting up the Printing Table Once all the supplies are assembled: the screens, the colors and the dyed fabric, the next step is to set the table for printing. The dyed fabric is laid on the table and stretched firmly using soft pins at close intervals. Then the hinge clamps or stoppers (‘gittis’ as they are called locally) are set.   The setting of the gittis requires skill. The screen for the first color to be printed is kept on the printing table. Three registration stops are marked on the surface of the printing table. These are such that there is one stop at each of the lower ends of the design to be printed, and one right in the center. The registration stops ensure that the placement of the screen is in exactly the same place each time relative to the image printed.
   
Strike Offs /Trial Hand screen textile printing is as much a craft as a science. There are many variables that are beyond immediate control. To deliver printed fabric to the highest standards, a strike off needs to be printed before running production. In the textile printing industry a strike off is defined as a small run of fabric printed with screens for the first time after the screens are made, or fabric which is printed in new colors or on new grounds with existing screens. The entire set of screens must be used, and there usually must be enough yardage to show at least three repeats. Strike offs serve a number of functions:
  1. Testing the screen to see if the image has been burned in properly, identifying forpinholes, blockages, and any other areas of deficiency.
  2. Checking the repeat to find the most accurate measurement.
  3. Testing the colors to see if there is any color shift between color dabs and productionconditions.
  4. Testing the ground under production conditions.
It is most valuable to check color matching, as there is almost always a slight shift between the color test and production conditions. Two main reasons why a strike off is important before starting the production:
    1. Firstly, in production alternate frames are printed. Errors in the repeat do not show upuntil all the fabric has been committed and the alternate frames are filled in. Also, if thefabric shrinks too much it may ruin the repeat. Shrinkage sometimes does not show up until 30minutes after the fabric is printed. It is then too late to fix the problem. There may be largelosses of fabric, at the customer's expense.
    2. Secondly, prices are based partially on the maximum use of the print tables. To hold up theuse of a 30 m table to test 5 m is not efficient, and would result in higher prices all around.Unfortunately, it takes almost as much energy and labor to print 5 m as it does 30 m. Screenshave to be pulled, fabric set, gittis set, colors mixed, fabric has to dry, screens to be cleanedand put away. Many of these tasks take the same time whether 1 m is printed or 60 m. Theefficiencies of scale play an important role in hand printing small runs.
  Hand Screen Printing

‘Screen printing is like ski jumping. Once you start, there's no convenient stopping place until the end.’

The process of hand screen printing involves two people at a time. The screen for the color that prints first is pulled out and positioned on the printing table, position set according to the gittis (stoppers). The first color is poured on to the screen and two people walk up and down the tables printing each color frame by frame, with the large squeegee pushing the desired color through the screen onto the fabric. Every alternate frame is printed. By the time the first round is over, the colours would have dried and the fabric would be ready for the second round of printing. This way, the process is repeated as many times as the number of colors to be printed.

Color Check After the cloth is printed and completely dried, it is put into the boiler and steamed so that the colors come out intense and dark. This process also makes the colors seep into the cloth ensuring a fine hand.

Finishing and Quality Control After the desired color has been achieved, the fabric is washed. It is uring this time that the fabric might shrink by 8-10%. After it dries, it goes for quality check. The quality check is done for misprint or overlapping of design, bleeding of colours, large intervals between the screen shifts and color fastness.
Then the fabric is sent to the store-room where the yardage count is taken before it is issued to the stitching department where the equired fabric is cut and stitched into garments, bed covers, bed sheets, pillow covers and other requirements. The stitched product is then sent for final washing, drying, ironing and quality check before it is ready for sale. Use of the Product The hand screen printed fabric is used in a variety of purposes mainly for home furnishings and garments. Home furnishings include quilted products like quilts, pillow covers and cushion covers and non-quilted items like table covers, bed covers, bed skirts, runners, mats, napkins, cushion covers, pillow covers and curtain panels. Garment accessories like scarves, bandanas and sarongs are also quite in demand for the export markets. Marketing Screen printed fabrics have good markets both in India and abroad. The main markets for this fabric are in the US, Germany and Hungary. Recently Japan has also shown interest in screen prints coming from India. There is a huge demand for screen printed fabric in the domestic market also. Changes in Recent Years By definition, a print is an image that has been produced by technical means, which enables it to be multiplied. The art of hand block printing and screen printing to produce attractive fabrics of rich colors and patterns is age old. With an ever increasing market for these printed textiles in oversees markets, newer designs and color combinations are being constantly experimented with. With new market directions, new technologies like rotary printing and ink-jet printing are emerging with fast growth and strong market penetration.

Hand Spinning of Kala Cotton at Khamir,
Issue #10, 2023                                                                              ISSN: 2581- 9410

Hand spinning is an ancient technique and it is considered that it started in India. The craft form initially used the hand spindle or drop spindle technique to spin the natural fibres. The equipment like Doshi Charkha (traditional big wheel charkha) or other Kisan Charkha or Peti Charkha (Box Charkha) came into existence later. It was a wide spread practice in Indian villages to hand spin the local fibres like wool and cotton using Charkhas. Each region of state of India has their unique Charkhas.

Khamir’s tryst with hand spinning started with Kala cotton initiative. In 2007, after completing weaver solo exhibitions at New Delhi, we conceived the entire concept and started organising it, the hand spinning on Ambar Chakha was inherent part of the concept. As there were no Ambar spinners available in Kutch, we approached Udyog Bharti, a Khadi organisation based in Gondal city of Saurashtra to help us. They dedicated one of their group of spinners for the process. As payment of Khadi was decided on counts and Kala cotton was a coarse fibre with possibility of thicker count of 20s or less than it, the payment was lower than other Khadi counts of 30s and 40s. Also, there was a lot of struggle on the part of weavers to organise the weaving. We also provided continuous feedback to the hand spinners, which we receive from the weavers. The team members of Udhyog Bharti were kind enough to hold the spinning for almost two years, after that they told us to organise it elsewhere. We started looking back in Kutch and approached the Khadi organisations here. As it didn’t work out through Khadi organisations, we took the work in our hands to organise Ambar spinning on our own. We identified hand spinners in Tara Majal village, who own Ambar Charkhas and were not associated with any Khadi organisation. We started working with a group of 7 women there. The first task was to upgrade the Ambar Charkhas as many were not in working condition.

A hand spinner from Arikhana village, one of the hand spinners joined hand spinning recently (Photo courtesy: Fumie) (24th January, 2023)

We were in search of a technical person and the spinning women gave us a name of Mansangbhai, who was working with a Khadi organisation at that time. We searched for Mansangbhai and located him in Bhuj where he was working as a gate keeper of an ATM. We requested him to allocate some of his time for the hand spinning initiative. Mansangbhai helped us to improve the conditions of Ambar charkha and also organised the registration of the hand spinners in 2015-16. His continuous engagement helped to increase output and earnings of Ambar spinners. We expanded the hand spinning with Mr. Bimal Bhati joining the team in July, 2017. Bimal having a degree in textile technology, was working with production department at Welspun industries in Anjar before shifting to Khamir. He worked with wool spinners in Khamir. His technical understanding helped to organise wool spinning. He joined cotton spinning work as a coordinator. His sustained interest and inputs helped us to spread our work to nearby villages. The request mostly came from the existing spinners of Manjal, who wanted us to give hand spinning work to their relatives living in nearby villages. We spread to Sanosara and Nana Nandra villages. In parallel, the processing of Kala cotton was organised in form of a cotton mill located in Paddhar village. That helped us to organise the supply of rovings and carded cotton locally.

A hand spinner from Arikhana village, one of the hand spinners joined hand spinning recently (Photo courtesy: Fumie) (24th January, 2023)

In an internal review of Kala cotton initiative in 2018-2019, Archana Shah, founder of Bandhej, suggested to Khamir to promote pure hand spinning. We didn’t put conscious efforts in that direction, but when we tried, the journey of hand spinning took an easy turn from Ambar charkha to single needle Peti charkha (Box Charkha). Bimal met few women who were familiar with the Box Charkha spinning and having small instrument with them too. He gave them raw cotton and asked them to prepare the yarn. Thus, the first samples were prepared. The hand spinning on Box charkha was a slow production process, but it helped to revive the hand spinning skills and generates a lot of livelihoods by giving work to more women.

A hand spinner from Arikhana village, one of the hand spinners joined hand spinning recently (Photo courtesy: Fumie) (24th January, 2023)

The journey with hand spinning started towards beginning of 2019 on Peti charkha with three spinners in Nandra village, Abdasa block of west Kachchh. This revival of hand spinning technique which was lost or stopped before the earthquake has come alive after almost 3 decades. We needed to organise the carded cotton from the mill in form of Puni. This was procured easily from the Paddhar spinning mill which was set-up by two local entrepreneurs after they noticed the potential of kala cotton for the region.

Hand Spinners from Mota Nandra village, one of the first hand spinners of Kala cotton with Peti charkha

The number of hand spinners slowly and steadily increased. We did a training with Nagendra Poludas Satish of Kora design. The training helped us to understand the count based hand spinning system. We introduced the same on the ground and transferred the current weight based payment system to count based payment system. This new system helped us to rationalise wages as well as organise the yarn properly for weavers. The spinners were introduced to the entire weaving system so that they could understood the importance of counting system.

Lady Bamford Foundation, Jaipur sanctioned a training support grant to hand spinners. We enrolled 30 new spinners under the support and expanded our work to Moti Vamoti village and organised a training of spinners from the village. The Covid pandemic started in the middle of the training and soon we understood that it is very important to provide continuous work to hand spinners at their homes during the pandemic like situation.

We organised an online fund raising campaign called “Kantai Se Kamai” to include more hand spinners during Covid. The campaign received tremendous support. One of our well-wisher put us in touch with Mr. Vikram Lal of Lal family foundation. He liked the idea and immediately sanctioned the support. This gave a new boost to our ground efforts and number of women doing hand spinning doubled to 80 in a short period of time. We increased the work intake during the peak of Covid waves to ease the income, livelihoods related issues. We also introduced a yearly bonus system. This system was introduced to increase the income of spinners and recognise and encourage those who are doing good work.

A grand mother and grand dauther with the book “Craft future”, which has their combine photo on the cover. At the event in Bhuj haat (8th October, 2021)

We continued our efforts after Covid pandemic. We started celebrations and encouraged coming together of hand spinners. Post Covid pandemic, one such program was organised at Bhuj Haat, where large number of hand spinners joined together for the first time. Archana ben Shah wrote a book titled “Crafting future” and a hand spinner grandmother and daughter received a space on the cover page of that book. We celebrated that achievement in presence of same grandmother and daughter at the event. It was one of the rare recognitions received.

Hand spinners spinning together during Ratia Baras celebrations on 21st September, 2022 at Khamir

We initiated the celebration of Retia Baras, a birthday of Gandhi ji according to Indian calendar with spinners on 22nd September, 2022. We invite spinners across all the villages to Khamir campus and they spin together. In last such celebration, we invited hand spinners of Rajasthan associated with Nila House. It was a unique get together and celebrations of hand spinners working and living in distinct regions.

The number of hand spinners actively working with us are 125 and Ambar spinners are 15. We wish to create a unique model to demonstrate that hand spinning is a relevant idea in present times.

Hansaba, A Kala cotton spinner speaking at the event in Bhuj haat (8th October, 2021)

Khamir’s main objective to encourage the hand spinning as part of Kala cotton is to revive hand spinning skill and provide sustainable income to women based in villages. The women living in villages has limited work options. Moreover, we work with the women of Darbar communities who do not venture out of their home to earn livelihoods. The hand spinning is not a full time livelihood and women can do it at their own pace and free time once they complete their house hold work. The average income is somewhere between 1500 to 3000 based on amount of work done and yarn count. We also provide them yearly bonus of 10 to 15 % according to the scale of work done by them.

The initiative has opened up many possibilities of connecting hand spinning with handloom weaving. The initiative is generating interest among young spinners and weavers. Many young girls are spinning at home in their free time. The hand spinning is also part of Khamir’s craft curriculum initiative.


Hand-Head-Heart, Ethics in Design
Abstract Our understanding of design has been evolving steadily over the past 100 years and in recent years there has been a rush of new research into a variety of dimensions and Ethics is one the many dimensions that have received research attention. In this paper we look at the various dimensions of design and at current and past definitions to see the contemporary understanding of the subject as we see it today with the aid of models that the author has evolved over several years of reflection and research. We then trace the evolution of design as a natural human activity and restate this history in terms of the major stages of evolution from its origins in the use of fire and tools through the development of mobility, agriculture, symbolic expression, crafts production and on to industrial production and beyond to the information and knowledge products of the day. This sets the stage to ponder about the future of the activity and of the discipline as we see it today.With the use of a model the expanding vortex of design value and action is discussed with reference to the role of ethics and value orientation at each of the unfolding stages through which we have come to understand and use design over the years. Beginning with the material values of quality and appropriateness we explore the unfolding dimensions of craftsmanship, function, technique, science, economy and aesthetics that has held the attention of design philosophers and artists over the post renaissance period. In the last fifty years our attention has shifted through the work of several design thought leaders to aspects of impact of design on society, communication and semiotics, environment and even on politics and culture with some discussion on each of the major contributors in this ongoing discourse. The further developments that lead to systems thinking and on to the spiritual levels are introduced to place the ethical debate at the centre of the design discourse at each of these levels of engagement.Some critical case examples are introduced to exemplify the arguments that have been made to establish the various levels of ethical actions that design has discovered and with these the author will argue that design is evolving to a more complex form that will require new kind of integrated design education that is already being experimented with across the world in the face of a series of crisis that we have been facing in industrial, economical, social, and most visibly at the political and ecological levels. These ethical lessons are still diffuse and disconnected in the fabric of design action across the world and we will need to find ways of bringing these to the hand, head and heart of design education if we are to find a new value for design that will help us address the deep crisis that we are facing today. The full paper addresses the following six questions by expanding on each as we go forward with the discussions that each question entails.
  1. What is Design today?
  2. How did Design evolve from being a core human activity to become a modern discipline with a significant future?
  3. What are the unfolding dimensions and orders of Design that we can call the “Ethical Vortex of Design”?
  4. Who are the thought leaders who have anticipated these expanding dimensions of Design particularly from an ethical perspective?
  5. Are there some critical cases in this broader filed of Design that could provide clues for our journey forward at each of these ethical nodes towards an “Integrated Design of the Future”?
  6. How do we move towards a new Design education that can “Create the Unknowable – the future for all of us”, in an ethical manner and still be in tune with the needs of our times?
1. What is Design today? Let us start with our new definition of design since the word has acquired so many meanings over the years. I have used the metaphor of fire to define design using a model that was developed with my students. When we look at fire we see that it has various components — Fire (Agni) is a process of transformation—a material is transformed by organic exchanges with the environment and an effect is the product of this exchange. The process is always situated in a particular context and this context is represented by the ground on which stands the fire, both time and place taken together form the context. The process of burning and the products of light, heat and smoke are all in close interplay with the environment and design too is an activity that can happen only with reference to its own context. This fire therefore represents the kind of complex transaction that I consider an adequate expression for the systems metaphor for design. This means that we see design as a complex activity. There is not a single product that we can call a simple product. Take for example the simplest of products that you can think of and explore its possible effects. If you look at it only as a product of technology, that is, as some material transformed into a functional shape, then it would seem to be simple. However if you consider its entire life-cycle and its impact on society, it is quite another matter altogether. So it is becoming increasingly evident that design has to look beyond the object itself as a mere artifact, as produced by technology, to the effects that these objects have on a complex set of user-related parameters and finally the effects of these objects on the environment and culture at various stages of their life cycle need to be taken into consideration while we design them. This leads us to re-evaluate the role of design and to anticipate the shape of the design activity in the years to come. We are beginning to understand the complex nature of design, which means that you also need a fairly complex method of dealing with it. Design methodologies need to be reevaluated and innovated to cope with this complexity. A lot of technological development in recent years has created negative results, some with catastrophic consequences. We are certain that the exploitation of technology without the use of design processes that take cognizance of the long term needs of users and environments will lead to disaster. I have been thinking about a “Seed” metaphor for Design for India ever since I engaged with John Chris Jones’ book “Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures”. I have realized that “Design” is indeed like a seed that needs to be carefully nurtured and cultivated before it yields value, real perennial value, which is why I prefer to use an agri-horticultural metaphor for design as opposed to an business-industrial metaphor of speed and strategy. “Good Design” – is like a fertile seed that is a product of human imagination and supported by deep convictions of experience from explorations that could be spread over the land to generate huge value for all stakeholders. Only when it is nurtured and cultivated does this seed generate value and produce a farm or a forest which is a manifestation of the seeds potency and this nascent value is quite invisible till it is eventually realised on the ground, a bit like the chicken and egg dilemma. This is why we as designers have to struggle to make our visions and convictions accessible and visible to all those who need our services. Design actions are located at the leading edge of the future that we wish to build. Many attributes and intentional relationships will remain invisible since these would need to be explained through discourse in language, visualized with images and models and in some cases even realized as working prototypes before they can be understood by the stakeholders and the political leadership. To create a viable and desirable outcome through our intentional thought and actions may be a product of the design process but it is not an inevitable happening if society does not nurture that process. Design is notoriously difficult to define but we do have some compelling definitions that we could use today. According to Harold Nelson and Eric Stolterman in " The Design Way", the process of design is the path of human intentions being pursued by the designer or user of design through the stages of exploration, composition, judgment and action. The stages are iterative and the designer revisits the previous stages to develop conviction and build support for the next move forward. The process of design is in need of active support from the stakeholders and in need of promotion and nurturing if at all it is to succeed and become sustainable. Herbert Simon on the other hand said “Everyone designs who devises courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred ones". A very general definition but others have argued about its shortcomings to understanding design today. Bryan Lawson and Kees Dorst in “Design Expertise” have characterized ‘design as’ a variety of things including –a mixture of creativity and analysis, problem solving, learning, evolution, the creation of solutions to problems, integrating into a whole and as a fundamental human activity – but declare that no single definition is possible. Yes, it is complex and we will need to cope with this ambiguity in the days ahead. 2. How did Design evolve from being a core human activity to become a modern discipline with a significant future? Design is a very old human activity that started with the first steps taken by mankind when they attempted to change their environment for their convenience. It is a product of intuition and prolonged thought and deliberate action that is driven by intentions and imagination and most of all deep convictions. If design is indeed that old, why does it slip our attention when it is critically needed in addressing the meta problems of our times? Why do we have slums, and catastrophes that are as yet unmanageable in our "designed" cities, organizations and in our everyday lives? To understand this dilemma we must look at how we have developed our knowledge resources to help solve these very same dilemmas and also understand why these abilities are failing us in this modern age of rich information access and archived scientific knowledge. Design evolved gradually and reached a very high degree of refinement and resolution in our villages and living spaces of our traditional societies in the pre-industrial age. The Mayan, Harappan and Indo-Gangetic settlements in India and the Chinese civilizations are results of such evolutionary innovations that used design thought and actions. This craft based evolution was permitted by the interplay of time and the ingenuity of the local craftsman and local leadership, which created a vast body of traditional wisdom, that is today still embedded in the rural and village life in places such as India, but may have been lost in many other centres around the world. The Indian village is unique since it has had a long period of undisturbed evolution till it was rudely disturbed by the arrival of ubiquitous communication and globalization in the post independence era. The Indian village survived the vagaries of the industrial revolution since it could form a self sustaining loop of local requirements and the historical stage of village evolution ensured that it had reached a level of autonomous existence based on the availability of local resources for the most part and with very little dependence on the external world by way of trade or social contact. These are evident in the offerings by Christopher Alexander through all his substantial books about the essence of design. Today this kind of design, at a fundamental level of form giving, has all but been forgotten by the mainstream and it is replaced by a form of professional activity that is seen as dealing more with aesthetics rather than with the fundamental structure and meaning production systems of our society. This needs to change in an era where science and technology are being placed at the hub of our decision making pathways when they can only provide information and knowledge about the world but not about what is desirable to be done to the world. So while technology tells us what is possible we do need to look at design with its participative and integrating methods to find out what is desirable and valuable for a sustainable future. It is therefore my argument that education, business and governance must re-establish contact with this very old discipline, in its older form and purpose, which has got sidelined in our belief in specialization and in our proclivity to the use explicit knowledge resources even in situations when values and feelings need to be the decision drivers and not analytic facts couched in scientific arguments. The history of design for me did not begin with the industrial revolution but it is perhaps the oldest ability of humans and it pre-dates both science and art, in my definition. “Design is human intentions and actions that create new value”, Harold Nelson states categorically that humans did not discover fire but they designed it. With this definition we can link the earliest human use of design, perhaps, to the very first use of fire to keep other animals away, for security, as Richard Dawkins tells us in his "Ergasts tale", fire was used some two million years ago. The science of fire was still far away in the future, but humans used fire long before they knew how to make fire or even understand its dynamics. Tool making, settled agriculture, mobility and technology followed in ever increasing rapid evolution of thought and action. In rural India the crafts traditions are a reminder of these integrated times when design was inseparable from many forms of human expression. Human history and design history are intertwined inextricably till we discovered formal education and then the whole story crumbles into specialization and analysis over generalist and synthesis, unselfconscious design as a core human activity is sacrificed at the altar of academic disciplines of science, technology and management. This model about History of Design shows us the unfolding of design as a natural human activity that intuitively preceded rational use of knowledge as science and technology across all the stages of human evolution and these are listed below in a brief summary. Pre-History
  1. Hunter / Gatherer / Caveman The Fire & Axe Revolution starting over 2 million years ago
  2. Nomadic Culture to Settled AgricultureThe Water Mobility to Wheel Revolution and Social Evolution over several hundred thousand years
  3. Stone Age to Bronze Age The Craft & Technology Revolution (see Levi Strauss, Structural Anthropology 2 – chapter on “Race and History”) over several thousand years.Ancient to Recorded History
  4. Exploring the Intellect and Symbolic CommunicationFrom the Greeks to (modern) Europe, Egypt, India, China, Americas {Mayan}The Science & Communication Revolution (from the mystic to the rational thought and formal logic) over the past several hundreds of years.
  5. Technology & Industry & Application of ScienceThe Industrial and Technological RevolutionContemporary History on to the Future
  6. Hi-Tech & Information Tech -Age of ComputingThe Information (age) / Revolution (from Bits to Bytes) over the past hundred years
  7. Content and Databases -Search and CommunicationThe Knowledge Revolution over the past few decades
  8. Innovations, Integration and CreativityThe Creative Revolution (The Design Revolution?)New Economics -The Value of One and Social Networks over the past few years.
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin had predicted the complexification of the human condition and he proposed the formation of the Noosphere, which we are witnessing today at the social, and the technological levels but our ethical tools are lagging far behind to cope with this massive shift towards “Omega Point” that he had proposed as a direction for man. More that at any other time in history we need today to address the role of values and ethics in dealing with the huge conflicts that we face as humans, all divided by nationality, religion, economic class, gender and other categories, all man made and therefore artificial, according to the wisdom of the Indian philosopher Jiddu Krishnamurthy. Design is affected by each of these divides and we will need to mobilize our understanding of these conditions before we can address the “wicked complexities” that they produce in their wake. 3. What are the unfolding dimensions and orders of Design that we can call the “Ethical Vortex of Design”? In 2006 I was invited to speak at the IDSA conference in Austin Texas where I presented a very brief paper titled "Giving Design back to Society: Towards a Post-mining Economy". The title sounds pompous and unrealistic, but look at it this way. A few years ago the Supreme Court of India banned all harvesting of timber from the forests of the Eastern Himalayas and instantly 400 odd local timber and plywood based factories in Assam and the Northeast of India had to down shutters. Germany and many Western nations introduced stringent laws banning the import of textiles with Azo dyes and the Indian handloom industry was in a tizzy and had to seek Government help to re-train hundreds of thousands of weavers and dyers involved in the age old craft in India, big change in a hurry. More recently the state Government of Delhi had to ban all public transport busses, taxis and scooters using petrol and diesel due to environmental action by local NGO's and soon with Court intervention and community action, CNG or Compressed Natural Gas was introduced as an alternate fuel with dramatic and positive effect. I sense these and other transformations as fore-runners for a massive transformation when material and economic interests will give way to social and ethical interests. Design could be a central capability that if used at many levels, produce effects far beyond the aesthetic and performance levels that we are used to today. Both environmental as well as social concerns influenced my own work in bamboo. The need to find alternatives for cultivated resources to sustain a huge need for material artifacts and an alternate industry as well as the social need to solve the immense problems of poverty in rural India and other parts of the world have informed the work that we did over the years. Working with and using bamboo one realizes how amazing is the concept of fertile soil to make materials that are both strong and abundant. Reflecting on my three decade old association with the crafts of the Northeastern Region of India and on the lessons that we have learned about design and bamboo from the craftsmen of the Northeast gave many insights about design, at three distinct levels. I call them the “Three Orders of Design” and these are briefly explained below. The First Order of Design: The Order of Design of Material, Form & Structure This level of design is recognized by most people and is the commonly discussed attribute. Here material, structure and technology are the key drivers of the design offerings as these help shape the form that we eventually see and appreciate in the artefact. We can appreciate the offering as an honest expression of structure and material used and transformed to realize a particular form that is both unique as well as functional. It is here that skill and understanding of the craftsmen are both used to shape the artefact through an appropriate transformation with a deep understanding of its properties and an appreciation of its limitations. The Second Order of Design: The Order of Design for Function & Feeling – Impact & Effect This level is influenced by utility and feeling of a society and is largely determined by the marketplace as well as by the culture in which it is located. Here aesthetics and utility are informed by the culture and the economics of the land. We can sense and feel the need for the artefact and the trends are determined by the largely intangible attributes through which we assess the utility and price value that we are willing to accord to this particular offering, which is quite independent of its cost. The Third Order of Design: The Order of Design for Value – Meaning and Purpose This level is shaped by the higher values in our society and by the philosophy, ethics and spirit that we bring to our products, events, systems and services. At this level value unfolds through the production of meaning in our lives and in providing us with our identities and these offerings become a medium of communication in themself, all about ourselves. It is held in the politics and ethics of the society and is at the heart of the spirit in which the artefacts are produced and used in that society. There are deeply held meanings that are integral to the form, structure as well as some of the essential features which may in some cases be the defining aspects of the offering, making it recognizable as being from a particular tribe or community. These features define the ownership of the form, motif or character of the artefact and these are usually supported by the stories and legends about their origin and give meaning to the lives of the initiated. All three layers are important and we need to learn to appreciate our creations along all three axes if we are to reach a sustainable offering in the days ahead. Design of our traditional artifacts embrace these layers and when we embark on the making of our new and innovative products for new markets we will need to pay a great deal of attention to all three orders of the design spectrum if we are to reach a semblance of sustainability and order in the future. The unfolding “Vortex of Design” that I had used as a model in my IDSA lecture gave way to the “Ethical Design Vortex” that moved through these three orders in sweeping and overlapping stages to include various manifestations of design thoughts and actions along a growing spiral of influences and categories listed below:
  • The First Order of Ethics in DesignMaterial – Craftsmanship – Function – Technique – Structure
  • The Second Order of Ethics in DesignEconomy – Society – Communication – Environment
  • The Third Order of Ethics in DesignPolitics & Law – Culture – Systems – Spiritual
This organization is still work in progress and my critics and friends will help me refine these and make them more acceptable in the days to come. I am not alone in thinking up these various categories but I must take a detour of about four decades of reading and acknowledge the influence numerous thought leaders who have shaped my perceptions and values in my current understanding of design. 4. Who are the thought leaders who have anticipated these expanding dimensions of Design particularly from an ethical perspective? I have below a list of papers and books that I have drawn on to develop these ideas and arrive at the conclusions offered at this stage. The lists A & B under the “References” section are indicative of the ones that I have immediately used for this paper but there are many more that have stimulated me to think on these lines and they would be too numerous to relate and even recall at this stage. However I am listing below both the categories used of the Ethical Vortex of Design explained above and alongside I have named the corresponding thought leaders to permit the reader to make their own journey forward from here. This is a very personal list and it is not exhaustive.
  • 1st Order of Design
  • Material – Norman Potter, Bauhaus masters (Paul Klee, Johannes Itten, Josef Albers et al)
  • Craftsmanship – Charles & Ray Eames, David Pye
  • Function – Donald A. Norman, R Buckminster Fuller, Frei Otto
  • Technique – John Chris Jones, Bruce Archer
  • 2nd Order of Design
  • Science – Bruno Latour, Bryan Lawson, Ulm masters (Otl Aicher, Hans Gugelot, Horst Rittel et al)
  • Economy – Hazel Henderson, Bryan Czeck
  • Aesthetic –Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Jasper Morrison
  • Social – John Thackara, Donald Schon, Liz Sanders, G K VanPatter
  • Communication – Klaus Krippendorff, Umberto Eco, Gui Bonsiepe
  • 3rd Order of Design
  • Environment – Victor Papanek, Gregory Bateson, NID masters (H K Vyas, S Balaram et al)
  • Politics & Law – M K Gandhi, Tomas Maldonado, Victor Margolin
  • Systems – Stafford Beer, Harold G. Nelson, Wolfgang Jonas and John Heskett
  • Culture – Claude Levi-Strauss, Christopher Alexander
  • Spiritual – Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Jiddu Krishnamurthy
5. Are there some critical cases in this broader field of Design that could provide clues for our journey forward at each of these ethical nodes towards an “Integrated Design of the Future”? The lecture is accompanied by a visual presentation and these slides will show cases across some of the categories mentioned above with an attempt to show the ethical relationships that each of these stand for as an exemplar of the listed categories above. Some of these will cover more than one category and that in my view is quite normal since the value is never held in just one attribute but in the synthesis of many often conflicting variables that have been elegantly and ethically resolved. Some of these are listed below but these are just indicative of the ones that I may eventually use based on availability of appropriate information and access to images from the authors of the works. The list below is therefore not exclusive to the category in which they appear and there are already many cases around that use design at the levels that we describe in our paper but we may not yet be aware of these since both designers as well as the media may have overlooked the huge value that has already been unfolded by these unheralded and as yet unknown offerings by ordinary but remarkable people. Several of these case studies came to light when we explored sustainable design across many sectors as part of our research for the set of posters that we produced at NID with the help of faculty and students for the World Economic Forum as a backdrop for their meeting at Davos in January 2009. There may be many more out there to be discovered and celebrated and yet others to be mobilized as design opportunities to be nurtured and taken forward with design vision and action. Case Studies in Transformation These case studies are illustrated and expanded in the visual presentation that accompanies this lecture and the web links for further information are provided in the visual presentation format.
  • Material & Craftsmanship – Textiles from recycled paper yarn and fabrics.
  • Process & Technique – Aravind eye care system, Lijjat papad through women’s action.
  • Technology – ITC e-Choupal: rural e-commerce system, Paul McCready’s solar powered flights
  • Form & Function – Biksha patra of the Jain saints in India, Patient engagement at Mayo Clinic
  • Economic – Amul cooperative diary system, Jawaja collaborative artisanship
  • Social & User behavior – Sulabh Toilets redefine sanitation, Daily Dump: home composting
  • Collaborative – Wikipedia networks, Linux open source
  • Environment – Furaat water harvesting, Industree Crafts social entrepreneurship
  • Social & Political – Gandhi and Khadi revolution, Grameen Bank micro-credit
  • Systems – Project Better Place: cars without pollution, John Todd in Buckminster Fuller Challenge.
6. How do we move towards a new design education that can “Create the Unknowable – the future for all of us”, in an ethical manner and still be in tune with the needs of our times. Design for me is a basic human activity as well as a professional activity performed at many levels by a variety of professionals with their vast range of skill sets and an equally wide range of motivations and intentions, some deep and profound and some definitely shallow and short term, all of which may be needed and necessary based on the complexity and the context that is being addressed. Yes, political will must be brought into the equation if massive change is to be achieved in getting a city or even a country to feel right for its citizens and it must accommodate all the ethical dimensions in an integrated manner. The quality that Christopher Alexander has called "The Quality without a name", in his book the “Timeless Way of Building", is not about some transient Fashion but a very durable and amazing quality that can be sensed and felt but which cannot be seen or explained in words. How then do we get this quality into our design education of the future is the big question that design teachers and philosophers must ponder going forward. It is for me about touching and changing design and not about the designer and we must look at the emerging contours of explorations from many contributors such as the Kaos Pilots in Denmark and the NextD initiatives in New York and the d-school experiments in Stanford to see how the design education of the future may be shaped. In Conclusion Design must be returned to the society as a culture forming and shaping process with an ethical and sensitive activity that is multi-dimensional, unselfconscious and ubiquitous. All our professions and academia must be steeped in the design ethic and take ownership of relevant parts of it if we are to discover the true power of the discipline at the leading edge of human evolution which should be both environmentally sustainable as well as socially equitable in the days ahead. References: A. List of Papers for “Hand-Head-Heart: Ethics & Design”
  1. Abraham Moles, The Comprehensive Guarantee: A New Consumer Value, in Design Issues, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Spring 1985), pp. 53 – 64
  2. Abraham Moles & David W. Jacobus, in Design Issues, Vol. 4, No. 1 / 2, Designing the Immaterial Society (1988), pp. 25-32
  3. Alain Findeli, Ethics, Aesthetics and Design, in Design Issues, Vol. 10, No. 2 (Summer, 1994) pp. 49 –68
  4. Alain Findelli, Moholy-Nagy’s Design Pedagogy in Chicago (1937 – 46), in Design Issues, Vol. 7, No. 1, Educating the Designer (Autumn 1990). Pp. 4 – 19
  5. Alain Findeli, Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion, Design Issues, Vol. 17, No. 1 (Winter, 2001), pp. 5-17
  6. Cameron Tonkinwise, Ethics by Design, or the ethos of things, in Design Philosophy Paper No 2, 2004
  7. Claud Levi Strauss, Race and History, Chapter xviii, Structural Anthropology 2, 1976, pp. 323 – 360
  8. Carl Mitcham, Ethics into Design, in Discovering Design: Explorations in Design Studies, Eds. Richard Buchanan & Victor Margolin, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995, pp. 173 – 189
  9. Victor Margolin, Design for a Sustainable World, Design Issues, Vol. 14, No. 2 (Summer, 1998), pp. 83-92
  10. M P Ranjan, “The Levels of Design Intervention in a Complex Global Scenario”, Paper prepared for presentation at the Graphica 98 -II International Congress of Graphics Engineering in Arts and Design and the 13th National Symposium on Descriptive Geometry and Technical Design, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil, September 1998.
  11. M P Ranjan, “Design Before Technology: The Emerging Imperative”, Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Design Conference ‘99 in Osaka, Japan Design Foundation and Japan External Trade Organisation, Osaka, 1999
  12. M P Ranjan, “Cactus Flowers Bloom in the Desert”, paper presented at the National Design Summit, Bangalore, 2001
  13. M P Ranjan, Lessons from Bauhaus, Ulm and NID: Role of Basic Design in PG Education, in proceedings of DETM Conference, NID, Ahmedabad, 2006
  14. M P Ranjan, The Avalanche Effect: Institutional Frameworks and design as development, Posted on PhD-Design discussion list, xx 2003
  15. M P Ranjan, Creating the Unknowable: Designing the Future in Education, Paper presented at EAD06 conference, Bremen Germany, 2005
  16. M P Ranjan, Design Journey: Styles and Modes of thoughts and actions in design, Posted on PhD-Design, discussion list, 2007
  17. S Balaram, Product Symbolism of Gandhi and Its Connection with Indian Mythology, in (eds) Victor Margolin and Richard Buchanan, The Idea of Design, MIT Press Cambridge, 1995 pp. 127 -143
  18. Kees Dorst & Isabelle Reymen, Levels of Expertise in Design Education, International Engineering and Product Design Education Conference, 2-3 September 2004, Delft, The Netherlands
  19. Elizabeth Sanders, Design Serving People, in Cumulus Working Papers, Copenhagen 15/5, University of Art and Design, Helsinki, 2006, pp 28 – 32
  20. Richard Buchanan, Dennis Doordan, Victor Margolin, Twenty Two Years of Pluralistic Discourse, in The Radical Designist, MIT Press, 2006
  21. Estelle Alma Mare, Design Art and the notion of Empathy, in SAJAH, volume 23, number 3, 2008, pp 1 – 8
  22. James Fathers and Gui Bonsiepe, Peripheral Vision: An interview with Gui Bonsiepe Charting a lifetime of Commitment to Design Empowerment, in Design Issues, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Autumn 2003), pp. 44 – 56
  23. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, A Systems Perspective on Creativity, in Handbook of Creativity Eds. R Sternberg, Cambridge University Press, 1999. Pp. 313 – 335
  24. Hazel Henderson, Foreword, in Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators: A New Tool for Assessing National Trends, Eds. Hazel Henderson, Jon Lickerman, and Patrice Flynn, Calvert Group Ltd., Bethesda, 2000
  25. Wolfgang Jonas, A Scenario for Design, Design Issues, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Spring, 2001), pp. 64-80
  26. Wolfgang Jonas, Nicola Morelli, Juliane Munch, Designing a product service system in a social framework: methodological and ethical considerations, in Undisciplined! Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference 2008, pp 104/1 -24
  27. Wolfgang Jonas, A special moral code for design? Or, Aristotle will do, in Design Philosophy Journal, July 2006
B. List of Books for “Hand-Head-Heart: Ethics & Design”
  1. Bruce Archer, Design Awareness and Planned Creativity in Industry, Office of Design, Trade and Commerce, Ottawa and the Design Council, London, 1974
  2. John Chris Jones, Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, London, 1970
  3. John Chris Jones, Designing Designing, Architecture Design and Technology Press, London, 1991
  4. Johannes Itten, Design and Form: The Basic Course at the Bauhaus, Thames & Hudson, London, 1963, 1975
  5. Josef Albers, Interaction of Color: Revised Edition, Yale University Press, 1971
  6. Paul Klee, Pedagogical Sketchbook, Frederick A. Praeger, New York, 1953, 1962
  7. Paul Klee, Paul Klee Notebooks Volume 1 The Thinking Eye, Lund Humphries, London, 1969
  8. Paul Klee, Paul Klee Notebooks: The Nature of Nature Volume 2, Lund Humphries Pub Ltd, 1992
  9. Lazlo Moholy Nagy, The New Vision: Fundamentals of Bauhaus Design. Painting, Sculpture and Architecture, by Laszlo Moholy-Nagy and Daphne M. Hoffmann, Dover Publications, New York, 2005
  10. Nigel Whiteley, Design for Society, Reaktion Books Ltd, London, 1993
  11. M K Gandhi, Gandhi: 'Hind Swaraj' and Other Writings, in Anthony J. Parel (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997
  12. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, The Phenomenon of Man, Harper and Row, New York, 1965
  13. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, The Future of Man, HarperCollins, New York, 1969
  14. Robert Prisig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values, Bantam, New York, 1984
  15. R Buckminster Fuller, Critical Path, St. Martin's Griffin; 2nd edition, New York, 1982
  16. Otl Aicher, World as Design, Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 1994
  17. Thomas Maldonado, Gui Bonsiepe, Renate Kietzmann et al., eds, “Ulm (1 to 21): Journal of the Hoschule fur Gestaltung”, Hoschule fur Gestaltung, Ulm, 1958 to 1968
  18. Tomas Maldonado, Design, Nature, and Revolution: Toward a Critical Ecology, Harper & Row, New York, 1972
  19. Gui Bonsiepe, Interface -An Approach to Design, Jan Van Eyck Akademie,Netherlands, 1999
  20. Christopher Alexander, Nature of Order, Book 1 – Phenomenon of Life, Book 2 – A Vision of Living World, Book 3 – The Process of Creating Life and Book 4 – The Luminous Ground, The Centre for Environmental Structure Publishing, Berkeley, 2001 to 2004
  21. David Pye, The Nature of Design, Studio-Vista, London, 1964
  22. David Pye, Nature and Art of Workmanship, Cambium Press; Revised edition, London, 1995
  23. Norman Potter, What is a Designer: things, places, messages, Hyphen Press, London, 2002
  24. John. Heskett, Industrial Design, Thames & Hudson, London, 1985
  25. John. Heskett, Toothpicks and Logos: Design in Everyday Life, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002
  26. Victor Papanek, Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, Pantheon Books, New York, 1971
  27. Victor Papanek, The Green Imperative: Natural Design for the Real World, Thames & Hudson, 1995
  28. Claude Levi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology, Volume 2, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1983
  29. Stafford Beer, Platform for Change: A Message from Stafford Beer, John Wiley & Sons Inc, London, 1975
  30. Charles & Ray Eames, Eames Design: The Work of the Office of Charles and Ray Eames, in John Neuhart, Marylin Neuhart and Ray Eames (authors), Abrams, New York, 1994
  31. Jiddu Krishnamurthy, Freedom from the Known, HarperOne, New York, 1975
  32. Richard Buchanan and Victor Margolin, Discovering Design: Explorations in Design Studies, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995)
  33. Victor Margolin, Politics of the Artificial: Essays in Design and Design Studies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002
  34. Victor Margolin and Richard Buchanan, Idea of Design: A Design Issues Reader, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1996
  35. Donald A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York, 2002
  36. Donald A. Schon, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York, 1983
  37. Bruno Latour, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., USA, 1987.
  38. Bruno Latour, Politics of Nature: How to Bring Sciences into Democracy, (tr. by Catherine Porter), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA, 2004.
  39. Hazel Henderson, Beyond Globalization. Kumarian Press, 1999
  40. Hazel Henderson, Ethical Markets: Growing the Green Economy, Chelsea Green Publishing, 2006
  41. Bryan Czeck, Shoveling Fuel for a Runaway Train: Errant Economists, Shameful Spenders, and a Plan to Stop them All, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2000
  42. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Creativity : Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, Harper Perennial, New York , 1996
  43. Howard Gardner, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, and William Damon, Good Work: When Excellence and Ethics Meet, Basic Books, New York, 2002
  44. Howard Gardner, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, and William Damon, Good Business: Leadership, Flow, and the Making of Meaning. Basic Books, New York, 2002
  45. Klaus Krippendorff, The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design, Taylor & Francis CRC, New York, 2006
  46. Wolfgang Jonas and Jan Meyer-Veden, “Mind the gap! on knowing and not-knowing in design”, H.M Hauschild GmbH, Bremen, 2004
  47. John Thackara, In the Bubble: Designing in a Complex World, MIT Press, 2005
  48. Harold G. Nelson & Erik Stolterman, The Design Way: Foundations and Fundamentals of Design Competence, Educational Technology Publications, New Jersey, 2003
  49. Bryan Lawson, How Designers Think, Architectural Press, New York, 1997)
  50. Bryan Lawson and Kees Dorst, Design Expertise, Architectural Press, New York, 2009
  51. Kees Dorst, Understanding Design: 175 Reflections On Being A Designer, Gingko Press, Berkeley, 2004 & 2006
  52. Peter G. Rowe, Design Thinking, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1991
  53. Gregory Bateson, Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1972
  54. Frei Otto, IL20 TASKS, Institute for Lightweight Structures, Stutgart, 1975
  55. Naoto Fukasawa & Jasper Morrison, Super Nornal: Sensations of the Ordinary, Lars Muller Publishers, Baden, 2007
Keynote lecture at the 4th National Design Conference between 8th and 9th October 2009 at ITU in Istanbul, Turkey at the invitation of the Department of Industrial Product Design at Istanbul Technical University (ITU) and the conference co-sponsors, Koleksion A.S., Profilo and the ITU.
   

Handblock Prints of Bagh,
In the late 1990’s when Craft Revival Trust started its explorations of the bylanes and corners of craft practice amongst the first traditions tracked were those of handblock printing and dying. The unearthing of the carved bust of the priest-king at Mohenjodaro draped in a shoulder cloth with trefoil motifs, references in ancient texts, visual and archaeological evidence all date the dyeing and patterning of textiles on the sub-continent back several millennia. Of the many traditions of handblock printing that continue to be practiced in India from the celebrated to the relatively unknown, the tradition of Bagh in Madhya Pradesh holds its own. This bustling small township known for its ancient Buddhist mural painted rock cut caves is home to the Khatri chippas the hereditary printing and dyeing community. The Khatris trace their ancestry to Larkana in Sind from where their long march eastwards began over 400 years ago. Their wanderings led them to several places including Bagh where they settled near the mineral rich waters of the Baghini River, its flowing waters vital to the printing process. Catering to the textile needs of the regions tribal populace of Bhil and Bhilals the Khatris printed and dyed the lugada saris, ghagra full length gathered skirts, angocha shoulder cloth and odhni head mantles. This customary wear was worn for occasions like weddings and celebrations and ppurchased by tribal communities either with cash or bartered with forest produce during the lunar month of Kartik, around Diwali and at Phagun, the harvest period around the festival of Holi With changing times and the availability of cheap mill made textiles the ties between the block-printer and their traditional tribal patrons diminished and the Khatris of Bagh began to explore new avenues to stay relevant. The patriarch of Bagh printers the late Hajji Ishmael Khatri, awarded by the President of India with the honorific of Shilpguru, was instrumental in placing Bagh on the handblock print map. In the late 1980’s he collected disused blocks from other printers, made new blocks from old and damaged ones, researched and single handedly collated and built up the Bagh motif directory. This design repertoire rooted in tribal culture extended from floral butis and vines to a vast range of jaal trelliswork and geometric patterns, all startlingly contemporary in look. Ishmael experimented with layouts and colors, created variations in shades and established Bagh as a block printing center to be reckoned with. The printers in Bagh follow the mordant dye printing technique to create their striking deep red and iron black handblock printed textiles. This complex manual process requires patience, skill and dexterity with the printing of a sari, for instance, taking a minimum of three weeks to complete. At the very core of the process is the block itself, with the quality of the print dependant on the skill of the block-maker. Intricately carved by specialist block-makers in Pethapur, Gujarat in long lasting teak wood, the block-makers follow the exact specification of the printers. Even before the printer starts the process of stamping the first block several steps have to be completed to ready the fabric to accept the print and the color. The cloth either cotton or silk  is first washed to remove all impurities and then soaked overnight in a mixture of arandi-ka-tel/unrefined castor oil, alkaline mineral salts and goat dung. When this mixture is completely fused into the fabric it is then treated with harda/myrobalam nut powder. These processes soften the fabric making it receptive to the dye and ready for printing. The printer lays the cloth onto a low table, dips the block, usually 6x6 inches in size,   into the color tray ensuring that no extra color adheres to the block. He then carefully places the corner of the block on to the fabric setting its position before lowering the whole block down. With a firm, sure hand he thumps the block with his fist thus ensuring an even print. This process is then repeated again and again till the whole fabric is printed. Each print aligned and flush with the next. With   experience a block printer can average about ten meters in a day. The deep black color is extracted from rusted iron fermented with molasses or as is more common now from iron ferrous sulphate/ hara kasish. The shades of red emerge when the patterns printed with the mordant alum are dyed in the synthesized alizarin red dye bath. Boiled in huge copper vats set on wood fired furnaces, the yellow Dhavda/Axle wood tree flowers are added in to brighten the color. The fabrics are constantly shifted and turned in the vats with long wooden sticks as the mixture boils for over 4 hours, deepening the color. The alum print ensures that when the fabric is dyed, only the alum printed areas retain the red color as it holds fast the dye, like a glue, to the areas it has been hand blocked on. The fabric is then washed in the river Baghini, rich in copper and other minerals. It is from its waters that the dramatic blood-red and iron-black motifs associated with the Bagh handblock printed textiles emerge. [gallery ids="165473,165474,165475,165476,165477,165478,165479,165480,165481,165482,165483,165484,165485,165486,165487,165488,165489,165490,165491,165492,165493,165494,165495,165496,165497,165498"]     First published in Sunday Herald on 17th May, 2015.

Handcrafted Textiles for A Sustainable Future,

By Design: Sustaining Culture in Local Environments

Issue #004, Winter, 2020                                                                            ISSN: 2581- 9410

  1 Introduction Indian textiles have been appreciated the world over since antiquity and it is to the credit of traditional artisans that hand skills have survived and evolved across time. The ornamentation of these textiles communicates the story of our indigenous design aesthetic and culture. Each region in India offered its own unique skills, distinctive range of textiles that use diverse materials and methods. (fig 1) I was first exposed to handmade textiles as a student at the National Institute of Design (NID), Ahmedabad, in the mid-1970s. (fig 2) Historical context: patronage and craft production In the past, royal patronage and wealthy merchants supported the arts and crafts. Products created by local artisans were worn by other local communities. The artisan understood his clientele and there was a close interaction. This allowed the crafts to flourish and the artisans were encouraged to innovate in response to the needs of their customers. By the mid-1970s, however, many communities were starting to give up the use of local fabrics, opting instead for cheaper mill-made materials that were flooding the rural markets. As a result, the craftsmen lost their clientele as well as their livelihood. There was a time before the Industrial Revolution when all fabric around the world was hand-spun, hand-woven, and embellished according to the requirements of the consumer and skill of the producer. (fig 3) Today, most cultures have lost their craft traditions and skills. We, in India are fortunate; our vast array of crafts skills survives but craftspeople have lost their former patrons and struggle to maintain commercial viability. Many artisans would continue to practice their hereditary vocation if it were financially rewarding and commensurate with their labour. Today, when most artisans earn less than an unskilled labourer on a construction site, there seems little incentive for them to continue their ancestral profession. This needs to change. Through collaborative partnerships, these valuable hand skills need to be re-purposed to become relevant again. Craft revival: block printing in Kachchh in the 1970s My association with the craft sector began in 1977 while I was still a design student at NID. As part of a project commissioned by the newly-established Gujarat State Handicrafts and Hand looms Development Corporation, I was sent to work with a block printer, Khatri Mamadbhai Siddikbhai (“Mamadbhai”), at Dhamadka village in Kachchh district, Gujarat, to create a collection of prints for their store,Gurjari. (fig 4) Dhamadka was known forajrakh - the block-printed chadors worn as male dress by local herders, or maldharis.(fig 5) Sulekha, my senior at NID and I were sent to live with Mamadbhai’s family for two weeks. We were  to study and document their textile craft and based on this understanding would then design a collection of block prints for their stores in urban centres. We were among the first outsiders to reach the village and to work with a printer to produce textiles for an alternate market. At that time, the printers only produced fabrics for local, rural communities. Dhamadka was isolated and no-one from the village had even visited an urban centre or interacted much with people from the city, so people were apprehensive about having two young, unescorted ‘city girls’ living in their midst. Luckily, Mamadbhai was a well-respected man and was able to pacify the local community. In the 1970s, the village had no electricity, so the day started at sunrise and ended at sunset. During the day we worked in the workshop, gaining practical knowledge about the process of dyeing and printing; evenings were spent listening to Mamadbhai’sstories about life and work. This was a world completely different to our own. We were amazed by the generosity we were shown. Living with Mamadbhai’s family at Dhamadka was a great learning experience and it became the foundation for a lot of my future work. (fig 6)Our collection of prints was greatly appreciated and from that time onward, the family received regular orders from Gurjari. After my graduation, I continued my association with Mamadbhai. I used his traditional prints to create new surfaces by changing the placement of blocks to produce a range of home furnishings. There were always a few pieces that had some printing variation and didn’t pass my strict quality requirement. I felt it would be a financial burden for him if I  just rejected these prints; something he could not afford. So instead I decided to make the reject pieces into garments, using the parts of the fabric that were serviceable, and a collection developed. I showed it at exhibitions in Ahmedabad, Mumbai and Delhi and encouraged by the positive response, I started ordering fabrics regularly from Mamadbhai, a relationship that has continued until the present day. It was during this period that Mamadbhai started to gain a reputation for his knowledge and understanding of block printing and dyeing.(fig 7) His interactions with designers and museum patrons made him realise the relevance of his ancestral craft. He understood that designers would come to his doorstep only if he continued with traditional practices. He shifted gradually from using chemical dyes to natural mineral and vegetable colours, and recreated old blocks. He was far-sighted and wise enough to teach his three young sons the value of the craft. He consciously passed on his knowledge of the traditional methods and talked to them about their history and craft.Exposure, appreciation and sustained regular work transformed the lives of this family and many others in Dhamadka. For example, Mamadbhai’s son, Ismail Khatri, who completed only basic primary education at the village school, ending his studies in class seven, was awarded an honorary degree in 2003 (Doctor of Arts), by De Montfort University, Leicester, UK, for his deep understanding of his ancestral craft and his contribution to scholarship: a commendable achievement. (fig 8) Over the years, the quality of ajrakh produced by Mamadbhai Siddikbhai’s family in Kachchh has continued to improve and today, their name is synonymous with high quality ajrakh.(fig 9) When I first started working with Mamadbhai, no-one from the village had ventured ‘outside’ or had worked with an urban designer so it is heartening to see that his sons and grandsons have gained recognition and established financial stability – all of which  encourages them to pursue their ancestral profession. Mamadbhai’s grandsons have become globe-trotters and are regularly invited to international seminars and workshops to demonstrate their craft.During a recent visit to Kachchh, it was very encouraging to observe that all one hundred and forty families of block printers living in Ajrakhpur (the new village established by the Khatris after the Gujarat earthquake of 2001) have regular orders. This is a new and encouraging development. In my experience, if there is an appreciation and a sustained market demand, craft skills can be revived and the next generation of artisans see a future in continuing their hereditary occupation. Tie dye (bandhani) Apart from the longstanding relationship with Mamadbhai’s family, another meaningful association has been with a bandhani artisan, Khatri Ismailbhai Nironawala, whom I met when travelling around Mandvias a student in the late 1970s. (fig 10) While wandering in the bazaar, I chanced upon an old man sitting in his shop tying knots on a piece of fabric. Out of curiosity, Iwent up to him to take a closer look. He showed me some of the bandhani odhana that he created for local communities. At the time, Mandvi was a leading centre for cotton bandhani production. I first started collaborating with Ismailbhai in the 1980s. (fig 11) I had discovered that there were very few good bandhani craftsmen left in the region. Mostly, the work was of poor quality and local consumers were not willing to pay the price asked. In order to make the product cheap enough to suit the market, the artisans had to compromise on quality. I was able to change this pattern of decline through design intervention and improving the quality of production. Over thirty-five years of continuous work with Ismailbhai and his sons, we have managed to create more than eighty collections, using the same bandhani dot technique, adding new colours, rearranging old patterns, and in the process, developing a new design vocabulary, without ever compromising on quality. (fig 12)I also persuaded Ismailbhai to educate his children as well as to teach them tie-dyeing, and convinced him that his craft has a bright future. Today, all his three sons are involved in bandhani production. Their education and exposure has helped them to experiment with designs, adapt to the current market requirements and expand their business. When, in the mid-1990s, I started a mail order business, bandhani outfits were prominently featured in our catalogues; these were distributed all around the country for over seven seasons. (fig 13) In many ways, the catalogue helped build the Bandhej brand, and popularised bandhani nationwide and Mandvi became known as a centre for quality bandhani. Merchants from towns and cities throughout India, carrying copies of the Bandhej catalogue, travelled to Mandvi to place orders. This design intervention has had a rolling effect; bandhani fabric continues to retain its charm and the dyers of Mandvi have more work than they can handle. Today, over twenty-five thousand people in Kachchh earn their livelihood from tying bandhani fabrics. The collections created in collaboration with rural artisans were greatly appreciated by urban customers. (fig 14) This response gave me the confidence to start the first Bandhej retail shop at Ahmedabad in 1985. During this phase, I was completely fascinated by the bandhani technique and decided to call the company Bandhej, another term for tie-dye that also means ‘a bond’. The name seemed appropriate as it captured my strong bond with artisans as well as craft techniques. Bandhej: craft and design for the modern world Bandhej was started with a vision to uphold, preserve and sustain the precious hand skills and inherent knowledge of the indigenous artisan through collaborative design intervention.Over the years, Bandhej has created a distinct idiom in its design, offering a range of handcrafted clothing that has an understated elegance with contemporary appeal. The company continues to promote handcrafted, sustainable fashion that is eco-friendly and supports a large number of traditional artisans. Even as the main business of Bandhej has been to design and produce a range of clothing for its retail outlets, the underlying concern has always been with the diverse traditions of fabric-making and embellishment in India. Over the years, the company has striven to work with artisans towards building upon their skills and knowledge by suggesting fresh design directions and providing a market for their production. In the process, Bandhej has played a modest role in rejuvenating many traditional craft techniques and there has been a knock-on effect to the company’s interventions. My colleagues and I at Bandhej have a deep commitment to the people with whom we work. Apart from our involvement with printers, dyers and weavers in Kachchh, as the business grew over time, we expanded our association to include weavers in Champa, Chanderi and Maheshwar in Madhya Pradesh; Mangalgiri and Puttapaka in Andhra Pradesh; Bhagalpur in Bihar; and Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh. The large network of artisans developed over the years has allowed us to manufacture what we design. Without the dictates of any external pressures, our products are sold through our own retail stores in Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Mumbai and Chennai; the company also has an online presence. (fig 15) This sounds wonderful, but it comes with great responsibility. The most challenging task has been to constantly find new design directions for the same craft skills and to create fresh collections season after season, maintaining quality as the scale expands. Legacy At a personal level, it has been gratifying to see that most of the children of the artisans with whom Bandhej has collaborated see meaning in pursuing this work.They perceive the financial benefits and appreciate the comforts of working within their homes. In many cases I am already working with the next generation; I find they are more open to experimentation as they have experienced a wider exposure than their forebears. Artisans are quick to learn, and today, many of the younger generation connect through the internet with a wider market. What started as journey inspired by my fascination with handmade textiles has now shifted to a concern for sustainable livelihoods for the craft community in general. Over the years of collaboration with artisans I have been able to demonstrate that there is a viable market in urban centres for craft-based products. Design can play a very positive role in rejuvenating the craft sector. While they are highly-skilled, artisans need to develop fresh products that are relevant to the fashion-conscious urban markets that demand newness every season. Appropriate and sensitive collaborations between designers and craftspeople can generate sustained work for a large number of our very skilled artisans. Equally, designers can benefit from this rich repertoire. Designer-artisan collaboration It is widely believed that the high-end luxury market is the future for hand-made textiles. An increasing number of textile and fashion designers are collaborating with artisans which has given the craft sector a fresh sense of purpose and greater visibility. The process is now driven by mutual, commercial benefit and has transcended the stage at which initiatives were driven by philanthropy. But many of these commercial initiatives serve the high end market segment, and support a comparatively small number of artisans. Given the size and the diversity of the artisan groups, this number is not sufficient to sustain the crafts community overall. The market needs to expand substantially. Around thirty million textile artisans would greatly benefit from a renewed interest in handcrafted textiles. Local communities also need to be encouraged to use locally-produced textiles. This would restore the close bonds that formerly existed between artisans and consumers. The artisans would profit from direct interaction with the consumer which would help them to incorporate the consumer’s preferences in future production. Craft for mass consumption There is a misconception that craft production cannot be scaled up. Handmade products are unique and no two pieces are identical; in addition to which the pace of production is different to that of industrial fabrication. If this is understood and production is planned with a clear understanding of time required for creation, and supervisors accept the variation inherent in craft production, orders can be distributed amongst a large number of artisans. Design and production managers would need to have an encouraging approach that is realistic and conducive to making things by hand. Why should the five thousand scarves or shirts all be identical if they can be made by hand in the same price range and of acceptable quality?Once the five thousand products have been distributed throughout a chain of shops, they are purchased and worn by individuals who put their personal stamp of them. The charm of the handmade object is in its uniqueness and there need be no compromise on quality. Women’s upliftment Apart from weavers, printers and dyers in different part of the country, Bandhej also works with many women’s groups who add embellishment to the garments. Among these women, the experience of working with an embroiderer named Tyaibabanuhas demonstrate dhow a little support, exposure and encouragement can bring about change. (fig 16) Tyaibabhanu’s husband, Mohammadbhai handled Bandhej’s metallic thread embroidery production. His job was to collect work from the studio and take it home after which Tyaibabhanu would execute the order. Like many artisans, she had good knowledge of the embroidery technique as well as an inherent understanding of how to create forms, patterns and layouts - all skills that are passed down from generation-to-generation as a matter of course.She was in charge of marking out the patterns on the garments or saris and would then distribute the work to the women in her neighborhood. After a while, it became frustrating to work with Mohammadbhai as he could not grasp the new layouts and I was keen to explain the designs directly to her. It took me a long time to convince him to bring Tyaibabanu to the workshop. He explained to me that the social conventions of his community meant that women do not step out of their home even to buy vegetables. So I continued to communicate with her through Mohammadbhai but things reached crisis stage and I had to inform him that I would be forced to stop giving him work as he could not comprehend what was required. Under pressure, he reluctantly brought her to the workshop. I remember her first visit; she came covered in a burkha. Although I could not see her expressions, I sensed that she was uncomfortable and in the confines of my office, I suggested that she could remove her burkha, if she wished. She seemed quite relieved to do so, and was happy to embroider a few samples with metallic thread, to show me the various possibilities. She was very receptive to my suggestions and together we created several new patterns. (fig 17) From that day onwards, she started coming to the office regularly, to work on samples and take back materials for bulk production. In the process, she has done some wonderful work, gained self-esteem and confidence, and is now the primary bread-winner in the family. When I first met Tyaibabhanu she could not even sign her own name, having had no formal education. Today she manages more than forty women. She regularly distributes work to them, manages payments and ensures that the quality of their work is of an acceptable standard. She no longer needs an escort; operating her own business has given her tremendous confidence and a new freedom. She has invested in her own work space and has bought a home - all from her own earnings. She now travels to Lucknow with her grandchildren to visit her extended family, something she never dreamt would be possible. Her ability as a professional artisan and entrepreneur has transformed her life and expectations. Conclusion: working together for a sustainable future I am happy to have had the opportunity to develop partnerships with artisans and through these associations we have learnt from each other and enriched our lives. Based on my experiences, I believe that with appropriate partner ships craft skills can be re-purposed to suit contemporary markets and craft as an occupation has a bright future.But we are faced with the two major challenges today: climate change and unemployment. With growing concern for the large number of people who have lost  their jobs to automation and robotics, and fears about climate change due to excessive use of fossil fuels and pollution, there is wisdom in developing the craft sector. It is both labour-intensive(and thus has the potential to employ far more people) and inherently eco-friendly. We need to develop sustainable methods of production and to raise awareness of responsible consumption. As part of this agenda, craft skills can be re-purposed through sensitive design collaboration; innovative marketing and appropriate promotions can raise awareness of the value of handmade goods. This strategy would help to generate new markets locally and nationally as well as globally. New narratives need to be created for handmade goods to become aspirational products for the younger generation who are socially-aware and concerned about the well being of the environment. The craft sector has the potential to do a number of positive things: for example, to create a large number of jobs without huge investments; to empower women and marginalised communities involved in the sector. (fig 18) It could provide sustainable livelihoods to families and communities in their own locations through the use of local resources, protecting them from the misery of economic migrancy. If artisans find work within their village and they have access to education and basic healthcare, there would be little reason for most to migrate to the cities. The community offers better security when compared to living in an urban slum, in over-populated cities where jobs are increasingly scarce. Craft is a generally ‘green’ means of production that can benefit the environment and has a light carbon footprint; moreover, indigenous craft articulates our distinct cultural identity in the age of globalization. Craft, however, needs a vibrant platform for new synergies.There is a need to shift from patronage to collaborative partnerships in order to create sustainable livelihoods for artisans that enable them to live with dignity and allow future generations to practice their hereditary profession.In India, we areat an advantage as craftspeople have not yet lost their ancestral hand skills. (fig 19) With the greatest concentration of craft skills in the world, Indian artisans can make a very significant contribution to the search for a more socially just, inclusive and equitable planet, whose work offers opportunities for sustainable development. We need to applaud and celebrate our artisans who are the custodians of our rich cultural heritage. There is the potential to brand ‘handmade in India’ for the world market. List of illustrations Fig 1: Map of textile production centres across India. Fig 2: Meghwal girls in Kachchh district, Gujarat. Fig 3: Spinning cotton and weaving on a pitloom in Kachchh. Fig 4: Khatri MamadbhaiSiddikbhai at Dhamadka, Kachchh. Fig 5: Maldhari men (cattle herders) wearing ajrakh, Kachchh. Fig 6: Khatri MamadbhaiSiddkbhai and sons (L-R), Abdulrazzak, Abduljabbar and Ismail, at Dhamadka, Kachchh, in 1977. Fig 7: Dr Ismail Mohammad Khatri smearing alum mordant paste on to resist-printed cotton. Fig 8: Dr Ismail Mohammad Khatri printing an ajrakh. Fig 9: Printing and dyeing an ajrakh at Dhamadka. Fig 10: Khatri Ismail Nironawala, Mandvi, Kachchh. Fig 11: Women tying the bandhani(tie-dye)dots. Fig 12: Tools used for tying bandhanidots. Fig 13: Bandhej catalogue. Fig 14: Tie-dyed saris. Fig 15: Interior of Bandhej shop. Fig 16: Tyaibabhanu embroidering with metal thread on a silk, tie-dyed sari. Fig 17: Mookesh – metal thread embroidery. Fig 18: Artisan in Uttarakhand weaving a rag rug. Fig 19: Extra weft weaving in Kachchh, a feature of local men’s dhablo(blanket).  

Handcrafting a Sustainable Future, Challenge and Opportunity in a New Millennium
This essay pays tribute to the many whose tireless attention has impacted issues that affect India’s poor and marginalized. Millions of such lives are entwined with crafts, and their wellbeing with the need for understanding of the economics of this huge sector. Such understanding does not exist today, despite the centrality of crafts and artisans to India’s “tryst with destiny”.  Today, the country does not know whether the number of its artisans in this country is 11M, according to its nodal Ministry, or 250M as suggested by one of India’s most distinguished corporate leaders. In a nation and at a time obsessed with the challenges of employment and the specter of jobless growth, reliable data is surely a pre-requisite for effective policy making – particularly for policies directed at what may be its second largest source of livelihood. Or is it our intention to continue to prescribe treatment for this crisis-ridden sector in the absence of adequate diagnostics? The economics of India’s craft sector Issues of economic impact usually begin with an oft-repeated acknowledgment that it represents India’s second largest source of livelihood after agriculture. The dismal reality is that data to back this claim is unavailable. India may be is the world’s largest resource of artisanal skill and wisdom, yet its artisans and their crafts are in crisis today even as India in the 20th  century gave the world its most significant demonstration of craft heritage as an expression of modernity. This is the situation seventy years after Indian craft powerfully catalyzed a Freedom movement and then moved into centralized planning as part of the emergence of a modern nation that was rooted in the confidence of an unbroken culture stretching back over 7,000 years.  While economics is the focus here, the importance of Indian craft transcends statistics. The culture of hand production helps define us as Indians. For Mahatma Gandhi, craft was wealth interpreted as life. For Rabindranath Tagore, it was “life in its completeness”,[1]a force acknowledged a century later today as second to none in its understanding of human wellbeing and of the future of the  planet. Perhaps no other industry can match the contribution which artisans and crafts can and do make to the Sustainable Development Goals[2]that are now the global benchmarks of progress. And yet, India does not know or seem to care how many artisans it should treasure or of what they contribute to the Indian economy. This is not just a crisis of ignorance. It is one of indifference to the millions of marginalized citizens who carry the wisdom of our heritage in their hands and eyes. Yet neglect by economists is not new to the sector. A century ago Gandhi drew attention it: “The industrial arts and handicrafts, considered as inessential luxuries, are practically ignored even by recognised authorities on economics. They have found it impossible to realise the connection between art and industry and to appreciate the value of quality or a high standard of workmanship. That is so because they have never attempted to interpret national wealth in terms of life. Will India benefit by the mistakes of the West? Her rare industrial arts and handicrafts are not yet extinct. They merely require recognition and encouragement. But if that is not immediately forthcoming it will be too late. We shall then be guilty of strangling them with our own hands”. [3] Gandhiji was writing at a time when the decline of artisans and their crafts had emerged as a key element within a nationalist movement that had embraced both economics and culture. The penury of India’s peasants and artisans was being elaborately discussed, leading on toward distinct and unprecedented efforts to evolve a cultural policy.[4]Under Gandhi’s leadership the handmade sector moved into the centre of the greatest freedom struggle the world had seen. The charkha became a symbol of swaraj understood as self-reliant local economies powered by labour-intensive activity. A handloom revolution followed, transforming behaviours and tastes. As a vision of a new India emerged, handcraft was made central to the idea of India as a modern society with its own distinct identity.In1946 Jawaharlal Nehru’s A Discovery of India, written while imprisoned in Ahmednagar Fort, argued that the evolved and cultured nation that India had been before colonialism constituted a resource that could be directly accessed by planned development under a free national government. After Freedom The power of that resource would soon be tested when Freedom was accompanied by the horror of Partition. As thousands of devastated refugees, many of them traumatized women, poured across new borders, Prime Minister Nehru turned to Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay. It was she who moved into relief camps with needle, thread and textile to offer an opportunity to recover hope and sanity through memories of skill and beauty. What was made in relief camps had then to be sold to demonstrate hope, livelihood and dignity. The idea of a Central Cottage Industries Emporium began in an abandoned barrack on Janpath that was used by the Indian Cooperative Union to start a small retail outlet. From here, a handcraft marketing movement spread across the country. Rooted in the values of the Freedom movement, it addressed the multiple challenges of managing a human disaster, creating employment, and of earning the foreign exchange essential for new industries in a mixed economy. Independent India became the first country to position crafts within the priorities of centralized planning. India’s First Five-Year Plan[5]would declare in 1951 that village industries, small-scale industries and handicraft had an “importance for the economy as a whole (that) can scarcely be exaggerated”. The Plan included “the setting up of new boards for khadi and village industries and for handicrafts, the imposition of a cess on mill-made cloth to assist the development of khadi and handloom, and measures taken for the reservation of certain lines of production in favour of the handloom industry”. Policies and institutions were created to reflect a confidence that culture and economics could together identify a uniquely Indian modernism, inspired by Gandhi, Tagore and others including Rukmani Devi Arundale. A sector was defined and then given priority. Seven decades later, that priority would regress dramatically as new attitudes took command. What is the craft sector? Apart from the familiar claim of handcraft as the second largest source of Indian livelihood, this elusive giant has much to offer beyond numbers. Indian artisans and their crafts offer rural opportunities for non-farm, labour-intensive, employment intensive, value-added activity. The export demand for Indian craft quality is virtually unlimited, tested in recent periods of recession. The sector is a huge magnet for domestic and international tourism – ‘Incredible India’ without crafts is unimaginable. India’s artisans are primarily those still at the margins of society: SC/ST communities, tribal communities, minorities, and women who contribute an estimated 50% of sector output. Handcrafts are thus a socio-economic safety-net, including in some of the nation’s most sensitive areas: the northeast, J&K, and the so-called Naxal Belt or Red Corridor which extends through craft-rich regions. Crafts offer confidence and identity in a world of globalized sameness. They have the lowest carbon footprint of any major industry. All this, and yet both the size of the handicraft and handloom sector in India as well as its contribution to GDP remain unknown. Estimates of industry size can depend upon definition and source. Some range between Rs24,000 and over Rs26,000crore, contributing between Rs10,000-13,400 crore annually in export earnings. Yet the official figure of handcrafted exports alone in 2018-19 is between Rs26-27,000 crores[6]and that excludes the export of handmade carpets(which are accounted for separately as Rs 12,364 crores in 2018-19[7])and gems and jewelry (primarily from so-called unorganized units) estimated at around US$40B or a colossal Rs284,000 crore! [8]The 12th Five Year Plan had projected handcrafts as becoming the largest non-farm sector in rural India, swelling its workforce by 10 per cent, doubling output and exporting 18 per cent more during 2012-17. According to official pronouncements, the sector comprises 10M-11M artisans. Other estimates take this figure to 200M and above.[9] This astounding variation demonstrates how a crisis of data can easily translate into the absence of priority in planning and investment. According to Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, the data available to her is only about ‘formal’ sector, and not about the sector where employment opportunities are concentrated: “Indian informal sector employment has not been appropriately or exhaustively documented. When we are referring to data from government organizations like NSSO, it talks only about the formal sector and not about the informal. In India, the nature of our economy is that it is in the informal sector where the majority of our employment is. If there is stress in the respective sectors, I am willing to hear”.[10]The offer is gracious but unrealistic. The reality is that artisans are not organized to lobby, or to bring roads or railway lines to a halt, or to bring demonstrators to the capital. When even language is loaded against artisans, suicides become inevitable. The official position is that handcrafts are part of the ‘unorganized’ and ‘informal’ economy of which little can be known. In contrast, the ground reality is that no Indian craft is either unorganized or informal. Craft traditions have been meticulously organized over centuries, with strict formalities and protocols governing practices and values.  Yet these false adjectives prevail, demonstrating both a lack of awareness as well as insensitivity to what gives this sector its extraordinary potential. Such contradictions offer a backdrop to the sector’s current crises, and semantic reform could be a first step toward its transformation. A challenge of definition Getting language right can assist the resolution of major issues of definition, essential to identify more clearly what is a craft and who is an artisan. The Eighth Five-Year Plan offered a serviceable option: handicrafts are products that are crafted primarily by hand, using simple tools. These products can be traditional, artistic and of utility.[11] Traditional knowledge and the artisans’ direct manual contribution should form a substantial or distinctive part of the end product or service. With the use of machines minimal or limited, handcrafted products are distinguished by identification with traditions as well as geographies. An artisan is a person with special hand skills, handed down traditionally across generations and often linked to complex traditional knowledge systems that encompass aspects of material, technology, design and notions of value[12].(So much for what is so often dismissed as ‘unorganised’ and ‘informal’!)With serviceable definitions in place, the power of Indian craft may be allowed to emerge – a power that is economic, social, environmental, cultural, political and even spiritual. India’s position in a global context of craft awareness India represents the world’s largest resource of artisanal knowledge and wisdom, rooted intraditions that have an unbroken history going back thousands of years. Seventy years after the charkha helped liberate the country from colonial rule, India does not know how many artisans it has nor what they contribute to the economy while elsewhere in the world their critical importance is acknowledged as a gigantic sector and mirrored in an astonishing slogan from the heart of the European Union in 2003: “The Future is Handmade”[13]. This prediction reflected a relevance of craft that goes well beyond the hand-made, toward a pervasive culture of quality indispensible to survival and success in world markets. The power of craftsmanship as a huge competitive advantage is demonstrated by Japan, the East Asian Tigers, and in the economies of Italy, Scandinavia, Latin America and through the emerging importance of ‘creative and cultural industries’, perhaps the globe’s largest sector as understood defined by multilateral systems such as those of Unesco, UNDP and the World Bank. As the global understanding of progress  moves beyond statistics toward human well being, it moves closer to the understanding of artisans and crafts that the Mahatma and Gurudev advocated a century ago. Emerging concepts of creative and cultural industries and of sustainability In 1994 the UNDP’s Human Development Indicators offered measurements of progress that were focused on the wellbeing of communities and societies. Within these new benchmarks, the concept of creative and cultural industries emerged as a means to “empower people to take ownership of their own development and stimulate the innovation that can drive inclusive sustainable growth……. The creative economy can be a source of structural economic transformation, socio-economic progress, job creation ….. while contributing to sustainable human development”.[14] In 1996 the UN Report of the World Commission on Culture and Development observed that “The pretentiousness of the ‘culture of development’ has given way to a deepening of meditative engagements and dialogues with other cultural traditions....The UN report of the World Commission on Culture and Development (1995) has made a solemn and sombre admission that many development projects had failed because the importance of culture had been underestimated. ....Culture, which is the soul of development, can no longer be ignored and needs to be explicitly stated in the notion of human development”. In 2000, the World Bank introduced this emerging concept toward helping define legacies of heritage that could assist economies on the brink of globalization. The term ‘creative economy’ was used in 2001 by British writer John Howkins, who applied it to 15 industries in arts, science and technology that were estimated at that time to represent overUS$2 trillion worldwide and growing at 5% annually. The Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity at Unesco (Paris) in 2001 acknowledged cultural diversity as a factor in the development of knowledge-based economies. The concept of creative and cultural industries was further refined in 2005 through a UN/World Bank  initiative in India which led to the Jodhpur Consensus on Cultural Industries[15]. This consensus claimed that these industries are “a source of capital assets for economics, social and cultural development” as well as “a vital resource for the cultural identities of communities and individuals which lead to further creativity and human development …… What cultural industries have in common is that they create content, use, creativity, skill and in some cases intellectual property, to produce goods and services with social and cultural meaning”. While the value and meaning produced in cultural and social goods may often not be measurable in economic terms, these industries were stated as fundamentally important to social development. The Jodhpur Consensus pointed out that the creative and cultural sector was perhaps the largest industry in the world at that time, outstripping petroleum and constituting some 3% of world GDP estimated that year at $2,250B. It also identified craft as the largest component of India’s creative and cultural industries. Unesco’s 2005 Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions predicted that cultural and creative industries will represent around 10% of global GDP in the years to come. It claimed that the creative economy generated annual revenues of US$2,250 billion and global exports of over US$250 billion, employing more people between the ages of 15 and 29 than any other sector, with women representing nearly half of the people working cultural and creative industries. Creative Economy Reports of 2008 and 2010 by UNCTAD and UNDP were followed by one in 2013 by Unesco and UNDP which identified these industries as “the true wealth of nations in the 21st century”[16] and in its 2015 Report, linked culture and creative industries to each of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals with examples drawn from around the world. Also in 2013, the Inter-American Development Bank had developed its concept of “The Orange Economy: An Infinite Opportunity”[17].  The choice of ‘Orange’ was inspired by association with sacredness and a respect for Eastern traditions. This brilliant analysis of creative and cultural opportunities in Latin America argued that if the Orange Economy was a country in 2013, it would be an economy just after Japan in size and ahead of Germany, with the fourth largest labour force in the world (after China, India and the US), and with the value of its global exports double that of Saudi Arabian oil in 2011.  The World Economic Forum in 2015[18] estimated that revenue from creative industries ($2,250 billion) exceeded those of telecommunications services ($1,570 billion globally), and even surpassed the entire GDP of India ($1,900 billion). Three years later, UNCTAD stated that “The creative economy has the power to influence and inspire present and future generations, to protect our planet, people, cultures and natural resources and therefore contribute to a more sustainable development path… Trade in creative goods and services, is a powerful, growing economic force. Its contribution to GDP and share of global trade is only likely to increase as it intersects with the digital and sharing economy, e-commerce and the many opportunities emerging in these spaces….. ”[19].UNCTAD identifies 7 creative goods categories. The very first of these is Crafts/Art, followed by Audio-visuals, Design (including fashion, interiors and jewellery), New Media, Performing Arts, Publishing and Visual Arts. The global market for creative goods was reported to have expanded from $208 billion in 2002 to $509 billion in 2015, with an average growth rate exceeding 7%. The international trade in crafts/art totaled $ 35 billion in 2015, representing the most important creative industries sector for exports from developing countries. (India’s 2015 creative exports estimated at $ 1.6 billion were about 4.6% of the total). OECD reports[20]have indicated that since the 1990s a number of countries have adopted the concept of “Creative Nation, starting with Australia in 1994 and New Zealand in 2000. Culture and creativity are recognized as key ingredients of prospering urban economies and for an ability to attract, retain and support creative people and a strong economy. Switzerland, Scandinavia, Germany and Italy have recognized their craft heritage in the success of precision and engineering industries as well as in design leadership. Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and China are making major investments in craft strategies.  The East Asian Tigers exemplify the awareness of artisans and their crafts as offering a seedbed of creativity and innovation that translate into huge competitive advantages in the global marketplace. Japan’s Kanazawa project is an outstanding example. Kanazawa is now registered as a City of Crafts in recognition of “The spirit of artistic production that made possible Kanazawa’s own industrial revolution and made it the home of top engineering companies”[21]. At a meeting of the World Crafts Council in 2014, China observed that a decade earlier it had identified two “sunrise” industries as essential to its rise as a global power: IT and handcraft. The USA and the UK have also rediscovered the potential of their craft sectors. In September 2019 a cross-party gathering of MPs in the UK praised the UK creative industries’ record of boosting economic growth, jobs and exports and vowed to support the sector's future success by building on the progress made since the Government and industry had agreed on a Creative Industries Sector Deal. A 10-point Creative Industries Manifesto  was launched to drive inclusive growth and innovation throughout the UK, recognizing creativity as a driver of worldwide 'soft power' for the UK. Tim Davie, Co-Chair of the Creative Industries Council and CEO of BBC Studios, said: “Our industries have a critical role to play in the future economic and cultural success of the UK – both at home and internationally. And creative skills will be increasingly important to other sectors across the economy…we need to build on it if the creative industries are to fulfill the potential over the coming years, and to continue being world leaders in an increasingly competitive global market.” Nicky Morgan MP stated thatThe fact that you have so many MPs and ministers here is testament to the support you have in Westminster and Whitehall. I know that the sector is only going to get stronger. I am prepared for the sector’s asks and you are a great source of soft power and waving the flag for this country”[22]. In 2015 the UN Sustainable Development Goals toward its 2030 Agenda offered artisans a new and powerful argument for priority. Of the 17 SDGs, the craft sector directly addresses 11 Goals including that of ensuring sustainable consumption and production patterns (Goal 12). Perhaps no other industry can claim such an impact on the concept and application of sustainable development. The search for a reliable data base Efforts to secure an understanding of India’s colossal craft advantage have taken place against this backdrop of growing international awareness and receding interest at home. India is an influential member of multilateral institutions which have nurtured the concept of creative and cultural industries. The Jodhpur Consensus was forged on its soil. Yet these facts are in stark contrast to the marginalization of artisans and their crafts that has been apparent since at least 2009. The crisis may well have started much earlier. A year after Independence, the lack of data in 1948 stood in the way of Central and State Governments in extending financial and other assistance to cottage industries. At the initiative of the Board, the Government took steps to gather information on various cottage industries and published them through The Industry and Trade Journal of the then Ministry of Commerce and Industry. A landmark came years later with a 1995 status report on India’s artisans by SRUTI[23]. It pointed out that “India’s proud and industrious artisans were once the background of the Indian economy…. Today, these very artisans have been marginalized by the ‘modernization’ and ‘industrialization’ of society…. Most of them live in abject poverty with no prospects for a better tomorrow…. The new economic and industrial order that is emerging concedes no space to the artisanal sector….. Government schemes and programmes are hijacked away from the poor artisan to the rich industrialist”[24].  A seminal article in the Economic & Political Weekly in 2003by Tirthankar Roy and Maureen Liebl[25]  again highlighted the lack of attention to a huge section of the Indian economy. They stated that “artisanal skills do not command the recognition and respect they deserve. This is partly a reflection of the traditionally low social status of the artisan communities (most of which are caste-based) as well as the low levels of education and high levels of poverty in the sector”. They noted that the handicrafts sector was characterized by “vastly asymmetric information as well as asymmetric capabilities between the artisan and the market operators”. A beginning was attempted by designer Rajeev Sethi in 2006-2007 through a Task Force at the Planning Commission. It offered a compendium of resources and a blueprint titled Past Forward – Future of Indian Creativity[26], a 3-volume effort which found few takers. The result: India has as yet no systems of governance that bring its creative and cultural resources together as engines of growth, despite the scale of these Indian resources as likely to be the largest in the world, with India’s crafts in turn probably the largest component of this sector worldwide. The ‘sunset’ syndrome By 2009 influential opinion described the craft sector as a “sunset industry”, one that seemed embarrassingly out of place with India’s new aspirations of global power. Discussions with authorities by Crafts Council of India (CCI) and its partners revealed that key decision makers had no idea of the scale of India’s craft industry. The only discernible acknowledgement was in export performance, and in perennial lip service to ancient culture. Activists were actually advised to encourage artisans to shift to ‘sunrise’ sectors like IT![27]At the heart of this situation was the difficulty, without robust data, of bringing home the sector’s economic reality and potential, as well as of locating responsibility for such data within the fractured governance of such a diverse sector. One authority advised CCI that there may be some 30 ministries and departments in New Delhi with responsibilities and impinging on crafts and artisans (see box for their current avatars). There is no record of these authorities ever meeting for a joint consultation on the sector. There is no discernable overarching strategy that links them, while a mistaken notion prevails that the future of Indian crafts is really all about exports. This fixation has a history dating back to 1951.[28]
Agriculture

Commerce & Industry

Culture

Development of the Northeast Region

Environment, Forests and Climate Change

Dept of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance

Health & Family Welfare

Dept of J&K Affairs

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs

Human Resource Development

Labour & Employment

Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (which oversees the Khadi & Village Industries Commission)

Minority Affairs

Rural Development

Skill Development & Entrepreneurship

Social Justice & Empowerment

Statistics &Programme Implementation

Textiles (given nodal responsibilities yet not in charge of khadi, while the bulk of Indian crafts are non-textile)

Tourism

Tribal Affairs

Women & Child Development
  The crisis of confusing data How many Indians constitute the world’s largest resource of artisanal skills and wisdom?  4.8M: NCAER (1995-96) 6.5M: Artisans identity cards provided by the Development Commissioners of Handicrafts and Handlooms 6.8M of which 55% are women (Census 2011) 7.5M-12.5M: SRUTI Status Report on India’s artisans 1995, based on 8 crafts 8M: National Sample Survey (date?) 9M-10M ‘craft workers’ or 15% of manufacturing workforce & 8% of GDP (World Bank) 10M–11M (3.5M weavers, 7M other artisans): Official estimate, Ministry of Textiles 12M-16M Sixth Economic Census 2013[29]. 15M: D N Saraf (1982) 15M by 2012: 11th Five-Year Plan forecast 31M: Madras School of Economics (2011, extracted from Census 2001) 70M : attributed on-line to Yojna (2019) 73M : Indian Institute of Foreign Trade(2009) 145-178M : Planning Commission Task Force (2005)[30] 200M:Crafts Council of India/MSE, 2011[31] 250M: Ravi Venkatesan (former Chairman, Microsoft  2015)[32]   The journey toward reliable data By 2009 the impact of such neglect had frustrated efforts by CCI and other activists to help artisans respond to massive changes in domestic and global markets. Most official policies and schemes were unable to reach those for whom they were intended or to reflect huge shifts in demand and market organization. Within the nodal Ministry of Textiles, the two Development Commissioners for Handlooms and Handicrafts had under their purview a list of important crafts yet limited for reasons rooted in the First Plan, leaving out many others. Of the crafts within the purview of the Ministry of Textiles are many that have no link whatsoever to textiles: wood, metal, stone, paper, cane and bamboo among them. Khadi, India’s great contribution to world textiles, is outside the scope of this Ministry. Not to mention gems and jewelry (estimated at 7% of GDP, 15% of exports, and employing 4.6M workers in 2018 expected to rise to over 8M by 2022 according to www.ibef.org), musical instruments, jharoos, chiks, the basic matka upon which millions depend for safe water, kites (until recently), diyas, locks, scissors, festive images/decorations/pandals, handmade utility products made from re-cycled materials, floral crafts, carts, boat-building along India’s 7,500 km coastline and in Lakshwadeep, the Jaipur Foot and other prosthetics and medical devices fashioned by hand ….the list goes on. Working Groups established to support the two Development Commissioners toward the 12th Five-Year Plan underlined the need to resolve these issues of definition, data and governance. Yet priority for such attention is still awaited. Whose job could it be to build a reliable data base for India’s craft sector? Consultations revealed that locating reliable data lacked priority as well as clear responsibility. In the hope that demonstration might speed both, in 2009 CCI decided to strike out on its own[33]. Following discussion with economists, development agencies and academics, the Council approached the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust. It  provided a small grant to conduct a study in two stages:  to first investigate existing sources of information relating to the sector as well as to the challenges of definition, and a second stage of a limited cluster study in two craft-rich districts: Karur (Tamil Nadu) and Kutch (Gujarat). CCI’s Craft Economics & Impact Study(CEIS)[34]commenced in June 2009 and concluded a year later. The importance of crafts to social and political stability emerged strongly. A large proportion of artisans were found located in disadvantaged social groups, their situation compounded by low literacy and educational levels and the narrow portability of traditional skills into a new economy. Women emerged as significant players, representing almost 50% of the sector including high participation at higher skill levels. In both locations, craft practitioners went back several generations and traditional practices dominated. The dynamism inherent in the sector was reflected in changes and technology, materials and markets. Piece-rate payment dominated and 40% of artisans reported 250-300 days of craft activity annually, influenced primarily by rainfall. Eighty percent learnt their skills within the family. Almost a third were struggling entrepreneurs, marketing their products independently[35].This independent ability produced a marked improvement in incomes compared to those who sold to traders. 25% of artisans had received ID cards issued by the Development Commissioner (Handicrafts). Through the CEIS, a modest start had been made toward developing methodologies to study a sector of such complexity, diversity and spread. The task now was to get the outcome reviewed and tested at appropriate levels. CEIS was then shared at a seminar in Kolkata, where a peer review involved participants from economics and other social sciences, architecture, design, media, engineering and crafts. A key recommendation was to endeavor toward a national craft perspective plan that could address issues of economic, technical and social infrastructure and speed artisans’ access to entrepreneurship and to markets. At the seminar, West Bengal Governor Gopalakrishna Gandhi put his finger on the pulse: “The hard argument, the real argument, which overrides all others, is not exclusively about sentiment or reason – but about common sense. And that common sense tells that whatever we do in terms of economic planning and development in India, there will always be several hundred million people in this country, the figure being unverified, who cannot but live with and through the work of their hands. Now it is a great compensation of nature that these hundreds and millions of people have talent in their hand, which the assembly-liners and the free-marketers do not quite concede. And that talent is the unexplored reservoir which needs to be used for their good which means the greater good of the great number of the people of India”[36]. CCI and its partners then took the CEIS output to the Planning Commission. There the largest group of sector stakeholders ever brought together reviewed the CEIS findings under the direction of Dr Syeda Hameed[37]. While its approach and output were endorsed, the need to move toward a more detailed, national exercise was underlined. This led to CEIS findings being forwarded to the Ministry of Statistics& Programme Implementation. MoSPI was then about to launch the Sixth Economic Census. Procedural delays on account of state elections provided an immediate window of opportunity, while Chief Statistician T C A Anant and his colleagues offered understanding and priority. They explained to CCI the constraints of the Census’ focus on ‘economic establishments’: those who are self-employed, who take their products direct to the market, and who spend a minimum of 180 days annually on craft activity. As time was limited, the Census could focus only those crafts under the MoT, leaving outall crafts not within its purview, and others not defined in terms of National Industrial Classification (NIC) codes. This exclusion would also leave out those who work as artisans at certain times of the agricultural cycles, those who produce for self-consumption, for festivities, for informal sale or for barter. The Census would thus count a selection of ‘craft entrepreneurs’ while excluding millions of other craftspersons. And yet it would provide important indicators that could then lead on to further investigation. CCI and its partners were encouraged to understand the Sixth Economic Census as a first essential investigation, and were asked to join EC2013 teams and to help train enumerators in every state and in every major language to understand what is a craft and who is an artisan. Sixth Economic Census 2013: A breakthrough The Sixth Economic Census 2013[38]has proved a watershed achievement, identifying almost 2M craft manufacturing establishments and giving the sector a new and empowering language: no longer just 2M craft establishments but 2M artisan entrepreneurs. Using its cross-cutting estimate for all sectors of 2 persons directly employed per establishment, an EC estimate of direct employment was of over 4M now emerged, representing over 3% of the population and contributing almost 2 % of the Indian economy. Taking into account CCI’s own knowledge that in the craft sector between 6-8 persons are employed per establishment, a guesstimate of employment generated through these ‘establishments’ rose to somewhere between 12M and 16M (or over 9% of the population and over 6% of the economy.(All this, while other estimates of sector employment hovered between 11M and over 200M!) Based on EC findings and taking into account the need to evaluate and verify its data and to analyse some puzzling data sets (e.g. neither Rajasthan nor Gujarat had emerged as top craft-producing states), MoSPI recommended the need to undertake further surveys so as to develop a methodology and design for the proposed Satellite Account specific to ‘handmade in India’ for “assessing the contribution of this important sector” to the national economy[39]. Satellite Account directions: a need for field surveys So who could undertake the task of comparing EC2013 data with other troves of data such as those with the NSSO and with the National Classification of Occupations? Who would conduct the essential field surveys and support the MoSPI with a methodological foundation for the proposed Satellite Account? As in 2012 at the Planning Commission, now once again it was suggested that CCI and its partners as domain experts should now consult with experts to assess what such fieldwork might entail, what teams would need to be assembled, and what resources might be needed for the task. Volunteers who had come together to support CEIS and then to help facilitate the Sixth Economic Census once again fanned out for consultations across the country to better understand what policy makers needed to understand about such a vast and diverse sector: craft employment and income data for craft industries including daily wages per person, data that might help track movements and shifts among those working as artisans, and the identification of key investment and social as well as market priorities. All existing troves of data would need examination. Several areas of Census 2013 data would require identification, selection and clarification, including analysis of state-specific findings. The designing of separate sample-survey strategies for handicrafts and handlooms might be needed, taking into full account surveys already undertaken or underway. Drafting of questionnaires for field use would be needed, with locations carefully selected on craft characteristics. Partners would need to be identified for a field task of developing a research methodology that could later move smoothly into official systems of national accounting. Following consultations with the Indian Statistical Institute in Kolkata, economists associated with the Madras Institute of Development Studies and others, CCI partnered with the Institute for Human Development (New Delhi) to draft research proposals that could attract the support that was now needed to get to work. A national task of this dimension was estimated to cost anywhere between Rs50L and Rs70L, not a large sum in the context of the task but a huge challenge for a small NGO.  NITI Aayog’s research grant facility was recommended as a first window toward fund-raising, with the hope that a NITI Aayog grant might provide credibility that could catalyse other donor support. Research proposals were submitted to NITI Aayog in October 2018, following a Request for Proposals (RFP) on field research toward the proposed Satellite Account and “to arrive at the policy prescription on sector” which “is seen to have huge potential for employment generation and exports. The data would be used to develop satellite account specific to ‘handmade in India’ so as to assess the actual contribution of this important sector to the national economy. A satellite account is a term developed by the United Nations to measure the size of economic sectors that are not defined as industries in national accounts””[40].Other partners, authorities and donors have also been consulted. The process is on-going. In the interim, millions of artisans have been devastated by policy moves that have betrayed little understanding of the size of the sector or of the scale of suffering ill-conceived measures can create. The havoc of demonetization in 2016followed by GST in 2017 has now given way to the impact of an economic slowdown, the incalculable damage that the J&K lockdown has visited upon one of India’s greatest concentrations of craft activity, and unrest in the northeast, where craft activity is dominated by women. Every one of these crises has hit artisan communities at times of the year that should be their peak seasons for earning and market contact.  Where we are today As 2020 opens, over a decade after the crisis of data first emerged and despite the enormous significance of the Sixth Economic Census 2013 and is recommendations, resolving the data crisis is as yet no one’s priority outside of a small circle of craft activists. Throughout this journey they have been repeatedly fobbed off with the excuse that surely all the data that is needed already exists, despite clear indications from those who manage India’s accounting systems that this simply isn’t so, and the stark reality of current estimates and guesstimates varying from 11M to over 200M.The search continues for both understanding and resources with which to undertake the fieldwork that must be the essential foundation for a census, or Satellite Account, specific to handmade in India. What is at stake? Attention is being drawn to India’s so-called informal sector that still accounts for over 90% of the national workforce, including artisans, while a frightening  prospect of ‘jobless growth’ emerges as new technologies enter the mechanized sector. India is said to be losing an estimated 550 jobs a day, and there is growing anxiety of overseas pressures within its ‘sunrise’ IT sector. Controversy surrounds official claims of over 1M new jobs created annually. In 2017 the Government of India identified 4,000 traditional product manufacturing clusters that include handlooms, handicrafts and other traditional products.  It is here that outreach is essential to provide capacities that young artisans now demand: entrepreneurship, language, marketing savvy and access to design, technology and e-commerce. What can be achieved has been brilliantly demonstrated by young masters developed by activist Judy Frater[41] in Kutch through design and management training tailored to rural artisans, and again at Sally Holkar’s Handloom School[42]in Maheshwar (Madhya Pradesh). The demand for admission and the professionalism of the alumni emerging through these opportunities indicate beyond any doubt the potential of craft as a calling that can respond to the aspirations of today’s youth. Investment and outreach are needed to take achievements to scale. If it is acknowledged that only low-technology, labour-intensive strategies will create jobs for rural millions, could an improved system of national accounting of artisans and their crafts offer silver bullets of knowledge, wisdom and investment opportunity? Could robust data help transfer millions into a mainstream of dignity and hope?  If data alone cannot provide all the answers, could it at least reveal the strength and capacity of a giant waiting in the wings with extraordinary advantages? To these can be added yet another: the trends that have emerged worldwide in response to the pervasive and illusive concept of sustainability: the return to ‘small is beautiful’, the rise of moral capitalism with its focus on social goods, a new generation with new patterns of consumption that include a search for experience and relevance, and a de-globalisation that focuses on local production, local brands and on-line growth.[43] Where can we go from here? For those who have endured together over this journey of a decade and more, the global Sustainable Development Goals seemed to offer the greatest chance for change, if anyone would finally listen. Yet the Index & Dashboard just released by NITI Aayog[44] on India’s SDG performance makes no mention of crafts although the sector contributes directly to 11 of the 17 SDGs – no mention of the sector’s massive contribution to Goals of poverty reduction, decent work, and sustainable industry. No mention, not even under Goal 12 (‘Responsible production and consumption’) that is almost a manifesto for the country’s artisanal advantage. None of this is surprising. In a sector with so little data, where can NITI Aayog find the data to feed its SDG Index? Yet possibly no other industry can match handcrafts for the contribution they make to what today constitutes the universal agenda for real progress through access to rights, to empowerment and justice, and for responsible production and consumption that can protect our fragile planet and future generations. What makes the Index & Dashboard lacuna significant is that at the 2015 Paris Summit on Climate Change, Prime Minister Modi gifted each delegate with a documentation[45] of India’s traditional climate wisdom --  rich with handmade examples relating to nine key sectors: energy, agriculture, biodiversity, food, health, shelter, textiles, apparel and water! In the words of Shikha Mukerjee, an activist in Kolkata who has followed this seemingly endless journey toward robust sector data and refuses to give up: “India’s artisans are hidden in plain sight. Their work is in our homes, our public institutions, airports, in the hospitality industry, in the faith-based economy. Their work is tagged and held in depositories across the world. Every visiting foreign delegation and every visit by an Indian delegation to foreign lands includes products from the artisan sector, treasures of exquisite design and workmanship. The value of the products is therefore not in question. The value of the producer is”.[46] Another tireless colleague is Uzramma, who has devoted decades to the cause of weavers in Andhra and elsewhere. From Hyderabad, she observes: “As the tide of the times changes in favour of low-energy technologies the living craft industries of India will come into their own, bring with them hope of redistribution of wealth in society, of regeneration of nature, of freedom from market domination. Craft skills will proliferate, craftspersons and their abilities will gain respect. Lost or forgotten artisan skills, like blue-glazing of earthenware, or herbal tanning of leather might be rediscovered. Society needs the craftsperson’s practical intelligence, gained from constant hands-on interaction with materials. This will be the greatest contribution to society of a resurgent Indian craft industry”[47].Karnataka’s Prasanna, playwright and founder of the Gram Seva Sangh, has called for a return to Gandhian economist J C Kumarrappa’s  ‘economy of permanence’ or what Prasanna prefers to describe as a ‘sacred economy’  representing systems of production that ensure 60% use of  human labour and 60% use of  local materials[48]. One could turn to the wisdom of Prof Krishna Kumar: “The need is for a contemporary vision of the Indian village which can comprehend the process of transformation to modernity of 60% of our people and to do this within their own locations. In such a transformation, handcraft has a critical position, supplementing as well as substituting existing livelihood opportunities and ensuring that ‘modernity’ is not confused with the hopelessness of migration to urban slums or the inequities of current preoccupations with statistical growth….This reality suggests that the artisan may be India’s ultimate resource for a scientific, value-based modernity”[49]. Almost a century before the Sustainable Development Goals were declared and before that stirring EU slogan of a future that is handmade, the Mahatma had urged a nation yearning for freedom to comprehend the vital connection between the value of its crafts and its understanding of national wealth.  In the same year, Gurudev gave his vision of crafts as an expression of “life in its completeness”.  What might it finally take to help awaken us into that heaven? Annex 3 Sharada Ramanathan, The Hindu, June 2012 India must pay more attention to its creative industries not just for the profits they generate but as enablers of sustainable human development: The Copyright Act (Amendment) Bill, 2012 passed recently by Parliament, is a landmark beginning for the Indian creative sector. In an era that is overwhelmed by global commercial interests for short-term gains, the collective consciousness of a mighty heritage, perhaps involuntarily, heard the voice of the individual artist who has been central to the ethos of its civilization. The very fact that this Amendment got passed reflects a larger need to focus on the creative sector not merely as a tool for profitability but as an organic agency for human development and sustainability. But India's ambition to be a “superpower” by 2020 at the cost of her soft power heritage has run into tangible trouble: between 1997 and 2006, at least 1,66,304 farmers committed suicide in India, resulting in recent farmer uprisings against the usurping of land by corporates and the state. In Andhra Pradesh alone, at least 2,000 weavers committed suicide between 2006 and 2011. Is this “superpower” model going against the very fundamentals of India's “soft power”? Three characteristics distinguish India: a 5,000-year-old extant, unbroken, well-documented, civilizational, cultural heritage; an overwhelming population of no less than 1.2 billion; and a living laboratory for pluralistic development without a common spoken language. While other countries may share some of these characteristics, India is unique in having to factor all of them into any developmental plan, thus necessitating an original blueprint. The Indian arts and cultural sector has the inherent capacity to create the desirable models of development. Indian crafts alone can potentially employ about 25 per cent of India's population. For example, the north-eastern hilly state of Manipur is being industrialized at a heavy cost due to its topography. The crafts sector could be revitalized as a nerve centre of Manipur's development as its soil is congenial to growing bamboo, and since it has traditionally produced master craftsmen of bamboo products. While this rehabilitation is integral to peace and development in the State, it equally calls for radical transformation in governance. Annex 1 Indicators of the invisible power of Indian crafts In the absence of robust data, evidence of the economic contribution of artisans has remained largely anecdotal. Yet these examples communicate the potential of what reliable data may finally deliver in terms of understanding and priority: Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2014 pointed out that the kite-making, then unrecognized officially as a craft, constituted a Rs500 crore industry in Gujarat alone. This rose to Rs700 crore in January 2016 (and to Rs625 crore in 2018) according to the state Chief Minister, with 70% of output from women, 90% of employment generated within minority communities and over 30,000 persons employed in Ahmedabad alone. Employment during the Sankrant season in 2019 was estimated at 50,000 of whom 3,000 were regular migrants each year to Ahmedabad from UP. In 2020, only 500 were reported to have come on account of the widespread liquidity crunch. The impact of GST and the recession has decimated this industry in Gujarat – a 30% drop in business was reported in the first week of January 2020 (Times of India 4.1.2020). The national dimensions of this popular craft remain unknown, like many others. The Times of India estimated in 2015 that the economic impact of a single regional festival, that of Durga Puja in West Bengal,  was of about Rs40,000 crore, much of it representing hand production. In a country of year-long festivity spread to every corner of the land, the economics of festival crafts is left to the imagination. The Crafts Council of India experienced a turnover of over US$20,000 at a recent Santa Fe International Folk Art Market, achieved by young Indian artisans who have emerged as masters and entrepreneurs in their own right. Success at Santa Fe (New Mexico, USA) is considered a benchmark for the capability of traditional crafts worldwide to flourish in today’s markets. The Industree Foundation (Bangalore) has developed data systems that demonstrate what entrepreneurship can achieve by leveraging sector data effectively. Industree Foundation has innovated a Creative Million Mission, now in its third year, to impact the economic and social status of women artisans. The Mission has received a US$3M grant through White House intervention, and will raise the equivalent of an additional $6M from state authorities and the private sector. At an 8-day craft event in Pune featuring 100 artisans, Dastakari Haat Samiti reported a sale of Rs2.4crore, without any subsidies. Earlier, at an Oxford (UK) craft show which attracted some 250 participants, 10 artisans brought from India by the Samiti registered business worth GBL20,000 in three days, far ahead of China. A Kashmiri artisan won the First Prize with his embroidered shawl. The Samiti reports on the astronomical bids made on-line for stalls at the Dilli Haat for periods of 1-3 months. Perhaps reflecting the affluence of traders rather than actual artisans for whom this facility was originally intended, the bids nevertheless reflect the level of domestic demand for handmade quality. Annex2 Extract from the International Database of Cultural Policies[50] “Though the arts/culture distinction is not in itself unique, what is perhaps unique is an elaborate cultural policy centrally tied to India’s ‘development’ vision.  First, that India’s cultural policy presumes that India’s cultural resources, represented by the artisan-producer and crafts-producer, are a repository of national resources, and as such are central to the very enterprise of nationalism, informing all of its programmes.
  • Second, that they contribute a crucial component to India’s nationalist project of identifying and protecting its national heritage.
  • Third, while the protection and sustenance of the artisan has a cultural justification as representative of national heritage, it is nevertheless its economic component that gives it such visibility, informing the most ambitious and difficult aspect of national development: the agenda of agrarian reform
  • Fourth, that the administrative elements of culture that arise from such imperatives therefore most directly impact the field of education, so that the Department of Culture, from the inception of Independence, is located in the Ministry of Education (until 1985, when it was shifted into the newly formed Ministry of Human Resource Development)
  • And five, perhaps most daringly, the founding documents would claim that the nationalist programme presents no contradiction – indeed, a synergy – between the support and development of artisanal practices on the one hand and the stated nationalist goals of industrialism and the emphasis on science and technology on the other”.
Endnotes 1]Life in its Completeness”: Rabindranath Tagore’s legacy of though and action on artisans and crafts. Crafts Council of India, Chennai, 2018 [2] http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld  [3] Mahatma Gandhi in Young India, May 1919 [4]International Database on Cultural Policy offers insights.See Annex 2. [5]First Five-Year Plan, Planning Commission, Government of India,1951 [6]https://epch.in/policies/exportsofhandicrafts.htm [7]http://cepc.co.in/industry-at-a-glance in [8]https://gjepc.org/admin/StatisticsExport/698945475_Total%20Exports%20of%20Gem%20&%20Jewellery%20(2008-09%20to%202017-18).pdf [9] See Annex 1 for other evidence. [10]Indian Express, Sept 2 2019 [11] See Eighth Five-Year Plan, Planning Commission, Government of India 1992. The World Trade Organization has contributed this definition: “Artisanal products are those produced by artisans, either completely by hand, or with the help of hand tools or even mechanical means, as long as the direct manual contribution of the artisan remains the most substantial component of the finished product. The special nature of artisanal products derives from their distinctive features which can be utilitarian, aesthetic, creative, culturally attached, decorative, functional, traditional, religiously and socially symbolic and significant.” UNESCO-UNCTAD/WTO (ITC), Manila Oct 1997 [12] See Value of Craft: The Indian Case, Priyatej Kotipalli, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 2018 [13] Prince Claus Fund for Culture & Development, The Hague, 2003 [14] How cultural and creative industries can power human development in the 21st century: Thangavel Palanivel, UNDP Deputy Director of the Human Development Report Office, 23 January, 2019 [15]Unesco. Asia-Pacific Creative Communities: A Strategy for the 21st Century, Senior Experts Symposium, 22-26 February 2005, Jodhpur, India. [16] Creative Economy Report 2013, http://www.unesco.org/culture/pdf/creative-economy-report-2013-pdf See also Unesco’s Reshaping Cultural Policies 2015 on Monitoring the 2005 Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (creative-economy-report-2015.pdf). This 2015 report provides indicators for tracking culture in national development planning. [17]https://www.iadb.org/en/news/news-releases/2017-07-13/orange-economy-innovations-in-lac%2C11841.html [18] www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/12/creative-industries-worth-world-economy/ [19] Creative Economy Outlook: Trends in international trade in creative industries. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2018/3 [20]European Framework for Action on Cultural Heritage. oecd.org/cfe/leed/culture-and-creative-sectors.htm [21]INDIA 2010, Business Standard Books, The Craft Sector: Crisis and Opportunity, Ashoke Chatterjee, p 83 [22]thecreativeindustries.co.uk/creative-industries-praised-for-economic-contribution [23]India’s Artisans – A Status Report, SRUTI Society for Rural, Urban and Tribal Initiative 1995. There has been no effort since that can match the detail and thought invested in the SRUTI Report. [24]Ibid [25]Handmade in India: Preliminary Analysis of Crafts Producers and Crafts Production, Economic and Political Weekly, December 27 2003pp 5366-5376 [26] Planning Commission, Government of India/Rajeev Sethi, Asian Heritage Foundation [27] Direct employment in the IT sector: 4M in 2017 and over 10M indirectly employed [28] India’s 1st Five Year Plan reflected the urgent priority in those years of earning foreign exchange. This led to the decisions to position crafts within the then Ministry of Commerce. With shifts that have taken place since in Ministry oversight, the export-driven decision-making has been sustained. Yet activists know that it is the domestic market for handmade quality that dominates the industry. Exports are the icing on the cake: in 2018-19 these were estimated at $4.4B out of a global trade of about $230B, or about 2%. [29]2M identified craft entrepreneurs or “commercial establishments”, extrapolated with CCI estimate of 6-8 persons per weaver/artisan employed in pre- and post-production processes [30]Quoted in Values of Craft: The Indian Case, Priyatej Kotipalli,Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 2018. The number is not limited to crafts and extends to other traditional art forms and knowledge system. The same Task Force report on page 18 of volume 1 mentions 225-255M skilled/potential practitioners. [31] Using extrapolation factors corresponding to a pilot study, 8th Five-Year Plan estimates, and a study of industrial codes : Crafts Council of India/MSE, 2011 [32] Sunday Times of India, 15 March, 2015 [33] In the absence of strong data, one strategy has been to collect anecdotal information that can help communicate the power of this sector. See Annex 1. [34]Craft Economics and Impact Study April 2011, Craft Council of India, Chennai [35]  This finding would resonate 4 years later through the Sixth Economic Census 2013 [36]Craft Economics & Impact Study, Crafts Council of India, Chennai. April 2011 [37] Member, Planning Commission, Government of India, 2004-2014 [38] All India Report on Sixth Economic Census, Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Central Statistics Office, New Delhi. March 2016. [39]Ibid, page 86 [40] Public notice on the NITI Aayog website quoted in the Economic Times, October 16, 2018: Handicraft industry data on artisans, units soon, Yogima Seth Sharma [41]Judy Frater’s pioneering experiments began at Kala RakshaVidyalaya at Tunda Vandh and moved to  the Somaiya Kala Vidya which she established in Adipur. [42]www.thehandloomschool.org [43]Management consultant Ruchir Sharma in conversation with Prannoy Roy, NDTV, 12 January 2020. [44]https://niti.gov.in/sdg-india-index-dashboard-2019-20  December 30, 2019. Mentioned are procurement practices, and sustainable buildings/construction, tourism, food systems, consumer information, lifestyle and education. [45]Parampara: India’s Culture of Climate Friendly Sustainable Practices, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change/ Centre for Environment Education, Ahmedabad 2015 [46]Correspondence with author. [47]Crafts show the way for Indian industrialization, Uzramma. Alternative Futures: India Unshackled, Authors UpFront, 2017 [48]The Hindu, 6.12.2019. [49] 2nd Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay Memorial Lecture, Prof Krishna Kumar. Centre for Cultural Resources and Training (CCRT, New Delhi), February 2011 [50]www.worldcp.org/world-cp-asia-php and Ashish Rajadhyaksha et al in World CP-India Country Profile.pdf

Handicraft Articles Made with Cane,
Santa Clara la Laguna, on the banks of lake Atitlan is situated 147 kms from Guatemala. Though placed in spectacular natural beauty, the people of this region live in extreme hardship and poverty: 85% exist below the poverty line with 65% illiteracy, high levels of child malnutrition, lack of basic infrastructure and 60% unemployment. The people of this region belong to the ancient Mayan culture and the K’che’ indigenous ethnic group. One of the most traditional activities of this community is the manual crafting of articles from cane fibre. Cane plants grow by the lake and each craftsperson has their own crop. Cane is an incredible natural resource which flourishes the more it is cut, ensuring the ecological sustainability of the system. A project financed by the Social Service Department of the Council of Madrid, Spain, and carried out by both CIDEAL, in Madrid, and FUNDAP, in Guatemala, was directed to promote sustainable development of the handicraft producers and their families, who work the cane fibre, exploiting the abundantly locally available resource. The beneficiaries of this project belong to the poorest social class, and are unable to fulfill their basic daily needs; consequently, they lack housing, education, and employment. Two complementary actions were carried out simultaneously in order to achieve the main aims of the project:
  1. The first action was focused on social organization of the sector and the creation of a productive structure that joined 150 indigenous artisans: men and women, who work in the sector.
  2. The second action provided the artisans with training, technical assistance, bank credits and help to commercialization, so as to achieve better quality and a more efficient diversified production. This would allow easier access of the products to the national and international markets in the required conditions.
INNOVARTE also organized the attendance of the artisans to commercial fairs such as Biocultura Madrid 2003, in Spain. This represented the effort made by the project executing entities, CIDEAL and FUNDAP to put craftpersons in direct contact with their consumers avoiding intermediaries thereby ensuring that the artisans received the maximum economic gain. Apart from exhibiting the craft objects, the fairs also provide the opportunity for the creator to meet his consumer exchange ideas and create awareness and a knowledge base of grass-root art activities.
SERVICES PROVIDED BY INNOVARTE
  • Technological Innovation in Production: in which research of raw material is conducted, followed by the technological transfer required to optimize the craft and semi-craft manufacturing process. Great importance is also given to the quality control to reach standards needed in international markets.
  • Product Design: Design, for Innovarte, is the key to help improve craft articles. The whole process is reconsidered, studied and modified according to international trends. New collections based on the market are designed, but always preserving the local cultural features.
  • Marketing: Innovarte is concerned with the importance of international trends and consumer’s tastes. It brings this information to the craftmen/women. It is also involved in the process of presentation of the articles with correct packaging and labels, required to communicate properly with the customer. Innovarte undertakes market research, products test, creation of a brand, together with assistance to craftspersons to participate in fairs and thereby creating channels of distribution.
  • Image and Promotion: Innovarte organizes special events; designs catalogues, advertising material and web sites, aimed to help the articles be present in different markets and improve sales.
  • Training: Innovarte also provides training in the form of courses, seminars, conferences for both craftmen and their trainers and NGO staff, organizing the interchange of information and experiences among different entities and crafts associations.
For further information please contact:
Innovarte Glorieta de Bilbao C/Sagasta, 1-1 C 28004 Madrid Spain Phone: 0034 91 448 56 04 Email: [email protected] Web: www.innovarte.net
 

Handicrafts in Indian Schools, The quest for purpose and relevance
Issue #008, 2021                                                                              ISSN: 2581- 9410 Seventy-five years of freedom is an appropriate milestone for reflection on the state of artisans in India, and what has been achieved as well as what remains to be done to ensure a future for their wisdom and skills. Securing crafts within formal systems of education can be one important means. It was advocated during the movement for freedom and accepted as policy once Independence was achieved. Yet implementation has been inconsistent, as has been understanding. Well before the Covid, the sector found itself mired in a crisis of misunderstanding and neglect. Grappling with the devastating impact of the pandemic, artisans and their well-wishers have been trying to innovate ways to help restore, to whatever extent possible, livelihoods and markets lost over these difficult months. The need has never been greater to generate awareness of what makes artisans and their crafts vital to national wellbeing. Their future depends on new generations, and education is the only path to bringing artisans and their crafts into the consciousness of young Indians. Absorbing the value of their craft heritage and understanding what it will take for that heritage to endure may be the only insurance towards a sustainable future for millions of artisans. To achieve this, notions of craft education in schools may need to strengthen the pedagogical approaches of the past while also going beyond those to position artisans and their crafts firmly within the larger development challenges facing India and the world. Fresh opportunities have emerged, and they demand attention.   Sustaining crafts in a post-Covid scenario Moving the pedagogic understanding of crafts beyond issues of culture, aesthetics, materials and skills can give these elements greater conviction if reinforced with an appreciation of the social, political and management dimensions which constitute the actual context of India’s crafts. To this can be added a link between the handmade   and the global understanding of sustainable development. Such awareness is relatively new, yet it can enrich schools with vast opportunities for learning, relevance and priority. Thus, craft education in schools may now need to emerge as an interdisciplinary understanding of all that is needed to keep Planet Earth a safe place for future generations -- no longer as a ‘soft’ extra-curricular option, but as a core capacity toward comprehension of some of the greatest challenges faced by human society.   Crafts in Indian education before and after freedom The importance of establishing an overarching context for craft education in schools is not new. Rabindranath Tagore began his pioneering work in this direction more than a century ago at Santi Niketan. He sought an integration of craft heritage into education at every level, and for this he drew on craft cultures and experiences in many parts of the world. For Mahatma Gandhi, the value and dignity of handwork was central to a Nai Talim that could make Indian education relevant to social and political challenges that would come with Independence, and translating political freedom into emancipation from oppression and want. These examples inspired the revival efforts of Kamala Devi Chattopadhyay and Rukmani Devi Arundale through the institutions they established and led, while Pupul Jayakar linked craft education directly to the Krishnamurthy network of experimental schools. Others too were motivated over many years. The Crafts Council of India, Craft Revival Trust, Paramparik Karigar, Centre for Cultural Resources & Training, National Institute of Design, National Institute of Fashion Technology and IITs are among those who have made valiant attempts to link artisans to formal education. Yet here we are, 75 years on, aware that contact with India’s craft heritage within India’s schooling system remains a rare exception. While there has never been a shortage of genuflection at the craft alter, evidence of actual action on craft education is scattered and incomplete.  Mantras extolling our ancient heritage continue like a tanpura’s drone, relegated as background effect. All this comes to attention at a time when artisans need awareness and support more than ever, their wisdom understood within a wider context of human development and the future of the planet.  These connections need to be established within the classroom if craft education is not to remain a cultural token, and students left unaware of how understanding the handmade is a passage to understanding their world. More than a century ago Rabindranath Tagore’s experiments at craft education were linked to what he described as “life in its completeness”[1]. It is to that grand and integrated understanding that craft education in schools may now need to return.   While history needs time and space, it may be useful to revisit at least some key developments that followed Independence. The finest historian of these is Prof Krishna Kumar, former head of the National Council for Education Research & Training (NCERT) and an indefatigable champion of this cause. Its passage was reviewed some years ago by Prof Kumar in an article contributed to SEMINAR magazine. Harkening back to efforts in 1937, we learn of Gandhiji’s spirited advocacy over opposition from many sides, including leftist opposition to craft as ‘child labour’ and Congress-Muslim League differences on Basic Education. Despite cynicism and confusion, the idea of craft education in schools was implemented after 1947 wherever Gandhi’s nai talim was imparted through Basic Schools. These helped produce a generation which Prof Kumar describes as having received “something different from the staple of colonial schooling…The desire to make things with one’s own hands and the confidence that one can make all kinds of things…if the basic urge to recreate the world is not muzzled.”[2]   Nai talim was certainly an inspiration to Kamala Devi Chattopadhyay and Dr Kapila Vatsyayan. Together they established the Centre for Cultural Resources & Training (CCRT) in 1979. Interestingly they located CCRT under the Ministry of Culture rather than that of Education. Its purpose was to foster a holistic commitment of education that would encompass cognitive, emotional and spiritual development: “Education at all stages has been regarded as a powerful instrument for social transformation. The major task of education in India today is to usher in a democratic, socialistic, secular society which removes prejudices among people. The objectives of introducing crafts in schools are to help in the realization of these goals. Therefore, not only does it form an integral part of the school curriculum, but has its ramifications into other subjects of the school curriculum”[3]. CCRT advocated a healthy interest in crafts as offering in early school years the key advantages of bilateral brain coordination, enhanced cognitive development, strengthened visual learning and problem-solving skills. The training of educators for government-run schools became a core CCRT responsibility, and artisans and crafts were incorporated into the development of learning materials for schools and training programs for teachers. CCRT’s objectives clearly stated that experienced craftsmen “though not fully educated in the formal way” would be associated with CCRT efforts to “expose students to the rich Indian cultural heritage”[4].  CCRT workshops introduced teachers to crafts, encouraging them to learn pottery, clay modeling, papier-mâché, mask-making, tie & dye, rangoli, wall decorations, cane and bamboo work, book-binding and making paper toys. Although CCRT’s outreach is to Government schools, its example and model stimulated wider awareness and advocacy. NGOs like the Crafts Council of India and the India Foundation for the Arts cooperated and drew on the CCRT experience toward opportunities in private and informal schools.   Despite CCRT and others’ efforts, the concept of Basic Education all but vanished in the official sector in the wake of the seminal Kothari Report (1964-1966). This established the 10+2+3 framework for Indian education, its influence extending over the next decades into the 1986 National Policy on Education which emerged under Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi. India was now entering a new phase of its development and “craft-centered education for children started to look like an unnecessary, idyllic whim”[5].  School administrators, parents, teachers and students were now focused on moving through school in phases carefully regulated by exams, not cognition.   It is worth noting that the 1986 Policy emphasized the linkages essential for a child to discover her latent talent and to use it for creative expression that could draw upon her own environment.  Yet despite all the evidence of the contribution that craft learning can offer for fostering the creative development of a child and advancing her core skills as well as academic achievement, the pressures of an examination-oriented system proved overwhelming. Creativity through arts and crafts as well as other extra-curricular activities was pushed to the sidelines by academic burdens.   A new century looks at craft education Fast forward then to a new century that has seen several efforts at reviving the importance of crafts within the school system.  The focus has remained on the value of heritage, with only token acknowledgement of a broader social and political context. NCERT has remained the key institution. In 2004 it recommended that CBSE schools should incorporate what was termed as ‘work education’, with crafts as part.  The next year in 2005 NCERT introduced syllabi for Classes 11 and 12 that could link craft education through other learning, including the relationships of craft heritage to dimensions of aesthetics, economics, environment and culture. NCERT emphasized the importance of understanding craft processes in an age dominated by technology. Schools’ efforts to impart basic craft processes, philosophy, aesthetics and theory could draw on the thinking and demonstration of Tagore, Gandhi, Ananda Coomaraswamy, Kamala Devi Chattopadhyay and Pupul Jayakar. The hope was in stimulating respect for diversity, hand skills and manual work while exposing young people to aesthetic experience and heritage values that could demonstrate a relevance between tradition and modernity. NCERT made specific reference to CCI, Dilli Haat, museums and markets as resources, as well as to the importance of field exposure through interaction with artisans in the locality. A project approach was recommended, and text books developed to support these directions. A year later in 2006, a Focus Group on heritage craft produced a position paper which included a call to create a pool of artisans who could be trained as educators in schools. The Group underlined the importance of developing materials and linkages with resource persons and institutions. Its recommendations included contact with CCI, Jaya Jaitly, Fab India, NID, NIFT, Dakshin Chitra, Sanskriti and Sasha.  Important to note is a list of resource persons and institutions provided to help to take recommendations forward.  Yet response remained modest to NCERT’s urge that schools create “respect for crafts persons and for craftsmanship” as the “integral aim of these recommendations”[6]. In 2008 a syllabus emerged for Heritage Crafts in Arts Education’ and a text book on heritage crafts was published in 2011. This reflected the joint contributions of Shobita Punja, Faisal Alkazi, Jaya Jaitly and Laila Tyabji. Despite a syllabus and materials, only a handful of schools have taken advantage of the NCERT syllabus. Resistance to further ‘burdens’ on a system already under stress, parent and teacher concerns over ‘distraction’ from examination preparation, and the paucity of teachers with any understanding of crafts have contributed to this disappointing record.   Throughout these years NCERT through Prof Krishna Kumar has championed the cause of crafts heritage as an essential element of school education, a cause reviewed at length in Prof Kumar’s Kamala Devi Chattopadhyay Memorial Lecture at CCRT in February 2011[7]. Change clearly demands basic reform to an education system still dominated by colonial preoccupations with examinations and certificates, not with learning. Only a major overhaul can help India’s education systems recognize crafts not only as culture but also as livelihood for millions, as a gigantic industry, as a resource of scientific and technological knowledge, and as a powerful means of social justice.   While several disciplines will have to be brought together to give young people the touch and feel of this transformational opportunity, preparing such ground and context has hardly begun. Instead, ignorance of the sector within systems of authority and governance remains monumental and crafts have almost disappeared from India’s official school education systems[8]. We are back at a time when most stakeholders are as unaware as they may have been a century ago about the contribution that our craft heritage can make to a child’s academic and personal growth, yet at a time when Covid is demanding a re-assessment of everything society knows and does, there is a real opportunity for reviving the cause as well as for taking craft education beyond a single heritage and into an understanding of other factors which together constitute human wellbeing.   What needs to change? The NEP opportunity Past developments offer a backdrop to the major opportunity that now emerges through the New Education Policy of 2020[9]. The NEP advocates education that is rooted within an Indian ethos and in the Constitutional duties and responsibilities of citizenship to protect and enhance our cultural heritage. The Policy encourages critical thinking and creativity, and calls attention to the importance of cultural and artistic development in early childhood.  It seeks to remove the ‘silos and barriers that have been raised between subjects and learning opportunities, recognizing the importance of design thinking if creativity is to be promoted as a 21st century capacity. The NEP makes specific reference to project and enquiry-based learning. As part of such experiential learning, the Policy advocates student exposure to local crafts persons, suggesting that schools hire “local eminent persons/experts as master instructors”. These recommendations are focused on middle school years i.e., Classes 6 to 8. It is in these critical years that NEP seeks to ignite learning by linking the physical and social sciences with mathematics, arts and humanities. There may be no stronger link available than craft processes and the wisdom that informs them. The NEP is thus a huge opportunity to take issues of craft education in schools to another level of understanding and demonstration. To use that opportunity, it may be useful now to bring together the persons who have provided years of thought and recommendation, and with them to revisit past efforts, moving to a fresh understanding of present-day opportunities, resources and to address new concerns such as the impact of AI and robotics on the future of crafts.    The NEP opportunity demands attention to providing a foundation for taking off from where the past century has brought us and taught us in terms of needs within classrooms as well as the challenges of actual implementation. Among these are creating flexibility within rigid exam-oriented syllabi, appreciation of the value of handwork among parents and educators, training of educators in learning approaches in an area of knowledge that can be new to most, and dealing with the centuries-old stigma of caste that continues to place the holders of our craft heritage at the very bottom of the social ladder. Could this be an initiative for Craft Revival Trust? Could the Trust help move NEP into nationwide action at a time when the Covid pandemic demands that we use every opportunity not only to promote the sales of artisanal products, expanding this to opportunities that artisans should be given as India’s cutting-edge educators? Could such a thrust encourage understanding of handicrafts as an expression of sustainable development as the global community now understands it? Linking the skills and wisdom of artisans to the UN’s seventeen Sustainable Development Goals can offer limitless school opportunities not just for an integrated understanding of development as human wellbeing but equally for demonstrating those interdisciplinary linkages that the NEP underlines as essential to 21st century learning that is both Indian as well as global in relevance and wisdom. This would be a fitting tribute to the legacy of Tagore and Gandhi and to such pioneering spirits as Kamala Devi, Pupulji and Kapila Vatsyayan.   Yet there is a need for caution, returning us to Prof Krishna Kumar: “One major reason why the introduction of handicrafts at school looks difficult to implement now is because of the popular perception that it has failed once. The notion that ideas ‘succeed’ or ‘fail’ is entrenched in the world of decision-makers at all levels. Who wants to give a failed idea a second run when so many shining new ideas are being relentlessly supplied by the IT industry, engineers-turned-educators and management gurus, not to forget the multilateral agencies which invent terms and programs quite regularly for Third World consumption? India’s heritage crafts don’t fit in the commonly peddled vision of ‘developed’ - The dream of becoming a developed nation is fast becoming like manufacturing twenty-eight flavours of ice cream with one taste. On the other hand, handicrafts are perhaps the most representative symbol of India’s cultural plurality. They signify the integration of work and values, in a context which recognizes the presence of the artist in every human being, and a craft product was meant to be used in the course of everyday living…all were designed to be of use even as they infused the daily journey of life with continuous aesthetic strength, acting like a cultural drip irrigation device. It will be a good idea to try linking education with crafts once again, but with the requisite hindsight to avoid earlier mistakes, because both sectors are facing a similar crisis. …It is a well-established fact that India’s education system has stayed moribund partly because of the colonial legacies of administration and financial management, but mainly because of older cultural legacies which divide literacy and intellectual learning from manual work and dexterity. Our national failure to universalize elementary education and to reform the system so that it stops acting like a crude instrument of social exclusion of the so-called weaker sections (including over 10 million artisans), has to do as much with the cultural character of the curriculum as with our rigid administrative practices…. Delays in implementing reforms have cost us heavily. Far from nurturing self-confidence and initiative in the young, our system makes them feel alienated from the larger society and scared of exercising personal judgment in any sphere of life. It neither trains the senses, nor does it nurture sensibility. For millions, the system continues to act, as it did in the late-nineteenth century, as a means of getting a piece of paper which offers the promise of ever-scarce office jobs. The need to link work and education has been one of the loudest refrains in post-independence history of policy discussions, but little progress has been made in reducing the gap between mental and manual work which forms one of the oldest negative values in our culture….There is no reason why we cannot revisit Gandhi’s idea of introducing crafts into the school curriculum, not as an extracurricular activity, but rather as an experience which will give greater meaning and depth to the rest of the curriculum. If we think about this matter afresh and work on it with imagination and hindsight, we might reform the system of education in a manner which only the crafts can help us reform, and in the process, we might also provide to our heritage of crafts a major institutional space where new designs, techniques, relationships and visions can flourish. Like much else in a caste-ridden social order, both the knowledge and skill aspects of crafts have suffered from the effects of isolation and stagnation. Linking formal education with crafts could help foster creativity in both”[10].   Caste: a wandering elephant in India’s craft space Within such a holistic approach there is the need to return to the neglected issue of caste in India’s craft experience. Over these years of effort on the education front, the caste factor has been left largely unaddressed, the unacknowledged elephant left wandering in the crafts space. Caste has a determining role in the past, present and future of artisans. The value of India’s craft heritage cannot be grasped by the young unless they also are encouraged to understand how that heritage has passed down through generations, as well as the oppressive systems that have ensured the survival of craft skills at a social cost that is unacceptable today. Craft heritage needs now to be integrated into an understanding of movements for social transformation, which in turn demand that craft education reflect an interdisciplinary approach that can draw on history, sociology, anthropology and economics so as to offer a context for appreciating the sector’s contemporary relevance. Hopefully, schools can encourage inclusion of local artisans as educators, and open opportunities for artisans’ children to participate in learning environments with their more privileged peers. Interactions of this kind could offer pride, dignity and opportunity for those from within hereditary traditions, while offering outsiders the chance to learn under their mentorship and to respect those whom society has too long relegated as outcastes. The outcome could go beyond awareness and sensitization to opening and encouraging future career choices within which crafts are not a life sentence imposed by caste but rather a door open to all, to that magical quality which Tagore celebrated as “life in its completeness”.   Seventy years on, the caste reality remains in place, modified by all that has happened and not happened over this period and yet a powerful factor dominating millions of lives. Social stratification continues to place artisans at the bottom of the social ladder, with oppression including the dominance of power structures within ancient caste structures. Yet these very structures also provide the social and financial safety nets which government schemes continue to deny the millions of artisans who together constitute India’s second source of livelihood after agriculture. Artisans remain dependent on their own communities in myriad ways. Any change in the future of artisans may depend on changes within caste systems which act as both barriers to change in power equations as well as the only reliable social insurance available. Craft education within schools will need to underline a collective responsibility toward building a truly democratic and inclusive society, a precondition for craft heritage to move into a future on its own terms and reflecting its own aspirations.   It is interesting to speculate why the caste dimension received little attention in efforts since freedom to link heritage crafts to an Indian modernity. Tagore and Gandhi recognized this need yet it did not translate into concentrated attention from the celebrated pioneers of India’s craft renaissance. Issues of social structure were included by NCERT in its syllabus recommendations, but not underlined as a structure that must change if an Indian advantage is to be secured. Perhaps there has been an underlying assumption that affirmative action against caste discrimination was a responsibility for politicians and not for craft activists or for the Ministry set up to serve artisans. It may have been assumed that caste oppression would disappear once the market economy functions effectively. A dangerous assumption, perhaps. In a recent discussion with this writer on the future of his craft, a distinguished artisan shared this response: “Why do you keep asking about the future of my craft without telling me why I am still regarded as untouchable? Which young person wants a future as an untouchable who cannot even access drinking water or live alongside others in this village?  We may get national awards but once we return home, we remain outcasts. We are regarded as unclean, and yet you tell me that what I know and what I do should be passed on to the future. To whose future, may I ask? Is it any wonder that my son tells me that even if I have been able to make a decent living through my craft inheritance, what he wants is not just a decent living but a career that gives him dignity”. In contrast is a report from Jamal Kidwai of Baragaon Weavers, who interacted with a group of artisans brought together by Delhi Crafts Council at its Kairi event in March 2019[11]. Kidwai reported not only on how deeply rooted crafts remain within the caste system but also on how proud and confident artisans can be of both caste as well as craft. Some had graduated as middlemen and traders, an aspiration of entrepreneurship that has taken great priority within the challenge of the Covid pandemic and demonstrations over recent months of hyper-connective technology being mobilized to the service of crafts.   Beyond caste: Finding new role models The lesson may be that craft education must include a strong component of understanding of the social and economic systems through which crafts have moved across centuries, and what has to change within those systems if craft traditions are to endure. Within this may be a need to send out a message that tomorrow India’s craft sector should be able to welcome young people into careers that are determined less by caste and more by motivation and ability. Such role models exist. They need to be identified and their stories told. These can include artisans who are today great designers and educators as well as those from outside caste systems who today pride themselves as artisans, designers and as craft educators, and who respect ‘outcaste’ artisans as much as they do their other peers.  The message should be that this sector can offer spaces and personal futures that can be rewarding and fulfilling, provided that India’s artisanal millions are given a status which can serve as an endurable foundation. It is that respect which should be the objective of craft education in schools, transcending all other pedagogical goals by providing the context which gives those goals their priority.   Responding to the demand for inclusion from new generations will be a key requirement, extending beyond respect and dignity for hereditary artisans to opportunities for inclusion in craft practice for those from non-hereditary backgrounds. The impact of such diversity could be transformational, and it has begun. Design schools and revival activities such as Women’s Weave in Maheshwar, Dakshina Chitra in Chennai and Banglanatak.com in the east offer evidence. These small but truly significant beginnings can help reduce the stigma of caste-based activity while also raising challenges of whether outsiders might threaten hereditary prerogatives of territory and ownership. So far, there has been welcome evidence that exploitation is not the dominant experience.  Barriers have been broken by camaraderie and collegial professionalism while the need for sensitivity and respect is constant. Such movements have become commonplace in the performing arts, once reserved for traditional inheritors. Caste is not the dominant factor in their vision of the future. Why not now in crafts?   Within the search for justice is the other need to address the educational needs not only of children in established school systems but also those faced by the children of artisan communities. For new generations from within hereditary channels to remain with the calling of their forebears, they will require educational opportunities that are on par with those of ‘outside’ peers, supplemented by opportunities to learn and to earn under masters of their own traditions. One avenue could be stipends and scholarships of the kind now familiar in the performing arts. Other models include the experience of the Delhi Crafts Council which over many years has offered support to both parampara gurus and their chelas, demonstrating what incentives of this kind can do to build future generations of artisans. The alumni of this intervention now include award-winning artisans with global reputations, offering a pool of talent sensitive to modern education and capable of moving comfortably into schools as craft educators who offer an unparalleled opportunity for contact with the history and grandeur of living traditions.   Next steps What then can we recommend today as a pattern of craft education within schools that can stand on the shoulders of history and use the NEP as a launch-pad? There are also new opportunities through the emphasis on project learning within the                                                                                                                                               elite International Baccalaureate system now in vogue, and its openness to interdisciplinary learning.  Craft education in schools will require strong linkages with other disciplines, particularly the social sciences including economics, anthropology, political science as well as the discipline of management. Without an understanding of democracy and of development as human wellbeing, craft education can remain in a silo all its own without the connections that give this sector such extraordinary importance in terms that are cultural as well as social, political, economic, environmental and indeed spiritual. The future of crafts needs to be positioned within the greater context of national and global movements toward a more democratic and just society, as well as the challenges and opportunities that come with technologies that today both threaten craft tradition while also offering opportunities for that heritage to move into unexplored spaces. These can be linked to what is today the greatest opportunity the craft sector has ever had, of demanding and receiving its due priority. This opportunity is offered by the Sustainable Development Goals[12] of the United Nations. The SDGs today constitute a globally-accepted blueprint for human progress, and no sector contributes to these Goals as powerfully as crafts and artisans do. Yet that contribution is most often neglected, including by India. The need for education and awareness is thus huge, and change must begin in schools. This should be no surprise for any of us. Gurudev and the Mahatma understood the challenge and gave us early demonstrations and guidelines for change that went beyond an inheritance of skills to an understanding of what today is the buzzword of ‘sustainability’. The values that need to be sustained are the values that should inform craft education within Indian schools.   A first step might be to now bring together those who have helped develop the school curricula and approaches which NCERT and the NEP offer as a launching pad. Revisiting past experience and materials through such a brainstorming might help indicate current opportunities and challenges, reveal why the school experience of implementation has been limited so far, and what that experience can tell us of the need for change through the opportunity of a new policy intended as a genuine break from the past. This might enrich curricula review with fresh inputs including the need to ensure awareness of the broader developmental context for craft futures. In an era struggling to understand and achieve sustainability, the context as well as the opportunity for craft education in India’s schools is nothing less than the future of the planet and the wellbeing of all those it shelters. This includes millions still left at the margins, and India’s artisans are among them. That is what education must change. References [1] Crafts Council of India, “Life in Its Completeness”. Chennai 2018.  Rabindranath Tagore, Shiksha, Visva-Bharati, Kolkata, 1945. [2] Prof Krishna Kumar, Crafting an Education. SEMINAR 570, 2007 [3] CCRT website :  http://ccrtindia.gov.in [4] Ibid [5] Prof Krishna Kumar, Crafting an Education. SEMINAR 570, 2007 [6] NCERT Focus Group Report 2006 [7] “Hastakalayein aur Shiksha”, Kamaladevi Chattopahdyay Memorial Lecture, CCRT, New Delhi 2011. See also Dr Kapila Vatsyayan’s Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay Memorial Lecture Education through the Arts: Values and Skills.  CCRT, New Delhi 2009 [8] An important exception has been in the emerging field of design education, pioneered by the National Institute of Design (Ahmedabad) where crafts were integrated into a curriculum innovated over 50 years ago. Interaction with artisans and their crafts is today an established feature of design education in India, while other important experiments have developed design training opportunities for artisans. [9] https://www.education.gov.in [10] Prof Krishna Kumar, Crafting an Education. SEMINAR 570, 2007 [11] Jamal Kidwai, The Wire. 31 March 2019 [12] https://sustainabledevelopment.un.orgpost2015transformingunworld

Handloom and Handicrafts,
https://youtu.be/8tUau0WK8w0

Handloom skills in an industrial age,
Every day for 30 days in June, Laila Tyabji took a selfie wearing a handloom sari before heading for work—she posted this series of images on Facebook. Despite public perception, the Union textiles ministry, recently handed to Smriti Irani’s care, is hardly a comedown. It’s true that human resource development (HRD), her earlier portfolio, dictates India’s future, but textiles are a major part of our present. They encompass the lives of the largest number of people after agriculture, including some of the most marginalized and exploited: handloom weavers of course, but also mill and power-loom workers, and the labour in our garment sweatshops—often daily wagers, therefore totally unprotected by either unions or social security. Sadly, handloom, power-loom and the big textile mills are not harmonious bedfellows. They cater to the same clientele, but have few common interests. For handlooms, power-looms are an ever-looming threat, making cloth cheaper and faster, and eating into their rural and small-town markets. For the big mills, power-loom is also the gadfly, as low production costs enable it to effectively undercut them. Nevertheless, it’s the big mills that tend to have the money and connections, and therefore the government’s ear. In the textiles ministry, these three sectors vie with one another for concessions and attention. It’s a tussle in which handloom, very much the poor country cousin, is generally the loser. A friendly bureaucrat once told us, “Government responds to a voice that is loaded." Handloom has neither cash nor clout. What it does have is extraordinary design and skill traditions that are unique and cannot be produced by any other method; the ability to make each individual piece unique and different—all with very low infrastructural costs. Mill cloth, for example, would have to produce a run of several hundred metres before recovering the cost of changing a design, texture, or even a colourway. Handloom can do this in a single warp. In a consumer society where everyone wants something “exclusive", let us exploit this advantage.   Expand Last year, when Dastkar, a non-profit organization working with Indian crafts and artisans, and others from the handloom sector campaigned against changes to the Handlooms (Reservation of Articles for Production) Act, 1985, even sympathetic government officials couldn’t see what the fuss was about. The power-loom lobby wanted the Act to be withdrawn as it protects traditional handlooms, especially saris, from being copied by their power-loom competitors. “If power-loom can make cloth cheaper and faster, why preserve handloom…?" was the common response. One power-loom lobbyist said, “We have progressed from the firewood chulha to gas and electric stoves. If we need to hang on to technologies from our grandparents’ times, it is a mark of regression. Our children will laugh at us." Another claimed that “the customer prefers the cheaper power-loom sari". We need to challenge that statement. First, it is not an either/or—there is place both for power-loom and handloom. India’s consumer base is diverse and multilayered, and though handlooms have lost some rural customers, there is a growing demand for this amazing fabric in the urban and international market. Over the last five years, the sale of handlooms has actually increased. Avid bulk buyers at Dastkar, Sanatkada and Crafts Council exhibitions bear witness to this. Globally too, as an understanding of the design versatility and “green" values of handspun and handwoven textiles grows, more and more international buyers are looking to India as a source. How tragic then if we allow it to die instead of investing in its potential. Second, to say that we don’t need handlooms because we have power-looms is really absurd. To take the chulha analogy, it’s like saying that because we have microwave ovens, we don’t need tandoors! Each serves its own unique purpose, and it’s the Indian tandoor, not the microwave, that creates our unique Indian cuisine and draws tourists and foodies. The handloom creates thousands of one-of-a-kind weaves, motifs and textures that no power-loom can replicate—a wonderful tactile drape that is irreplaceable. And guess what? Handloom doesn’t only mean Fabindia kurtas, saris and being boringly “ethnic". Think furnishing fabrics, men’s shirts, and those palazzos and asymmetrical skirts everyone is wearing. However, access to credit and markets are not the only requirements if this potential is to be realized. We need investment in both infrastructure and the fabric itself—handloom drapes beautifully but does not lend itself to well-stitched garments. India’s once-inspirational Weavers’ Service Centres, which helped mentor and invigorate weavers, their technology and skill sets, need to come alive again before we start sending Western-wear designers to Varanasi. Albert Einstein warned: “I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots." In chasing technological dreams, we should not forget the power and creativity of the human hand. It is India’s strength that we have hand skills while successfully being part of an industrial age.

Handloom Spaces: Locating Mubarakpur,
Issue #008, 2021                                                                              ISSN: 2581- 9410 A New Model for Handloom Revival Mubarakpur is located in the district of Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh. Historically, fine cotton fabrics have been woven here since the 14th century and it finds ecstatic mention in the diaries of Berber traveller Ibn-Batuta. Ornate silks and brocades began to be woven here towards the 17th century under the patronage of Raja Mubaraksha. Today, there are about 30,000 families engaged in handloom weaving here but the cluster has not received much recognition in recent times and always lived in the shadow of neighbouring Banaras. In fact over the past few decades, Mubarakpur has become a cheap outsourcing destination for low grade, synthetic zari sarees that are bought by traders from Banaras and sold in small towns across Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. From a socio-economic perspective, the weavers of Mubarakpur are severely disadvantaged. The rate of literacy is low; each household has about 10-11 members while the average monthly income is about Rs 4,000 per household. The weavers are severely indebted to the gadidars who exploit the situation by lowering the wages paid even further. In fact, a large number of weavers are able to survive only due to the food subsidy received from religious institutions in the region. The situation was further aggravated by a spate of communal riots a few years ago that further reduced the meager volume of trade. The final blow was dealt by the perpetration of powerlooms which only served to reduce wage rates further. When AIACA visited the region to conduct a study in 2013, it was found that weavers were earning as little as Rs 100-120 a day. Senior, skilled weavers were severely disillusioned with handloom weaving. As one weaver, Iftikar bhai put it, “Agar hamare paas koi aur chaara hota, hum yeh kargha utha ke ghar se bahar phek dete.” (If we had any other option, we would throw these looms out of our homes.”) So is the revival of handloom possible for a group of weavers with no recognition, no capital, no access to market and, most crushingly, no hope? AIACA began implementation of this model through a pilot program in 2014. Expectedly, the biggest challenge was mobilization of weavers. The pilot was supposed to enlist 5 weavers but convincing even a single weaver proved difficult. Of the 5 weavers identified for this phase, 2 ultimately backed out and the pilot was completed with 3 weavers. However, the situation changed dramatically when the first products were complete and the first wage payments were made as per the government- prescribed rate of Rs 250/ day. “There is no currency like trust and no catalyst like hope.” I received a call from one of the weavers confirming he had received payment for the first dupatta and I will never forget the disbelief and amazement in his voice. And of course, the happiness. The very next week 50 weavers enlisted for the project. Later on we learnt that no trader in Mubarakpur was paying the government-mandated minimum rate and so what we had done was perceived as almost a miracle. As mentioned earlier, the wages received by the weaver were almost half the prescribed rate. At this stage, however, being unsure of what the market response would be we adopted a phased approach to enlisting more weavers. By October 2014, there were 10 weavers weaving under the newly constituted Burhani Mubarakpur SHG. A year down the line, this SHG had assets worth Rs 15,00,000 in terms of stock and sale revenue. The 2nd SHG was then formed comprising another 10 weavers. Apart from the income incentive, we also realized that the by using pure silk and zari yarns, the nature of work itself was viewed as aspirational by the weavers who were used to churning our polyester sarees in garish motives and colours. Weaving pure silk and cotton fibres is considered a hallmark of good craftsmanship and most weavers are denied the chance to ever work with these materials due to the high yarn cost. Hence, the project has succeeded in building the morale of the weavers greatly as well. Finally, there has been widespread market acceptance of the products developed as well. All products are being sold under the brand name ‘Mubarakpur Weaves’. Initial buyers included the Kamala store, Artisan Cottage, Shilpi Crafts-store. The SHG was awarded membership to Dastkar, the Daskari Haat Samiti and Craftmark. Weavers have met with representatives of these organisations directly and were able to take their input and incorporate this into their products. Through a continuous training process, the weavers were able to take production and procurement decisions collectively and AIACA maintained a largely supervisory role. Overall, the project has been successful in proving that handlooms are not a sunset industry. In fact, the revival of handlooms is key to providing insitu employment to marginalized communities and ensuring them secure livelihood in their homes, preventing migration and improving the standard of living. A time-bound, holistic and realistic approach to enterprise creation at the grassroots level is required. Today, the weavers in the project have an average household income of Rs 7,000 with an additional 10% of profit earnings on all products sold at the end of the year. There is further scope to increase this to 25% through more direct sales to end consumers. Update: This paper was presented at the Craft Revival Trust’s conference Locating Mubarakpur at IIC , Delhi in 2015. Subsequently, Mubarakpur Weaves was presented as a successful case study by AIACA at the UNESCO conference in Schenzen in 2016. The SHGs formed succeeded in procuring continuous orders from FabIndia and they are also regulars at craft exhibitions across the country. Ultimately, the true success of a craft project lies in its ability to create continuous engagement with the right customers over time. One-off, flash-in-the-pan projects are a great disservice to the craft and the craftsman. For me, personally, the project came a full circle when I heard ladies at a cousin’s wedding in Delhi excitedly exchanging notes on sarees they had recently bought from a “ beautiful, artisanal brand” called Mubarakpur Weaves!  

Handloom Weaving Clusters Of Bihar,
This article discusses nine weaving clusters of Bihar in terms of the yarn used, count, type of looms, style of weaving etc. Each cluster though existing within similar geographical conditions having similar kind of production capacities, yet produce different products and weaves.
  SIGORI COTTON CLUSTER, PATNA Sigori is a small village of Patna district which used to be small concentration of weavers in the vicinity. Presently about 3000 looms chug along producing a variety of cotton dress materials, mainly shirting, dhoti, gamchha ie shoulder scarf etc. The use of Vat colors, plain weaves & various check/ stripe patterns using 32’s to 60’s cotton yarns, characterize Sigori’s handloom offerings.BIHARSHARIF CLUSTER, NALANDA  Biharsharif town and its nearby villagers such as Nepura, Malah Bigha etc. houses many looms producing some fine silks as well as cotton dress materials. The weavers procure silk yarns from Gaya, Bhagalpur etc. and produce some fine tussar , mulberry and matka silk fabrics. Cotton dress materials and bed sheets are also made by some weavers using broad width looms of 60” width.
BHAUARA COTTON CLUSTER, MADHUBANI Bhauara is a small cluster near Madhubani township. Fine muslins, cotton dress materials, fine dhotis are some of the offerings from Madhubani region to the rest of the world. However the cluster presently has about 300 odd looms producing mainly material sand gamchhas using 4-‘s to 60’s count cotton yarns.The cluster is presently being supported with a holistic package of interventions under the Integrated Handloom Development Scheme (IHDS) of Development Commissioner (Handlooms) Govt. of India.
MANPUR CLUSTER. GAYA Manpur, Tekari, Chakand and other villages of the region houses a number of weaver families. Manpur produces not only fine tussar silk but also a large number of gamchhas typically used at most pilgrimages. The weaver families produce what they can sell to traders of Bhagalpur or to the local traders based in Gaya. Some weavers have attempted natural dyed tussar silk fabrics such as stoles, dress materials etc.
KATORIA CLUSTER, BANKA Katoria, Chorbe and Dumwara are some of the important handloom destinations in Banka district of Bihar, which shares its boundary with the state of Jharkhand. However, the area enjoys a unified geo-climatic condition suitable for tussar cocoon rearing and the forests of the region provide ample scope for the same. Building upon this, the region possesses a large population of women who carry out traditional thigh reeling of tussar silk.Thus Ghhichha, Katia and other types of tussar silk yarns are produced and further woven into Tussar-Ghhichha (TG), Mulberry - Ghhichha (MG) fabrics. The rustic looks and the coarse texture of the fabric is appreciated by fabric experts across the globe. This cluster, which possesses about 400-500 looms, is presently being supported with a holistic package of interventions under the Integrated Handloom Development Scheme (IHDS) of Development Commissioner (Handlooms) Government of India.
Bhagalpur is acknowledged as SILK CITY and is renowned worldwide for its silk production. The silk industry in this city is 200 years old and many generations of silk processing communities exist here that have been producing silk for generations including its well known sericulture, manufacture of silk yarn its weaving into exquisite products. This silk is known as Tussah or Tusser Silk. Silk weaving is a longstanding customary household industry of Bhagalpur. In order to further develop handloom silk industry in the state of Bihar, the Weavers Service Centre was established in Bhagalpur in the year 1974 by the Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. The Bhagalpur cluster is the second largest silk fabric producing and exporting hub after the Karnataka state. Bhagalpur silk home furnishing made ups are gradually becoming admired in the Overseas markets. However, the Silk saris produced in Bhagalpur are more popular in the domestic market. Within the Bhagalpur area there are several clusters:
HUSSAINABAD CLUSTER, BHAGALPUR Hussainabad is a part and parcel of Bhagalpur. The looms being presently used in the cluster are pit looms with single box fly shuttle technique. The use of 4, 6 or 8 pedals to create textural patterns in the fabric and some makeshift dobby of 6-8 plates are in use in the cluster.The effective width of the fabrics is ranging from 45 to 55 inches. The weavers of the cluster have been doing a lot of design-based production as per the demand using up to 8 pedals for textural patterns. They are adept at handling varieties of silk & the cluster has a reputation for being the key source for matka silk, which has earned brand name for Bhagalpur.
NATHNAGAR CLUSTER, BHAGALPUR Nathnagar is a part of the extended township of Bhagalpur and is well connected with Patna and Kolkata and thereby with the rest part of the country. A large number of households are engaged in weaving activity in the region, some in power looms and some in handlooms. The cluster has a very large number of looms though they remain functional based on the orders received. In any case 300- 400 looms are said to be operative at any given time.The looms presently used in the cluster are pit looms with single box fly shuttle technique. The weavers do not do the use of jacquards but the use of 4 to 6 pedals to create textural patterns in the fabric exists in the cluster. The weavers of the cluster have been making a variety of silk and cotton fabrics ranging from the famous silk chaddar of Bhagalpur to tussar silk fabrics, dhoti, lungi, gammcha etc. However, the number of cotton looms is more than the silk looms in the cluster.The various types of yarns being used in not only Nathnagar but also most handloom clusters of Bhagalpur region are as under:
Cotton: 10s, 20s, 32s, 40s, 8/2s, 2/ 10s to 2/80s
Mercerized Cotton: 2/80s to 2/120s
Spun Silk: 2/60 to 2/240
Tussar Silk: 33/37 D
Staple: 2/14 to 2/34
Noil: 2s, 4s, 6s, 7s, 10s, 20s, 30s
Throster (85): 2/20 to 2/30
Matka Noil: 20s, 6s, 10s
Muga Silk: 2/72, 1/60, 1/33 D
Linen: 10, 14, 20, 25, 40, 50, 60
Fancy Yarns such as Acrylic, Wool, Lub-lub, Viscose Flag, Kela Silk, Lurex, Payal
CHAMPA NAGAR CLUSTER, BHAGALPUR which is a part of the Bhagalpur township, houses about 500 odd looms and these produce a range of silk fabrics. The present product range can be divided into 65% silk dress material, 20-25% silk home furnishings, 15-20% silk saris and cotton fabrics.The width of the looms is up to 50 inches. Both frame as well as pit looms are being used in the cluster. Use of 4 to 6 pedals to create textural patterns in the fabric is common in the cluster. The weavers are skilled and have a clear understanding of possible variations in weave structures and possible combinations utilizing the resources to the maximum usage. They are ready to accept new design ideas and are open to suggestions and not adamant to just stick to the conventional weaving technique.They do tie and dye, they try out motifs, patterning, as per yarn innovation they also try out fancy yarns and always work according to the demand.
KHARIK BAZAAR, BAGHALPUR Kharik is closely linked to Bhagalpur geographically as well as economically. It is located about 30 kilometers away from Bhagalpur off the NH 31.A large number of households are engaged in weaving activity in the region, some in power looms and some in handlooms. The cluster has a large number of looms though they remain functional based on the orders received. In any case 300- 400 looms are said to be operative at any given time. The width of the looms is up to 50 inches. Both frame as well as pit looms are being used in the cluster which produces from coarse cotton lungis to fine silk dupattas.Some of the weavers also produce tussar silk fabrics such as Tussar-Ghichha or Mulberry-Ghichha.References: http//www.handloomofbihar.com http//www.india-crafts.com/textile/indian_handlooms/ http//www.indianhandloomscluster-dchl.net/ 
 

Handloom Weaving in Waraseoni, Innovation in a Cluster

The heritage that still dwindles, A respect - new found… The deft use of the hand and the loom, To ink the yards of the weave…

If you have not heard of Waraseoni you would probably miss it on the map or even while pottering around in the state of Madhya Pradesh. Its a small town in the Balaghat district with a population of 24,757 comprising of 50% of male and 50% female population with maximum literacy rate(as per Indian census 2011).

Waraseoni finds itself on the world map owing to the popularity of its traditional cotton saress and present silk handloom fabrics. Waraseoni art is clothed in the sensitivity of its design & centuries of mysticism. The intricacies of the design bear a testimony to the craftsmens love for his customs and rituals.The intricate hand embroidery on cotton and silk adds to its demand. Foraying into the diverse market of sarees, dupattas, kitchenware, dress material has also added to Waraseoni's credentials. The art is steeped in the beauty of its surrounding with exquisite motifs and designs. Instruments of music, that beats to the rhythm of life; the music that arises and awakens the spirit and infuses reverence towards the fabrication of handlooms;the tempo of the weft against the bass of the warp.A place where designs consist of Floral motifs, Geometrical patterns, warli and tribal Inspiration,Chanderi & Maheshwari pattern can be seen. A Project given to NIFT Mumbai, was an effort to incorporate innovation in cluster that aspires to provide a roadmap for cluster practitioners. From the times of the kings, through the British Raj, till a formalized peak in the years following 1920, the cotton handloom industry of Waraseoni has thus far imbibed the growing demands of the markets and carved out a niche base for creating livelihoods that support and supplement the incomes of countless families. In addition to this is the emphasis of silk – the foundation and progress of the start to end production and manufacture of tussar silk. To innovate and develop a design identity that provides equity to Waraseoni is indeed a task that shall elaborate the true culture and inspiration that defines the society that is woven into the fabric of dedication. One has to constantly remind oneself that the weaver is an artist, a musician, and his loom - aninstrument of music. He is powerfully aware of every nuance of the weave and energises the rhythm of the loom to coax it into reproducing the finest music in textiles. The raga is established as he throws the shuttle through the tautly stretched warp threads, back and forth, over and over again. He beats the warp rhythmically, keeping taal. The wooden pedal is depressed to synchronise the throwing of the shuttles. The bamboo reeds are his wind chimes. All his senses of touch, sight and sound come into play during this play of divine music, a reverential piece of art. Each expression has its own language and its own interpretation, an expression which deserves to be respected and admired for all time. There is hardly a village where weavers do not exist, each weaving out the traditional beauty of India's own precious heritage. Mehndiwada, Beni, Hattaares situated in the Balaghat district of Madhya Pradesh. Weaving is one of the main occupations of the people of Mehndiwada, Beni, Hatta. Since ages, these villages are renowned for the cotton saris produced there; especially for their quality but with the passage of time this craft is now on the verge of extinction. Nowadays silk has taken place of cotton. Now in the present scenario there are around 150 looms in Mehndiwara, Beni, Hatta and people are still practicing this craft. MadhyaPradesh is famous for Chanderi, Maheshwari and Waraseoni Tussar silk saris.
COTTON SARIS OF WARSEONI
The Waraseoni area, originally part of ancient Vidharbha, is the beginning of a vast cotton growing and weaving belt that stretches into neighboring Maharashtra. The Waraseoni area has been renowned for its fine count saris mainly 80 - 100s counts for years. Waraseoni handloom cluster has a history dating more than 100 years since the time of King Raghuji Bousle. It was his royal patronage that led to the flourishing handloom activity in the 1920s. During this phase, the weavers produced many varieties of cotton saris such as Jot, Mukty, Miradani, Mungiya, Partya, Ruiful etc., with 10 - 20s count yarns. In the 1950s cotton saris were produced in around 300 looms, mainly producing patterns. Hatta and Janta Saris of Waraseoni goes with a legend that they could be used for 2 years on daily basis and could be later cut or joined used in case it gave way in the posterior. The saris had a double aanchal , which mwant that they could be worn both ways and thus lasted longer. During the initial phases 9 meter Maharashtrian saris were produced. The increased importance of sericulture has of late been the focus of the state government of Madhya Pradesh when considering the cluster of Waraseoni. The cluster was identified to provide sustenance to the languishing cotton weavers and improve the economy. In Waraseoni area Tussar Silk is cultivated prominently. All processes from rearing of cocoons through weaving till sales at its formalized outlet is at Waraseoni. Tussar Silk, also known as Kosa Silk, is valued for its purity and texture. It is drawn from cocoons especially grown on Arjun, Saja or Sal trees. It is available naturally in shades of gold-pale, dark, honey, tawny, tobacco to beige, creamy, etc. Design Analysis Historically the saris of the Waraseoni cluster have been a brief mix and match of reigning designs. The motifs used were RuiPhool, Jai Phool – floral, Karavati, DoubleKaravati – Saw Faced, and Shahpuri with Gom - Arrowhead. The borders were from 1.5 to 5 inches in width and were measured using finger width (ungals). The pallu often had a Karvat/Kumbh – Temple pattern. The Baal saris had a silk warp and a cotton weft weave. It popularly had a 7 inch silk double flower pattern border called ‘Do dhadiruiphool’ border. If the same sari was checked, it was referred to as the Kothisari. The Anjani or the Aanjana pure silk saris are marriage saris and are also referred to as Bhamoari saris. They are characterized by red and yellow Mukhiya checks and the Cheechpopdi checks. They are influenced by the Gom motif and are often seen to cater to the wealthier Baniya and the Lodhi communities. The Sendri sari is red in colour and most often an adornment for the bride in the marriage ceremony. The typical style of wearing saris in the cluster is the Double Kashta and the Marar style of draping. Tribal Motifs The design terminologies that are still in vogue in the cluster reveal a similarity of approach and a great deal of exchange with Chanderi. Design Problems The motifs of paisleys and flowers, patterns of tendrils and the dobby borders of diamonds and circles are not traditional to the very core. They are not part of the legends of Waraseoni and the replications earn no identity. Diamond Borders Unfortunately, the efforts to contemporize and adapt the designs to the markets of today, as claimed by the weavers, are also failing to a large extent. It is noticeable that there is no sense of new-age design as far as weaving is concerned. The designs for the embroidery are also over used and are largely variations of the tilak, kundan and few other motifs. This severe lack of design sensibility with respect to the traditionality of yesteryear and the modern mind-set of today is a drawback to which Design Solutions were given. With the study done in Waraseoni Cluster, it was concluded for Design that motifs taken were neither traditional nor contemporary, no inspiration of real life taken. Limitations in the diversified range if Products. Design Solutions A vast arena of inspiration, a scope unlimited for development and the profit of its rapid implementation… The designs that exist in the products of Waraseoni may be recognized to be borrowed, but that is in the light of their present knowledge level. By cashing in on the skills of the weavers, new designs can be introduced to make an impact on the saris and weaves of Waraseoni. Butis can be enhanced and, variety can be added to the borders, design solutions can be suggested in terms of the variety in embroidery and endless variations of the same can be made under the watchful eye of belongingness to the cluster of Waraseoni and its inspirational influences can be beneficial towards the development of better design. Hence Designs were developed taking inspiration from the heritage and real life experiences of Waraseoni. The motifs developed were placed in different products using pattern engineering. Product Development The product range presently benefiting the cluster is that of saris and dress materials. Both of them include embroidery as a method of value addition. The inclusion of stoles, scarves, bed linen, cushion covers and other lifestyle products, aids the cluster in terms of production output factor. Many products can be developed in a limited time frame and this eventually widens sales horizons that cash in added profits that are extremely required prior to further growth. This development is crucial to add to the economic sustenance of the handloom cluster.

HANDLOOMS – Part of our Past, or Hope for the Future?,
Handlooms are the warp and weft of India – our culture and aesthetics are rooted in its threads. Each fabric tells a story; the raw material, motif and design rooted in the landscape and community. [caption id="attachment_197970" align="alignnone" width="624"] Often forgotten is that handlooms are also a major part of our economy. (Photo Source: IE)[/caption]   Two successive years of COVID and lockdowns have changed the Indian economy – destroying lives and livelihoods as a consequence. The handloom sector has been no exception – weaver communities all over India have been decimated. Mohd Dilshad is a handloom weaver from Chanderi, weaving diaphanous, gold-edged sarees spelling summer and celebration. Today his story is bleaker. “Last year,” he recounted, “we were short of food, we didn’t have money for new production. These days we are worried about life and death. The Corona virus reached our villages. It was everywhere, and there is no nearby hospital, no proper medical supplies. 12 artisans died in the first fortnight. 200 more got infected the following day.” His story is only one of hundreds of handloom communities across India. Tragically, this year Covid struck the hinterland, with districts and villages everywhere in the grip of sickness and death. With few proper medical facilities, the percentage of deaths was proportionately high. The weaver community in Kota had 160 deaths, a tiny village in Barmer had 80. In an Odisha, a 100 out of 500 infected sabai grass-weavers died. A durry weaving cluster in UP had 250 deaths. In Andhra, among handloom weavers, one in every 8 cases proved fatal. The sad stories poured in – from Uttarakhand, Bihar, Kutch, Bengal, Kashmir, ….. There is a silver lining. Over and over, during floods, cyclones and droughts, in Orissa, Bihar and Bengal and the 2001 Kutch earthquake, craftspeople show a resilience and recovery quicker than the average industrial enterprise. The investment required for infrastructure, raw material, tooling etc is comparatively small, and the skills already exist in their hands and heads. They are an ideal sector for regenerating livelihoods and incomes. What WE need to do is give them the support and marketing. Handlooms are the warp and weft of India – our culture and aesthetics are rooted in its threads. Each fabric tells a story; the raw material, motif and design rooted in the landscape and community. Often forgotten is that handlooms are also a major part of our economy. Weavers form India’s second largest employment sector. Including the numerous ancillary workers involved – the loom makers, the spinners, those setting the warp, those washing and starching the fabric, those transporting and selling it- the numbers go into countless millions. They are professionals whose knowledge systems and skillsets that are unique to India, unparalleled in the world, with a minimal carbon imprint; perfectly suited to local conditions and production systems. A gold mine. Every year at this time, the Textile Minister sends out a letter to chosen influencers, urging them to promote handlooms on Handloom Day. Everyone – film-stars, tycoons, politicians, socialites – posts selfies of themselves wearing beautiful Patolas, Banarsis, and Kanjeeverams, with ILoveHandlooms hashtags. But handloom and the weavers who weave it need more than a one-day Love Fest.The rest of the year they remain unseen, voiceless and outside mainstream politics and policies – dismissed as part of our cultural past, seldom regarded as a asset for our economic future. We need to begin with the basics – appropriate yarn, investment in design, product development, entrepreurship, textile technology, dyeing, washing, and packaging facilities, access to credit and markets…. Production and demand hand in hand. Do people still want to buy handloom? An intricately woven FORTY LAKH Kanjeeveram sari recently found its way into the Guinness Book of Records and Nita Ambani’s cupboard. One brand alone, FABINDIA, consumes over 15 million metres of handloom annually. So many moribund weaving traditions have recently found a revival – Habaspuri, Dongria, Ilkil, Bomkai, Begumpuri, Kotpad, Bhagalpur, Tangaliya,Bavan-Buti, Kunbi, Baluchari…. There’s even a newly evolved and hugely popular sari – the Bhujodi, whose weavers previously made heavy goats wool shawls. The Western shift from fast fashion and mass production to green, organic, and ethically produced products is a contributing factor. Designers like Abraham & Thakore,Sanjay Garg, Neeru Kumar and Bappaditya Biswas have made their names with handloom. A new generation of young weavers are suddenly seeing a future. We need to cherish and protect these unique skill sets; honouring and investing in their makers. People cite Nita Ambani’s bejewelled 40 lakh sari but no one remembers the names of the weavers who wove it. Its lack of social acceptence that causes weavers to leave the sector, not because no one wants handloom. Handloom’s survival depends on so many external factors – market linkages, access to education, finance, design and market information, the know-how to develop new fabrics for Western cuts and stitched garments…. Francois de Laval, the French traveller commented in the 17th century that “Everyone from the Cape of Good Hope to China, man and woman, is clothed from head to foot in the product of Indian looms” It could happen again. But every day needs to be Handloom Day!

Handmade Artisanal Product Development, A Report
Preface Product development is an important element in current efforts to find ways to improve livelihoods and preserve cultural identity among rural low-income artisans in less developed countries. A number of designers are applying their skills in the alternative and ethical trade sectors to increase the capacity of artisan groups to enter new markets. In their work as product development consultants, these designers provide advice or training or facilitate learning that is critical for rural artisans to adapt their traditional skills and knowledge to make marketable products. This report is based on research into the experiences, views and insights of product designers who work with artisans. Their work takes place in many different countries and situations, yet there are common concerns, including the difficulties artisans confront and the complex issues involved. This report is intended to prompt further discussion about the issues and practical approaches needed to promote the well-being of artisans and their communities. The report is focused on the contributions of North American consultants to handmade artisanal product development and marketing. Most of the consultants, based in the United States, were contacted through the cultural organizations, The Crafts Center in Washington D.C. and Aid to Artisans, Hartford, Connecticut. Several of the designer consultants are Canadian. Twelve recorded interviews, additional conversations and consultants’ written materials form the basis of the research material, which was collected between September 2001 and February 2002. Also interviewed were a number of ethical business importers of artisanal products and directors of organizations committed to improving artisan livelihoods. For the purpose of this report the research material was primarily drawn from the design consultants; their feedback on a draft report was integrated into this document.
INTRODUCTION TO ARTISANAL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
1. The Work and Worlds of Artisans Hardship is common in the lives of artisans and craftwork is seen as a way of earning a living. But craftwork is also a source of cultural identity, threatened by increasing globalization. Product development interventions can be an important means to improve livelihoods and support cultural continuity. Participants in this research describe the situation of artisans as follows:
  • The transition from making traditional craft to producing items marketable in the West is a challenge for artisans. It is also something they are keen to do, especially when they are treated fairly and with respect for their traditions.
  • Thousands of poor artisans make products designed by large companies or smaller import businesses for sale in the West. Many designers and the companies they work for are not interested in the local culture or economic situation of the artisans. Frequently artisans are paid very low wages, they are asked to produce items that have little or no cultural relevance and craft production is discontinued when a market trend changes or the company leaves or goes out of business.
  • Many large companies are only interested in the bottom line. They ignore what artisans traditionally do and ask them to make different kinds of products. Unfortunately, artisans often don’t question this practice or realize it is not good for them to abandon their traditions just to please the big companies. As a consequence artisans don’t recognize the skills and abilities they have and they think that people in the West would not appreciate the quality of what they do or value their tradition.
  • Artisans in rural areas of less developed countries are often poor agriculturalists, who make craft to supplement their incomes. Women especially do craft to raise money to support their families. Many depend on craft for their survival.
  • Those artisans are just hanging by the thread they weave. They would be in serious trouble if they couldn’t make something to sell.
  • Artisans are proud to make products that have a basis in their cultural tradition, but they cannot always find people to buy what they make. If craftwork doesn’t put food on the table they are not going to continue. Having a market would mean that artisans will continue to make products and young people will continue to learn the skills because they can make a living by doing this. If people don’t abandon their craft skills then the art in the community won’t die away.
  • It is very difficult for artisans to make the transition from doing a local craft in a traditional technique to making a product that is marketable in today’s economy. Artisans, especially in rural areas have little exposure to Western lifestyles, contemporary fashions or trends. It is hard for them to know how to apply their artistic skills, techniques or specific materials to make something that is desirable by consumers and at the same time is something they want to do.
  • The craft bridge between generations is not that strong; it is very hard for young people to look forward to making a living through craft. The economic incentive is not very good. But the cultural incentive may be stronger.
Given an opportunity for advice on creating new products for sale in new markets, artisans have different perspectives about what they want:
  • Some just want a job. Others want work that respects what they do. Some want to do what they’ve done for years and not change. Others love to change. They love new ideas and learning about what’s in fashion in the U.S., Europe or Canada. This spurs them on to become creative themselves. Others become indignant; they want to make what people in their culture have made for centuries. These artisans want their work respected for its heritage and exhibited in Western galleries; anything less than this they see as cultural imperialism.
  • Artisans want to know what is selling. By learning to make something that will sell better artisans know they can earn money. They are also aware of market realities because they hear what people say as they come and go through their region. They take it all in. They know marketing catchwords, such as “no child labour”. These people from less developed countries are savvy and intelligent and eager to learn and become a part of the European, Australian and North American marketplace.
  • When artisans are able to make and sell their handmade products, when they receive consistent orders for their work, there is a beneficial impact on their livelihoods.
  • Particularly when the money earned goes into the women’s hands the lives of the whole community are often improved. For example, drinking water is available, homes get floors and roofs, children can stay healthy, go to school, and have school uniforms and textbooks.
2. Consultants’ Motivations to Work with Artisans Product development consultants bring expertise and sensibilities to their work with artisans around the world. The consultants interviewed for this research are fundamentally concerned with the well-being of artisans and the continuity of cultural heritage. They have differences in their perspectives and approaches to their work but they share certain motivations. Some designers make a shift to work with artisans because they are tired of the commercial sector rat race; they want to apply their skills in a more meaningful way or they become concerned with how and where things are made. Product designers like to work with and learn from artisans around the world because they appreciate artisans’ skills, abilities and commitment to making beautiful products. Significantly, they like to feel they are making a difference, having a positive impact on people’s lives and their ability to feed their families.. Fundamentally, they have a sense of commitment to the artisans. One describes her role in terms of introducing new people to the global playing field, which allows them to raise their incomes, level the playing field a bit and give other people a chance to play. Another describes her work as grassroots hands-on diplomacy, a type of interaction that is a significant way to change economic status as well as open hearts. 3. Diversity of Product Development Situations Product designers work around the world in places with distinctive peoples, cultures, histories, physical and social environments, and economic and political situations. Several factors that impinge on what product designers do include the following: In some places traditional artisan skills continue to be handed down from one generation to another; in other places many skills have disappeared and need to be recovered through different forms of teaching and learning. In some places artisans are part of groups or organizations that have developed long term working relationships; in other places artisan groups are in early stages of organizing or the artisans remain dispersed in rural areas. Some artisan groups, over a period of time, have had access to useful product development and marketing assistance, others have rarely, if ever, benefited from such interventions and support. In some places artisans show flexibility and interest in innovation with respect to changing their products or design elements. Some areas have local or tourist markets that buy handmade artisan products. Some artisan groups are connected with international trade partners; others are not ready for exporting or have not yet established links with international markets. A diversity of contexts in which product development takes place means that generalizations are difficult to make. While looking at some of the overarching concerns, this report also gives examples from distinctive regions. The majority of examples are drawn from South East and Central Asia, South America and Africa. Specific geographical, historical, political and economic conditions have formed unique circumstances in which artisans aspire to earn a livelihood and affirm their cultural identity. Following are two cases. Case: South America – Peru A consultant travelled in Peru twenty years ago and was very impressed with the culture, the people, their philosophy and folk art. She was impressed by the quality and sophistication of hand made things and the fact that craft skills were centuries old. She also realized the skills were being lost, which is an issue similar to the extinction of animals. Traditionally skills were passed down orally father to son and mother to daughter, but there was widespread poverty and the combination of poverty and terrorism and the lack of government support for education and decent health care. People in rural areas, subsistence farmers who traditionally made handmade products, stopped doing crafts when the children were starving or dying. People moved to the cities and took jobs to support their families, and the younger generation rarely learned to make these crafts. In some places no one knew how to weave a particular way, or do a specific ceramic glaze or kind of jewellery because one or two generations ago the people stopped being artisans in order to go and get a job and put food on the table. In villages where the most sophisticated weavers and metal filigree artisans had once lived, artisans produced only crude pieces by comparison to what they did 60 or 70 years ago. No one was left to teach how it used to be done. Another designer working in Peru found that craft is an important thing that people in the villages have and know. Some people are incredibly talented, others are not talented but they do craft because that’s the only thing for them to do. Some are shrewd business people. Some have shops in town, filled with ticky-tacky tourist things. While all these people are working in craft, the question is: how do you bring them together to benefit together? The consultant told them to look at their tradition, what people were doing 100 years ago, rather than going to Cusco and buying a little knick-knack to sell in their stores. In the area of Puno, in Peru, many export companies hire women to do hand or machine knitting. For piecework they are paid very little for the amount of work involved. The women want a way to sell directly. Their grandmothers used to do hand weaving with natural dyed yarns, making mantas in beautiful colours to carry babies on their backs, but that practice died out. Now they work with whatever yarns are available, which are mostly machine spun and chemical dyed, not the best of colours. A consultant encouraged the women to remember what had been done two generations ago; if they went back to doing those stripes of beautiful colours they would start to have a market. Recently some people began to do their own dyes, using plants from around their villages. There is a question, however, about whether there would be a local market for hand woven mantas because women now wear less expensive machine-made mantas. Case: South East Asia - Laos For 200 years, until the U.S. left the region in the 1970s after the Vietnam war, Laos, a land locked country, was ruled by many people, including the Thais, French and British. Many men died during the war and the women kept themselves and the families going by weaving. Weaving didn’t die in all the hardships; it was all they knew how to do and people still needed cloth. There was not much money but food was exchanged for cloth. And because there was looting during the war, people rolled up their cherished hand woven goods, put them in glass jars and buried them in the earth. In the last 10 years, as things have settled down, people have been unearthing these beautiful textiles. Laos is the poorest of all the East Asian countries – the average income is $350 U.S. per year.  But with the people’s sense of style and cleanliness it doesn’t look like a poor country. These are amazing dichotomies. Why are these things so different from one country to another? What is so different about a culture that keeps them moving forward? Weaving is still part of the daily lifestyle within Laos. Two strong and intelligent Lao women have decided on their product line and have weaving training centres. Nicone went to university in France and now owns her own successful business. Kongthong was trained in Soviet Union and her family started the Phaeng Mai Gallery and weaving center. These women are working hard to keep traditions of Lao weaving alive. They bring women from all over Laos for training to develop quality control. They teach how they want things dyed and the quality of things woven. They tell weavers how things need to look in order to sell in Laos or to export; this let’s them attach the name of the business to each product and they can have a sense of pride. After the women have done training for six weeks or two months they go back to their villages. When orders come into the training centers, these are sent out to the villages and the women work on them as they can along with all their other chores. Then they send the weaving back and get paid for all the work they have done. Nicone has a fabulous sense of style and colour, which is a marriage of Laotian and European. She doesn’t need a foreign designer to work with her; she should actually be working with people in the West. Kongthong’s sense of design is very different and she benefits from the consultant’s suggestions for marketing in the Western world. She has received, but is not dependent on international grants through Lao government and the Phaeng Mai Gallery helps to host a textile conference every two years. 4. What Product Development Consultants Do In each context where they work, consultants figure out what is most appropriate to do. Following are the perspectives of five consultants, describing what to do in product development.
  • Start by looking for the unique raw materials that can be given added value. Examine the culture and specific handmade abilities of the artisan groups. Study market trends for product colours, shapes and sizes. Try to determine how to “tweak” what the artisans already do in order to produce something more mainstream, something that fits with the trends and achieves a quality standard for international markets, but is still a beautiful unique handmade piece. Look for market niches that may buy the craft produced by these artisans. Think about how to get artisans what they need so they can make things in a respectful manner that incorporates their traditions of working with their hands but also allows them to make products that will be successful and bring orders.
  • Take what artisans are currently doing, whatever skill or product they are capable of and then broaden their scope and try to come up with something interesting. The idea is not to teach new skills and change what they already do, but to maintain a strong connection to the artisan tradition. Bring catalogues and show pictures to spark inspiration and ideas. Without this visual information, artisans do not know how people in the West live, and how, for example, they use textiles as decoration. A designer can help the artisan make a traditional fabric into a throw, woven in new dimensions and given a new name but using familiar skills.
  • Product development is part science, part art. Look at the products artisans currently make, the techniques they use, and the materials and tools they have readily available. Pull from that what they might be able to make that would be highly marketable, given your understanding of the U.S., European and global markets. Look at the market: What’s popular? What might be going out of style? What might be a new interesting product? Where the trends are going? And try to marry those two aspects.
  • Village craftspeople produce beautiful things for everyday use. Look at what they already make for themselves and the children. Do not change the traditional work but use their difference and sense of style as an asset. See if their work needs some small adjustments to make it appropriate for a North American market. Market demand and consumer choice is huge. So it is very important to look at all the magazines and catalogues and see what is hot and which direction the market is headed. Then communicate with the artisans by showing pictures from magazines and catalogues. Artisans are aware of what is marketable and very willing and enthusiastic about making small changes to sell more products.
  • Product development is an intuitive process. It is a combination of what you think you can do, what you know the artisans can do and what you know is going to sell. Work with the visual sensibility they already have or you help them nurture. Pull from their own culture because they are the best at doing that. The trick is to make these things also very attractive to Western eyes – if that’s the market they are going for. If you don’t do that you are producing something that can be copied by Vietnam or China or whichever country is being exploited by the bigger system in order to get cheaper prices
5. Creative Tension In the crafts sector, product development consultants bridge diverse worlds and provide an extremely valuable function in doing so. Product designers take a significant role in trying to strike a balance between respect for artisans’ culture and the market realities that influence how artisan products can sell. As one designer says, we walk a fine line trying to respect artisan skills and culture, while also being aware of the market that artisans have to be brought into for the future. As will become evident in this report, this is a difficult task and complex issues are involved. There is soul searching among consultants who question the impact of what they do. Are we distorting the culture, or are we giving them work that at least has some dignity for them as opposed to working in the Pepsi Cola bottling Company, or pasting Mickey Mouse decals on plastic key chains? Where is right and wrong, where’s morality?  It is very hard to draw the line. What is Culturally Appropriate? Design and development of handmade artisan products for new markets is not straightforward or formulaic. Contradictions arise because of questions about what is right, the moral considerations of product development. Consultants make different decisions about what they will and won’t do based on previous experiences and the contexts in which they work. But questions arise in their work about what is culturally appropriate. Their different perspectives include: An artisan’s creation is like a message that goes out into the market saying this is who I am; this is where I’m from, take me and love me for who I am and where I’m from. Most artisans want their own vision of the world accepted through their craft. The market says: that’s special, but we don’t need it so we aren’t buying it. Artisans can take it personally if you don’t like what they make. They think they don’t matter in this multi-cultural world and so there is an element of neo-colonialism. Lots of things are produced by skilled artisans according to some North American’s sense of what the public wants, for example: pink and turquoise painted wooden tropical fish. Using their traditional work is important to the preservation and pride of their culture and identity. Money is necessary, but a sense of pride in ones work is worth a lot. Those of us with larger incomes have to be educated about this. The most important thing: design from their culture and do not make applications that are alien to their culture. Don’t ask Armenians to embroider Mickey Mouse on things or have Guatemalans embroider holly on Christmas ornaments. I wouldn’t do that because I think it is not appropriate. I don’t take an artist who does one-of-a-kind pieces and put them on an assembly line to make something for JC Penney. That would be a travesty. Trends are related to lifestyle issues and right now there is a need for nurturing, and pets are a big thing. But artisans should not be asked to make things like doggy blankets. Is that the only response? Or do consultants who present such ideas have insufficient knowledge of the options? This is a matter of social conscience and respect for artisans. Get to know what the culture is and then tweak it. I can respect designers who make sweaters with handmade daisies or fish or little people that sell really well and give work to hundreds of thousands of people. People in Peru, India and elsewhere say don’t worry about corrupting us. Provide us with work and we’ll make it work. Tell us what you can buy and we’ll make it. Our business needs to provide food for our families. Let us decide. If we can earn money making certain kinds of things we don’t ordinarily do, then maybe the master craftspeople will be able to keep doing special items. Their work will continue to be alive. If not then nothing will survive. Many artisans are less worried about tradition and culture; they want work. It’s good to pay them to make a dog sweater. They laugh about it. The problem is more a reflection of a disintegrated American culture and values in the West. Use materials that are indigenous and readily available.  People are comfortable working with what they are familiar with in their area. To reproduce something in a plastic substance means gloves, masks and other health issues. In Puno, Peru, the women love acrylic yarn; they like the bright colours, the softness and durability. We are imposing our cultural expectations when we say stop using acrylic. But acrylic products will not sell in the market. Try to rescue some crafts in their original state. You can do museum reproductions and find a market as well. Try not to impose something more modern on the culture just because you know it will sell. If you do try to design something that is not quite traditional involve someone from the particular culture who can use ancient symbols in a way that looks modern. Be realistic about how much of the cultural heritage you want to salvage. Sometimes it is misleading to let people think they have potential to make a business out of crafts that are ugly and should just die off. They keep making them or copying their neighbor, but it doesn’t sell and they don’t understand why they can’t have a business. You are better off being truthful and saying you probably don’t have a future in this. The challenge is to figure out how to redirect the skills. What is Authentic Traditional Craft Anyway? The question of what is authentic traditional craft does not always have an easy answer. As one designer said, tradition is a moving target. You have to look back in time to find out when a certain technique or design was introduced, or why particular products were designated, or became known as, authentic. In Peru, women customarily knit alpaca designs on sweaters. When a designer asked if there was a cultural tradition or meaning for this, they said no, the gringos like it. The consultant was trying to be sensitive to the culture but the alpaca sweater design was not a cultural tradition, it was market driven. In Hungary, the Craft Council had authority for the authenticity of Hungarian crafts. Artisans could sell only through government shops where each craft item was judged by a standard derived from the Communist era, which elevated peasant art, and this determined authentic Hungarian craft. All craft was measured by this dated standard and any new craft ideas were not valued. A consultant working for Aid to Artisans was sensitive to the situation but also helped to turn it upside down. They started to design products that utilized traditional skills, they told the story of those skills, and they applied the skills to making new products that would sell to new markets. Eventually the government was satisfied, they dissolved the jury and new stores began to sell craft. 6. Distinctions Between Types of Handmade Artisanal Products Questions of cultural relevance in product design involve a complex mix of factors. There is a spectrum in product development between leaving things pretty much as they have been traditionally made, changing them very little, or beginning with market research to produce designs that are primarily concerned with marketability of products and thereby increasing employment and incomes. This spectrum includes ethnographic objects, products that involve minor adaptation of skills and items that are entirely market-led designs. A product developer outlined the following six types of handmade artisan products. Each of these reflects a degree to which traditional/ethnic designs and skills are used or changed in making new products:
  1. High quality museum, art gallery or one-of-a-kind pieces
  2. Museum gift shop or art gallery pieces that are ethnographic but not fine art quality
  3. Handmade traditional objects that are replicas of museum pieces, made in quantity by a variety of artisans. These objects are not unique to an artisan but something a whole village might make in a similar quality or style based on old traditions.
  4. Items made for tourists
  5. Icons, made by traditional techniques, but innovative, different from traditional ones
  6. Things made by hand, respecting techniques and abilities of artisans but having little to do with the particular culture. Example: hand spinning and knitting a wool sweater, which has daisies or a Scandinavian design. Although the design has nothing to do with them, spinning, dying and knitting is in the tradition of the people, and the sweater sells.
 
  1. 7. What Changes and Doesn’t Change
 Case: Laos Laotian weavers make a shawl for themselves that is patterned all over. It has many different designs in many different colours that are subdued and aesthetically beautiful. Someone who really appreciates it might buy a shawl made like this but certain changes would be needed to make it more sellable. Working with these weavers, a consultant never asks the women to change the individual patterns on the piece. Instead she suggests changes that would suit the North American market. For example: Several sections could be isolated and put on the ends of the shawl; one pattern section could be woven 5 inches from one end and another pattern section woven 20 inches from the other end. While this changes the traditional shawls for the purpose of selling them, it lets the weavers use their own patterns and colours, simply reoriented on the background cloth. When the weavers asked how much to charge for this new shawl, the consultant said charge the same price. When they asked if this was fair, she replied, yes, because you are doing the same design work only a little less. So the price was changed by a couple of dollars. It was a good price and they were happy. The increase in price wasn’t too much so that it changed their economic situation in the village. In another village, weavers made silk blankets with a beautiful overall design, but the colours didn’t work. To design a new blanket to fit with Western interiors, the consultant suggested they choose colours from five of their scarves and put these together in an original way. So part of the new blanket design was woven with the colour from scarf number 1, another part of the blanket was woven with the colour from scarf number 2, etc. In this way the woven design remained the same and the colours were their own. Case: Kyrgistan In Kyrgistan designs on rugs and other craftwork often have a positive/negative contrast. The women do felt work ornamentation by putting two pieces of contrasting felt together and cutting through both pieces. Then they separate the two pieces, take the positive image or motif out of both pieces and switch them around. Because the felt pieces have been cut together they fit perfectly. Then they sew the pieces together and braid around them. A designer began a workshop thinking about what distinctive cultural technique she could apply in a different way to develop new products. The cut felt technique offered many opportunities to play with colour and the consultant tried to achieve more variety than the basic positive and negative shapes. It took her a long time to figure out how to work with three layers of felt in three different colours and then she tried to explain the process to people in the workshop. They said they could not do that because it would reduce the quality. She told them she was sure it would work: cut through three layers and then flip the images, #1 to #2;  # 2 to #3, #3 to #1. Eventually they agreed and cut through the three layers of felt. But they waited for her to separate the pieces. They were amazed that everything fit perfectly when they watched her flip the pieces. The whole process involved tweaking but maintaining their traditional technique. One participant, an art school teacher, became excited to work on all the possible colour combinations. And the artisans have taken the idea further since.
  1. FOCUS ON THE MARKETPLACE
A common theme in product development is the challenge of designing marketable products and gaining access to an appropriate market niche. The product designer’s advice is often critical to the success of artisan production and sales. Consultants try to understand the marketplace and bring information, suggestions and perspectives about marketing to the artisans. In addition some product developers take an active role in the marketing and sales of handmade products.
  1. 1. Business Perspective
Through experience consultants realize the importance of the business side of artisan production. In all product development you have to keep thinking about the market--the customer and the market. If you don’t get the business right there is no artist employed. I am pretty pragmatic about working with the artisans. It is very important to tell them the truth at all times and to be very realistic. Keep their expectations in check and yet really encourage them and support and mentor. A really good businessperson understands market-led product design. You don’t design in a vacuum. You understand your target audience, your customers, your competition and how you are going to use this information as you design. I respect all the different perspectives artisans have about what they want to do and I also recognize the truth of the market place: the buyer is really the engine of economic success.
  1. 2. Constraints for Artisans
While the aim is to create products that will sell in local and international markets, artisans encounter considerable obstacles. In many cases, the social, economic and political situations where they live and work limit their opportunities to produce and sell their craft.  Some of the constraints observed by product designers include: People in Third World countries work under huge limitations: lack of consistent raw materials, lack of sanitation, crowded conditions, little contact with the outside world, negative attitudes about the work of women, intermittent electricity, poor sewing equipment, dull scissors. It would be helpful if governments recognized their own contribution to the poor living conditions of their people. In many cases artisans in rural areas don’t and will not have access to information on market trends. Many cannot afford to be online or they don’t know how to get information online or evaluate what they see. They do not have access to fashion and interior decorating magazines or mail order catalogues on a regular basis. They get piecemeal information from tourists or ex-patriates who want to buy something. They may have an old catalogue, which is better than nothing but this doesn’t prepare them to make things for next year’s market. What they think is a trend may have gone out of fashion in the last 10 years. Often artisans produce one item and then take it to a bazaar to sell. They may think they have produced something of good quality that will sell but often there is no market. In the former Soviet Republic the state supported the production of a mass of poor quality things just to meet quotas and keep people working. So artisans have not thought about why something does or does not sell. They just kept doing it. They don’t think in terms of a larger sales capacity or building a business. The market niche for handmade products is tiny not just because the market doesn’t want to buy them. Artisan products aren’t competitive for reasons that are not entirely the fault of the producers. Their own government can make them non-competitive. In Peru artisans have to pay an 18% tax to export their products. They can get it back later if they apply but they don’t have the capital to finance the process for a period of months until they are paid back. A combination of factors at country and business levels make it almost impossible for an artisan business to succeed: in some places there is no capital to finance production or grow a business or to buy needed equipment or raw materials in bulk at a competitive price. In some places there are illegal customs officials or everything is done under the table; nothing is done officially and so people can’t get a credit history for a formal business.
  1. 3. What Marketplace?
Product development consultants can help artisans understand markets in general, and also how local and global markets work. For artisan groups in different countries and regions, there are different opportunities to be tapped and constraints to be taken into account. The presence or absence of certain conditions makes a difference to what is possible and practical. These include, for example: good materials at reasonable prices, local market channels, tourism, entrepreneurship, investment capital and export promotion. Consultants can help artisans understand their competitive advantage and identify which markets they will do best in over the short and long term and develop products that sell well. They can also impress upon artisans that there are many steps to the process of entering and competing in the international marketplace, as well as challenges along the way. In some countries there are both local and international markets for well-made hand crafted products. In Thailand artisans know what their local markets want and need; they know what local people like when it comes to festival time or special weddings. Also, where a growing middle class is being educated about maintaining their identity and being proud of their traditions, the middle class are buying beautiful handmade things to wear and for their homes. The viability of a local market for handmade artisan products is tied up with whether or not local people have the money to buy them, and if so, whether they appreciate and value what local artisans do. One consultants says, if you can sell to your neighbour do that. The closer and simpler the business transaction, the better. We are not proponents of packing and shipping and gaining customers 10,000 miles from where you live. But your neighbours may not have the level of income to buy what you make, they may be making the same things as you, or nobody in your region appreciates your culture. In Peru many middle and upper class people do not want to buy things made by the indigenous people. But North Americans think these products are beautiful. When they get an order from the USA, many artisans say, you have no idea how much your people are honouring us by appreciating the work we do. Markets, including local markets, change over time. Ten years ago in Armenia when most people could barely afford to buy food, the local market for artisan products included Westerners and ex-patriates working in non-profit organizations. In recent years appreciation of handmade products has increased among an intellectual and artistic middle class and so the local market has expanded. In countries where artisans have limited resources and no ability to export the emphasis is on trying to develop regional markets. In Uzbekistan artisans had little or no raw materials to work with. There were no entrepreneurs, no capital to invest and no banking system that promoted trade. The only possibility was to try to develop a local tourist business based on an increasing interest in the Silk Road. For artisans in some countries, setting up procedures for exporting is very difficult. In Mali there is little security and so there are problems of theft and graft in getting products by train or truck to a coastal port. Sending things by train is risky because a whole car can be stolen. Transporting by truck means adding “tariffs” to the cost of goods, because there are people who set up along the road and extort money. Sometimes artisans think that sales would be better if only they could get into the international market. But there are so many steps required to enter and compete in the international market. They need unique products that are well priced. However, products can become prohibitively expensive, for example, when artisans can’t get materials at a reasonable price. Consultants can try to help them design unique products but it is still hard to compete in the world market. The alternative is to try to make things for the local market and tourist market. It is advisable that artisan groups work on developing more than one market option. Rather than depending on one outlet, they need a wide array of customers. They can supply customers in a local market, a more distant regional market and also be ready to export to other countries. This gives greater flexibility in case sales in one of their markets suddenly stop. In Peru, Machu Pichu was a major tourist attraction until ten years ago when terrorism kept tourists away. Thousands of families who had relied on tourism looked for work elsewhere and some opened export businesses. As the government has recently been encouraging tourism large numbers of tourists are returning. As a result, many artisans who were involved in exporting are going back to making things for the tourist business.
  1. 4. Product Development in the Context of Alternative Trade and Ethical Business
In addition to mainstream commercial importers of handmade products, Alternative Trade Organizations (ATOs) and ethical businesses are bringing the work of artisans in less developed countries into the global marketplace. It is beyond the scope of this report to profile specific organizations and businesses that use fair trade practices and consumer education to promote cultural preservation and sustainable livelihoods for rural artisans. However, there are complex issues involved in expanding the market and supporting work with dignity. It is not only a matter of how to get products right for what the market wants, but also how to encourage importers and consumers to be interested in artisan products and concerns. Business Done Ethically There is an increasing demand for the commercial sector to have a sense of ethic and conscience.  Consumers are becoming more aware of fair trade and labour issues, such as child workers and poor conditions in factories, and people in less developed countries know what is fair for them and demand something better. Along with the promotion of Fair Trade in the Europe, USA and Canada, a misconception has developed among consumers. Because they have learned that some organizations and businesses that sell artisan products abuse the artisans, consumers assume that every craft importer takes advantage of the artisans by making a huge mark up. An importer--an intermediary--may only be concerned with making a business profit and may not be concerned with cultural preservation and keeping traditions and values alive. In the craft sector, this is what gives intermediary a bad name. But this is not always the case and many importers try hard to have fair and ethical relations with the artisans. A product designer/ importer concerned with ethical business practices makes sure she knows who is making the products she buys and that the people are well-treated. She visits cooperatives or the homes of people whose work she imports so that she knows the working conditions. She finds out if they are earning a livable wage, or a wage comparable to what people can barely live on, and she ensures that people are paid an acceptable amount. When business is done ethically it can be a positive force for generating income and improving people’s lives. Artisans fulfill orders, earn money and there is no corruption, where there is a spirit of ethical work. A consultant who is also an importer doesn’t charge the artisans for her time or development work. When she places an order with them she pays 50% of the money up front so they can buy materials and eat while they are filling the order. When they deliver the order, she pays the remainder; she doesn’t wait 30 days to pay. Sometimes she pays more than the artisans ask for their products because they don’t understand inflation rates, or because she knows what the products are worth when they do not. The fair trade market is small compared to the regular commercial market. And there are business people who run successful businesses, who have big hearts and share with their suppliers, the artisans they work with. There are also multi-million dollar commercial sector export companies that operate on fair trade principles. For example, a designer who works with artisans in the Philippines has handed over control of her company to her managers, and given employee stock options to everybody. Often these ethically minded business people are too busy to communicate about what they do as ethical businesses. Many of the small importers are the heroes of the industry. They establish relationships with the artisans over time; they are devoted to the artisans. They pay more to the craft producer than Fair Trade organizations can, but they don’t have the protection – subsidies – that the ATOs have.
  1. 5. Consumer Awareness
Handmade artisanal products can be presented in the global marketplace and be appreciated. To expand the market for artisanal products, the number of people who buy handmade products needs to increase. Many consultants are keen to raise awareness of artisan products, lifestyles and issues. Relative to the number of artisans in the world the Western industrialized marketplace is large enough to include every handmade product, if the incentive of buyers is strong enough. However, most North Americans know about cheap poorly made products for sale in local tourist markets; few are aware of the sophisticated artisanal products made in different regions of the world. Money needs to be invested in a long term sophisticated market awareness campaign that explains why consumers should buy handmade products. A consumer awareness campaign would raise questions about where things come from and how they are made; it would aim to increase understanding and conscience about the exploitation that typically occurs in the market and things that need to be changed, such as, low wages and lack of social security and environmental protection. In addition, organizations and businesses that work in good conscience need to increase public awareness of the realities of bringing artisan products to market through their advertising and P.R. campaigns. Buyers and consumers need to understand all the costs that add up associated with shippingand processing: containers, insurance, transportation from port of entry to the warehouse, warehousing, and export documentation. Everyone involved deserves to earn a fair--not exorbitant--profit. Western consumer choice plays a major role in product development because the aim is to bring artisans’ work into the international marketplace and have an audience. A market for artisan products relies on consumers knowing about them and wanting them. Consultants want consumers to understand:
  • Diversity of culture is a phenomenon for people in the West to appreciate.
  • These products come from rich traditions, which make our lives richer by knowing about them.
  • Handmade products are better in terms of craftsmanship or a spiritual or cultural message.
  • Something an artisan makes by hand is much more than the product itself; each textile contains vision and heartache and hope.
  • Buying a product helps someone feed their family.
  • Artisanal handmade products are soulful, not mad mindless consumption, or exploitative, made at the cheapest price just to get a product in the marketplace.
  • When they buy these products, they contribute to the overall health of the globe because they are helping artisans keep their cottage industry lifestyle
Approaches to Consumer Education Strategies for increasing consumer awareness are important and need to be developed. Some countries have adopted particular models; Japan honours exceptional artisans as “living national treasures” and India has the award of "Shilpa Guru" for outstanding mastercraftspersons. However, the question remains as to how to reach a wider audience to tell the stories of artisans and sell their work. Some options include:
  • Consultants contribute to increasing consumer awareness by sharing their experiences through writing and images. They can write articles, get interviews in trade magazines and give public talks.
  • It is too complex to develop a good housekeeping seal of approval for artisan products, like the European label for fair trade coffee or products. But product labeling is important to inform consumers about what they are supporting through their purchases.
  • Information hang tags to accompany every product can tell the story behind the product, which may appeal to consumers’ social conscience and touch something in their lives. When they read the story, they may want to support an initiative, such as, a particular woman’s group.
  • Information to be supplied with every order sent out can include: where the handmade product is from, who made it, what traditional culture it is based on, what are the materials, and where the buyer can get more information.
  • Consumers want a little but not too much information. There was an idea to use a point of purchase bar code label so the customer could go to an in-store computer and find information on the village where the product comes from. But most customers did not have time to do that.
  • Bring the stories into the media, including radio and TV, such as the History and Discovery channels.
Increase the connection with ecotourism. Case: Consumer education Artisan groups need a market. A consultant who works with cottage industry artisans in Laos, Thailand and elsewhere in Asia says their work is fabulous; very little needs to be tweaked to make it desirable in a North American market. A major part of her job is to help North American consumers understand how they contribute to the overall health of the globe when they buy these products. For almost 30 years she has travelled throughout U.S. and Canada, and to Australia and New Zealand to give workshops on using silk in spinning, weaving and felting. She gives as many as 15 slide lectures each year to the public as well as to workshop participants. She takes them on a journey through pictures and words to meet some artisans and learn about their lifestyle. She shows images of the villages, children, festivals, raising silk worms, gathering mulberry leaves, weaving, gathering reeds for basket making, and hand pounding spoons and knives and forks. Her goal is education in North America about the importance of promoting cottage industry around the world because this will help to sustain artisan lives and communities financially. She explains that the artisan lifestyle is agrarian; food production is the main income and cottage industry is a supplemental income. She tells her audience that artisans know their work and can make whatever anyone wants them to make. But North Americans must understand the importance of preserving cottage industry as a lifestyle. Not every part of the world can become a technologically advanced society like the West. The cottage industry lifestyle is needed to preserve the health of the globe. Helping artisans keep their lifestyle is part of our responsibility, which means thinking and making wise choices about how we spend our money. Whenever possible, she tells people about places involved in fair marketing that have good products and she also suggests catalogues and magazines. Her idea is to inform people about the artisans so that as consumers they will see things differently and pay attention to where things come from and who they are supporting through their purchases.
  1. 6. Responsible Development and Cultural Property Rights
 As more and more artisans from different regions of the world try to sell their work in international markets, there is increasing competition for buyers. Some countries, such as India and China, have a competitive advantage because of very low production costs, often due to cheap labour and exploitative child labour. Poor conditions also include a lack of enforcement of environmental regulations or standards for personal safety. Because of unfair price competition, artisans in Peru and Guatemala, for example, who do earn more in wages and have a higher standard of living, cannot compete with Indian artisans. A responsible form of development could lead to greater advocacy for improving conditions among the poorest workers, which in turn could lead to a more equalitarian competition among artisan groups around the world, competition that is about style, quality and taste as opposed to price. On the other hand, artisans, especially those in China, need employment. A consultant said that those in the West who may not agree with the country’s politics, need to get over their resentment that cheap products made in China and India are sold through large companies such as Pier 1 and Pottery Barn. The artisans need the work and these companies place big orders. Associated with increased competition from countries with cheap labour is the problem of designs and products being copied and reproduced at a lower cost. This problem is exacerbated when importers seek out the lowest cost of production, without regard to the cultural identity of the items. A buyer, who saw something she liked in Guatemala, didn’t buy it there because it was too expensive. But a year later her shop was selling Guatemalan type place mats that had been made in China. Distinctive cultural elements, such as those embodied in craft have mixed between regions for millennia by means of travellers, traders and invaders. However, in an increasing globalized world, there are enormous threats to cultural diversity. Cultural languages and forms are being diluted at an increasing rate. Embroidery as a design language is currently strong but the skills can be lost in one generation. Handweaving has many pressures. Increasingly, the international marketing of handmade products raises the issue of cultural property rights. Exploitation of cultural property rights is occurring in many places. In Indonesia, the weavers on the Island of Sumba produce exquisite textiles but all their designs are being replicated in Jakarta and sold to tourists. The people are at their lowest point in history due to environmental and economic problems and they cannot now compete with the production of their own textile design images being done in Jakarta. The cultural property rights of the Sumba weavers need to be protected. The question is how to discourage the breach of cultural property rights. What are UNESCO and other organizations doing about this problem?  MAIWA’s owner says that there needs to be a team of people who are sensitive to this issue and working on this. Networking is very important in order to identify when an indigenous design is inappropriately being used. She advocates putting pressure through letter writing to oppose appropriation of designs from one place by another. For example, write a letter of complaint about the Chinese production in Yunnan province of Kutch India embroidery designs. The Chinese copies are being sold at a price that is lower than what the poor Kutch women can make them for. It is necessary to impress upon people that copying cannot be allowed, especially in trade shows. Although it is common for knock-offs to be sold by street vendors, exporters and importers should have restrictions on breaching cultural property rights. In the past some cultures have not valued their artisanal products, but these will be more valued by them in the future. However, the establishing of cultural property rights for artisanal products will not be easy or in many cases possible. Basically the process could involve: identifying something clearly as an icon of a culture; defining a way to trademark or copyright the item; articulate a clear statement to the effect that a particular culture owns this item and if other people want to use this, they can buy the rights and pay royalties. For example, an American designer who uses an African Kuba cloth design in making a rug, ideally, would pay a fee to the village that dreamed up that design. III. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT ASSIGNMENTS  Product designers are brought into a wide range of situations to assist artisans in creating products to sell in new markets. The consultants who participated in this research are often hired by an organization for a specific time period according to a project guideline and budget. It is beyond the scope of this report to profile the organizations that consultants work for, but Aid to Artisans is a major player in sending designers abroad to work with artisans. III. 1. Consultants’ Research  Consultants prepare for their work abroad by doing research to learn about the people and history of the area. Some read as much as possible about the country and culture where they are going to work and they become informed about cultural symbols and traditional designs artisans have used in the past. Some visit museums and read books to learn in depth about the uses and meanings of ritual and everyday objects. Consultants who build on this material in their work with the artisans, often invest considerable personal time and resources travelling to different countries, looking at handicrafts, visiting artisan groups and learning what’s going on in each place. It is also part of their business to research the marketplace because it is important to give this information to artisans. They spend time learning about the international market by going to international gift shows, looking in stores, looking at fashion and interior design magazines from around the world, talking with colleagues who are consultants, designers, or buyers. One consultant writes a trend report and provides this information to artisan groups. Another learns about import and export quotas and duties, especially for countries that do little exporting. Market analysis is complicated but it is a source of valuable information for product development. A consultant who does market analysis acquires a wide range of information about such things as: competitive advantages in different regions, artisan tools and techniques, availability and costs of raw materials, and import tariffs. Knowledge about competitive advantages of artisanal products and price points in different countries helps a consultant be able to advise a group of artisans. For example: the Philippines have a very strong production capacity for certain products; East Indians produce large quantities at prices that almost no one in the world can compete with; certain countries face huge U.S. import duties for certain products but other countries do not have these duties for the same products. III. 2. Approaches to Product Development Consultants can have a range of assignments in their work with artisan groups. Sometimes they have the task of coming up with a product line within a designated time period. Sometimes they give workshops or seminars on topics ranging from natural dyeing, colour, and market trends to business skills, organizational development and exporting. Some designers become involved in getting artisan products into the marketplace. What they do depends in part on the assignment and in part on their particular approach. One route to product development is to look at the artisan products first, then adapt these to some extent and try to determine what market they fit into. Another approach is to look at the market first in order to design products for an identified market segment or niche. These are not mutually exclusive; usually there is a mixture of both, but a difference in emphasis influences how product development occurs in different situations. Interventions also differ according to an artisan group’s stage of market readiness. For example, a workshop in skills development would need follow up on developing products, which may then require follow up on making market links. Developing products with another group may be a matter of continuing to generate new designs in response to changing market demands over time, and the group is already familiar with the process. Differences in approach also reflect the degree to which an intervention is either pre-planned or facilitated, which makes a difference in how much ownership the artisans have in the process. Questions include: to what extent is product development dictated to artisans; how much is achieved through facilitation, drawing from the people’s traditions and experiences? What kind of opportunities do artisans have for gaining information and making decisions about the things they make? What kind of encouragement and guidance is available for innovation? In addition, consultants’ have distinctive personal styles and ways of relating to artisans, which demonstrate their level of experience, cultural knowledge and sensitivity as well as their understanding of the marketplace and ways to bring information, suggestions and perspectives to the artisans. A Range of Approaches The approach to product development in any instance depends on many considerations, including: how many people can be employed; what is the skill level, what profit margin is achievable, what are people’s views and values regarding cultural appropriateness of new products, and what opportunities are there for artisan learning and innovation. Following are examples of approaches to product development; they represent different ways of responding to culture, relating to artisans, and creating products for a market. A consultant who is primarily a market researcher tries to figure out who should be the market for a group of artisans and then decides what kind of products to make. The reason for this approach is to not waste effort in producing things that are not sellable. The method entails working with the buyers initially and having the end buyer in mind. The process involves determining the market niche, contacting buyers, asking what kind of things they would be interested in, showing them the materials and capabilities of a particular artisan group, developing a product they would be interested in at the right price point and then bringing the product to them and making the sale. About 30% of SERRV’s products are designed in-house. This labour intensive process includes a merchandise analysis based on their previous product sales. Then SERRV sets purchasing goals with particular groups: the product team defines how long they will maintain a purchasing goal and a time frame for getting groups to be able to work on their own. SERRV does not want the groups to be competing with each other by making the same kinds of things, like nativity scenes. A consultant whose work is usually U.S. market driven brings a huge suitcase filled with books, current fashion and interior design magazines, and piles of catalogs. She requires clients to keep the suitcase for the entire time she is working with them so that they can study what is happening in the marketplace. A picture communicates beyond words. This suitcase is her jumping-off point for creating products with each client. She also brings samples of products, which relate to the types of techniques that producers could use as well as show the quality considerations demanded by the market. Another consultant, whose perspective is to not change the culture too much, says generate ideas based on what they have, rather than preparing a package ahead of time and saying we need to do this because the trends are this. Most important in working with artisans is not to impose your own ideas because after you leave the process is not theirs and it doesn’t continue. Instead you influence the design but the ideas come from them. She even asks to borrow things people wear to use in the workshop and asks people, can you design from that? A consultant who views her work as creative collaboration says, I don’t go and say, let’s do this; this will do well in the market here. I am much more interested in: What do you do? How can that be put into a collection? How can that be modified, first of all to work well in your local economy and also how will it go over in the international market? During a workshop she had a wall of photographs of clay techniques and ideas of embellishment and she asked artisans, what would you add? A consultant who sees herself a facilitator, not a trainer or educator, says product development isn’t about bringing a design idea and telling artisans, this sells, will you make it? The facilitator says “in my experience” this kind of colour, or too much patterning, or these particular colours, are not likely to sell very well, or, if you have too many colours in the palette that is not going to last in the market. Quality of Relationships Most important is relationship with the artisans. Groups need face-to-face experience in developing products and connecting with the marketplace. Establishing good relationships is the basis of successful work as a consultant. Consultants’ perspectives and ways of working are reflected in how they are able to connect with the artisans. One consultant says the interaction must be one of  “totally respecting them.” She recognizes that how you show things to artisans makes a difference in how open they will be to learning. This approach helps instill a sense of craftsmanship, especially if they plan to enter the competitive international marketplace and they need to understand the importance of quality in their work, instead of taking short cuts. III. 3. Types of Product Development Work The following section contains examples of consultant’s work, including some of the things that happen when consultants give workshops or develop a product line. III. 3i. Giving Workshops   Facilitation One designer says a facilitator has more scope to be responsive to artisans as compared to a trainer who has a pre-planned program to be delivered. She outlined key points of product development facilitation:
  1. Show artisans the value of their traditional knowledge and skills, even if they have forgotten what used to be made, or what kinds of designs were done in the past. In each context, there are many reasons why cultural knowledge and skills have been lost, neglected or distorted.
  2. Be responsive to what skills and traditions people have, draw from their knowledge, experience and cultural traditions, derive from how people work and then build on that. Ask people questions and help to further their thinking and experiences.
  3. Give a framework for helping people think about what to create in order for things to be marketable. Set limits in terms of marketplace constraints. The intention is not to dictate but to see what will or will not likely be successful.
Relate to artisans’ experience and environment  A consultant gave a colour workshop to weavers from different countries of Asia with the aim to expand peoples’ sense of colour by looking at the world around them. As part of the workshop artisans were given two hours to look around outside and collect pieces of things to study the colours from their environment. They brought everything back to the workshop and the facilitator asked them to sort things into colour groups or relationships. She then asked everyone to select colours in order to make a limited palette. A similar exercise was used to encourage the revival of textiles that have not been woven for a long time. The facilitator asked the artisans to bring textiles from their homes and communities, textiles that represented who they are. She then referred to these textiles and asked the weavers how they might use certain parts of the design to limit the complexity of the original design in making a new product. Stimulate new design ideas Case: Laos. At a conference workshop on colour and design for Laotian weavers, a consultant demonstrated ways to design cushion covers and scarves and other things. She had lots of coloured paper and images cut out of magazines. She also took pieces of Laotian cloth, colour xeroxed them, cut up the copies and reorganized the pieces on sheets of coloured paper. In contrast to the traditional symmetrical designs she showed how one side of the cushion cover could have three stripes and the other side could have an intricate woven pattern. The weavers loved the look but it is not something they would have thought of because they learn in a traditional manner. It is easy for a North American designer to draw from different cultures and see what people do and how they do things and then mix it all up. This doesn’t necessarily go against the grain of Laotian weavers; they love thinking in terms of using their traditional things in different ways. But they have been taught the same way year in and out from grandmother to mother to granddaughter. This is the way it has been. Case: Peru. A consultant who gave a workshop on design, colour and creativity wanted to help artisans look at things around them and to incorporate motifs and colours into a product in a different way. She believed this approach would lead to something more sustainable rather than specifically designing a product for them. She introduced colour theory to teach about color combinations, such as the concept of analogous and complementary colours and how to avoid bright and dull colours fighting each other. Realizing that colour theory wasn’t very useful to them, she gave an exercise on colour combinations. All the balls of coloured yarn were put on the table; each person was given one ball of yarn and asked to take four or five other balls of yarn to put together with the first ball to make different colour combinations. The experience helped them learn; they became involved in doing it and seeing and helping each other. They made beautiful colour combinations. One woman worked with a pattern of the fields, using a different stitch and different colour for each field to make a beautiful patchwork. The consultant saw that the process was empowering for the participants because for the first time someone from abroad wasn’t saying, this is right and this is what you should do. They were developing it themselves. Develop distinctive products and product lines  Case: Bolivia. The aim of a series of workhops in Bolivia was regional economic development through helping the organization COMART make distinctive products to sell in their shop. Women from the different COMART groups organized a workshop and the leaders of about thirty groups participated in the seminar and they took all the information back to their groups in the towns they came from. The participants were mostly women who were producing craft at night after the family was fed and the children were in bed. They do this to earn extra money. But their attendance at the workshop varied each day, because of their obligations to their families. The consultant worked for COMART with handloom weavers and hand knitters to develop and give the artisans new ideas for products. The idea was to find new ways to use the products they were currently making and update them to try to increase their sales. She gave a four-day seminar each week for three weeks in three different towns, teaching about colour and colour relationships, finishing, quality control and merchandising. Recognizing that South American artisans had a different sense of colour, the consultant gave them exposure to a Western sense of colour and how colour components work together. She also talked about differences between Bolivian and Western perceptions of natural fibres as compared to synthetics fibres. The artisans were working with alpaca and llama wool, which are considered luxury fibres in the West. These could become high-end products if made very well. On the other hand if the finishing is poor quality, they might as well use sheep’s wool. The designer also explained merchandising, how to make a group of products that are similar in use and similar in pattern and colour. Instead of making one product that stands alone, a merchandising approach gives the artisan more products to sell and encourages buyers to purchase more products because they go together. For example: it is best for an artisan who is making a hat to also make a scarf and gloves that match. The Bolivian artisans appreciated the training; they understood what they were being told and shown and they saw what impact the experience would have on their lives. Developing a Product Line  Overcome resistance  Case: Turkmenistan. A designer was sent to Central Asia by Aid to Artisans with the purpose of giving a product development workshop. She had a limited time frame, three weeks, to come up with a product line that was priced. She poured her energy into generating designs and passing them out to the women, saying, can I see that in two days? She talked with them about how to interpret the designs. Some responded by saying they couldn’t do this and others by offering suggestions on how to do it. When she first worked in Turkmenistan the artisans discussed for several hours all the problems and why things were not possible to do. The designer wanted to work respectfully, but she felt compelled to say, “I have to leave here with a product line in three weeks. We need to discuss how we can do it, not if we can do it.” The frustration ended when one woman announced, give me something, I’ll do it, and then others agreed as well. The woman who was most resistant never made anything, but the rest became focused and worked hard to finish things. Later when they looked at the line of products they had made, they were pleased with what they had been able to accomplish. The women then documented how the things were made, and as time permitted, they made duplicates so they knew how to do them again after the workshop was over and the consultant had left. Assess people’s abilities and try to develop their skills  A product designer needs a variety of skills in order to be able to assess artisans’ skills. This includes, for example, not only technical skills but also abilities in quality control and pricing. A consultant can recommend not only what products to develop but also about what capacities people have that can be utilized and strengthened. She identifies and makes note of what different people do well, such as, someone does good embroidery, another has good management skills, or someone is a potential group leader. For example, in Kyrgistan the leader of a district group was well organized and also focused on quality and so she could take responsibility for quality control. A woman who attended to details could take charge of production; another person had abilities in marketing. Assess the capabilities of the groups to become self-sustaining  A consultants tries to identify which organization or group is the most cohesive, the best organized, and most likely to have the capability to go the whole distance in terms of production and marketing. She also looks for a smaller group that is on the verge of having production capability, perhaps with assistance of the larger group, which may have enough work to employ and train more people. For production, she works with both levels – the one that is already capable of large production and one that has smaller capacity but able to grow. Case: Mali. A designer was sent to Mali by Aid to Artisans to develop home furnishings based on traditional cotton textiles and leatherwork. She designed a group of products based on Bizan, a beautiful jacquard weave fabric that is further patterned with tie-dye or batik and embroidery. Wealthy people wear this cloth daily and poor people save money to buy it for high holy days or to wear during Ramadan. The designer went to Mali for one month to meet the artisans and review the sector. Six months later she returned for three weeks to make products that were later displayed and sold in the ATA booth at the New York Gift Fair. The new products were pillows, tablecloths, runners, place mats, napkins, slippers and robes made out of this fabric. The number of different things that they could make astounded the artisans. The only thing that changed was the end product, not the skills. The colours were ones that people used ordinarily but they were also ones she thought would be acceptable in the Western marketplace. Her job was to put them together in a different way. When she visited different places where artisans were working, she identified two groups that make Bizan. One woman, a well-known dyer in Bamaka has a large organization, works in a building and employs about 40-50 people in the dyeing process. Local people come to her to have fabrics made and she is capable of making large quantities. Another woman runs a small organization and teaches the process to eight to ten girls about 16 years of age. This woman sits under a thatched shelter in a fishing village and uses water from the Niger River. She knows all the combinations of dyes that give different colours. A big fabric sampler is stitched together with small pieces of all the colours she has ever dyed. When asked for a particular colour, she figures it out in her head and tells the girls what to do to get that colour. The consultant involved both organizations in the production; she asked the smaller one to produce one group of fabrics because she wanted to help the small organization grow. Produce quality designs on time One designer consultant works with a small staff to produce 200 excellent new products for SERRV in two months. Many designs are generated and only a few are selected for production. For example, to get 200 quality designs they go through five versions of each one. They work on 1000 designs to produce 200 in the hope that 12 will become top sellers. All the groups that SERRV works with have computers because SERRV buys in quantity from them; the groups are profitable and can afford to buy the computers. The artisans can take pictures of the products with a digital camera and send the images to the designer. This process saves time and money and facilitates communication about revisions. Earlier, when a product was sent which was not right, there could be no revisions until the designer made another visit to the group. III. 4. Difficulties in Product Development Assignments  Some of the difficulties product designers experience are related to project demands, time limitations and production uncertainties. III. 4i. Project Demands  Lack of in-country preparation A designer, sent to Indonesia to work with a group of wood carvers, anticipated helping artisans to come up with new design motifs and create small furniture items. However, the artisans expected to be given completed designs and they did not have the necessary cabinetry skills to produce the kind of required finished product. Limited number of resource people A consultant had to learn many things beyond her area of expertise because of many different requirements to be fulfilled and few people to share the responsibilities. When a consultant works with a large company, different people become experts in different layers of the operation. In the artisan sector, designers try to contribute as much as they can. For example, ordinarily a production manager would figure out the best yield on four metres of fabric; this is something she had to learn to do. Time Limitations  Inappropriate expectations A designer sent to work with rural woman’s groups in the Andes found an organization had given the women looms and some basic training and then had left them. While she was introduced to the artisans as someone who could help them enter the international marketplace, she was given one hour to work with them. And the women needed to learn how to sew to be able to make products from their woven fabric. In the limited time, the designer showed them pictures from catalogues and magazines to give them an idea of the marketplace, but the experience was frustrating; she wanted to do something more useful. Limited time for cultural awareness When the project time is too short and there is not enough time for research in advance, the designer is not able learn enough about cultural customs or traditions before starting the product development. Given two days to work with felt makers in Georgia, a consultant had little time to develop products and the yarns were acrylic or poor quality wool. She had no time to change the materials. As she worked quickly she changed the colour of some items, but one woman said she could not knit these colours, because they were for men’s socks. The consultant felt badly that she had not checked ahead of time and known about this tradition. Insufficient time to work one on one A training project that is three weeks is not long enough for a consultant to be able to give individual attention, even though she wants to help each person. There is so much work to do to get a group together, and support them, that it is often a challenge to be able to help individuals. Increased use of technology in product design and communication Local NGOs that help numerous small village groups of artisans market their products, and that are successful in getting enough international assistance, have been able to afford computers. It is rare that individual artisan groups have this capacity, even if they sell a lot of products. Only large organizations, with a field staff that speaks English, can do design work via fed-ex, fax, email and digital imaging. Electronic technology is helpful but takes too much time. One designer now takes more time to prepare and scan a design sheet and send it digitally to artisan groups than three or four years ago when she did drawings by hand, and prepared and mailed a design sheet. Also, the color on the artisan group’s computer monitor may not be calibrated the same as the designer’s, and so a colour reference sheet has to be mailed. In addition, email is time consuming. A consultant gets complicated emails everyday from all over the world, rather than as before, getting one fax in a season about what the artisan group is sending. Production Uncertainties Consultants describe problems in communicating with artisans and getting the products right: What the consultant designed is not necessarily produced. For example, when the dyes are not right and the colours are muddy instead of bright, all the colours have to be adjusted. There is a litany of things that drive you crazy. A designer doesn’t know how a product is going to work out even though the artisan is skilled and can do a complicated weaving, for example. They could figure out difficulties together at the loom, but the designer is not right there with her. A designer puts every detail in the working drawing, because she knows she can’t make assumptions. Often she has to explain what the product is going to be used for because the artisans may not have a clue. III. 5. Collaboration with Others in the Country of Work  In their work with artisans in different countries consultants benefit in a number of ways from collaboration with others  Project Field Directors The project field director is often a local person who can provide references to books and other information to help the consultant prepare in advance for her work with a particular group of artisans. The field director is often knowledgeable about the region and the people and generally identifies skills in different communities before the consultant arrives. The field director looks for groups of artisans that have talent and may start to organize and bring these people together informally.  Sometimes there are a wide variety of skills and levels of quality and the artisans are spread out geographically.  Often arrangements are made to bring artisans together in a central location or city for a workshop. A field director who helps the consultant during a project may also continue to work with the artisans after the project is over. For example: a three week training period is too short to work out costs and local means of transport to take finished products from the local region to the capital city for exporting.  The field director can get this information or direct others to figure this out. After the project ends, a field director may also help artisans set up a business and take care of an office to handle exports. In-Country Facilitators An in-country facilitator can help with problem solving. For example: in Peru, this person helped artisans take a product development workshop seriously. As a foreigner, the consultant felt she could not tell the women to try harder but the in-country facilitator spoke forcefully to make them understand why the workshop was important for them. The poor rural artisans did not understand how product development could benefit them and that learning the process could provide them with some income and hope. The Peruvian facilitator said, is this what you want for your life? Is this what you want for your children? She was tough with them, but it helped and the consultant felt it was the right thing to do. In another instance, a consultant needed help from the in-country director to solve the problem of lack of commitment and poor attendance during a three week product development workshop. To encourage participation they decided to offer certification to those who finished the course. This succeeded as an incentive; from then on attendance was recorded and the women received certification at the end. In-Country Designers  Explaining design concepts to groups in rural areas of less developed countries is often difficult. The consultant finds that often the artisans have no idea what she is talking about when she gives a design idea. So it is valuable to have a counterpart in-country who can act as a design interpreter, or translate the ideas sensitively. Especially when working with ATOs or larger businesses, it is helpful for a consultant to be able to work with an in-country designer. Some organizations, for example in Chile, have professional part time designers who are not on staff, but are brought in as needed. In this case, the consultant can give an idea and they are able to generate many more ideas from this. Product development consultants who work with good product designers abroad can rely on them to work out details based on an initial design concept or a picture that shows the type of product, its size and colours.  For example, a designer created a colour palette and sample swatch for a table cloth and sent it to a good designer in India who knew, based on previous orders, how to make place mats and napkins in the right dimensions. A few consultants have had positive experiences working with product development people in other countries. Some of these people are well trained and others can draw enough to communicate their ideas. The problem is they don’t understand market-led design and they don’t have enough exposure to the market to know what will sell. They need to rely on Western consultants to tell them what would sell.  Associates Working in remote places where artisans have never or only once dealt with other markets takes time. A consultant who worked with basketry people in the Philippines says it is important to have someone from within the country with you who the artisans have either heard of through reputation or they know. This opens all kinds of doors and establishes trust. Then they know that when you order 5, 10 or 30 of different things you will follow through. Because artisans need their materials, she pays half the price at the beginning. And she leaves the other half with the person in-country to pay the artisans when products are delivered to Manila for export. Often a large company needs a person in-country (schooled abroad or an expatriate) who understands the requirements of product consistency and quality in the North American market. This person can then check on production and receive the goods before shipping abroad to assure that what is produced corresponds to what was ordered. Consultants may also learn from other foreign consultants working abroad. For example, a designer has met other product developers from Australia, Holland and Great Britain who have worked in Bangladesh. Learning from them about how they work and what products they create for different markets has broadened her own scope of working in Bangladesh. III. 6. An Idea to Build on Collective Wisdom One designer said it does not make sense for each consultant to be “reinventing the wheel” in their work with artisans. Many organizations are trying to help out but they do not talk to each other and they each start from the beginning. Of particular use would be a manual or an interactive website or database that contained ideas for working with artisans. This could include experiential methods for teaching design, colour, quality and how to be entrepreneurial. Ideally this would contain experiential learning exercises of a product development curriculum, examples of design projects that helped artisans learn through their experience of the design process. Also useful would be examples of methods used in different places to translate design concepts in ways that relate to artisans’ cultural experience and stimulate their learning about design and colour. The designer would benefit from a “how to do” book that contained information on how other consultants work with artisans, what processes are used, how the artisan group responds and what they learn. Each designer has their own way of doing things and each project has its own challenges but there are common elements that could be shared and benefit all. Another designer sees there is a direct conflict for independent consultants who compete for contracts to share their professional knowledge freely with other consultants. She feels her professional skills are part of what makes her distinctive as a consultant and she must convince would-be contractors that she is the most qualified and competent for a particular assignment. If she shares her professional skills with other consultants she will no longer have a competitive edge. Another designer would like to works with others who are willing to collaborate on developing a manual. She likes the idea of gathering and telling the stories of specific places and situations. She sees this as a process for learning rather than a problem of competition and stealing ideas. More and better ideas are needed. She feels there could be more work for people to do than there are consultants prepared to do this work.
  1. ELEMENTS OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
This section includes topics that consultants try to explain to artisans in order to help increase their capacity to make excellent products, know how to do business, identify the right market for their work and make sales. Increasingly the successful groups have both design capacity and business capabilities.
  1. 1. Basic Requirements
There is a  wide range among artisan groups in terms of their knowledge of traditional techniques and designs as well as their stage of business development. At the very beginning there are basic requirements that need to be met before the introduction of other elements of product development. These include:
  1. Foundational knowledge and skill. A technical level has to be reached, such as, knowledge of fibres and dyes, before talking about designing a product. For example: a weaver might have taken ten hours to produce a wonderful ikat dyed and woven scarf, but after one washing the intricacy of the pattern is completely gone, because the dyes were not colourfast.
  2. Materials bank. The lack of high quality and consistent supply of raw materials is often a problem. Artisans need good quality raw materials. For example: before beginning to design products, replace cheap yarns with good quality cotton, silk or wool and obtain good quality natural dyes and low impact chemical/synthetic dyes that are already measured out, since most people cannot achieve the exactitude of measuring that is required.
  3. Resource library or design bank. Artisans need to be able to see images of their own cultural heritage and cultural property, such as, many examples of traditional textiles that people can refer to in creating new work. Access is important to a good library with magazines and books, or an on-line image library, which AEN wants to develop. Visual stimulation for product development could be provided through design centers around the world. As an example, under their Ministry of Trade, the Design Center of the Philippines has produced excellent catalogues of their tribal images and a record of product development work that has been done.
  1. 2. Quality Control
How to increase artisans’ understanding of the importance of quality and consistency in production is an important element of product development. The quality acceptable to artisans in many countries is most often not acceptable to buyers in U.S., Europe, Japan, Australia and Canada. Artisans do not realize that foreign buyers and consumers are very demanding, particularly in the U.S. When commercial buyers make large orders of a product they want each item to be exactly like what they ordered. They don’t want surprises. Although one of the beauties of handcrafted products is that everything is not identical, North American consumers expect to receive what they ask for and they don’t want to be disappointed. Because this requirement of standardization is so difficult for artisans to understand and to execute, consultants need to assist them in using good quality materials and improving techniques. Example. A consultant working in Turkmenistan had difficulty ensuring that artisans made pillows that were square and not some other shape.  She showed them how to make a square by folding the fabric on the diagonal and seeing that any extra fabric meant one side would be longer than the other and the pillow would not be square. Quality control and consistency is a major issue because artisans are not used to making large quantities of the same thing. A training program for quality control involves identifying all the ways a product can be made poorly so that mistakes can be anticipated and problem-solved in advance. A list of quality control criteria can be established for making a particular product. Criteria can include such things as the acceptable properties, quality and cleanliness of raw materials and the standard to be met at each step in the process of making the product. In addition, arrangements can be made for skilled artisans who have been trained in quality control to work with other artisans to ensure a good standard is met. Example. The aim of a training session with dyers was to improve consistency of colour. The question was: how will the artisans consistently make three print fabrics that coordinate with a solid colour fabric of the same orange, whether the dye formula is written down or not?
  1. 3. Business Skills
As well as quality control, the development of business skills needs to be emphasized, including reliable on-time delivery. Although artisans first of all want to make sales, they need education in all aspects of running a business. They don't understand the demands of doing business in the U.S., for example, and that communications have to be answered immediately and truthfully. At least 80% of what artisans worldwide need to learn to be successful is the same as what small business people in the U.S. need to learn. Not only artisans but also anyone in small business needs help in understanding how to make a business survive, work and be profitable. These things can be taught, but in most countries artisans are on their own; there are no free resources on small business administration nor college or university extension courses to help people out. Example. In the Surin region of east Thailand, a consultant helped a group of women with business development. The women were skilled weavers and well organized as a group but they needed business and organizational skills to keep track of what they had done. They had no way to respond to a customer who wanted to reorder a product. The consultant provided assistance in organizational details, such as, giving a code number to each style of an item, which was entered into a ledger, and then recording how many of each had been ordered by a particular customer. In this way the women could keep track of which were the more desirable colours as they started selling. They were excited by the idea of being able to reproduce things for people. Itemizing products and keeping a ledger was a revelation to these women. Typically, in Peru an artisan business starts with the nuclear family, including cousins, uncles and aunts, who may make up a whole town. In order to benefit more people, rather than competing with each other, a group of artisans can learn to run their own enterprise. In the process several families can be encouraged to work together and possibly share the work with each other, especially if they have a large order. Resources: Artisan Enterprise Network business development curriculum and information for artisans. Making Cents, an experiential learning model to teach entrepreneurship. 
  1. 4. Costing and Pricing
An objective of product development is to create a product at a certain price and have it sell. However, setting the right market price is a major consideration for artisan groups. Some of the concerns include: The price the market will pay is often not commensurate with the time that has gone into production. Institutions that represent artisans and export their products have done time and motion studies, accurate costing of raw materials and overhead. After doing the number crunching they found the price is higher than what the market will bare. Market forces influence the selling price and this is very hard on artisan production. One consequence of this is a reduction in quality and distinctiveness in order to reduce costs. Intricately designed products are not in the market because the market can’t afford them. Particularly high quality work is not available in the commercial market because department stores won’t pay the price. It is common for an artisan to take a product to the local market and a customer will bargain the price down to less than half the price the artisan initially asked for. They do not know whether they are losing money or making money. In order to help a group of felt makers in Turkmenistan establish an initial cost for an item, the designer asked questions, such as: How long did this take to make? How much did the fibre cost? How long does it take to prepare the fibre before making felt? How long does it take to sew? What is a fair wage? Determining an initial cost is complicated and there can be misunderstanding. When asked how many hours it takes them to make something the women say they have to cook for their children and families. But the purpose of the question is not to make them work eight hours a day. One hour a day would be all right. The question is how many hours does it actually take to make something. The advantages of teaching about costing and pricing is that artisans learn where they lose money and they can maintain a good profit margin. They may find the cost of a product needs to be $60 or it can be $10. As they think about what a product is worth, they can determine whether they could sell more and make more profit. Or they know exactly what they can do, for example, when a customer tries to bargain. They can say, no I’d be losing money if I lowered the price that much but I’d be prepared to go down a small amount. They also realize where they can be more efficient, such as by making a bulk order of fibre or making only one trip to the market. Without information about costing and pricing, artisans do not understand the differences between the cost of what they make and the product’s wholesale and retail cost. They don’t know about the chains a product goes through to reach the retail marketplace. Consultants can help artisans understand what is involved. For example, when artisans see something in a catalogue with a U.S. retail price of $100 and the product is almost identical to what they make, they want to sell their product for the same price in their own country to a tourist or ex-patriate. But a tourist doesn’t want to pay that much and it is not appropriate for them to do so. It is hard for artisans to understand they should not ask $100 for that product and there is a legitimate difference between what they get for a product and the price a buyer pays. Although in some cases a very large percentage goes into the buyer’s pocket, not all the difference goes into the buyer’s pocket. It is important to help artisans understand the legitimate steps and costs involved. Explain what goes into the final retail price. For example, what steps have to happen to get a product from a rural village in Albania to the end consumer market in Los Angeles? How many people are involved and what are the costs associated with carrying out each step? Examine which steps in the process may be circumvented or combined or altered in some way to minimize the overall costs involved.
  1. 5. Local Market Options
Opportunities for selling in local and tourist markets are not always fully recognized. Often artisans don’t know there is a local tourist market for well-made items that could sell at a good price. In Peru, where there are both low-budget backpackers and tourists who stay in expensive hotels, a consultant advised the women hand knitters to make a sweater that was better designed and more expensive than the $5 ones they were selling on the street to the backpackers. She suggested they make something that would appeal to tourists who were looking for the quality level of a $100 sweater, commonly sold in stores that have export businesses. If the artisans could make a better quality sweater they could sell it for less than in the stores because they had a lower overhead. The women could tap into a new market and make a bigger profit for the same amount of work. A consultant can help artisans generate ideas for products to sell in local markets. To develop products for a tourist market involves knowledge of the artisans’ raw material situation, market possibilities, available funds and also tourists’ preferences. The process requires a blend of elements from the artisans’ culture and skills, and ideas about practical and functional products that a tourist will likely want to buy. The designer takes the artisans through a brainstorming process to try to open doors for them and inspire them to come up with their own ideas. Focusing on a particular product that they make, she tried to draw out what they thought they would change in order to sell the product within their region. Then she helped them with the design and the colours.
  1. 6. Market Layers
Whatever marketplaces are viable options for particular artisan groups, artisans are advised to layer their product designs in order to sell in different segments of the market. The marketing triangle is a useful tool to explain to artisans about differentiating between high and low-end levels of the market and targeting the appropriate level. At the top of the triangle are the high-end one-of-a-kind pieces, the traditional and ethnic objects of very high quality. A small market for these exists among private collectors, fine art galleries and museums gift shops. Artisans may be able to sell a few of these if they have some available. The market widens progressively towards the bottom of the marketing triangle. Handmade objects that involve simple adaptations of artisan skills reach a broader audience through small stores or catalogues or companies that sell exclusively handmade or ethnographic pieces. At the bottom of the triangle are cheap products, commodity items, such as fanny packs from Guatemala or poorly-made fabric wallets from Kyrgistan. Aside from expensive one-of-a-kind pieces or cheap items at the lower end of the marketplace, products based on minor adaptations of traditional designs or ones that are primarily market-led designs can fit a range of market levels. The target audience can be local or international, a tourist or a specialty market. SERRV regularly uses market-led design to employ artisans making Christmas items, such as Santa Claus and nativity scenes. By contrast, consultants who design artisan products as home furnishings recommend the middle to high-end market where the quality and therefore the profit margin is greater than at the low-end but the market is still broader than in the highest market level. The development of well-made products for sale in high-end markets is important for building artisans’ confidence in their skills and consumer awareness of excellent craftsmanship and designs.
  1. 7. Merchandising
A key concept of product development is building a product line or collection. The idea is to develop a group of different but related products, for example, a variety of sizes, shapes, colours, and prices. In terms of merchandising, a balance of related products helps a good item to sell better. A collection of pillows, for example, of different sizes – small, medium and large, and different shapes - square, oblong or a bolster cushion, make a rich product line when they are put together. A collection makes an impact on the potential customer who may then consider buying one or more of these. Similarly it doesn’t work to display everything the artisans can make. It is best to choose pieces that are most sellable, develop collections based on these products and remove other things. It is not effective marketing to overwhelm a potential buyer with so many products that they can’t focus on the best items. A product line with a variety of prices includes a number of high, medium and low price items. For example, a complicated beautiful hand-embroidered pillow cover, with embroidery like on a wedding dress in Turkmenistan is high price. Only a few artisans can do this quality work and only a few pillows would sell in a season, perhaps five in one month.  A medium price item can have a combination of hand embroidery and machine embroidery. Lower price pieces can be lightly machine embroidered or have stripes of fabric and a little handwork, but the fabric can still look Turkmen and work with the product line. Example. A consultant wanted to explain the concept of building a collection--a felt rug, several pillows and ottomans--to make a strong presentation in a store. However, in cities of the former Soviet Union there was little reference point for teaching this concept. In some stores there would be a pair of white high heels, next to a bra, next to a bottle of vodka and several antiques. In a rural area, the designer saw how people put things together inside a yurt and then she was able to refer to the artisans’ culture to explain concepts of quality, merchandising and building a collection. This helped the artisans understand her explanation of how things can work together in a way that isn’t all “matchy-matchy”.
  1. 8. International Market Trends
Market trends indicate directions for product development. And certain parts of the market are more suitable than others for handmade artisanal products. Two expanding markets relevant to artisans are home furnishings and children’s clothing. The home furnishing market is growing because Westerners are more focused on their homes and many work from home. And, although producing clothes for adults is too difficult because a certain fit is required, childrens’ clothes are more forgiving; it doesn’t matter as much if something doesn’t quite fit properly. The difficulty for artisans to know and keep up with changing trends can be offset to some extent if they can design things that are timeless. A consultant can tell artisans about the trends and recommend what products to make, but it is a good idea for them to work on making things that can sell season after season. Sometimes artisans are trained to produce things which a year later are no longer in fashion and the import company goes elsewhere for new products. A consultant’s advice is to be aware of certain directions but also develop unique culturally distinctive products that are timeless. Example. Because embroidery and knitwear is done in many places a special kind of product needs to be developed. In Kyrgistan, a local modern designer applied stitch work to make quality items that had a special attention to detail.
  1. 9. International Market Exposure
Several consultants said it is an eye-opening experience for artisans or representatives of artisan groups to attend trade shows, such as, the New York International Gift Fair (NYIGF). For people who do not know about the U.S. market, this trade show gives them a sense of the scope of the endeavour. They learn how to present and market their products and what level of quality is needed. They get lots of ideas because they learn about the competition and see new materials. After experiencing a trade show, artisans more readily understand what a product designer tries to explain about the international marketplace. The Aid to Artisans Market Readiness Training Programme at the NYIGF is particularly relevant for artisan groups that are preparing to enter the international marketplace. ATA offers informative presentations on colour and market trends, how to package and display products, how to deal with catalogues, and more. A consultant said ATA doesn’t miss a thing. Every aspect of the business is taught. Artisans learn throughout the program and the trade show about what is being made and who is buying it and then they can go directly to see where things sell in New York stores. There is nothing else like it.
  1. 10. Trade Links
Enabling artisan groups to have the capacity to sell in an international marketplace and to sustain their marketing is a complex process that requires new kinds of links between development and commerce. Increasingly the development sector needs to meet up with market realities and understand how to get artisan products purchased. At the same time, good import businesses need to be encouraged because they can have a significant impact on improving livelihoods. Product development consultants can be good designers but they also need to be able to connect artisans to the marketplace. An experienced designer can give specific contact information to artisan groups and encourage them to contact the buyers. Sometimes artisan groups expect the designer to make the contacts for them and sometimes the groups do not follow-up on the leads they have been given. However, if an import company can be introduced to, and attracted by, a particular artisan group and their products then a trading relationship can be initiated. As artisan groups improve their capacity to consistently produce quality marketable goods and to effectively run a business they have greater need for increasing their market access. Aid to Artisans (ATA) based in USA and TraidCraft in UK are the only non-profit organizations that provide trade facilitation services to artisan groups. As well as providing product design advice and marketing training, ATA, for example, promotes artisan products through their booth at trade shows and assists producers to make permanent links with importers, wholesalers and retail buyers who will place orders and import directly from the artisan groups. The most appropriate marketing route for a particular artisan group depends on many factors, such as, their readiness to export and the price point of the craft products. In addition, the development of a trade partnership depends on the capacity of an Alternative Trade Organization to sell their products or the fit between their craft and a commercial importer’s product range. SERRV and Ten Thousand Villages are major ATOs that work with artisans worldwide and promote craft products to a clientele that is largely middle class and charity or church groups. SERRV, which sells through a catalogue, and Ten Thousand Villages, which has a string of retail shops in North America, have a similar scope of products in terms of price and look. Recently they shifted their staff and services in order to make their products more in line with standard commercial demands for good product design: functionality, value, and quality. A commercial company or catalogue is often willing to buy more products at a higher price than a North American ATO. As a result, an artisan development project coordinator may choose not to go the ATO route for sales. Artisan groups that have the capacity can be advised by consultants to enter the commercial market directly. Earlier, 10 years ago, most groups were not ready; they did not maintain quality control or know about documentation. But now a generation of export ATOs has matured and some have greater capability than the American ATOs that are buying from them. SERRV and Ten Thousand Villages are trying to devise a method for helping artisans reach their markets directly, rather than doing the selling for them. In response to an increased capacity among artisan groups to enter the commercial market, SERRV wants to structure its programs to assist artisans in design and marketing. Rather than buying the products, SERVV would have the capacity to be an importer. ATO markets do not provide enough work and hope for artisan groups; they have not been sufficient to alleviate poverty. In the U.S. and even in Europe ATOs are in trouble. The largest in Europe, Oxfam, recently closed its stores to craft projects, ended all its crafts projects abroad, and began reorganizing to be more in line with accepted commercial procedures in terms of quality, design, price and competition in a global marketplace. It turns out that e-commerce is not the best way. At first EZIBA was an e-commerce business for selling craft. Later they printed a hard copy catalogue. Buyers wanted to see the printed page and not spend time looking through an on-line catalogue. Peoplink, who developed the CATGEN software in order for producers to get their information and products on-line, had to close their on-line catalogue because few customers were using it and few artisans were benefiting. The best hope for artisans to make a decent living comes from regular clients in the marketplace who run successful growing businesses, and who have the ability to continue to place re-orders month after month from producer groups. Over the long run what raises people out of poverty is steady employment, and reward for quality and punctuality, combined with a responsible business partner who ships products on time. A win-win-win commercial relationship for everyone would come about if sound businesses spent more of their budgets on handmade products (from places other than China), worked with wholesalers under different circumstances (for example, a lower agent's fee instead of a typical wholesaler's markup), and sold lots artisans’ work. A different kind of business relationship would mean helping the wholesaler link directly with responsible artisan groups to share market information and product design suggestions. 
  1. 10i. Communication in the Chain of Distribution
Establishing trade links relies on developing good relationships with different companies. Some companies can and want to buy well-made handmade products from all over the world. Others will do this because it is a fad, but the advantage is they have huge markets. Ideally artisan groups can link up with importers who understand their needs and the impact that sales of their products will have. In any case, it is important to communicate with the buyer, the retailer or catalogue producer, about the nuances of working with the artisan sector, because the process is very different from mass-production in a big factory in China, for example. The importer/buyer needs to be informed about how a certain product is classified in the gift business or what import category it will be; how many items the artisan group can realistically make in a month; whether the artisans have electricity and water and why their products might arrive late; what are the import and export quotas and duties, especially for countries that do not export in significant quantities. Larger companies, especially bigger chains who sell artisan products need to be encouraged to keep the information hang tags on the products so that consumers can be informed about the source of the product.
  1. CONTRADICTIONS IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Relationships between consultants and artisans include an intersection of different cultural values and ways of living and working, which prompts questions about what is right, what is the respectful and responsible way to work, and what are the moral and ethical implications of any product development intervention. Contradictions emerge in product development because of different perspectives people bring to the situation. The interaction between consultants and artisans has a mutual influence in shifting how people think. For the consultant, cultural sensitivity is demanded not only in regard to the kinds of products that are made but also to the different ways and conditions of living and working
  1. 1. Quality and Consistency Standards
It is a major challenge for product designers who work to create a perfect prototype and then artisans produce something different, either in quality, colour or design. Although artisans do not see inconsistencies as a problem, this is not good for the customer, the designer or the artisans. Market demand for good quality and colour consistency is often in stark contrast to the conditions in which artisans work and the availability of their materials and supplies. A consultant recognizes the gap between her expectations for product quality and what is possible for artisans given the physical, social and environmental conditions that influence what quality they ordinarily achieve. For example: woman embroiderers in villages of Bangladesh were asked to produce clean white silk cloth, but what they produced was not acceptable. It was difficult for them to keep the cloth clean because they worked on it in their homes, which have dirt floors, no tables or chairs. They have never been in an environment with a wood floor, table, chair, decent lighting, or hot and cold running water so they can wash their hands to keep the fabric clean. Although the designer tried to teach quality standards, they had no experiential base to understand or apply the training because that’s as clean as it gets with dirt floors and they think it is pretty clean already. Weavers in a Laotian village where they do natural dyeing and manage to keep up with orders for a small mail order catalogue find it almost impossible to meet market demand for consistent colours. The consultant wanted to know why 15 very different colours were produced with the same dye plant. When asked what type of dye pot was used, the women said any pot they had. They do not have a stainless steel non-reactive dye pot needed to obtain the same colour every time. Asked what mordant (a dye fixative) was used, they said wood ash, whatever kind of wood the boy brings them. While the consultant suggested that they could have more colour consistency if the same kind of ash were used for each dyebath, she also realized that in such a poor place, where wood is not readily available, it is difficult to get the same wood time after time. She feels product development must not make major changes in the materials artisans use.
  1. 2. Safety and Environmental Hazards of Dyeing
 Case: Central Asia Felt makers in Central Asia buy dyes from the market in little rolled up pieces of paper. There are no directions, no description of content, no safety data sheet and no indication of where the dyes come from.  The women often mix the dyes without gloves, dye the felt using a wooden implement to move the wool around in the dye pot and then dispose of the wastewater in the garden where they grow vegetables. Their hands turn the same colour as whatever they are dyeing. Sometimes they used Soviet made gloves, which were poor quality and fell apart. The ATA project provided the women with thicker better quality gloves that lasted longer. But the consultant realized that by increasing the amount of orders of dyed felted products there would be an increased risk to safety and the environment. She recommended the women switch to plant dyes and a workshop was provided to teach artisans the use of natural dyes. They learned to measure quantities accurately and get more consistent colours. However, introducing natural dyes brought additional problems, such as: finding local sources of dye materials, getting information on the season and method of extraction of the dye materials, setting up a business to import dye extracts if necessary, absorbing the additional expenses of producing natural dye products and dealing with concerns of colour consistency and fading through a complex process of dye testing.
  1. 3. Impact on Artisan Lifestyle
High quality skills and designs are emphasized in designing products for sale in the higher-end market. But production capacity of small producers needs to be taken into account, especially as this relates to a cultural difference in work ethic.
  • A consultant who sees her role in encouraging a healthy cottage industry lifestyle, says that product development must not significantly change people’s work in terms of the demand on their time. Many artisan groups cannot fill a large order even if they get one from a big company. And the pressure to fill large orders can go against the way people view their work. Trying to be helpful, a consultant suggested to Laotian weavers that they could lower their price when they get a large order. The answers she received made her realize how far removed Western society is from a cottage industry lifestyle. After much loud discussion, the weavers responded that larger orders would mean more work for them and less time with their families and less time for other chores and relaxation. The larger orders would bring added stress and they should be paid more not less.
  • A consultant worked with artisans in Central Asia to develop a product line in a limited amount of time. In the process she confronted questions about whether she was imposing her own work ethic on the
artisans. She had a plan to produce things to take back to North America, she kept designing in the evenings because there was not much to do, and she arrived the next day with expectations that the women would also work at her pace. But their pace was slower and they missed workshop time for a variety of reasons, such as, father’s day or a festival day and they didn’t let her know in advance. Sometimes if they agreed to do something in two or three days, when that time came round they would say it will be done tomorrow. This was frustrating and sometimes she felt like a slave driver and she had to check herself for pushing them. She had to consider whether she was pushing them because the training demanded they understand business timelines or whether she was going against the grain of their culture. She questions how much can designers expect, how much to push and whether to push at all.
  1. 4. Values and What is Appropriate
Consultants struggle with questions about what’s right to make and sell and about poor or unsafe conditions of artisans’ work. Some question their own values and realize they need to let go of their own points of view at times in order to be open to what is happening in a given situation.
  • A consultant with a critical view of Western consumer culture has been surprised to learn that the artisans see things a different way. For example: a teddy bear manufacturer was interested in dolls clothes produced by an Armenian coop at the NYIGF. The designer was shocked by the contradiction that in Armenia people can’t afford to put sweaters on their children while in America they are dressing up teddy bears. The Armenian coop director said, God Bless America because if they didn’t buy this we wouldn’t be able to feed our children. She realized that she criticizes her own culture for its frivolousness and consumerism but then experiences with artisans turn her head around 360 degrees. In a relatively well-off and free society people have their coffee shop conversations and philosophize quite intelligently about all kinds of things but in the end it comes down to the human level of crisis management and needs of people. So she tempers her beliefs and values and thinks about how much of her views she can apply situation-by-situation, country-by-country and even year-by-year. When governments are unstable and shifting everything can change. Interacting with artisans brings a very valuable perspective. On this level this work does a lot of good.
  1. QUESTIONS OF CONTINUITY
 1. Sustainability of Craft Development  Consultants see the need for continuity in working with artisan groups. They question how it is possible to bring sustainability to craft development. How can product development, including input on market trends, be brought to artisans on an ongoing basis, particularly after project funding ends. Issues of sustainability in craft development are not the same as those in agricultural development projects. Because trends change, teaching artisans a skill one time is not enough for them to able to take off from there and continue. Globally, market trends change quickly, especially as society speeds up and makes greater demand for things to be done faster and change more readily. Artisans who receive a two year limited exposure to the kinds of products desired in the marketplace and changes in trends find it exceedingly difficult to understand how to make use of the information and continue to follow the trends when they are left alone to make products for a Western market. Consultants want to know how artisan groups will be assisted to move from one step to the next through training. Many steps are needed to prepare artisan groups to be able to continue on their own to make marketable products. It is frustrating for consultants to work on a short term project and then be out of the picture, without any sense that there will be follow up. A design consultant is hired to instill knowledge about how to make a collection of products, and at the end she writes a report that recommends training in certain skills and that this will take a number of steps. But she can only hope that this will be realized. Although the stated goals of a project are to give artisans the tools and methods they need to become self-sustaining, this doesn’t always happen. It would be valuable to check on the level of sustainability a couple of years after a project ends, for example in barrios of Peru, to see how many workshops have sprung up. Example. After a successful but short-term workshop in natural dye techniques artisans were motivated to work in natural dyes. But they needed a more extensive program in product development using natural dye materials in order to figure out how to apply what they learned. This would require funding for another project. Interventions can’t be directed from the outside without the agreement of the artisans. Effort can go into setting up a means of production, but this won’t work if the artisans do not want to use the particular method. The approach has to come from the artisans. Example: a gas-fired kiln was introduced to replace the wood fired kiln that artisans used to make glass beads. The idea was to use a locally available gas supply instead of continuing to cut down the forests to fire the kiln. But the people never used the new kiln. NGOs often have unrealistic expectations and time frames for results. Many resources go into planning projects, but these are often short term and one time only, which doesn't accomplish much. It takes a great deal of time to train artisans to function independently in the U.S. marketplace, which is the stated goal of many projects. Sometimes a designer is hired directly by a U.S. company or overseas exporter and can develop an ongoing relationship, but often lack of funding, political instability, and corruption all conspire against return visits. Often NGOs are driven by their donors’ or funders’ budgetary constraints or aggressive programming. When Aid to Artisans gets money from USAID they have to promise a dollar-for-dollar return for funds invested. But it is not possible for artisans to be able to sell enough products by the end of the project time. It is also unrealistic to expect that their work will be sustained after the project is over. Self-sufficiency cannot be achieved so quickly. Artisans need to develop an understanding of business, but in order for skills and market access to be developed, a project needs to be subsidized well enough and long enough. 
  1. 2. Continuity of Market Relations
Sustaining market relations is a major concern and often difficult to achieve. When I went back to villages that I had not been to for a while, the people asked where have you been? We really broke our necks when you gave us a production order six months ago. Did it sell? Where’s the next order? That broke my heart. Often organizations that initiate craft-related projects do not ensure their continuity because they do not have enough money for marketing or they go on to the next funded project. Once a group is up and running, there needs to be more marketing efforts to help artisans become self-sustainable. Follow through is important because the worst thing is to get artisans fired up and making things but then there is no market for them; you burst their hopes and sometimes this is the only thing they have. Artisans need consistency and sustainability in market relations. Getting their products into a commercial catalogue can mean a big infusion of money in the short term. But it can be detrimental in the long term if the next catalogue no longer carries their products.
  1. 2i. Examples
SERRV is committed to long-term relations with producer groups. This used to involve a visit every two or three years. Since many designs are now generated in the designer’s studio and sent out digitally to artisan groups, SERRV no longer visits the groups every year. SERRV is also trying to create a development division; they want to send SERRV representatives to visit the groups and see what is needed in order for them to be able to work on their own. A Canadian-based ethical business, MAIWA, stays with the artisan groups until they aren’t needed anymore. They establish marketing contacts for artisan products around the world, including helping artisans get their work into museums and shops. VI 3. Bringing Along the Next Generation of Artisans The test of continuity ultimately lies with the next generation. Case: Laos A consultant tells artisans it will be important for them not to lose their young people. If they can break out of their mold, still work with their traditional designs but in a more modern way, they will attract the young people. She says if they have some different ideas, listen and help guide them so you don’t lose your traditions, culture and identity. Work with them so it is meaningful to them. It is difficult for young people all over the world to find a balance between their tradition, heritage and culture and also be part of a modern world with blue jeans and coca cola. They are now talking in the school system about how important it is to be Lao or Thai or Indian; what the differences are and what they mean, not necessarily better or worse. They can see the mistakes that have happened and they also talk about pride in their traditions. The jeans and coke are there. But the Lao people will find a balance, which will have to do with the differences between special occasions and everyday activities. Case: MAIWA MAIWA aims to develop confidence in craftspeople and re-establish apprenticeships in the artisan’s communities. They encourage young people to see their parents as international traders and exhibitors. The designer leaves a laptop computer with the artisans to show them not only their products on-line but also that they can have that kind of connection with the world. This helps young people see that making craft is better than a job at the bank; they see there is so much potential.
  1. 4. Preparing a New Generation of Product Designers
A lack of product design consultants in less developed countries means that most artisan projects hire foreign consultants. There is rarely a person in-country connected with an artisan project who has had artistic training or has an innate artistic flair that could be developed in order to design competitive products for the marketplace. Sometimes there is a local artist, good at design who learns readily from a foreign designer how to translate her training and artistic talents into marketable products, and then later can help a group of artisans become less dependent on outside consultants. The question of how to enable sustainability of product design in groups around the world is connected to other questions: How much training of local designers is needed? Can enough skills be taught to a product developer who lives in another country but does not have exposure to the international marketplace? At what point will they have enough analytical skills and design training to be able to carry on independently to produce things that will sell in any market in the world?  For example, in the Philippines there has been investment at all levels, such as adding design classes to the art school curriculum or businesses supporting the design profession by hiring a trained designer full time. Design schools in the West do not prepare designers for working with artisans. A design curriculum is needed to educate new designers about market analysis and design for artisan groups. Designers need training in figuring out market demands and trends and how to get the right information that can be analyzed and then applied creatively in product design. In the future some universities may introduce special industrial design courses that specifically address the discipline of market-led product designing for artisans. Mentoring programmes in design schools have potential to increase the numbers of young designers who have sensitivity and social conscience to work with artisans groups. Example. In a California design class project students can learn about what is involved in working with artisans. They learn about where different products come from, how they are made and used, what symbols they contain, and how to apply this knowledge in their own work. One consultant is involved in a mentoring program with a thesis student from India who wants to return to India and work with women artisans. Example. A mentoring programme at a New York high school of fashion industry uses a Mali artisan project as the basis of an integrative high school curriculum. The designer who worked in Mali talked with students about skills they need as designers and also different paths they can take in their careers. Students worked in a design class on making products from leather and Bizan fabric. In a marketing and merchandizing class they came up with creative ways to market and retail the products. In social studies they learned about importing and exporting from Western Africa. Product development is partly instinctual and new designers are creating their own businesses. Young people have opportunities to travel, many have been culturally sensitized as Peace Corps volunteers, and those who live in the U.S. have exposure to a sophisticated marketplace. For example, they go to Thailand, see the crafts, figure out how to make products marketable in the U.S. based on what their friends like, how they live and the stores where they shop. The major challenge when they start out as an importer is to work with the demands of retailers who always want and expect a new infusion of ideas. As they start their businesses, these young entrepreneurs find they suddenly have to shift their attention from an appreciation of the craft and the craftspeople to spending 80% of their time building the business, marketing, working with retailers, and filling orders. At this point the mentoring and nurturing and buying from the artisan takes back seat.
  1. 6. Ensuring Opportunities for Designers to Continue Working
A designer who has new product ideas and methods wants to be able to use these with different artisan groups to give them support and encourage their independence. She has ideas for product lines that could be developed, for example, a line of children’s boots and hats that are priced high enough so they can survive in the market. She also has ideas for applying the same methodology in American cities, working with groups of people that have skills that can be used to create products and help them financially. Another designer who has recently entered this field, and enjoys the process of helping artisans think differently, wants to continue to learn and work at the grassroots level in product design, training and teaching. She finds it difficult, however, to know about opportunities to do this work. It would be helpful if there were a broader picture of the field and available information about organizations that do this work. VII. CONSULTANTS’ REFLECTIONS  VII. 1. Perspective Shifts Following are comments product developers made about the impact this work has on their self-awareness and on their lives. I became less able to just do it as an interesting life for me and trying to sell beautiful one-of-a-kind pieces and I became more and more committed to selling things that enabled whole communities to get out of poverty and that meant understanding the marketplace more and figuring out how to get consistent orders to people who wanted to work and then pay them fair wages, better than they could get anywhere else doing anything else in their own country and also generating interest in the sector that was buying it. That reflects my personal commitment to poverty and discrimination, human justice and dignity, and to my desire to generate income for artisans so they can continue being artisans, as opposed to trying to keep alive a particular tradition in a particular town. I tried to figure out how to make the business work so that it would be profitable and grow and be able to employ more artisans on a continuing basis. You are looked at with a certain amount of trepidation – you are looked at – “well who are you, what are you going to do?” Many of the groups with whom I have worked have a preconceived notion about me as an American. It is important to me to downplay the fact that I am American. First, I am a human being who has compassion and skills, which can be of assistance to clients. When I learned about ATA I wanted to work for them. I said I’ll go as a volunteer on a project because I really believe in what you are doing. My first trip was to Ghana where we designed products using a lost wax technique and recycled materials, such as old brass spigots melted down and turned into candle holders. We made a variety of products, which sold well at the NY gift fair. The whole experience was incredibly inspiring as an artist/designer and it felt wonderful to be helping. It is a privilege to be able to work with artisans. They know how to make many things and it is very rewarding to help revitalize the crafts, increase pride in their design heritage and create an income for them. I try to facilitate that creative collaboration. I am inspired because I’m learning but it is hard work. At the end I am exhausted and usually I say that is the last time I’m going to do this, but of course I will do more. The best possible scenario is to see these artisans as our brothers and sisters and ask what can we learn from each other, what can we make together? I was honoured in Peru when the people invited me to a ceremony in Conocucho Mountain. Everyone brought candles to place in a stone niche carved in a wall and everyone spoke in Spanish about their gratitude to Mother Earth and for this project, and they sang songs. There was no cynicism, only gratitude. Although the workshop had begun poorly, it ended like that after four weeks. At the end of each class, people took turns, standing up one by one and speaking about the impact that the workshop was going to have on their lives. They said this is how they were going to be able to feed their children; their children would be healthy or they could take them to the doctor. All other issues fall by the wayside when you realize that you are helping somebody somewhere to do something on their own for themselves. To hear them speak like this was a profoundly moving experience. It makes you come away quite full. You are learning so much from them. But what they are learning from you is something that will help them feed their families. It is hard to keep a level business head and keep my emotional concerns from affecting my work. For example, India is a country of extremes. There is obscene wealth and totally devastating poverty and filth right next to each other and oblivious to each other. I worked with a group in a rural area where women wove sleeping mats with their fingers and toes while most of the men drank away earnings. The women turned to prostitution to pay 30% interest rates on the money they borrowed to buy reeds to make the mats. The average wage was 21 cents a day, and two women killed themselves because they couldn't pay their loans. With my daily expenses about $6 I felt overly rich. I had problems with this until I accepted that I have an expense account to keep me safe, healthy and energized, and I earn my salary because I live in the U.S. with U.S. prices. Not using my expense money for my own care wouldn’t help anyone; it would just get me sick and make me useless. The work load is intense and emotionally taxing, working with people who are living in difficult circumstances, struggling to put food on the table, or keep daughters out of prostitution, or give kids a bit of education. Development work has an emotional roll, and then to work in environments that are post- conflict areas is even a heavier emotional blow. Example: After six weeks work in Cambodia and seeing the level of things that people do to each other, seeing the result of Khmer Rouge activities – the legacy of land mines. Also after one month of work in Hezbollah villages in South Lebanon and post-conflict work in Tajikistan. People are in situations that are a direct result of hatred. It makes me think how important it is for mankind to be good to each other. It keeps coming home to me that we need to be human. I need to travel on my own, take breaks, and not only work in conflict or post-conflict zones, but also intersperse work that is a bit lighter in nature. Often there are not the amenities that you are used to. For example, a pit toilet or the electricity goes off and you work by gas light or there is no water in the morning and you boil hot water to take a wash. But you just get on with it. You have to be quite hardy. That is part of why we do this work because you scratch beneath the surface. I choose to live with people in their apartments rather than in their hotels because they benefit from the little rent I give them and I experience the culture more. I come back home and realize how affluent we are--there is a culture shock--but you are thankful for the hot water running. You also see you don’t necessarily need that new bedspread that you were lusting after, because you feel you have so much already, that you really don’t need all that stuff. Not knowing languages well is a problem. It is hard to talk about technical details, such as, dyestuffs or techniques in French or Spanish. I have a translator but it is frustrating sometimes because the artisans want to ask questions about the U.S. and I want to know more about them and it is hard to have a natural flow of conversation through a translator. It takes time to learn languages from tapes and these don’t deal with the specifics terms of product design. Also I don’t like taking all the shots or taking malaria pills for an extended period of time. But the personal issues pale in comparison to the bigger picture; there is so much to be gained for everybody. VII. 2. Networking and Cooperation Consultants had a range of responses to the following questions: Do you have opportunities to discuss ideas, issues, or concerns with other product development consultants? How important is this to you? Are you interested in the future to meet with other designer consultants to share ideas and concerns?  Following are some of the responses. Aid to Artisans has a network of designers; about ten are active designers who have been trained informally. Product designers have their own network of contacts with others who work with artisans. Informally, they support each other in a number of ways: establishing contacts when appropriate, discussing specific problems or issues, sharing information, generating ideas and insights, and providing contacts for work in different projects. Some consultants express interest in having more opportunity to discuss issues of product development with other consultants. Although they know other designers to discuss experiences and exchange ideas, some would like to take a more active stance and have a forum to get together nationally or internationally to exchange information, share experiences and talk about the challenges and what they can do to make things better. It would also be useful for some consultants to have a means to know about the different kinds of organizations that are working with the artisan sector and what they are doing. It is hard to get this information. A designer, who is just entering the field of working with artisan groups through non-profit organizations, sees the importance of having a forum for exchange of information. She sees the value of cooperative effort, and thinks a clearinghouse of information would be useful. Instead of finding a willingness to share information and methods and work together, she experiences a sense of competition among designers. A lack of funding for projects means competition for jobs, but partnerships would be valuable. It is helpful to have someone to bounce ideas off and it would be very good to find a way for cooperation and sharing of ideas at least once every six months. Among the different organizations and people working in this sector, there is a common goal of helping artisans and by working together all may benefit from each other. Some consultants say they have informal opportunities to share their experiences and ideas with other consultants but they are very busy doing freelance work and it is not that important to get together in a more formal way. After working on a project, they write a report and give recommendations to the organization that hired them, and then they go on to the next project. Getting together with other designers who work with artisans may provoke some ideas that can be applied in different areas. But experiences vary so much from country to country and the problems encountered often cannot be resolved through discussion. For example, a problem related to dyes might need another workshop or funding for infrastructure to set up a dye import company. This could not be taken care of by discussion with other consultants. A designer, focused on time management, questions whether it would be worthwhile to get together unless there was a specific focus on practical considerations and solving problems. The idea of having a conference as a forum to exchange information and discuss issues related to product development interests a number of consultants. One designer has long recommended an international forum for designers and design centers as an opportunity to get together and share experiences. The usefulness of this event, however, would depend on getting funding so people from the South could attend. VIII. CONCLUSION  Globally, millions of artisans are seeking ways to use craft skills and knowledge to improve their livelihoods. Local craft production is a significant part of cultural identity and heritage and also a potential for income, particularly for women in rural areas of less-developed countries. However, there are major difficulties for artisans who try to make a transition from producing crafts for their own use or sale in local markets to making marketable products for urban and international customers. Product development is a critical element in helping artisans improve their sales in local, tourist, national and international markets. This report examined a range of product development situations and challenges from the points of view of North American product design consultants who try to assist producers to value their craft traditions, access new markets and earn a decent living from their work. Essentially the designer looks for ways to draw from local cultural traditions and effectively integrate these elements with market realities, such as, demand for quality, consistency and functionality. The process is complex and there are differences in opinion about what is culturally appropriate. Artisans encounter many obstacles in trying to make and sell crafts, including, lack of quality raw materials, financing and credit, current information on market trends, business skills development, and supportive economic policies nationally and internationally. During assignments with artisan groups, product development consultants bring information and advice to help artisans understand about markets in general and also about particular opportunities and constraints to be taken into account. Product designers must make a bridge between the worlds of artisans and distant consumers and this requires a unique combination of knowledge, skills and sensitivities on the part of the consultant. The issue of improving the situation for artisans involves not only the design of marketable products but also the search for ways to expand market options. There is the question of how to encourage import companies to be interested in handmade crafts and develop businesses based on ethical practices and respect for artisans. As well, consumer education is needed to raise awareness about the value of handmade products and how their purchases make a difference to the lives of artisans and the health of the globe in terms of sustaining cultural diversity and small-scale cottage industry lifestyles. Both consumer education and international policies and enforcement are also needed to protect the cultural property rights of artisans. Exploitation of indigenous designs and products, and production of cheaper copies that flood the market, threaten the survival of many artisans and their specialized craft processes. Product designers take on a range of assignments in widely different situations around the world. They may be asked to develop a product line or give a workshop or seminar on topics, such as, natural dyeing, market trends, business skills or export requirements. They often encounter problems associated with project demands, time limitations and production uncertainties. Where possible, they benefit from collaboration and advice from in-country project directors, facilitators and local designers. The elements of product development fall into three broad categories: (1) creating products, (2) understanding business and markets, and (3) establishing trade links. Each of these has specific requirements, including, technical skills, material and design resources, quality standards, costing and pricing, merchandizing, market exposure and communication. A wealth of learning takes place within the relationship between product designers and artisans. The experience provokes shifts in awareness and perspective on both sides. Consultants recognize the conflict   inherent in introducing ways of thinking and doing things that impact strongly on changing values and lifestyles in artisan communities. On the other hand, many designers are touched by the gratitude expressed by artisans after learning practical details that they feel will help them overcome hardships, improve their ability to earn money and help their families. A significant issue is how to ensure the continuity of benefits to artisan groups, through support and product development, until they have the capacity to be self-sustaining. It is very difficult for groups to become self-sustaining within the time frame of projects or after project funding is over. Several problems include: lack of capacity to keep current on market demands and opportunities, and lack of assurance that market relations, once established, will be maintained. Some ATOs and import companies try to sustain relations with producer groups until they are able to be independent. When compared to the need worldwide for assistance to artisans, there are relatively few development initiatives, trade centres or commercial enterprises that work with artisans to help them develop and market handmade products. In addition, the product designers whose insights form the basis of this report are among the very few North American consultants that have the experience and capacity to make an impact on the sustainability of artisan livelihoods. When more people in governments, NGOs, development agencies and import businesses become convinced that the skills, products and concerns of artisans are important, assistance can be expanded in response to their needs. When this happens, product development expertise will be increasingly in demand. A variety of innovative programmes, including interdisciplinary learning in colleges and universities will be needed to prepare young designers to work in this field and experienced product designers would have a significant role as mentors. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY  Books and Articles Anderson, J. (1998). Return to Tradition: the Revitalization of Turkish Village Carpets. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. Bhowmik, S. &Jhabvala, R. (1996). Rural Women Manage their own Producer Cooperatives: Self-Employed Womens’ Association (SEWA)/Banaskantha Women’s Association in Western India. In Carr, Chen &Jhabvala (Eds.), Speaking Out: Women’s Economic Empowerment in South Asia (pp. 105-26). London: Intermediate Technology Publications. Gianturco, P & Tuttle, T. (2000). In Her Hands: Craftswomen Changing the World. New York: The Monacelli Press, Inc. Grimes, K. &Milgram, L. (Eds.). (2000). Artisans and Co-operatives: Developing Alternative Trade for the Global Economy. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Jongeward, C. (2002). Sustainable Livelihoods within Global Marketplaces: Rural Artisans in Thailand. Women & Environments International, 54/55, 29-31. Jongeward, C. (2001). Alternative Entrepreneurship in Thailand: Weavers and the Northeastern Handicraft and Women’s Development Network. Convergence, Vol. 34, No.1, 83-96. Jongeward, C. (2000). Cultural Investing: Artisans, Livelihoods and the Indian Context. In Johnston, Tremblay & Wood (Eds.), South Asia: Between Turmoil and Hope (pp.291-304). South Asia Council of Canadian Asian Studies Association and Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute: Simon Fraser University. Kaino, L. (Ed.). (1995). The Necessity of Craft: Development and Women’s Craft Practices in the Asia-Pacific Region. Nedlands: University of Western Australia Press. Kwon, C. (2002). The Feminine Voice of the Desert. Hali,124, 23-25. Littrell, M. & Dickson, M. (1999). Social Responsibility in the Global Marketplace: Fair Trade of Cultural Products. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Local Weaving Development Project (WAYANG). (1995). Weaving for Alternatives. Thailand: Nutcha Publishing Co. Ltd. Morris, W. (1996).Handmade Money. Washington D.C.: Organization of American States. Ransom, D. (2001). No-Nonsense Guide to Fair Trade. Toronto: New Internationalist. Newsletters and Organizational Publications  Aid to Artisans.[Quarterly newsmagazines.] (1997-2003). Special Edition Summer 2002: Global Artisan Profiles. Hartford: ATA. Crafts News. [Quarterly newsmagazines.] (1999-2003). Washington D.C.: The Craft Center. Dastkar.(n.d.). Dastkar: A Society for Crafts and Craftspeople. [Brochure] New Delhi, India: Dastkar. Ericson, R.B. (1999). The Conscious Consumer: Promoting Economic Justice through Fair Trade. Kirksville MO: Fair Trade Federation. HomeNet. [Newsletters] (1997-2003). Leeds, UK: HomeNet Kwon, C. & Chambers, B. (2000). MAIWA: A Quiet Manifesto for the Preservation of Craft. Vancouver: Maiwa Handprints Ltd. Manuals and Technical Papers International Trade Center. (2000). Product Costing and Pricing: Artisan as Entrepreneur Training Module. Geneva: ITC. Lewis, D. (Ed.). (1996). The ATA Export Manual: A Guide to Exporting Crafts to the US. Hartford, CT: Aid to Artisans Inc. Ramsey, C. (n.d.). Crafts and Women in Development.The Crafts Center, Washington, D.C. Reports Aid to Artisans. Product Development Project Reports, submitted by design consultants. Hartford, CT. (2002) Maker to Market.ATA Marketing Report. Hartford, CT. Humphrey, L. (2000). Which Way to Market? Exploring opportunities for marginalised producers in developing countries to supply mainstream commercial companies in the UK.Traidcraft Policy Unit Report Series No.1. Liebl, M. and Roy T. (2000). Handmade in India: Preliminary Analysis of Crafts Producers and Crafts Production in India: Issues, Initiatives, Interventions. A report prepared for the Policy Sciences Center, Inc. CT and World Bank, Washington, D.C. Satyanand, K. and Singh, S. (1995). India's Artisans: A Status Report. New Delhi: Society for Rural, Urban and Tribal Initiatives. UNESCO. (2001). Vital Traditions: Revival and Innovation in Traditional Textiles. Final Report of a Regional Workshop 28 November-16 December 2001, Hanoi, Vietnam.UNESCO, Hanoi office. UNESCO.(2000). Evaluation of UNESCO’s Programme for Crafts Promotion 1990-1998.Final Evaluation Report. United Nations University. (1999). Towards a New Vision: Traditional Crafts for Sustainable Development. Report of International Conference, November 27-28, 1998, Kanazawa, Japan. Kanazawa: IICRC. Websites AEN - Artisan Enterprise Network http//www.artisanenterprisenetwork.org ATA - Aid to Artisans  http//www.aidtoartisans.org CBI - Centre for Promotion of Imports from developing countries http//www.cbi.nl The Craft Center  http//www.craftscenter.org EZIBA    http//www.eziba.com FTF - Fair Trade Federation http//www.fairtradefederation.org HomeNet - International Network for HomebasedWorkers  http//www.homenetww.org.uk IFAT - International Federation of Alternative Trade   http//www.ifat.org ITC - International Trade Center  http//www.intracen.org/mds/sectors/artisanal/ MAIWA  http//www.maiwa.com Making Cents  http//www.makingcents.org SERRV   http//www.serrv.org Ten Thousand Villages   http//www.tenthousandvillages.org Traidcraft  http//www.traidcraft.co.uk UNESCO  http//www.unesco.org/culture/industries/trade/ NOTE Additional copies of this report may be obtained from the author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people contributed their time and thoughts to this research. Special thanks go to the product development consultants who shared the stories of their work with artisans: Rochelle Beck, Margaret Bishop, Patti Carpenter, Jane Griffith, Lynda Grose, Vicki Lederman, Docey Lewis, Rachel MacHenry, Cindy Owings, Mimi Robinson, Karen Selk, Stacy Spivak, Andrea Snyder and Michele Wipplinger. Thanks to Aid to Artisans, especially the contributions of Tom Aageson, Mary Cockram, Beth Gottschling, Keith Recker and Clare Brett Smith, and to the Craft Center, for assistance from Leah Kaplan and Caroline Ramsey. Thanks also to the dedicated business people involved in artisan trade: Amber Chand, Gaye Ellis, Charlotte Kwon, Holland Millis, Stephanie Odegard, and Jacqui Starkey. I am grateful also for the contributions of Doug Dirk of Ten Thousand Villages, Nina Smith of Rugmark and Carol Wills of International Federation of Alternative Trade. April 2003 This work was carried out with the aid of a grant from the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada and a grant from York University, Canada. 

Handmade is the Way Forward,

The Covid-19 pandemic and lockdown has severely affected the handloom sector, which was already reeling under the impact of demonetisation and GST. For centuries, the handloom weaver has continued to work from home, offering the world the choice of a conscious living, which is sustainable, local and green. These weavers offer me the hope and the conviction to carry on my journey in the handmade sector

A design by Vriksh. Photos courtesy of Vriksh

Recently, I finally finished revamping our website vrikshdesigns.com, designing a new look with an e-commerce integration. While summarising a decade of my work into the new website and sifting through hundreds of photographs and videos with long hours of Google hangout calls and Zoom meets with my studio team — the process kept taking me back into the memory lanes of weaving-villages where I work, some of them from my early years in Odisha. Once every two months, I visit Odisha to meet with my team of handloom weavers. Over many rounds of tea, our conversations traverse across topics around work, inspirations for new design collections, family, politics, travel and life. Odisha is a goldmine of textiles and it may take a lifetime to discover all the hidden treasures in handlooms. Even today, almost each and every district in Odisha offers exquisite and unique textiles from fine tussar silks of the coastal belt, curvilinear ikats from the west, tribal weaves and natural dyes of the south. One can never get enough of it! In design studio Vriksh, I work with handloom weavers who are masters of their art, offering new innovations to the traditional designs while retaining the cultural significance associated with this living tradition.

I recently returned home after attending a short course on South East Asian Textiles at the Victoria and Albert museum in London. It was an extension of my ongoing research on Vriksh’s new collection “Bali Jatra”, launched early this year. The collection is a reliving of the popular festival Bali Jatra or Boita Bandhana celebrated every year in Odisha, commemorating the historic textile trade between India and the South-East Asia. An unseen combination of Odisha’s curvilinear ikats with subtle hints of Andhra’s chintz motifs, Indonesia’s spiralling temple layout, Laos’s extra weft patterns and Thailand’s colour palette. The collection offers a contemporary twist born out of this beautiful cultural exchange reflecting distinct characteristics from every region. It is an explosive amalgamation of various design vocabularies combined with innovative ideas, using the famous Ikat and Jala techniques of Odisha in handwoven silk saris.

The handloom sector, while being the second largest employment source after agriculture in India, also provides us with a unique social and cultural identity.

On my return, I was looking forward to visiting Odisha and meeting weavers to share stories of my UK visit. The sudden call for a nation-wide lockdown meant that I had to wait till the situation was under control. When the pandemic hit India and a nation-wide lockdown was enforced, like many, I, too, was clueless about how the situation would pan out. During these uncertain times, my art has been my best tool of communication during physical distancing. The meaning of design organically took new directions, it expanded beyond textile art. I wanted to extend support to the weavers beyond helping them meet their financial needs so I would call them regularly to know if they are keeping well and safe.

During a conversation with Ajaya, a highly skilled weaver, friend and a close associate of Vriksh, he said, “Last year, my friend left for Surat in search of better earnings, but even now he continues to look for them. He tells me life is not easy there. Now he is stuck there with no food and money. I wish he comes back home safe and rejoins the loom.”

Incidentally, Ajaya had also returned from Surat a few years back for similar reasons. He adds, “The migrant labourers in cities have faced the biggest challenge during the lockdown. In this new normal, wouldn’t choosing local hand-made processes like hand-weaving in villages help limit migration to urban cities?”

 

'We are lucky that this local practice of making clothes is a continuous living tradition which hasn’t died.'

The handloom sector, while being the second largest employment source after agriculture in India, also provides us with a unique social and cultural identity. The entire process of weaving a handwoven cloth is a coming together of people, each with their own skill sets and women form an important part of this entire process. But it needs urgent attention of the government as well as the conscious consumer to strengthen it.

The last few years were already challenging, dealing with blows of demonetisation, then GST and now the COVID-19 pandemic has further crippled this industry. Orders have been cancelled, there is a blocked inventory of stock that artisans and designers are unable to sell due to market collapse. This has led to exhaustion of running capital; shutting down of small enterprises and piling debt. Handloom weavers have the advantage of working from home but currently there is no raw material available to continue work. “After the lockdown, not just India but the world will change, and we all need to come together with creative ideas to make it safer,” says Mano bhai, an ikat weaver associated with Vriksh for more than ten years.

Lakshmi is a tussar silk weaver from Jajpur district who has a keen eye for detailing and loves to experiment. She says with a sense of pride, “I am not a machine. It takes me minimum a week to weave a sari and sometimes a month, and no two are ever the same. I prefer weaving quality over quantity giving each piece a unique identity.” India is the largest producer of handlooms and handicrafts in the world. Our handloom weavers and artisans have been preserving the knowledge, skills and wisdom of self-sufficiency.

 

Vriksh’s new collection “Bali Jatra” (top) was launched early this year. An artisan at work.

We are lucky that this local practice of making clothes is a continuous living tradition which hasn’t died. Today, when the world is leaning towards slow and sustainable fashion, India can be a leader in guiding the world. I realised that this is the perfect time to share these dialogues with people beyond the crafts community. In April, Vriksh rolled out a social media campaign titled #WeavingOurWayForward, aiming to reach out to urban audiences. The response was quick and people were eager to join hands.

Some of us craft designers and organisations came together as one voice and launched an awareness campaign #HandmadeInIndia, a first-time experiment to kick-start a social movement to generate awareness on how essential is handmade in our lives and why we urgently need to support the craft community for a greener future. It was an attempt to engage with the four key agencies — craftspeople, intermediaries (craft NGOs, designers), government and the market. The response was overwhelming. So far, #handmadeinindia poster has been translated in 22 regional languages and still counting. It has been shared not only in Indian villages and cities but across the globe.

The entire process of weaving a handwoven cloth is a coming together of people, each with their own skill sets and women form an important part of this entire process.

Many artisans, over social media, shared the poster with government officials, buyers, NGOs, designers and, of course, craftspeople in their community. Many consumers and new supporters were convinced of handmade and shared it on their social media. Craftspeople responded saying it has boosted their morale and confidence.

This campaign has helped build solidarity across states within the craftspeople and the craft community at large.

For centuries, the handloom weaver has continued to work from home, offering the world the choice of a conscious living which is sustainable, local and green. Vriksh has been collaborating with the weaver community by making this conscious lifestyle choice. The dialogues with weavers have given me hope and conviction to carry on my journey in the handmade sector.

First published: Jun 13, 2020 in  The Punch Magazine in their special issue on Art in the time of Pandemic, curated by critic, author and contributing editor Ina Puri


Handpainted Kalamkari from Srikalahasti, Andhra Pradesh,
Figurative and narrative painting, using natural dyes, on textiles is an art which has been practised for centuries in Srikalahasti, Andhra Pradesh. Used as temple hangings these textile paintings are drawn free hand with charcoal sticks while the painting is done with a bamboo kalam (pen). The themes, mainly religious in nature include scenes from the great epics, picturisation of deities, the rendering of the Ras-Lila and other stories. The process followed is lengthy and painstaking with attention paid to minute detailing and each step is rigorously followed to produce a final piece.
  1. Unbleached cotton cloth that is to be used for the hand painted Kalamkari.
  1. The fabric after it has been washed in water and bleached by soaking in buffalo or goat dung solution, then washed in clean water and dried in the sun for a few days.
  1. The cloth dipped into a solution of milk and myrobalan (harda). Both the raw and ripe Myrobalan fruit can be used. Buffalo milk is added to the solution as it prevents the vegetable colours from spreading and smudging in the later stages the milk also adds a certain stiffness to the fabric thereby making it an easier canvas to work on.
  1. The pattern an auspicious Ganesha figure, is sketched on to the cloth with charcoal made of burnt tamarind twigs.
  1. The sketch is outlined using a kalam dipped into a solution made of iron filings that have been fermented in molasses. This mixture, when combined with fermented starch or with coconut water, results in the formation of iron acetate. When painted on to fabric that is treated with myrobalan it turns black due to the reaction between tannin and iron. This black holds fast when it oxidizes and it becomes permanent when boiled with red colouring matter. There a two types of kalams used by the artist. The sharp tipped ones used for outlining and drawing the details and the round broad tipped one used for filling in the sections. Usually a separate kalam is used for each colour or else the wooden rag which form the tip is changed.
  1. The areas and background meant to be in red are painted with an alum (phitkari) solution that is used as a mordant. Alum being colourless has a fugitive red colour added to it so that it is visible when painted on. This fugitive colour washes off easily. The cloth is then rested for at least 24 hours before the next stage commences.
  1. The cloth is washed in flowing water to remove the excess alum mordant. By washing the excess mordant the artist seeks to avoid the colour from running on to the other sections of the cloth. The cloth is dried very carefully and evenly to prevent overlapping of colours and uneven dyeing.
  1. The cloth is washed in tree bark (surulupatta) and rice water (chawalkudi).
  1. The cloth is again soaked in milk and myrobalan solution.
  1. The background and some other sections are re-painted with the alum mordant in order to obtain a deeper red for the section that is thus treated. This treatment helps to differentiate the two shades of red as this re-mordanted section has a red that is darker than the red of the figures.
  1. The cloth is washed again in flowing water to remove excess colour.
  1. The cloth is boiled in surulupatta and chawalkudi
  1. The cloth is bleached overnight once again in sheep, buffalo or goat dung and then dried in the sun for a few days. The cloth is normally dried on the riverbank for bleaching in the sunlight.
  1. The cloth is washed and treated in milk. The cloth is painted with crushed myrobalan flowers to obtain yellow.
  1. The cloth is washed in flowing water.
  1. The cloth is painted with chawalkudi
  1. The cloth is painted with an extract of dried pomegranate rind.
  1. The cloth is painted with myrobalan flowers and ferrous sulphate which is the second mordant used.
  1. The cloth is painted with alum and an extract of katha

Hanuman in Pahari Embroidered Coverlets,

The persona of Hanuman, the Monkey God of Indian pantheon, is so charismatic that his images have continued to appear extensively through the ages in various media, be it as powerful son of the Wind God or the devoted servant of Lord Ram or with Narayan and so on. Artists and artisans have used a variety of media like terracotta, stone, bronze, ivory and wood for making diverse iconographic forms of Hanuman in innumerable temples across the country. In addition to sculptures and idols, Hanuman's popularity has reached almost every household in the form of paintings on paper, cloth, wood, papier mache, print version and even in embroidery form. With India's rich and vast embroidery traditions, it could be impossible for the Monkey God to not make an appearance in them. Since it is not possible to discuss Hanuman in all kinds of embroideries, the focus here is on the embroidered coverlets of western Himalayan region. Several embroidered coverlets of around 18th-19th centuries from this region show different forms of Hanuman, but here only three forms of the deity, as appear in the embroidered coverlets from the collection of National Museum (further NM), are the topic of discussion. Prior to getting into details, here follows a brief overview of Hanuman's mention or presence in Indian literature, plastic arts and Pahari embroidery tradition.

HANUMAN IN LITERARY AND PLASTIC ART FORMS

`Hanuman' or `Mahakapi' mentioned in the epics and Puranic literature might have come from `Vrsakapi', mentioned in the early Vedic literature. As several Vedic deities were accepted in the later period, so was Hanuman. The term Vrsakapi' represents a monkey with the strength of ‘Vrsa’ or 'bull' or 'huge monkey', because Vrsa stands for bull as well as for a creature of gigantic proportions. A Puranic text says that Nandi, who had the face of a monkey, was mocked by Ravana when he visited Mount Kailash. Nandi cursed him that monkeys would ultimately become the cause of his downfall. Hanuman is the only deity who has made a mark in both the epics: Ramayana and Mahabharata, besides references of Mahakapi in Buddhist and Jain literatures too. The courageous deeds of Hanuman are well- recorded in the Kishkindha and Sunder khands of Ramayana while Vanaparv of Mahabharata mentions that Hanuman obstructed the path of Bhim in order to subdue his pride. The poetry of poet-saint Tulasidas and other poets elaborates upon courageous deeds of Hanuman in later period. Perhaps, the political instability of post-Gupta period became the reason for Hanuman's popularity amongst the masses. The images of the son  of Wind God started appearing from the late Gupta period (around 8th-9th centuries) and early stone images have been found from central and northern India. The most common and popular images of Hanuman that are often found in Indian art number seven. In the first form, Hanuman appears as sankat mochan, holding a mountain. In the second form, He stands straight and holds a mace. In the third form, He holds a gada in the left hand and slaps himself from right hand. Hanuman standing/sitting with folded hands is the fourth form. In the fifth form, He is airborne with Ram and Lakshman on his shoulders and holds mace and lotus flower in His hands. The sixth form is where He is either Panchrnukhi or ekdeshmukhi. In the seventh form, He is in the preaching mudra. As the lore of Hanuman's heroics started pervading public psyche, the deity began to be perceived as the only saviour from all dangers and the bestower of boons to His worshippers. Such glorification inspired artists and artisans to create images of Hanuman in different media. That the depiction finds place even in the threads of embroidery indicates the great devotion with which the Pawan Putra finds acceptance amongst the masses.

EMBROIDERED RUMAL OR COVERLETS

The square mulmul (muslin) or cotton coverlet embroidered with colourful silken threads is variously termed as `Pahari rumal' or `Pahari coverlet' or 'coverlet of Punjab Hill states' or 'Western Himalayan region'. The tradition of embroidered coverlet was prevalent all over the region, but the way Chamba patronized and protected this traditional art earned it the name of `Chamba rumal. However, the tradition of embroidery was practiced in other centres of Himalayan region also. Among other important centres were: Nurpur, Kangra, Mandi, Kehlur (Bilaspur), Basholi, Jammu and adjacent areas of Punjab. The term rumal should not be looked here in the context of handkerchief only; rather as mentioned in literature, the word is loosely used for coverlet that is used for covering platter (plate) on religious and ceremonial occasions and for special types of traded fabrics. A number of Pahari miniature paintings (Chamba/Kangra/ Kullu style) often show thal (salver) of gifts covered with coverlets. The beautifully embroidered rumals were even offered as gifts by devotees to Goddess Lakshmi, in the temples of Chamba region. Besides religious pupose, the Chamba rumal found takers during wedding celebrations when the exchange of gifts between families of the bride and bridegroom took place. Apart from rumals, sometimes large wall hangings were also offered as gifts to guests in the house, village or state. One such rectangular wall hanging was gifted by Raja Gopal Singh (r. 1870-1873) to a British dignitary, probably Lord Mayo, Governor General of India, who visited Chamba state in 1871 Apart from wall hangings and coverlets, this style of embroidery work was also done on religious textile costumes and miscellaneous utility items. The most common objects in the religious category are the gomukh (‘L’ shaped prayer bag for keeping beaded string for chanting), throne cover and handkerchief. Headdress  patka(sash), choli (female's bodice) and handkerchief (for tying around head) were also decorated with this type of embroidery work. Assorted itemslike the chaupar spread, pillow cover, basket cover were also adorned with similar style of embroidery as was done on coverlets.

Generally square in shape, coverlets have also been found in rectangular and circular shapes. Usually these were embroidered on white mulmul or cotton fabric but sometimes red-coloured rumal was also used. Un-twisted colourful silk threads (pattu) were used for doing embroidery work besides metal thread (silver thread) and tiny mirrors were also used, especially in the early works. Silk threads required for embroidery were sourced from the local market or the markets of Sialkot, (now in Pakistan) Amritsar and Ludhiana Punjab). The 'double satin stitch' or `Kashmir’ do- rukha' (double-sided) technique were the most favorite stitches found on coverlets. However, single satin stitch dam stitch, cross stitch, buttonhole stitch and chain stitch were also used for embroidering the coverlets. Generally, lines or borders on these cover drawn in black or maroon colour. This is evident in examples where embroidery threads have aged and only outlines remain. Skilled women of the region used to do these reversible embroideries that required great precision and deft handling. Often, such fine works of embroidery give the impression of paintings done on cloth.

NM COLLECTION OF PAHARI COVERLETS

The NM has a good collection of Pahari coverlet out of which three depict Hanuman in different forms in the first one, He is seen as Rama-sevaka, standing reverentially in front of Rama-Sita. In the second coverlet, He stands in front of Lakshmi Narayana and holds a fruit bowl. The Sankatmochan form is the subject of third one where He is shown in a swift move. The Line drawings of all the three coverlets is of good quality, although the size of figures is different in each one. The most proportionate figures are in the first one and in the second one the figures are large while in the use of third one the figures are the largest. The main theme has been composed within floral borders in all the three coverlets with little variation. In the first coverlet, the main theme is composed within a square frame in the centre and the second coverlet shows an oval border frame and the third one has minimal border and that too is only on three sides. On white cotton base these square rumals are embroidered with colourful floss silk threads, while metal threads are evident in two coverlets. The main stitch used in all the three is satin and long-short and other stitches are chain, running etc. Hanuman is shown wearing a lower garment, patka and crown/cap. He wears striped lower garment in first two coverlets, while in the third case the lower garment is plain. In all the coverlets, the patka is tied around Hanuman's waist and a small portion of end panels hangs in front. In the case of second coverlet, Hanuman wears an additional patka, a cross shoulder while in the third case, the additional patka hangs around the neck, where its both ends fall in the front. He wears a Kangra-style crown in the first two, while a conical cap with a rumal is tied around in the third coverlet.

[caption id="attachment_179494" align="aligncenter" width="322"]                                             Plate No.1[/caption]

Hanuman as sevak (dedicated servant to Lord Rama) is theme of the first coverlet depicting garden setting, where He stands in front of an enthroned Rama and Sita (Plate no-1). With folded hands, He is shown in slightly bent posture. A chauri-bearer (flying whisk holder) stands behind the throne. A pair of peacock and chinar trees make the garden setting appear very lively. Lord Rama is prominently depicted in blue (face, hands and legs). Crowned and armed with bow and arrow, He is sitting on a square throne. Rama's sitting posture on the throne, like a Raja (king), signifies His concern for sentient beings, a desire to be pro-active and an intention to engage in acts of compassion and liberation. The throne has a chhatra (umbrella) and a small stool is also placed nearby. Rama is dressed in brilliant red jama and a yellow patka, like a king of the region. The embroiderer has successfully created three-dimensional effect by using a pale-coloured seat and contrast yellow colour edge and red legs while stitching the throne. Sita, dressed in yellow lehanga and choli is sitting behind Rama. The chauri- bearer is dressed in attire similar to his Lord's but the colours are pale. Abundant use of silver metal thread is evident on the costumes of Rama-Sita, Hanuman and the chauri- bearer. Stylised Chinar trees in pale green, yellow and deep blue have been designed in a beautiful manner. Peacocks facing the Lord have been done in red, maroon, shades of green, yellow, white and blue that have come out well with small satin stitch on fine muslin. The black line drawing is visible though embroidered threads have worn out at places. Similar subject has been and wood from Chamba/Kangra school.

[caption id="attachment_179492" align="aligncenter" width="300"]                                           Plate No.2[/caption]

With little variation to earlier depiction, the second coverlet shows Hanuman offering a bowl of fruit to Lakshmii-Narayana (Plate no-2). Here, Lakshmi is sitting on the lap of Narayan and both of them arfound in Pahari paintings on wall, paper, e resting on the lotus flower seat, which has a long stem and is growing out of a pond. The chauri-bearer stands cross-legged behind the deity. Apart from figures, the remaining space has been filled with a Chinar tree in pale green  and deep blue and flower butas, which are bigger in proportion than the Chinar tree. The two armed  Narayan is draped in pitambar (yellow dhoti) and patka, worn like angavastram. The crown of Narayana has decoration of three lotus flowers, as illustrated in typical Guler/Chamba paintings. Lakshmi dressed in lehnga (orangish yellow and blue) choli (golden yellow) and odhani (blue with orangish border), is seated in anjali mudra (folded hands). The couple is seated on a pale rust seat covering. The white petals of lotus flower have an orangish stem and it rises out of a white pond with green border. Many lotus buds are also shown in the pond. Hanuman, in yellow with white face, holds a bowl full of fruits or lotus flowers. The Chauri- bearer standing behind the deities is dressed in yellow and organish dhoti and a pale green angavastram holds a handkerchief and the chauri. Narayana, Hanuman and the attendant wear angavastram cross style and the use of different shades of threads provides proper depth to the garments. Illustration of jewellery and good Line work in black colour has been done on the loosely woven base fabric. The floss silk thread has been embroidered in such a manner that it creates a wavy effect. The figures are unusually larger in size in comparison to the usual figure work of Pahari coverlets.

Another coverlet that illustrates similar composition with little variations is in the collection of Prague museum, Czechoslovakia. This square coverlet shows a two-armed Krishna, holding flute and lotus flower, standing with Radha on a lotus flower, which is coming out of a pond. Narad, the son of Brahma, holds a veena and stands in front of the couple with folded hands. Two gopis with a vessel and chauri and a gopa are also standing nearby. A lotus flower creeper border is all around. The remaining space in the centre has been filled with flower butas, small Chinar trees and a pair of birds. Use of limited coloured thread on the white muslin base makes this coverlet an important work of art. The use of lotus pedestal, which is coming out of the lotus pond, has also been used for other Hindu divinities in the 18th century art works. Ganesha, Krishna or other deities stand on lotus in Rajasthani miniature paintings of 18th century. It seems likely that the embroiderer had taken inspiration from miniature paintings or vice-versa.

[caption id="attachment_179493" align="aligncenter" width="300"]                                          Plate No.3[/caption]

The subject of third coverlet is rare and unusual. A two-armed Hanuman stands on corpses and is surrounded with gods and goddesses (Plate no-3). He holds the mace in one hand while the second hand is in the position of holding a mountain in movement posture and both of his feet are placed on male corpses. Ram and Krishna are around Hanuman and three Goddesses are seated on the upper register. Both deities are crowned: Ram in blue holds a lotus flower while Krishna in pitambara-orange patka holds the flute. Their interesting posture is of gazing at Hanuman, who is in the centre. Another important feature of this coverlet is the illustration of three Goddesses: Lakshmi, Parvati and Brahmani on the upper register. All the Goddesses are four-armed and hold the usual attributes and are astride their vehicles. Brahmani and Lakshmi are astride swan and Garuda while Parvati sits on lion skin and a bull is sitting nearby. Parvati, in the centre, has two heads and Brahmani is multi-headed. Since the upper portion of the coverlet is without border, maybe it's a portion of a bigger coverlet/ hanging. The peacock and flower butas are embroidered in the centre space, besides the figures. The soft subdued colour floss silk thread that has been worked in small stitches makes it an important work of art. The outline of all the gods and godesses has been worked upon in chain stitch, either with metal or silk threads. The embroiderer has very carefully used darker shades for outline, giving clarity and three-dimensional effect, especially in the case of garments.

CONCLUSION

Hanuman has been perceived as an ideal servant, an excellent intellect, a brave soldier, a superb musician and a devoted worshipper of Rama. His various forms are: as 'Rama-bhakta' he stands with folded hands and his body posture remains slightly bent towards his Lord in devotion or He is seated close to IIis feet. On the other hand, He is depicted as sankatmochan, who clears all the obstacles of his devotees. In such portrayal, He holds a club in one hand and Dronagiri mountain in the other to save the life of Lakshman, younger brother of Ram. In addition to these most popular forms, Hanuman is also depicted by putting his hand on face in gesture of curiosity or with panchmukha (having five faces) or ekadasmukhi (ten-headed) and so on. Some of these aspects have been well represented by embroiderers of Pahari region. Besides being represented in Ramayana scene coverlets, a number of His individual images were embroidered. A few interesting rumals showing scenes from Ramayana are housed in the Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, USA) and Jana-Pravah (Varanasi. Uttar Pradesh). Pahari coverlets are more popularly known for the Krishna theme and cosmic dance of the deity. 'Krishna-rasa' is one of the favourite subjects of these coverlets. Other deities like Holy Family, Gajantaka Siva, Ganesha, Lakshmi Narayan and Hanuman have also been embroidered. In fact. embroidery is one of the most creative expressions. where the embroiderer's personal reflection of ideas and beliefs are well represented. This aspect has been portrayed in all the three coverlets of NM collection. The Hanuman images here are exclusive, rare and special because of their size, subject, fine Line work and of course, good embroidery.

End Notes

  1. Rai Govindchander, Hanuman kadevattva and mutikavikas. Prayag, 1976; Banerjee J.N., Development of Hind Iconography, Calcutta, 1956; Nagar. S.L., Hanuman in Art. Culture, thought and Literature, Delhi, 1995. Banerjee, P. Rama in Indian Literature, Art and Thought, Delhi, 1986
  2. Other deities are Rudra as Siva; Prajapati as Brahma and so on
  3. Nagar, op, cite. p-32
  4. The first mention of Lord Hanuman in Mahabharata comes when He meets Bhim during Pandavas' exile and the second time when Lord Hanuman protects the chariot of Arjun throughout the battle of Kurukshetra by residing in Arjun's flag. Mahakapi Jataka of Buddhist literature has also been carved in stone sculptures found from Bharhut of Sunga period (3rd-2nd BCE). Jain texts have quite a different of Hanuman's birth. In Jain myths, Hanuman, Bali, Sogrivava and other Vanara are identified as Vidyadharas, a clan of supernatural beings.
  5. Ramayana by Valmiki in Uttara Kanda, Kishkindha, Sundara, Yoddhakanda and so as other versions of Ramayana also. Vana Parv of Mahabharata (ch-146-47)
  6. Nagar, op. cite, pp-108-09
  7. Rai. op. cite, p-311
  8. Stephen J. S., Oceanscapes, Tamil Textiles in the early Modern World, Delhi, 2014, p- 301& 335-36
  9. Author is thankful to Dr. Rohini Arora, Associate Professor in Government College, Punjab for providing this information in personal communication in June 2016.
  10. Margaret, Hall., 'The Victoria and Albert Museum's Mahabharata Hanging' South Asian Studies 12, 1996, pp-83-96
  11. Pathak, A., Chamba Rumal: Embroideries of the Himalayan Region, Annals of the Naprstek Museum, Prague (ed) Jirina Todorovova, 31. 2010. Pp-89-110
  12. Aryan S., Folk embroidery, of western Himalaya, Delhi, 2010
  13. Bhattacharyya, A.K, Chamba Rumal; Calcutta 1968, pp: 5-6
  14. Wood book cover and wall painting at National Museum depict similar composition, published by Kapur, S.S., Chamba wall painting in The Times of India, Annual, 1966, p-64.
  15. Sharma. V., Painting in Chamba, (ed) V. Sharma, in Vision of an Enlightened King, Shimla, 2008, p1-36, p-124.
  16. Pathak. Ibid, fig.A.2b
  17. Sharma, R.C., Kamal Giri & Anjan Chakravarty, Indian Art Treasures, Varanasi, 2006, pp-258-59
  18. Bhattacharyya, ibid, pp-22,30, 52, pl-III, VI, X; Rasamandal in Indian Textiles, National Museum Bulletin no-9, National Museum, New Delhi, 2002, pp: 21-29.
  19. Chamba Rumal depicts the Holy Family scene, Puratan, No-6, Bhopal, 1989, pp: 136-138.
  20. A Unique Chamba Rumal on the Gajantaka Theme, Marg, Vol-55, No-3, March 2004, pp: 54-56.
  21. Aryan, op-cite, p-47, p1-8
  22. Aryan, op-cite, p-92, p1-80

List of illustrations

  1. Hanuman with folded hands in front of Rama-Sita, Pahari, late 18th century, White cotton base embroidered with silk and metal threads, 65 x 64 cm, Acc. no. 51.28/45
  2. Hanuman offering fruits to Lakshmi-Narayana, Kangra, mid-19th century, White cotton base embroidered with silk and metal threads, 90x90 cm, Acc. no. 61.1011
  3. Hanuman standing on corpses, Kangra/Chamba?, mid-19th century, White cotton base embroidered with silk and metal threads, 65x62 cm, Acc. no. 65.182 (a).

First published in National Museum Bulletin no. 10


Heritage in Development: Art for Livelihood for Rural Development,
Issue #008, 2021                                                                              ISSN: 2581- 9410 Culture and Culture-based enterprises Creative, Culture-based sector has steady demand and is more resilient to economic downturns: UN Creative Economy Report 2010 notes that even at the time of 2008-2009 global economic financial crisis, the world exports of creative goods and services continued to grow, reaching USD 592 billions in 2008, doubling its level in 2002.  Particularly noteworthy is the steady growth of the South’s exports of creative goods to the world between 2002 – 2008.   In India, between 2003 and 2008, exports of creative goods have increased from 4.4 million USD 9.45 million USD with annual growth rate of 15.70%.  The same Report also indicates that the firmness of the market for creative products is a sign that many people in the world are eager for culture, social event, entertainment and leisure.  They are devoting higher share of their income to memorable life experiences that are associated with status, style, brands and differentiation. India is repository of rich diversity of cultural espressions: With five millennia of history, 28 States and 8 Union territories with some 638.000 villages, India withholds a great diversity of traditional cultural expressions including customs, rituals, artifacts, music and so on.  The investigation by the Anthropological Survey of India conducted between 1985 and 1992 identified some 4635 communities in all the states and union territories of India, suggesting that there will be potentially as many varieties of cultural practices and expressions. Cultural Industries, goods and services Cultural Industries are those industries that combine the creation, production and commercialization of contents which are intangible and cultural in nature.  These contents are typically protected by copyright and they can take the form of goods and services. Cultural goods and services refer to those goods and services that embody or convey cultural expressions, meanings and value.  Cultural goods and services include among others goods and services in the following categories*: -Publishing, printing and literature: books, newspapers, periodicals, other printed matter, ebooks, e-magazines, etc.; services for the publication, distribution, dissemination and promotion of books, newspapers, printed matter, electronic publications, etc.; library services, etc.; royalties and licence fees; -Music and the performing arts: music recordings, musical instruments, musical compositions and publications, etc.; festivals, concerts, plays and artistic performances, dance, opera, orchestral music, songs, other performing arts (circus, puppet theatre,** pantomime, street performances, etc.), etc.; performing arts venues (theatres, concert halls, marquees, etc.); music and performing arts production, dissemination, operation and promotion services; royalties and license fees; -Visual arts: painting (oils, drawings, engravings), sculpture, photography, photo-engraving, video art, computer graphics, graphic arts, electronic imaging; services for the production, dissemination, promotion and exhibition of visual arts; royalties and licence fees; -Crafts, design and architecture: ceramics, fabrics, embroidery, basketry, glass, jewellery, leather, wood, wrought metal work, metals, garments and accessories, furniture, interior decoration; designer objects; architectural services; services for the production, distribution and promotion of crafts and designs, etc.; -Audiovisual and new media: film, video recording, radio and television programmes, entertainment software (video games, educational programmes, etc.), Internet creativity sites, virtual reality, broadband video broadcasting (videostreaming), etc.; radio and television services, radio broadcasting service, services for the production, distribution, operation, dissemination and promotion of film, video recording, and radio and television programmes; royalties and license fees; -Cultural heritage: antiquities, collectors’ items, museum services, archive services (documents, recordings of items of the intangible cultural heritage, etc.), preservation services for historic sites and monuments; services relating to the safeguarding and transmission of rituals, narratives, folktales, Source: UNESCO. *These categories are developed on the basis of Cultural Policy for Development – Evaluation of the Stockholm Action Plan 1998, prepared by Professor Jens Cavallin and Professor Tobias Harding from the University of Linköping (Sweden, 2003) India is signatory to 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage and 2005 UNESCO Convention for the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: Safeguarding living cultural traditions and ensuring the diversity of cultural expressions worldwide constitute one of the primary concerns of UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization).  The former Convention commits the State Parties to put into place public policies and measures for the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage (understood, amongst others, as performing arts, rituals, festivals, craft skills and knowledge of nature) in their respective territory, while the latter affirms the right and obligations of the State Parties to ensure the diversity of those cultural expressions that are transmitted by means of cultural goods and services.  As a State Party to both the Conventions, India has the obligation to develop one or several national inventories of intangible cultural heritage (Article 12 of 2003 Convention) while the Operational Guidelines of the 2005 Convention encourage the countries to introduce support mechanism to translate cultural/artistic expressions into viable cultural industries.   (Source: UNESCO) It is difficult to establish a comprehensive overview of cultural resources at national level: There are multiple studies and research papers on the heritage sties and traditional art forms, but such data is usually scattered among various institutions and a consolidated overview of existing cultural resources is yet to be developed at the national level. Currently, 3667 monuments of National Importance come under the direct responsibility of the Archaeological Survey of India.  Besides these, the state governments protect 3,573 monuments. There are a large number of monuments which are neither under the ASI nor under the protection of state governments.  In addition, there are many historic structures belonging to various government agencies such as the Central Public Works Department, the Indian railways (including two World Heritage Sites), the army, and the navy. There is no comprehensive list of unprotected monuments in India. The National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities was launched on March 2007 to prepare a national register of built heritage, sites and antiquities. The Mission is stipulated to complete its work within five years ending in 2012. India also boasts diverse genres of performing arts including music, dance and theatre and puppetry, however no national level overview is available in this area. Craft forms are relatively well inventoried thanks to the effort of various institutions. Craft Revival Trust (www.craftrevival.org) documents more than 880 different craft while recently published “Handmade in India” identifies some 516 meta craft clusters across India. Cultural and artistic expressions, both traditional and contemporary, or tangible and intangible, constitute an important source of income in India.  But the actual size of culture-based business is yet to be assessed: India is the world biggest producers of films and the film industries are estimated to employ 5 million people.  Tourism, which accounts for more than 6% of India’s GDP, usually packages and sells visits to the heritage sites and authentic local cultural experiences.  India also has the largest number of independent self-supporting craftworkers in the world with the co-existence of both large-scale industries and small-scale cottage industries. According to the Annual Report of the Ministry of Textiles (2010-2011), India exports wide range of craft items comprising of cotton textiles, handloom textiles, man-made fibre textiles, wool and woolen products, silk, jute and handicrafts including carpet and jewelry.  Handloom Export Promotion Council (HEPC) reports that nearly 7000 million meters of cloth is produced annually by the sector of which 10 to 15% is exported to over 100 countries.  Besides, the Ministry notes that the Handicraft sector has witnessed 3% annual growth during the 11th Five Year Plan and the employment in the sector would reach 80 lakh by the end of 2012.  The data may not however give full extent of handicraft activities in India noting that the scope of government survey is usually restricted to a limited number of craft areas, namely carpets, art metal-ware, wood-ware, hand printed textiles & scarves, embroidered & crochet goods, zari & zari goods, imitation jewellery, and miscellaneous handicrafts (detail of ‘miscellaneous’ not specified). The existence of traditional occupational caste of musicians and balladeers as well as the popularity of Indian classical music and dance suggest that there is also an important number of people involved in artistic performance as means of income.  However, apart from data available from the organized film and music industries, no data is available to assess the volume of such activities across India. Information is generally scarce on the practitioners of arts and culture:  Existing studies on traditional art forms typically provide information on the origin, history and nature of art forms but rarely provide data on the actual size of population involved in the art forms, or their economic situation such as the income generated out of production / performance.  In the area of craft, Office of Development Commissioner (Handicraft) has begun the Census of handicrafts artisans during the 11th Five Year Plan.  As for the performing arts, no similar effort to inventory performers seems to be available. Sangeet Natak Academi has the list of selected number of artists having received Academi Fellow status or Academi Award, which can be viewed at its website.  Indian Council of Cultural Relations (ICCR) empanels a certain number of performing artists showcasing the best of Indian dance, music, theatre, puppetry and folk arts and who will be eligible for ICCR’s support for performance abroad.
Challenges of Rural Development and Opportunities for Culture-base Livelihood
Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) of the Government of India aims to enhance the livelihood security of the people in rural areas by guaranteeing 100 days of wage employment in a financial year to a rural household whose members volunteer to do “unskilled” manual work.  Under the scheme, the beneficiaries are typically involved in public works (water conservation, afforestration, land development and rural connectivity). Inclusive growth is the vision of the 11th Five Year Plan (2007-2012) of the Government of India: The plan strives to achieve inclusiveness through significant improvement in soico-economic infrastructure, development of human resources, greater employment opportunities with more focus on various socio-economic groups and disadvantaged sections. Job creation remains a crucial issue in India.  Rural India has higher rate of unemployment and their job, when available, is precarious:   India’s labor force has reached 375 million in 2002 and the country has to generate 200 million additional employment by 2020.  Report on Employment and Unemployment Survey (2009-10) by Labor Bureau suggests that 9.4% of India’s overall labor force is likely to be unemployed, corresponding to approximately 40 million persons, the majority of which (80%) is from rural.  Further, the report suggests that only 10% of employed persons in rural area belong to regular wage/salaried class.  The majority of them are either in the categories of self-employed (46%) or casual labor (44%), implying that their job may be in precarious situation.. Large part of India’s labor force is “illiterate” and “unskilled”:   According to the 1999-2000 data, almost 44% labour force in India were illiterate and only 33% had schooling of secondary education and above.  Only 5% of labor force in the 20-24 years age category had vocational skills compared with 28% in Mexico and as much as 96% of Korea.  Unemployment rate is higher for women and for youth. Traditional art skills are not considered as ‘skills’: Skill is typically determined by the level of formal education achieved and degree associated with it.  Traditional art skills are usually transmitted and learnt either within family or through traditional master-apprentice system outside formal education with no official certification. Thus, artistic skills of people are usually not accounted for as job skills. National Census of India does not recognize people involved in artistic/cultural occupations: Under the classification of the Census of India, population are categorized as ‘main workers’; ‘marginal works’, ‘non-workers’; and the workers are further categorized as ‘cultivators’; ‘agricultural laborers’; ‘household industry workers’; and ‘other workers’.  National Industry Classification categorizes economic activities into the following groups:

A&B

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting

C

Mining and Quarrying

D

Manufacturing and Repairs

E

Electricity, Water Supply and Gas

F

Construction

G

Wholesale and Retail trade

H

Hotels and Restaurant

I

Transport, Storage and Communications

J&K

Financial Intermediation, Real Estate, Renting and Business

L to Q

Public Administration and Defence, Compulsory etc

  Government of India gives importance to skill development and vocational training – but traditional artistic skills are not mentioned if not excluded: India has target of creating 500 million skilled workers by 2022. The skill development initiatives envision to harness inclusivity and reduce divisions such as male/female, rural/urban, organized/unorganized employment and traditional/contemporary workplace. While the National Skill Development Policy (March 2009) mentions the need to foster diversity of skills, art / culture-based skills are not mentioned in the report except textile. Sectors referred to include Mines and Minerals; Construction; Engineering; Banking and Insurance; Drugs and Pharma; Biotech; Healthcare; Textile; IT; Tourism; Agro and Food Processing; Paper; Chemicals and Fertilizers.
Support for the Emergence of Cultural Industries
Craft Sector has a large share of government supports: Traditional craft is typically associated with development projects including employment generation and livelihood improvement. Several ministries are responsible for implementing schemes related to the crafts sector such as the Ministry of Textiles, Rural Development, Small and , and the Khadi and Village Industries Commission These schemes promote the development and marketing of the crafts sector as well as improve artisan livelihoods (see table in Annex). Ministry of Culture, Gov of India, has number of funding schemes to support the emergence of cultural industries: Apart from the support to the existing institutions involved in the promotion of traditional cultural expressions (including IGNCA, Sangeet Natak Acadecmi, National School of Drama, Zonal Cultural Centres….) some of the Ministry’s schemes relevant to the promotion of culture based industries (Crore)

Schemes/ Institutions

Budget Estimates

2010-2011

Revised Estimates

2010-2011

Financial Assistance to Professional Groups and individuals for specified performing Art projects

25.00 (plan)

1.55 (non-plan)

25.00 (plan)

1.55 (non-plan)

Financial Assistance for Promotion of Tribal Folk Arts

0.25 (plan)

0.25 (plan)

Setting up of National Centre for Performing Art

1.00 (plan)

0.11 (plan)

Pilot Scheme for Cultural Industries

0.50 (plan)

0.01 (plan)

Scheme of National Artists Welfare Fund

5.00 (plan)

0.44 (plan)

Scheme of Building Grants, including StudioTheatres  (ex- scheme of Building Grants to Cultural Organizations

5.00 (plan)

3.90 (plan)

  (Source: Annual Report 2010-2011,  Ministry of Culture, Government of India)  
Branding and Marketing Rural Creative Enterprise
  Madhubani painting of Bihar: Art form is famous world-wide but why the region remains poor? Since the intervention of Pupul Jaykar in the late 1960s to translate the motifs onto paper for commercialization, Madhubani painting has become one of the most popular items of Indian folk paintings nowadays that are found at most of the major craft fairs.  They are also sold via on-line art galleries and some of the most successful artists sell their works at the cost of USD 500 to 3000 to international clients. Despite commercial success of Madhubani paintings, Madhubani district as of 2011 remains one of the economically backward areas of Bihar and the living condition of local artist communities, rather modest.  Except a handful of so-called top artists who would earn between INR 10,000 to 25,000/- per month, the earning of a large part of artists would be in tune of INR 2500 - 3,000 or less per month.  Clearly, the popularity of art forms has not benefited the local development. Too many artists for too little direct market opportunities Lack of direct market linkage is one of the main constraints. The handicraft office in Madhubani has reportedly registered more than 10,000 artists, which makes it virtually impossible to provide with equal opportunities to all of them to attend existing sales exhibitions. Source: banglanatak dot com – Report of informal field survey, March 2010 Government of India has various schemes to market rural creative products, but the sheer number of individuals, groups and communities in need of marketing support is a challenge: According to MSME Foundation (Clusters of India 2010), there is an estimated amount of 6400 clusters in India out of which 4259 clusters were mapped by MSME Foundation.  Out of 4259 identified clusters, 491 are handloom clusters and 2682 are handicraft clusters.  Cluster is an agglomeration of SHGs usually formed by NGOs, Government Departments or Banks. No data is available as to the overall number of existing SHGs in India and in particular those pertaining to culture / heritage based products.  Under Swarajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana  (SGSY) of the Ministry of Rural Development,  some 34.15 lach SHGs, including craft related SHGs, are formed since the inception of the scheme in 1999.  Under Ambedkar Hastashilp Vikas Yojana (AHVY) of the Ministry of Textile, there are a total of 611 clusters across India comprising of 17,476 SHGs and 186,970 member-artisans, producing some 28,576 types of items.  In turn, in 2010-2011 the scheme for Marketing and Support Service under the same Ministry organized 73 events across India including Gandhi Shilp Bazaar, Craft Bazaars, Exhibitions, sourcing shows, Marketing hub in Metros, renovation of emporium, State/Local level Marketing workshops and Awareness Camp in Schools and Hiring of Stalls by various regions. Further 62 International events were sanctioned, and 46 International events were organized in 2010-2011. UNESCO Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity and Geographical Indication (GI) register and give recognition to heritage practice, know-how and skills.  However link is yet to be established between such recognition and actual marketing of elements registered under these schemes. UNESCO World Heritage Convention gave strong international branding to, and boosted tourism development around, those sites inscribed onto the UNESCO World Heritage List. Likewise, although commercial promotion of heritage is not UNESCO’s primary goal, a Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, foreseen under the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, is expected to stimulate branding and marketing of those intangible cultural heritage elements registered under the list. As of August 2011, India has in total of 8 elements inscribed under the List (see box). At national level, the Government of India has enacted in 1999 Geographical Indicators (GI) Act, which entered into force since 2003.  A family of Trade-Related Intellectual Properties Right, GI Act aims at identifying good as originating from a particular place, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristics of the good become essentially attributable to its geographical origin. GI is commonly given to natural, agricultural and manufactures goods.  The GI tag enables producers to differentiate their products from competing products and is considered to be effective tool to protect those good associated with or deriving from local cultural traditions.  Till July 2011, 153 goods have been registered under the Act out of which 99 belong to handicraft / folk art tradition including Chanderi weaving of Madhya Pradesh, Madhubani painting of Bihar and Pochampalli Ikat of Andhra Pradesh (see annex for the table of registered handicraft / handloom products). For both UNESCO Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage or GI Act, much focus is  given to the registration of elements but the actual socio-economic benefit of these schemes on the livelihood of producers / practitioners nor the efficiency of   the efficiency of government post-registration follow-up mechanism is yet to be assessed. Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity – Elements inscribed from India The Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity is made up of those intangible heritage practices and expressions help demonstrate the diversity of this heritage and raise awareness about its importance.  The Intergovernmental Committee meets annually to evaluate nominations proposed by States Parties to the 2003 Convention and decide whether or not to inscribe those cultural practices and expressions of intangible heritage on the Convention’s Lists. Between 2008 and 2010, elements inscribed from India to the list are:
  • Kutiyattam- Sanskrit theatre of Kerala
  • Ramlila – the traditional performance of the Ramayana
  • Vedic Chanting
  • Ramman – religious festival and theatre of the Garhwal Hymalayas
  • Navroze – Parsi spring celebration (joint inscription with 6 othe countries)
  • Chhau Dance
  • Kalbelia folk songs and dance of Rajasthan
  • Mudiyettu ritual theatre and dance drama of Kerala
Source: www.unesco.org/culture/ich/   Tourists, both domestic and foreign, are consumers of cultural goods and services and remain an important market for rural creative enterprises: Tourists especially from developed countries are typically looking for ‘exotic’ cultural experiences and are the primary consumers of culture and heritage products.  In 2010, number of foreign tourist arrivals in India is 5.58 million (provisional) with 8% annual growth rate, while the number of domestic tourist visits within India is 741 million (provisional) recording annual growth rate of 10.7%.  Visitors from USA and UK altogether account for 30% of the overall foreign tourists. Foreign tourist’s spending on handicraft in India On an average a foreign tourist spends about Rs. 12,187 on handicrafts. The female tourists spent more than their male counterparts. Silk is the most bought item among the handicrafts, as 23% of the total expenditure was on this product alone. Other handicraft items of high values bought by respondent tourists include metal & jewellery, cotton & wool textiles and leather products.  Total expenditure on handicrafts by all the foreign tourists has been estimated at Rs. 29,851.54 million in 2001, which constitutes about 18% of the total value of production of handicraft items in India in 2001-02. This also forms approximately 44% of the total handicrafts exports (excluding hand knotted carpets) from India during the year 2001-02. Source:  Ministry of Tourism, Government of India, Survey of Foreign Tourists’ Expenses on Handicrafts, October 2002 Focusing on Festivals as an Instrument of Development  (…), festivals display considerable potential for the development of local community tourism, particularly in the rural environment. The festival is an expression of culture, of history and of community values, practiced and performed to celebrate, animate, commemorate and in some cases, challenge, traditions and ways of life. Festivals provide moments of meaning and connection for communities but frequently also provide spectacle and entertainment for the visitor. They represent a coming together of immaterial local knowledge and practices such as music and dance but also link with material world through the likes of costumes, masks and objects of ritual. If managed sensitively they can also provide a genuine opportunity for meaningful encounters between societies and cultures. It is important that festivals are positioned not merely as ‘events’ for the benefit of tourists but as meaningful performances of local community heritage which tourists can be invited to engage with. In such a way spaces and times can be produced for meaningful and lasting dialogue. Festivals exemplify local creativity and while the meanings and social functions of these need to be protected and preserved in the spirit of the UNESCO Convention on ICH, they are nevertheless an important resource for local development through a culturally sensitive tourism. With relatively minor interventions, local festivals as a focal point for so many dimensions of both intangible and tangible heritage, can be mobilised as an important resource in the development of tourism and as part of the wider sustainable development process. Professor Mike Robinson Director, Centre for Tourism and Cultural Change UNESCO/UNITWIN Member, Tourism, Culture and Development Festivals and rural tourism provide alternative marketing linkages:Classical marketing strategies typically consist of bringing rural products or artists to urban market.  However, multiple agencies are now increasingly adopting strategies to attract urban / foreign audience directly to the place of living of artists / artisan.  Examples include Explore Rural India tourism development programme by the Ministry of Tourism, Government of India or Jaipur International Heritage Festival and Jodhpur RIFF (Rajasthan International Folk Festival) by Jaipur Virasat Foundation. These are considered to be an effective means to give direct market exposure to a larger segment of local artists and artisan communities.  Be it festivals or programmes for tourists, these initiatives are intended to stimulate year-round work within the communities including the improvement of infrastructure, waster management, education and new product development. Explore Rural India As a sub-brand of global Incredible India campaign, Ministry of Tourism, Government of India supports Explore Rural India programme under the existing scheme of destination development.  Its objective is to showcase rural life, art, culture and heritage at rural locations and in villages, which have core competence in art & craft, handloom, and textiles as also an asset base in the natural environment.  The thrust is to promote village tourism as the primary tourism product to spread tourism and its socio-economic benefits to rural and its new geographic regions, thereby stopping the exodus from rural to urban areas The programme typically offers packaged programmes in art & craft imparted by skilled local artisans. So far, 153 rural tourism projects in 28 States/Union Territories have been sanctioned by the Ministry of Tourism including 36 rural sites where UNDP has supported for capacity building .  (Source: www.exploruralindia.org) Patachitra fair in the village of Naya, West Medinipur, West Bengal As part of its experimental Art for Livelihood project and with a view to giving direct market linkage to the patuas, banglanatak dot com organized a first ever Patachitra fair in their own village in November 2010.  The event was attended by over 5000 people and brought to the artists a total turnover of 15.000 USD to the artists in 3 days. Since then, the village receives visitors from the cities on a regular basis. Encouraged by the popularity, the villagers now maintain the house and roads extremely clean and show readiness to learn English. (Source: banglanatak dot com – Case study for UN-WTO )
Funding and Supporting Folk Art
In India, folk art and artists is financed by both commercial and non-commercial funding sources : Once, folk art and traditional art forms were patronized by kings, landlords (zaminders) and industrialists.  Today, they are supported increasingly by public institutions and business companies, rather than through the personal effort of such wealthy individuals.  Financing of folk art is done on one hand by ‘commercial’ funding sources (ie those motivated by profit and market consideration) and on the other hand by ‘non-commercial’ sources that do not require market-related profitability.  Ministry of Culture, Government of India and its various institutions such as Sangeet Natak Academi and IGNCA, have various project-based funding schemes and are the main source of non-commercial funding.  Museums, universities, research centres and foundation procuring folk art for pedagogical and documenting purpose are other examples of non-commercial patrons.  Commercial funding source is usually private and includes event management companies, music companies, film industries or craft retailers.  Given there is no comprehensive data about folk-art based business across India, it is not possible to assess the share of commercial funding against non-commercial funding  There is no regulatory framework to ensure payment of fare wages /remuneration to folk artists and artisans: While varied form of both commercial and non-commercial funding sources are available to support folk art forms and related projects, it is not clear to what extent these funding benefit directly the individual artists and artisans in monetary terms. Different music companies publish CDs and DVDs featuring songs and dance of the folk artists. Publishers print books highlighting their lifestyle, tradition and evolution of their art form. Film makers make feature films and documentary showcasing their lives. In all these, the artists and art form may get recognition but no regulatory framework is available to ensure payment of royalty to folk artists. Likewise, in the area of traditional craft, in the absence of regulation, payment of fair-wage to the artisan community is left to the discretion of buyers and the ability of artisans to negotiate sale prices.  Various NGOs and Government department offers capacity building on pricing to artisans; however training on pricing of performance is less common. In Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Art and Culture is not common area of support:     Out of 500 largest Indian companies doing CSR, only one company is identified as supporting art, culture and heritage conservation.  Education, health, community welfare and environment are the common are common areas funded under CSR.  Recently, the Ministry of Culture has revitalized National Culture Fund to promote public-private partnership for culture and to encourage corporate sector to consider culture and heritage as part of their CSR.

*****

References Policy Papers, Reports and Articles
  • All Indian Artisans Craftworkers Welfare Association (AIACA), 2010, Geographical Indications of India, Socio-Economic and Development Issues
  • Amar Singh, 2010, Clusters in India 2010, Foundation for MSME Clusters
  • Banglanatak dot com for UNESCO,2008, Working Paper on Art for Livelihood
  • Ministry of Culture, Government of India, 2011, Annual Report 2010-2011
  • Ministry of Labor, Government of India, March 2009, National Policy on Skill Development
  • Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, 2011, Annual Report 2010-2011
  • Ministry of Textile, Government of India, 2011, Annual Report 2010-2011
  • Ministry of Tourism, Government of India, 2011, Annual Report 2010-2011
  • Ministry of Tourism, Government of India,2009 & 2010, Statistic At Glance, 2009, Static at Glance 2010
  • Ministry of Tourism, Government of India, October 2002, Survey of Foreign Tourists’ Expenses on Handicrafts,
  • National Commission for Enterprises on the Unorganized Sector, (Year unknown), Working Draft on The Challenge of Employment in Development in India - an Informal Economy Perspective
  • National Institute of Rural Development, 2008, Rural Development Statistics 2007-2008
  • Planning Commission, Government of India, 2010, Annual Plan 2010-2011
  • Planning Commission, Government of India, 2007, Eleventh Five Year Plan of Action 2007-2012
  • PRS Legislative Research / UNESCO, November 2007, Issue Brief – Central Laws Related to Culture
  • PRS Legislative Research / UNESCO, February 2008, Issue Brief – Craft in India
  • PRS Legislative Research / UNESCO, January 2009, Issue Brief – Heritage sites in India
  • Rajiv Sharma and Sunita Chitkara, May 2006, Informal Sector in the Indian System of National Accounts, Paper developed for Expert Group on Informal sector Statistics (Delhi group) , CSO, India
  • UNESCO, 2009, World Report – Investing in Cultural Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue
  • United Nations, 15 December 2010, Creative Economy Report 2010
  • UNWTO, 2011, UNWTO Tourism Highlights 2011
Websites
  • Census of India: www.censusindia.gov.in
  • Craft Revival Trust: www.craftrevival.org
  • Explore Rural India, Ministry of Tourism, Government of India: exploruralindia.org
  • Geographical Indication Registry: http://www.ipindia.nic.in/girindia/
  • Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR): www.iccrindia.net
  • Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts: www.ignca.nic.in
  • Karmayog: http://www.karmayog.org/CSR
  • Ministry of Textile, Government of India: www.texmin.nic.in
  • Ministry of Tourism, Government of India: http://tourism.gov.in/
  • Office of the Development Commissioner (Handicraft): www.handicrafts.nic.in
  • Foundation for MSME Clusters: http://www.msmefoundation.org/
  • Sangeet Natak Academi www.sangeetnatak.org
  • UNESCO : www.unesco.org
  DISCLAIMER This note was compiled by banglanatak dot com and UNESCO New Delhi as the background document of the International Seminar on Heritage in Development – Art for Livelihood (Kolkata, 6-7 September 2011). The documents are based on various government reports as well as research papers. The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). Banglanatak dot com and UNESCO made every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but they do not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete.   Annex 1 Some Government Schemes for the Craft Sector

Scheme

Ministry

Details

Rural Employment Generation Programme

Khadi & Village Industries

Develop employment and skills for youth; promote rural industrialization

Rajiv Gandhi Swavlamban Rozgar Yoajna

Khadi & Village Industries

Loans for any entrepreneur, artisan, or businessman in rural or urban areas

Self Employment for Educated Unemployed

Youths

Khadi & Village Industries

Technical and skills upgradation to all educated unemployed youth; post-training financial assistance

Fund for Regeneration of Traditional Industries

Micro, Small and

Medium Industries

Focuses on development of 100 traditional industry clusters

Khadi Karigar Janashree Bima Yojana for Khadi Artisans

Micro, Small and

Medium Industries

Provides group insurance to spinners, weavers, pre-spinning artisans, and artisans engaged in the khadi sector

Product Development, Design Intervention & Packaging Scheme

Micro, Small and

Medium Industries

Seeks to improve the quality of khadi products and diversify into new products

Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana

Rural Development

Bring BPL families above poverty line by organizing skill based SHGs; includes rural artisans

The Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hastshilp Vikas Yojana

Textiles

Develops artisan clusters and self-sufficiency of artisans; technological training, skills upgradation; marketing interventions, and financial assistance

Marketing Support and Services Scheme

Textiles

Increase awareness of Indian handicraft products; financial assistance for marketing events (national handicrafts expos, craft bazaars, etc), infrastructure, services, and publicity

Design and Technology Upgradation Scheme

Textiles

Seeks new methods and modern techniques for traditional crafts; National artisan awards, including Shilp Guru awards, covered under this scheme

Export Promotion Scheme

Textiles

Conduct research, identify foreign markets, locate and market artisan clusters for export items

Research Development Scheme

Textiles

Surveys and evaluations on specific crafts, evaluate project implementation, social programmes for SCs and STs, and address any issues from the WTO

Deen Dayal Hathkargha Protsahan Yojana

Textiles

Product development, infrastructure, weaver training, supplies, and marketing

Integrated Handloom Training Project

Textiles

Skills training to weavers and others

Workshed-cum-Housing Scheme

Textiles

Workshops and house constructions for weavers

Input Support Scheme

Textiles

Ensures supply of yarn to the handlooms sector

Mill Gate Price Scheme

Textiles

All yarn sold to weavers at the Mill Gate Price

Design Development & Training Programme

Textiles

Development and skill upgradation of handloom sector

Integrated Handloom Training Project (IHTP)

Textiles

Skill Upgradation of weavers and handloom workers

Weavers’ Welfare Scheme

Textiles

Provides health insurance, thrift fund and new insurance

Bunkar Bima Yojana

Textiles

Life insurance through (LIC)

Handloom Export Scheme

Textiles

Development of products for export, publicity, and international marketing

Marketing Promotion Programme

Textiles

Financial assistance in organizing handlooms expos, crafts fairs, etc

Special Central Assistance

Tribal Affairs

Financial assistance for tribals in several sectors including village and small scale industries

Support to Training and Employment Programme for Women (STEP)

Women & Child Development

Promote SHG groups, provide skills training, enable employment & income generation projects in ten sectors including handicrafts, handlooms, and khadi and village industries

Source: Parliament Research Institute (PRS)/ UNESCO: Issue Brief for Craft Annex 2 Some Skill Development and Training Programmes under various Ministries relevant to culture industry development 

Ministry/Department

Schemes/Programmes

Target Group

Duration

Human Resource Development

 

Vocationalisation of Secondary Education (6800 schools covered

 

Student having passed 10th class

2 years

Jan Shikshan Sansthan

 

Disadvantaged groups of adults. Priority is given to adult neo-literates/ semi-literates, SC and ST, women/girls, oppressed, migrants, slum/ pavement dwellers and working children

Need based (1-4 weeks)

Labor and Employment

Craftsmen Training Scheme (CTS) (6834 ITI/ITCs)

 

 

School leavers with 8th, 10th and 12th pass

 

6 months to 3 years

 

Apprenticeship Training Scheme (ATS) (23,800 establishments)

 

School leavers with 8th, 10th and 12th pass or National Trade Certificate Holder

 

6 months to 4 years

 

Modular Employable Skills(MES)

 

School drop outs and unorganized sector workers

 

Short term (60-1000 hours)

Crafts Instructor Training Scheme (CITS) (6 Institutes)

 

Instructors of ITIs/ITCs

 

 

1 year

Rural Development

Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY)

 

Focus is on the vulnerable groups among the rural poor. SC/ STs would account for a minimum of 50%, women for 20% and disabled for 3% of the total swarozgaris during a year.

 

Need based (short term)

MSME [Small Industries Development Organisation (SIDO)]

 

Entrepreneurship Development Programme, Skill Development Programme (SDP), Management Development Programme

Workers

Educated unemployed youth

 Entrepreneurs

Short and long term

Khadi & Village Industries Commission under Ministry of MSME

 

51 Training Centres run 35 types of programmes

 

 

Unemployed rural youth, In-job Artisans/Supervisors working in KVI instts, Prospective Entrepreneurs, Beneficiaries of different Government. Schemes desirous of undertaking KVI activities.

 

2 months to 12 months

 

Textiles

Decentralized Training Programme, 24 Weavers‟ Service Centres, Cooperative Training, 13 Power loom Centres, Indian Jute Industries Research Association, Central Wool Development Board, Central Silk Board, Training Centres for Handicrafts, North –eastern Handicrafts and Handlooms development Corporation

Skill upgradation of Workers in textile industry

Mainly short term (15 days to 3 months). Some courses under Handicrafts are of 1 year duration.

 

 

Tourism

15 Food Craft Institutes under State Governments

10th pass

6 months- 1 year

Tribal Affairs

Vocational Training Centres (VTC) in tribal areas. 100% central assistance is given to State/UT/NGOs setting up VTC.

Unemployed tribal youth (each person is given training in two trades)

6 months in VTC and 6 month with Master Craftsman

Women and Child Development

Central Social Welfare Board (programmes are organized by voluntary organizations)

To train women in marketable trades and also upgrade their skills for getting remunerative employment opportunities

 

Women Empowerment Programme in collaboration with IGNOU (Training programme on Empowering women through SHGs_

To organize women into effective SHGs

 

Source: Table on Skill Development and Training Programmes under Various Ministries/Departments, Ministry of Labor, Government of India, National Policy on Skill Development, March 2009   Annex 3 Registration Details of G.I. Applications (Handicraft): from 2003 to July 2011 

S.No

Geographical Indications

Goods

State

FROM APRIL 2004 – MARCH 2005

1

Aranmula Kannadi

Handicraft

Kerala

2

Pochampalli Ikat

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

FROM APRIL 2005 – MARCH 2006

3

Salem Fabric

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

4

Chanderi Fabric

Handicraft

Madhya Pradesh

5

Solapur Chaddar

Handicraft

Maharashtra

6

Solapur Terry Towel

Handicraft

Maharashtra

7

Kotpad Handloom fabric

Handicraft

Orissa

8

Mysore Silk

Handicraft

Karnataka

9

Kota Doria

Handicraft

Rajasthan

10

Mysore Agarbathi

Manufactured

Karnataka

11

Kancheepuram Silk

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

12

Bhavani Jamakkalam

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

13

Kullu Shawl

Handicraft

Himachal Pradesh

14

Bidriware

Handicraft

Karnataka

15

Madurai Sungudi

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

16

Orissa Ikat

Handicraft

Orissa

17

Channapatna Toys & Dolls

Handicraft

Karnataka

18

Mysore Rosewood Inlay

Handicraft

Karnataka

19

Srikalahasthi Kalamkari

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

20

Mysore Sandalwood Oil

Manufactured

Karnataka

21

Mysore Sandal soap

Manufactured

Karnataka

22

Kasuti Embroidery

Handicraft

Karnataka

23

Mysore Traditional Paintings

Handicraft

Karnataka

FROM APRIL 2006 – MARCH 2007

24

Madhubani Paintings

Handicraft

Bihar

FROM APRIL 2007 – MARCH 2008

25

Kondapalli Bommallu

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

26

Thanjavur Paintings

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

27

Silver Filigree of Karimnagar

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

28

Alleppey Coir

Handicraft

Kerala

29

Muga Silk

Handicraft

Assam

30

Temple Jewellery of Nagercoil

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

31

Thanjavur Art Plate

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

32

Ilkal Sarees

Handicraft

Karnataka

33

Applique – Khatwa Patch Work of Bihar

Handicraft

Bihar

34

Sujini Embroidery Work of Bihar

Handicraft

Bihar

35

Sikki Grass Work of Bihar

Handicraft

Bihar

36

Nakshi Kantha

Handicraft

West Bengal

37

Ganjifa cards of Mysore (Karnataka)

Handicraft

Karnataka

38

Navalgund Durries

Handicraft

Karnataka

39

Karnataka Bronze Ware

Handicraft

Karnataka

40

Molakalmuru Sarees

Handicraft

Karnataka

41

Salem Silk known as Salem Venpattu

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

42

Kovai Cora Cotton

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

43

Arani Silk

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

FROM APRIL 2008 – MARCH 2009

44

Bastar Dhokra

Handicraft

Chattisgarh

45

Bastar Wooden Craft

Handicraft

Chattisgarh

46

Nirmal Toys and Craft

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

47

Maddalam of Palakkad

Handicraft

Kerala

48

Screw Pine Craft of Kerala

Handicraft

Kerala

49

Swamimalai Bronze Icons

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

50

Bastar Iron Craft

Handicraft

Chattisgarh

51

Konark Stone carving

Handicraft

Orissa

52

Orissa Pattachitra

Handicraft

Orissa

53

Machilipatnam Kalamkari

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

54

Brass Broidered Coconut Shell Crafts of Kerala

Handicraft

Kerala

55

Blue Pottery of Jaipur

Handicraft

Rajasthan

56

Molela Clay Work

Handicraft

Rajasthan

57

Kathputlis of Rajasthan

Handicraft

Rajasthan

58

Leather Toys of Indore

Handicraft

Madhya Pradesh

59

Bagh Prints of Madhya Pradesh

Handicraft

Madhya Pradesh

60

Sankheda Furniture

Handicraft

Gujarat

61

Agates of Cambay

Handicraft

Gujarat

62

Bell Metal Ware of Datia and Tikamgarh

Handicraft

Madhya Pradesh

63

Kutch Embroidery

Handicraft

Gujarat

64

Kani Shawl

Handicraft

Jammu & Kashmir

65

Chamba Rumal

Handicraft

Himachal Pradesh

66

Pipli Applique Work

Handicraft

Orissa

67

Budiiti Bell & Brass Craft

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

68

Thanjavur Doll

Handicraft

Tamil Nadu

69

Santiniketan Leather Goods

Handicraft

West Bengal

70

Nirmal Furniture

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

71

Nirmal Paintings

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

72

Andhra Pradesh Leather Puppetry

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

73

Kashmir Pashmina

Handicraft

Jammu & Kashmir

74

Kashmir Sozani Craft

Handicraft

Jammu & Kashmir

75

Lucknow Chikan Craft

Handicraft

Uttar Pradesh

76

Uppada Jamdani Sarees

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

FROM APRIL 2009 – MARCH 2010

77

Puneri Pagadi

Handicraft

Maharashtra

78

Banaras Brocades and Sarees

Handicraft

Uttar Pradesh

79

Tangaliya Shawl

Handicraft

Gujarat

80

Santipore Saree

Handicraft

West Bengal

81

Cannanore Home Furnishings

Handicraft

Kerala

82

Sanganeri Hand Block Printing

Handicraft

Rajasthan

83

Gadwal Sarees

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

84

Kinnauri Shawl

Handicraft

Himachal Pradesh

85

Kasaragod Sarees

Handicraft

Kerala

86

Kuthampully Sarees

Handicraft

Kerala

87

Sandur Lambani Embroidery

Handicraft

Karnataka

88

Hand made Carpet of Bhadohi

Handicraft

Uttar Pradesh

89

Paithani Sarees and Fabrics

Handicraft

Maharashtra

90

Champa Silk Saree and Fabrics

Handicraft

Chhattisgarh

91

Kota Doria (Logo)

Handicraft

Rajasthan

92

Surat Zari Craft

Handicraft

Gujarat

93

Cheriyal Paintings

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

94

Pembarthi Metal Craft

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

95

Payyannur Pavithra Ring

Handicraft

Kerala

96

Phulkari

Handicraft

Punjab, Haryana & Rajasthan

97

Khandua Saree and Fabrics

Handicraft

Orissa

FROM APRIL 2011 – JULY 2011

98

Bagru Hand Block Print

Handicraft

Rajasthan

99

Venkatagiri Sarees

Handicraft

Andhra Pradesh

  Source: Geographical Indication Registry (http://www.ipindia.nic.in/girindia/)