Issue 1, Summer 2019 ISSN: 2581 - 9410
The nomadic Rabaris of Kutch have produced some of the most spectacular embroidery of the Indian sub-continent. Inspection reveals a distinctive and coherent visual vocabulary expressed with great skill. It is a marker of their identity and plays such an important role in their traditional way of life that it has now seen as a barrier to change and is subject to a ban, which is rigorously enforced.
A glimpse of the dramatic attire of the Rabari, predominantly black wool for the women and white cotton for the men, impacts on the eye in sharp contrast to the dun-coloured landscape of the village or the kaleidoscopic hues of the bazaar. Closer inspection reveals a distinctive and coherent visual vocabulary expressed in supremely skilful embroidery.
However, in the last year, a radical piece of self-legislation has been introduced by the samaj, or community council of two of the three sub-groups in Kutch. A wholesale ban on the use of embroidery has been decreed by the Dhebaria and Vagaria samaj and an accompanying severe reduction in the amount of ornamentation to be worn. Only the Kachhi Rabaris remain aloof from the new austerity.
While the rules of the Rabari community are not recognised by the Indian legal system and are, therefore, not enforceable under national jurisdiction, they are rigorously implemented and fastidiously observed. A comprehensive system of penalties has been drawn up and transgression of the new codes of dress, for example, in both Dhebaria and Vagaria communities, incurs a fine of 5000 rupees (approximately GB£100) for a single offence.
Within days of the samaj’s edict last year, the women had stripped themselves of their jewellery and all the embroideries were stored away. No dissent was voiced and observance was total.
Reasons for Change What has prompted such drastic action? Two things: the need to modernise and, more importantly, the need to speed-up the whole procedure of marriage.
The idea of ‘modernising’ is generally expressed by the men rather than the women. They have greater exposure to the urban and metropolitan areas and are more conscious of the way others perceive them: anachronistic, quaint, tribal. Officially, they are classified as Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBCs). The desire to shed the more obvious markers of membership of a so-called backward community when in regular contact with groups of higher estate is understandable. Driven by the stigma of low status in class and caste conscious India, most of the men shed ‘traditional’ or ‘ethnic’ dress in favour of shirts and slacks. In broader terms, ‘modernisation’ is signified by the acquisition of consumer goods – a TV, a Hero Honda motorbike, a ghettoblaster, or the construction of a larger house. Modernisation and provision of community amenities such as education (for females as well as males); primary health care and an easily accessible, potable water supply are thought of by few and remain neglected.
Marriage cements the fabric of caste, community and society at large. Life without marriage is no life at all, unless it is part of religious devotion, and the unmarried are looked upon with pity. For the Rabari women certainly, preparation for it has been a feature of their daily labours. So comprehensive were a woman’s dowry requirements, after all they were supposed to meet her needs for life, that a woman could still be embroidering well into her 30s and full residence in her husband’s village might not be taken up until all was complete.
In tandem with the burden of dowry for the women, the requirements of the bride price had become impossibly onerous for the men. Bride price was usually paid in instalments as a combination of cash and jewellery over a number of years. However, the total cost of a Dhebaria or Vagaria bride (the case is different for the Kachhis) escalated in the last few years to between 1 and 2 lakh rupees (approximately GB£2000 – 4000), an astronomical amount for a pastoral migrant. Consequently, marriage arrangements were protracted in the extreme placed ridiculous demands upon the parties involved and sometimes did not unite the couple until their mid to late 30s, when a woman’s fertility starts to decline.
Thus, marriage rather than acting as a cohesive system within the community was contributing to the causes of its decline. Unsurprisingly, the answer seemed to lie in dismantling the offending elements of both dowry and bride price. However, what is surprising is the uncompromisingly radical policy adopted to achieve this and the swiftness of its implementation. Where a gradual reduction of the amounts of embroidered goods and ornaments might have been anticipated – such is the enduring pride of the female community in these tokens of membership – there has been no such moderation and minimalism now prevails where formerly densely embroidered narratives flourished.
Heritage for Sale A few months on from the initial implementation in numerous villages the accumulated dowry of several generations is being put up for sale.
There has been a trade in Gujarati and Rajasthani folk embroideries for two to three decades, now spurred-on by the rise in tourism. The sale of dowry items has become a source of income for members of most of the rural groups, either by selling directly to visitors or, as is more often the case, by selling to middlemen and dealers. As a source of income, the money realised is generally meagre, sporadic and finite. These textiles and embroideries were not made as commodities for trade. At the most utilitarian level they served as the domestic and personal items required by a woman and her family either at home in the village or, as with Rabaris, for use with the dang (the migratory group). In fact, dowry items rarely were simply utilitarian and were a great showcase for the Rabaris’ characteristic aesthetic, Stitched embellishment on clothing and household items became a marker of group identity, marital status, function (of the item itself and also a testament to the skill of the maker.
Until lately, in the Rabari community, embroidered-clothing played an integral role in the twin systems of dowry and bride price. Blouses, veil cloths, quilts and bags in particular were important inclusions in the series of gift exchanges enacted as part of the whole system of betrothal and marriage. Alongside utility and their function in nuptial arrangements, the embroideries give evocative accounts of Rabari life. Stitched details reveal aspects of daily existence: stylised women carrying water pots, ranks of flowers, parrots and peacocks compete for space with camels. The primary activity of fetching water for desert people and the flora and fauna encountered by the nomad are described stitch by stitch. The religious and symbolic are recorded and the celestial and the mundane jostle together in a single piece. A small repeated triangle is a thorn, a larger triangle a temple; flowers and a temple combine to-form a semi-abstract elephant design. The exuberant whole gives expression to a profound and devout Hinduism.
Adapting to Survive? The Rabaris came to Gujarat from Rajasthan where they were originally camel-herders serving the Rajput courts. The demand for camels declined and, adapting to survive, the Rabaris became primarily herders of sheep, goats or cattle.
The pattern of pastoral nomadism is changing yet again, eroded if not yet eradicated by the rapid urbanisation of modern India. The Rabaris have had to respond to these changes. While many are still pastoralists, there is widespread sedentarisation of all sub-groups. The Kachhis, who inhabit the central and western parts of Kutch, are now heavily involved in farming. The Dhebaria and Vagaria in the east and north-east of the district have retained a certain aloofness from farming, but are becoming involved in sedentary occupations such as agricultural labour, working in the salt industry, and trucking.
The impact of these experiences upon their lives is profound and assails the integrity of their traditions as no earlier upheavals have. The shedding of obvious markers of group membership, such as embroidery and ornamentation, is an expression of this far-reaching change. With the public declaration of ‘Rabariness’ gone, a significant surrender of ethnic identity is announced. For the scholar and textile enthusiast, research has lately been transformed from the documentation of a vibrant tradition to writing the epitaph for an abandoned aesthetic.
Further Reading J. Frater. ‘Threads of Identity: Embroidery and Adornment of the Nomadic Rabaris.’ Mapin Publishing, Ahmedabad, 1995.
A section of India believes that we are on the move and that opportunity for employment and enterprise in all spheres are growing. However another vast section in rural areas, particularly in certain regions and states and among certain communities, has been left frozen and immobile with no vision or hope of any change. These include artisan communities with low skills but no alternative options. Literacy figures are rising rapidly in some areas such as the north-east, and very slowly, particularly among women, in the traditionally backward states. Growth in employment has practically stopped in the public sector and but has grown in the services sector. Figures are quantifiable in formal industries and hardly available with any sense of accuracy in the unorganised sector. Uncertainties in assessing migrant labour, land ownership patterns, part time farming activity, artisan work closely related to farming or fishing, seasonal and full time employment in traditional cultural activity , result in only notional figures relating to employment being available for what is broadly called the craft sector. For many years governments have attempted to assess accurately the numbers employed in handicraft and handloom activity. Difficulties in arriving at exact figures stem not only from faulty census methodology but from insecure conditions faced by traditionally skilled and semi-skilled workers in this sector. For example, a handloom weaver’s family could consist of the head of the household who earns from his labours, a wife who assists him almost full time in pre and post loom work, but is not a wage earner, and children and elders who may also assist from time to time for no wage. If the wage-earner should die, often the woman takes over the work of weaving. She is a skilled worker but would most likely not be counted separately in any artisan census. A semi-skilled weaver may find he is unemployed if his master weaver cannot obtain orders for the season. He may be forced to go into manual labour or practice some other low-level skill, despite being a traditional handloom weaver. Unless he is actively on the loom he may not be counted in the census. Many weavers have migrated in larger numbers to larger towns and cities to find alternative work. Some may absorbed by textile manufacturing units on a temporary or permanent basis while others may get lost in the ocean of impoverished daily wage earners attached to construction or other such activity. In Varanasi we have the strange situation of 40% of the handlooms closed for lack of orders and work, while for much of the remaining looms business is brisk. A national handloom census carried out just 6 years ago gives the number of weavers employed in handlooms at around 75 lakh persons, yet officials informally admit that the figures could be almost double. It also means that five times this number depend on weaving for sustenance. Census gatherers do not identify part time or unemployed weavers who have moved from their traditional areas of work. In the unorganised sector, much of the work has that ‘now-you-see-them-now-you-don’t’ quality because it gets activated only on a seasonal or need basis. Actual workers can be counted but significantly, persons with knowledge of craft skills which are underutilized or redundant fall between the gaps. A documenter of crafts for many years would know that among other things, the most fascinating aspect of the crafts sector is the ability of certain crafts people to appear to be flourishing one day and almost disappear from sight the next, only to reappear in another form the day after. A small intervention by technicians, designers, NGOs, local governments or just a sporadic market demand can resuscitate an old skill or create new occupations almost overnight. They may disappear just as easily if demand disappears. It is against such misty and ephemeral factors that one must consider the potential for employment in the crafts sector. Exports may give employment a thrust but keep individual wages low and lead to sudden collapse if products lose their appeal or cannot be competitive. The history of crafts in the past 100 years would show a decline in those crafts which were part of earlier courtly lifestyles or were crushed for offering competition to British goods. Wherever industrial goods competed with local ones the latter died out and crafts people turned to other occupations. Also, wherever the world’s urban trends dictated changed life style, and old cultural practices gave way to new more ‘modern’ attitudes, the craftsman was often left by the wayside. However, the traditional potter, the blacksmith, the grass mat and basket weaver continued to make items for simple rural needs and survived because of this. The caste system also held traditional occupations in place. When India became a free country despite the many vicissitudes that crafts people had to face, they could still be found in large numbers, and a strong spirit of nationalism encouraged serious efforts by the government to resuscitate and revive their crafts. One flaw in its pattern of development was the categorisation of crafts themselves. The word handicrafts was meant to describe the more ornamental, decorative objects that may also be utilitarian but actually served the upper echelons of Indian society, whereas common potters, weavers and others who made non artistic crafts were categorised as mere village industry, serving villagers. Naturally, with the same hierarchies being reflected in the bureaucracy and upper middle class society, the latter were practically neglected in terms of development, financial support or marketing. It was left to the village markets to absorb and deal with these, while the elaborate and finer skills were noticed and admired by cosmopolitan society. For these reasons, the common categories were never quantified while the upper section received government attention. Despite this imbalance, India’s official policies and the schemes formulated to channel funds for the development of the craft sector are probably the most widespread and supportive in their intentions than in any other country. It is also arguable that India has the greatest number of skills in the craft and handmade textile sector in the world and therefore it is only natural this should be reflected in government policy. Government policies cover marketing through crafts bazaars and exhibitions, product design and technical training workshops, export development programmes, promotion through publications such as posters and catalogues, cluster development and buyer-seller meets, support to state organisation, apex co-operative bodies or NGOs to set up retail showrooms, and for state governments to set up haats (marketplaces) in urban areas to provide infrastructure to crafts persons for short periods of time. On paper they are well laid out and cover almost every development requirement. However, in reality, processes to implement them are mired in corruption and red tape and at times too inflexible to serve a sector full of disparate needs and tenuous results. Most often, what is really needed is commitment and passion, flexible modes of operation, complete integrity and considerable ‘hand-holding’ before a group of crafts men or women can confidently steer their own destinies in the commercial world of quality and competition. The most crucial component to ensure employment, i.e., sustainable livelihoods in craft occupations, is the market. Without this there can be no security. If the crafts person is sure of selling his/her goods, the motivation and confidence needed to access raw material, give time to ensure a fine quality finish, seek funds through loans to fulfil orders and finally, to pass on skills to the next generation , comes automatically. For far too long, the focus was on inputs, rather than opportunities to sell the output. It may be a chicken-and-egg situation but in the long run experience has shown us that if a market is available, or even indicated in the horizon, the artisan will make efforts to obtain the inputs needed to find a respectable space in the marketplace. In recent years globalization has been a big issue facing development activists who work at grass root levels. In some cases traditional occupations have been hit hard. Some years ago small fisher folk in Kerala were impoverished when big trawlers began to encroach on their spaces in the seas and the women who made packing material for the fish and sleeping mats out of screw pine leaves to supplement meagre family incomes found that they were the sole bread earners of the family. Financial burdens imposed by local loan sharks and unfair marketing practices which gave low returns resulted in desperate women committing suicide. It took many years of struggle, in which I was personally involved, major organisational efforts by dedicated trade unionists and some determined weaver women to stabilize their lives and their incomes. In another part of Kerala, traditional potters lost their markets for earthen cooking vessels because of competition from industrial substitutes. Women in these families turned to prostitution until another major intervention by the Dastkari Haat Samiti along with a designer and funds from government sources brought them back to making more contemporary and relevant products and out of prostitution. It was the loss of markets that caused their miseries, and even while they have excellent marketable products now such as terracotta murals and large garden pots and urns, it is largely private initiatives and not the government that sustains them. Life may have improved but the future is still precarious unless the connecting links between village production and sophisticated urban demands is kept firm by those involved in sustaining the livelihoods of such people. Positive stories in the craft sector abound in the current environment of enterprise, literacy, internet technology and cheaper travel. There is a quantum leap in the world’s interest in India’s special qualities. Crafts and handmade textiles are India’s greatest cultural resources that can be converted into economic wealth. Unlike ten years ago, crafts people who have had exposure to urban marketing events and state invitations abroad to demonstrate their skills at trade fairs and other ‘India shows’ have now printed business cards. Some have e-mail addresses and communicate via the internet through literate friends or even type Hindi words in English themselves. Their sons and daughters are now encouraged to be part of their enterprises since earnings and dignity in pursuing such professions has improved. Fifteen years ago most crafts people spoke with a sense of apathy and despondency, but today they know they can contact buyers through the internet or tourists will visit their village and buy their wares at their doorstep. Places like Dilli Haat have opened up major marketing opportunities where they learn confidence in selling to urban customers. In Uttaranchal small NGOs work with women’s groups in villages to convert local grasses and bamboo into basketry and rope or multiple utilitarian and artistic uses. These products are shown at crafts bazaars at places like Dilli Haat. Small entrepreneurs have developed into exporters confident of getting orders for contemporary, well-designed and well-presented handicrafts. In the district of Bhadohi a project initiated by the Dastkari Haat Samiti with help from Sandhi Craft Foundation, (an initiative of the ICICI Bank), enabled hundreds of women to have a vision of steady earnings from their traditional skill of basket making, which had never been produced for the market. Since they made them only for personal use, they had escaped the attention of institutional bodies. The women were either not earning from basketry or were earning a pittance in carpet weaving. After being motivated to convert their skill into earnings, getting guidance in colours and new product types, they realized that good orders could bring them a four figure income every month if they were industrious. In this instance, employment potential has been created among women in Bhadohi where none existed, within a year of focussed work carried out by the organisers. This example demonstrates the huge scope that exists for creating employment in the crafts sector. The basic requirements are, a) the ability to search for and recognise craft skills and their potential for development, b) provide necessary improvements to make them marketable, c) target and provide access to specific markets, d) provide temporary support to enable crafts people to form organisational bodies and access micro credit and other loans, e) assist them at a later stage in setting up a business enterprise with a proper business plan. The private sector and the government can work with established NGOs, design institutions, exporters and sundry marketing bodies to create the groundwork and bring crafts persons and their products out to the vast marketplace. Corporate social responsibilities can be fulfilled by ensuring that corporate gifts and some kinds of office equipment is accessed only from this sector. It benefits everyone to create purchasing power in rural areas, since industrial products would then be in demand, and encourage livelihood generation in a sector that is employment friendly, eco-friendly and, as a bonus, demonstrates the excellence of India’s traditional skills and multi-cultural traditions. 11th September ‘07 First Published Oct 2007, One India One People Reprinted March 2008, The Other Side |
In January 2010 I formally begin my final year diploma project for craft and design with KHAMIR (Kachchh Heritage, Arts and Craft, Music and Integrated Resources) a registered organization and craft resource center situated in Kachchh, Gujarat, India. . During this trip, I was able to visit and learn about a variety of Gujarat’s craft process, techniques and tradition. I studied and enjoyed my experience with one specific product of craft – that is Metal bells. I have a faint memory of my childhood when my grandfather used to take me to the village, where I heard music while the cow’s walked on the road, now it make sense to me it was nothing other than the bell tied around their neck.
As metal craft jargon is complicated, I will attempt to present it in a way that is easy to use and handy for the reader, potential buyer, marketers, and student of crafts and more specifically for the bell metal makers. Bell metal is my core focus area for specialization for my diploma project funded by Khamir and supported by Indian Institute of Craft and Design, Jaipur. This research talks about pros and cons and opportunity within the bell metal market; moreover it also focus on some of the sensitive issue within the industry.
BELL METALBrief History Many people know that Metal craft originated in Kachchh however it is believed that it is originated in Sindh (Now in Pakistan after the Indo-Pak partition in 1947). Currently, most of the Metal bell making work is done in two Villages – Nirona and Zura, in Gujarat by the Lohars of the Muslim community, their families have been making bells for as far back as they can trace their ancestry. The entire family often involved in the process, however I found women and children are involved in the less technical work. Women’s work is to prepare or to make basic material for instance, mud paste which can eventually provide finishing to the bell. Use of Bell Metal These bells are used to recognize cattle. They are tied around the cattle’s neck so the owner would know of their whereabouts. It is also used at entrance to home and as a decorative musical product, somewhat likes chimes, all the more since their tonal quality is scrupulously crafted. Craft designer and NGO’s are constantly in process to market bell metal product with innovative design and rhythm. When I returned to Australia, I found bell metal products in one of the local store in the form of key chain and a bell with a heart with pearls surrounding it. Some designers are one step ahead! Indian designer need to develop new cost effective design which also attract attention from the target market instead of increasing production of the same product with only minor change. Making of Bell Metal There are fourteen sizes of bells and that are customized for different animals. Size 0 is the smallest and size 13 the largest. The bell is made of iron and coated primarily with copper/Tamba and Brass/Pital, along with a few other metals. They are made from scrap iron sheets which are repeatedly compressed to join together and to give them the requisite shape. The metal parts are neatly joined by expert hands by a locking system without any kind of welding. Then they are coated with powdered copper with the help of mud paste and then heated in a furnace to fix the powdered copper on the surface of the bells. Once cooled and ready, a wooden piece or gong is attached to the centre of the bell for that characteristic sound which is beautifully sonorous. The sound that emanate from each bell depends on the artisan’s skill and three factors: (1) the size and shape of the bell’s body; (2) the size and shape of the wooden strip hanging within the bell and (3) the shape and curve of the bell’s bottom rim. Denting of the bell to get the perfect pitch is also done by hand, by repeated thrashing with a hammer. Bell making in Kutch is a wonderfully sustainable craft as the raw material is metal scrap which is purchased from junk yards and the only use of energy is in the furnace for preparing them. Even the waste generated is miniscule, comprising of small metal scrap and burnt mud. Who make it and who sell it? Please note that the views expressed here are from my research and understanding. The prices that have been taken into consideration are based on a comparative analysis based on available price information on the sales sites on the internet, selling prices in Australia and by export houses in India. I found it very interesting that NGO’s generating very good money out of the selling of bell metal products because their focus of the business is not on the domestic but however export oriented. Generally speaking, one piece of bell metal product in size 12/13 is being sold at $59 US dollar (Rs.2655 INR Rupees) and on the other side, community or individual person who makes it under the guidance of an NGO or designer charges about 250 INR rupees a day where total process may take up to 2 days that means total 500 INR Rupees labor cost that is equivalent to $11.11 US Dollar. The material cost including sheet metal, cost of coal will be around $14 US dollars if it bought from the wholesale market. There is, generally no cost involved in mud paste as, it requires water, red Clay (sand) (that is freely available in local area – as per the statement given by lohar). So it seems to me that the basic cost of the 12/13 size bell metal is about $25.11 US Dollar where the selling price is approximately, $59 US Dollar. Some people would argue that there may be other cost, for example GST, VAT however it is now well known that this cost paid by the customer on the top of the amount so basic margin of the seller (NGO’s, Business Organization) will be about $33.89 US dollar that means 57.44% marginal profit. This is one of the few segments where big companies do not want to enter and it has great potential. What about other - the Lohar’s side? There is other side of this business that is the maker - the Lohar who are not getting paid enough. I am of the opinion, that due to lack of marketing and educational skills, they are unable to target their market, consequently intermediary like NGO’s, Organisations, or designers come into the motion and digest most of the profit. NGO’s are meant to support local community however sometimes policy and action plan are different because policy represent compliance with legislation however action plan of the NGO’s and business represent need of growth and profitability. The Lohar has more work available however their quality of life remains unchanged due to decreasing profit. It seems to me that the Lohar makes 18.83% profit whereas Organization makes 57.44%. Craft industry in India is weird as people who have skilled and art in them, get paid less but it is also a responsibility of government to set up training center, export fair and to work in partnership with Lohar directly in order to achieve overall success. Another important point is payment, even if the Lohar makes $11.11 US dollar profit; they do not get their labor payment on time. Moreover material cost is invested by the Lohar whereas they borrow money from the local market to fund their bell metal work. So now when they pay off their interest, eventually they receive $10/$10.50 US Dollars. Unfortunately, Microfinance is still not easily available in rural area where they craft industry setting up for a year of years. In order to remain a part of business, Lohar has to keep invested $150US Dollar at any given time for the huge money making NGO’s, Businesses and designers. Potential of Bell Metal Market To support bell metal production and sell, export is mandatory and handicraft products are always in high demand all over the world however considering the statistic (2008-09) provided by Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts, India (EPCH) It has been noticed that US (27.57%), U.K (10.55%) and Germany (9.10%) are the highest importer of Indian handicraft product. Organization should conduct research in relation to the potential of bell metal products in other country where import of Indian craft still need a push for example Australia (1.32%) it is a country with plenty of craft creativity people and consumer. Business should focus on such a target market. In a Nutshell There are many good organization for instance Khamir who provides service and resource to conduct proper research and development for the welfare of community that engaged in handicraft, bell metal products and for their empowerment. The entire bell metal business system should be internally consistent and mutually supportive that means everybody makes profit while working but no one should aim profit by taking advantage of lack of community and knowledge access of bell metal maker, which is lohar. Below is some photography of bell metal making that I captured during my visit to Nirona. When you percept the cost of the Lohar for making product viewing these photograph you come to know it is a skills investment rather than money however when the product being sold to market it makes good profit but allocation of the profit is inappropriate, which is the current constrained of this industry. All photos are taken by Karnav shah.
|
The Poetics and Politics of Indian Folk and Tribal Art
Issue #005, Summer, 2020 ISSN: 2581- 9410
Our entire world is in lock-down. Can you imagine what it would be like if that were to continue for fifteen years? To be alone, truly alone, with only your spouse and infant child as company for a full fifteen years, seeing and being seen by no one else? No radio, no television, no computer, no printed materials, no contact with the outside world? What would your response be? Mine might be desperation and depression. If I were to express myself creatively, as I am wont to do, my art might easily be as dark as my desolate mood. During the current pandemic, when most of us on earth need to socially distance ourselves, to practice self-isolation so as not to catch or spread Covid-19, I remember the phenomenal story of Sonabai Rajawar. Around 1930, Sonabai was born to a poor farming family in a tiny village in Surguja District, an extremely remote part of what was then the Central Provinces of British India. She never knew her exact age or her birth year. Just before Indian independence, when the girl was fifteen, her parents arranged her marriage to someone she had never seen, a custom prevalent in those days. Her new husband, Holi Ram Rajawar, was a far older man, a widower who farmed his own rice paddies and supplemented that meager income by contracting to build local houses on the side. For their first ten years of married life, the two lived in his parents’ home in his village of Puhputra. When Sonabai did not become pregnant, Holi Ram and his family felt ashamed that she appeared to be barren. However, she finally gave birth to their only child, a son, in 1953. Soon after that, Holi Ram decided to build a house far outside his community’s boundaries. Isolated homes are rare in India; societies are dependent upon close-knit communities. Under his guidance, the couple constructed their own mud-wall home in a style common to the region: simple rooms and a barn enclosing an interior courtyard. Since the focus of all household activities was inward, toward the well-lit central courtyard, the exterior walls had no windows and only one door. Once the house was complete, Holi Ram closed and bolted that door. No one was permitted entrance, and Sonabai was not allowed out. For the next fifteen years, she could not speak to anyone but her husband and their child. Her parents, siblings and friends were turned away. Of course, Holi Ram continued to work outside, and when their son Daroga was old enough to attend school, his father would take him out of the house for that purpose and to play with his friends. Sonabai, although not physically bound, was her husband’s prisoner. In many parts of India it is not unusual for women to be secluded from common concourse with men from outside their immediate families. Ancient texts and reports suggest that this practice spread in India only after the first Muslim invasions of the eighth century. Throughout their history, South Asian women have always enjoyed a wide sorority of female friends and family. Each region of the subcontinent has a vibrant subculture of women’s customs, lore, stories, and rituals. Many claim that these legacies are the true foundation of South Asian society. But in her extraordinary situation, Sonabai lacked all human contact, male or female, except with her husband and son. Sonabai reacted to her isolation in a way unique in India’s long history. She invented an original style of art. Her initial purpose was purely practical: She had no access to the market and had no toys for her young son. At first, she constructed dolls for him using bits of cloth, but he was an active little boy and these were not entertaining enough. Then she had an inspiration. Sonabai remembered that while local houses were being constructed and the mud of the walls still wet, the women of her village had sculpted the clay surrounding their doorways into pleasant floral and geometric shapes that they painted with natural ochre pigments. Although trapped inside, this isolated woman still had access to clay. Holi Ram had dug a deep well inside their house. She discovered that its edges and the floors of the courtyard and barn were naturally composed of clay that was perfect for sculpting. Sonabai had no training as an artist but found that she could use her hands to mold simple forms that she left to dry in the sun. Within days, her toddler Daroga had a variety of toys to play with: horses, dogs, tigers, elephants, and soldiers. Although they were brittle and broke often, Sonabai could soak the shards and and have fresh clay to create replacements. Soon she realized that if she reinforced them with a core of bamboo sticks wrapped in straw, the toys lasted longer. Bamboo was plentiful in their home, stored in their barn as part of Holi Ram’s construction business. He did not mind her using scraps or decorating their home as long as she kept the interior of the house clean and their son and him well fed. After a year or two of sculpting toys, Sonabai had a further epiphany. She realized she could apply her sculptures to her walls and transform the interior of her home with bas-reliefs. Within months, she decorated every wall of her home with her art. Her vision was entirely unlike anything that existed in other houses in her region nor, although she did not know it, anywhere else in India. With no one either to instruct her or limit her artistic expression, she experimented with different techniques. She discovered that the only way she could get her sculptures to adhere was by covering the surface first with a fresh layer of mud. To this, she could add rolls and dowels of clay to create foliate forms and trees whose branches held monkeys sculpted in the same technique as the toys. She could fashion dancing men and women, musicians, flights of birds or barnyard animals: anything that caught her fanciful imagination. Confined to her home, Sonabai began to recreate what she longed for: her community, the surrounding forests, and the animals that lived in them. Without access to commercial pigments, Sonabai whitewashed her walls and then decorated her bas-reliefs with the red and yellow ochres that Holi Ram used for his construction jobs. She experimented with making other colors using the limited spices and foods in her kitchen and soon discovered that she could use charcoal for adding black to eyes or beaks. She loved the multidimensionality of her figures and wanted more of their details to stand out from the walls. That was when she realized that if she unwound the hemp used in old rope, she could apply it as hair to her figures of women and as manes and tails to horses, lions, and tigers. Months of each year are broiling hot in Sonabai’s new village of Phuphutra, now part of the Indian State of Chhattisgarh. With no exterior windows and no open doors, Sonabai’s home became almost unbearable. The roofed verandah that encircled the courtyard gave shade, but inadequate ventilation. Sometime in the first several years of her confinement, Sonabai realized that she could draw the wind down into her courtyard with latticework walls. Lattice, called jali in India, had been used in other regions for this purpose for centuries, but never in Sonabai’s district. She was entirely unfamiliar with the concept and, as far as she knew, had invented it. Using a sharp knife, she pared off strips of bamboo, then curled them into circles, binding them with palm fiber. Connecting several circles together, she covered their surfaces with fresh clay, then joined more and more of them to form a large lattice that she stretched between the clay columns that supported her verandah roof. While these lattices were still damp, she added sculptures. Snakes sinuously entwined their way through some of the circles. In others, sculpted human figures played flutes or drums. Sonabai had invented an entirely new way of creating jalis that are unlike any others in India’s long history. Over the years, as her son Daroga grew and ventured further afield and she remained at home, Sonabai continued her artistic transformation of their home. She changed and adapted her bas-reliefs and lattices until she perfected her techniques. Then, after imposing solitude on his wife for fifteen years, Holi Ram opened the outside door and let in the neighbors. By the time I first visited Sonabai, years had passed since her confinement, and Holi Ram was dead. In my subsequent years interviewing her, her family and their neighbors, no one would clearly explain why she had been imprisoned. I can only make assumptions. It may be that her husband was jealous of her youthful beauty and wanted no one else to experience it. Perhaps by the time she had reached her thirtieth birthday, he thought she had lost that appeal. Whatever his reasons for ending her isolation, Sonabai was finally free to come and go. The villagers were naturally curious about what had transpired during those absent years. They confided to me that what they saw when they entered her house astonished them. They were impressed, but in those early years of Indian independence, the country was still impoverished from the devastating effects of British colonialism. Puhputra was in a remote area cut off from mainstream culture. Everyone was too focused on simply feeding their families to give much thought to the creative endeavors of one oddly isolated woman. Sonabai’s natural shyness had increased during her solitary years. Although she could now enter the market and make new friends, she was reluctant to do so. Her natal village, family, and childhood friends were too far away to see often. For sixteen more years years, Sonabai’s life in her remote surroundings continued much as it always had. In 1983, Sonabai’s life irrevocably changed: She was discovered and acclaimed by the outside world. Her state’s capital city, Bhopal, opened a new, innovative museum. Called the Roopankar Gallery, part of the larger Bharat Bhawan, its expressed goal was to exhibit contemporary urban art alongside works created by local folk and tribal artists. Scouts circulated throughout the large state to find good indigenous examples. As they surveyed Surguja District, they heard about Sonabai. One of them told me that when they entered her home, they were dumbfounded. Sonabai’s canvas was the entire interior of her house. Inside she had created a magnificent visual raga of color, form, and whimsy unlike anything they had ever seen. They were determined to take examples back to Bhopal to show their superiors. Sonabai shyly refused their request, stating that the sculptures were her children. Determined, they gave money to Holi Ram, who loaned them a pickaxe to tear down one wall to take with them. Sonabai was crushed but was powerless to stop them. From that day forward, change came quickly. Swaminathan, the museum’s director, was thrilled by his scouts’ discovery. His deputy returned to Puhputra to commission more sculptures and jalis from Sonabai for a solo exhibition to which he invited some of New Delhi’s artistic elite. The director of the National Crafts Museum attended and was so impressed that he nominated Sonabai for the Rashtrapati Purushkar (the President’s Award), the highest honor India can bestow on an artist. When Sonabai reluctantly traveled to Delhi to receive the award, her 31-year-old son, Daroga Ram, accompanied her. The artist received a bronze medal and a check for more money than her family had ever seen. In just two years, she had grown from obscurity to fame. In 1986, Sonabai and Daroga were flown to San Diego, California. With Daroga assisting her, Sonabai spent two months in Mingei International Museum, demonstrating her art as part of an exhibition I co-curated about Indian terra-cotta. Sonabai’s experience in America must have been confusing, so beyond her scope of reference that she entirely blocked it out. When I interviewed her about her it years later, she had retained no memory of America whatsoever, although Daroga had loved the trip and grown through it. Upon their return from the U.S., Sonabai would have preferred to resume her quiet lifestyle. Yet again, her wishes were disregarded. For the rest of her life, the next twenty-three years, her art was in high demand. She was given exhibitions at the National Crafts Museum in Delhi and elsewhere in India, invited to demonstrate her craft at festivals and fairs, and commissioned to create artworks for India’s fashionable wealthy. Although Sonabai longed for anonymity in Puhputra, her husband and family were glad of the substantial boost to their income her fame brought. Daroga was now married with children of his own. This new financial resource extended Holi Ram’s farms and would provide substantial dowries for the couple’s two granddaughters. Sonabai remarked that this was the best part of it all: that her work would ensure that she could find good husbands for these girls. In 1991, the scope of her art expanded when the federal government gave her a stipend to teach her artistic techniques and style to ten local artists. Several of these younger men and women excelled at these skills, developing creative expressions directly inspired by the vision of this modest, talented visionary. Now their work was also in demand for exhibitions and festivals, some of them overseas. The income of their families and the community substantially improved, as did the profile of the entire region. That effect is still being felt today, years after Sonabai’s death. My personal experience of entering Sonabai’s home changed my life. I had already spent decades surveying and documenting folk arts and crafts throughout India. I have developed a deep admiration for the innovation, eloquence, and creative insights of Indian artists and artisans. But suddenly, I encountered an entire environment that expressed one woman’s unique vision. Everywhere I looked, her genius surrounded me. I had met Sonabai many times elsewhere as she demonstrated her art. I thought I knew her work well. I did not. A friend who accompanied me stated: “Sonabai’s house is like entering a cathedral – entirely different and yet equally as magnificent, even holy.” I entered through the barn, the only access to the interior. I was dazzled by a wall directly in front of me covered by a green-leafed tree filled with monkeys picking and eating ripe fruit. It’s humor carried with me as I walked through a dark inner grain storage and grinding room and into the bright space of the home’s interior courtyard. In the foreground was a series of brightly painted and sculpted jalis (lattices) connecting the pillars that supported the shade awning. This passage surrounded the center of household activity. Snakes entwined themselves through the jalis, while musicians played, women danced, and parrots sang: all part of Sonabai’s remarkable dreamworld. Layered behind and alongside these pierced portals were walls alive with bas-reliefs: sculptures that joyfully, whimsically depicted a wide variety of rural life. And each room radiating beyond this central core contained sculptures. I immediately realized that although Sonabai had applied her artwork throughout her home, she was also a master of negative space. Nothing was overcrowded: All had been executed with a highly refined eye. Before that experience, I was a cross-cultural surveyor who compared and contrasted the art of one Indian region with that of another. I had assiduously avoided working with a single artist and had no desire to write a monograph. Sonabai changed all that. I worked closely with her until she died in 2007 at the approximate age of eighty. We developed a mutual respect, perhaps even a friendship, although she was always painfully shy. I interviewed her for a book and a film and, with her encouragement, commissioned her last large installation. Together with her son Daroga Ram and the other local artists she had influenced, we created a major exhibition at the same museum in San Diego in which the mother and son had worked and exhibited twenty-two years earlier. A year before that exhibition opened, Sonabai gently died at home. Her loss deeply saddened me. Daroga Ram and his wife Rajenbai came to California to help install the show, and yet again, the viewing public was ecstatic. Sonabai: Another Way of Seeing remains the most popular exhibition that Mingei International Museum has ever held. At that time, I recognized that Sonabai’s message is universal. Subjected to conditions that might crush another person, she had transformed her life into an uplifting expression of beauty and joy. Now, in 2020, when throughout the world we are told to isolate ourselves and stay at home, I am again drawn to Sonabai’s remarkable creative inspiration. I can resent my confinement and grumble that I am unable to conduct my usual activities — or I can embrace this opportunity to create a new vision of life, another way of seeing.Photo Captions 1) Sonabai Rajawar in 2004 © Stephen P. Huyler 2) Sonabai Rajawar in 2004 © Stephen P. Huyler 3) Holi Ram & Sonabai’s house © Stephen P. Huyler 4) Sonabai created clay toys for her toddler son © Stephen P. Huyler 5) Sonabai painting a clay horse for her son © Stephen P. Huyler 6) Sonabai invented the technique of adding hemp hair to her figures. © Stephen P. Huyler 7) A clay monkey eating fruit © Stephen P. Huyler 8) The entrance into Sonabai’s barn reveals a wall adorned with a tree filled with monkeys. © Stephen P. Huyler 9) Sonabai created latticework by joining circles of bamboo strips surfaced with clay.© Stephen P. Huyler 10) Sonabai created latticework by joining circles of bamboo strips surfaced with clay.© Stephen P. Huyler 11) She placed birds and other figures in her lattices. © Stephen P. Huyler 12) A flute-player, parrot and cobra animate one of her jalis. © Stephen P. Huyler 13) Three green parrots add color and dimension to a lattice wall © Stephen P. Huyler 14) One of the finished walls that surround Sonabai’s courtyard. © Stephen P. Huyler 15) One of the finished walls that surround Sonabai’s courtyard. © Stephen P. Huyler 16) Note the negative space of this wall and doorway. © Stephen P. Huyler 17) As Sonabai aged, she taught her daughter-in-law and granddaughters how to sculpt in her style. Here three generations sculpt together. © Stephen P. Huyler 18) The interior of Sonabai’s house when first viewed by scouts in 1983. © Jyoti Bhatt 19) The interior of Sonabai’s house when first viewed by scouts in 1983. © Jyoti Bhatt 20) Sonabai Rajawar in 1983 © Jyoti Bhatt
This fashion show has been the culmination of all efforts and collaboration. The launching collection was shown and the project was presented. Both have received extremely positive feedback and project has been now placed on an international forum due to this exposure. Companies, industry associates and designers have offered to collaborate with the weavers and many people have been moved by the project. We are in touch with the interested individuals and companies. Feedback received has shown us that our weavers now have the potential (with direction from the right creative source) to move beyond their village into the global textile and fashion market.UNESCO, Paris (September) A one day conference was held in UNSECO in Paris, to celebrate the 40th anniversary of establishment of Auroville. The Varanasi Weavers project was presented to a 700 strong audience. This was a great forum to create and spread awareness of the project. Much appreciation and feedback was recieved about the project.The Varanasi Weavers project is funded by Bestseller Foundation, Denmark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Over the last several years we have seen a significant growth in design experiments internationally, which combine the latest cutting edge technology with traditional hand-processes. As India and other developing countries with evolved hand-craft traditions grapple with more immediate questions of locating a space for them within rapid mechanization, and making available a better quality of life for the craftspeople; the world over, crafts themselves are being redefined through new technologies and individual expressions. This is giving rise to new forms and shapes, aesthetic and textural qualities and at times, to new functional attributes altogether. For most western and developed countries this has been a natural process. With hand-manufacture having died as a mode and means of everyday production, hand-processes have acquired a considerable niche and novel value. This development has resulted in such products fitting into various segments of production, sale and of consumer use - one, through hand-crafted, high-end products of luxury brands and two, as products of antique and ethnic value. Third - and which I bring under discussion here - is the phenomena of such hand-processes having elevated themselves from such ‘everyday manufacture’ value to being art expressions; often seen as, and engaging with sculpture, painting and other fine arts. These are also often sold through art galleries and agents who are otherwise engaged in art trade. Why such craft-technology has not developed in any form in the country shows the complex situations that the country faces with regard to mechanisation, and the search for what belongs to a community and to the individual in the Indian context. Intertwined within such situations, at every stage and level, are questions of choice. And these choices are critical in defining the future of Indian aesthetics and the role of our material culture in participating in societal debate and change. There is on the one hand, the need and value for a new breed of Indian designers and artists, for whom such crafts could be a medium of individual expression. On the other hand, are the fragile contexts within which these crafts have evolved and thereby find their unique place in the international context by strengthening diversity and cultural nuances. There are an increasing number of Indian designers, who have begun to make their inroads into this uncharted territory, most often through specialized educational programmes in international design schools and universities. While on the one hand this is welcome news, there is also a need to pause and enquire into this phenomena. The discussion on the interaction between mechanized and hand technology gives rise to several questions in the Indian context. And the resolution of these questions can inform the very definitions of crafts in the country for their future. They could also help to forge new uniquely Indian aesthetics, showcasing the country’s creativity at its genius best through stimulating traditional-contemporary dialogues. Therein, can also lie India’s most defining opportunity and challenge. Deeply embedded in any such enquiries and experiments must be an understanding of the affordances the mechanized and hand technologies have in the country, which are often socio-economic and cultural; and further which rest on precarious needs and realities of the Indian craftspeople. That crafts in the country must evolve is a valid argument, and indeed they cannot survive if they are to not evolve. But what does evolution mean in the crafts context? Is there one monolithic process of evolution around the world for hand-crafts? And most importantly, what does this evolution enable? One view here can be that the way forward for crafts is to encourage their conversation with mechanized technology. This assumes that within an evolution of manufacture and production, mechanization is an inevitability where mechanized technology interventions are the only natural extensions of these crafts. There is no doubt here that dialogues with such technology can play an important role in articulating newness in product, process, design and expression, which are the constant needs and demands of any time. What is essential to assess here, is the role mechanised technology has played so far, and what its implications can be in the long run on the crafts sector at large. We have seen that in most parts of the country, powerlooms have entered the manufacturing scene by their ability to provide handloom replicas at a much cheaper cost. The mushrooming of powerlooms across the country has rapidly begun to shrink the production, consumer and aesthetic base of handlooms. This brings me to my first concern: that through the process of such technology-craft dialogues, it is possible to provide the crafts sector with alternatives of replication, for doing what it does best through machine processes, thereby affecting its original textural and aesthetic qualities. We have seen the recent crisis in Varanasi with regard to the massive flooding of local markets with cheaper, machine-made replicas of traditional brocades. The Chinese have developed machines which can replicate Kutchi embroideries, and that they are already being imported into the country. Recently, there have been reports of Italian machines having mastered the art of Jamdani, the intricate labour-intensive skill which originally belonged to Bengal. 1Not too long ago, a famous international designer tried screen printing on warps to simulate the Ikat effect… Such mechanisation is not restricted to textile manufacture alone. A trip to the Chawdi Bazaar market in Delhi will show you that even religious statues of Indian Gods and Goddesses are now being manufactured in China, with uncanny precision within a matter of seconds. (It is quite likely that your recent Diwali statue of Laxmi was made in China). Is it only matter of time, when our neighbourhood terracota potters will no longer be seen with their clay pots piled by the dozens in numerous shapes and sizes? Evolution of crafts can also mean, apart from such ‘obvious mechanisation’, an evolution in its consumer and market bases, its uses and functions and in the nature of the economic structures which support it. It could also mean reinstating the relevance of their original forms, examining such qualities and the reasons for their survival. Is it not a matter of enquiry, why in spite of several developments which could have changed the vocabulary of traditional designs, they survive in their original forms in the country? While there is a constant reference to the ever-changing aspects of craft traditions, the Indian example has shown that in spite of such changes, it has been in fact the common non-change which has characterised it more prominently. This shows a deep-rootedness of the Indian culture, which in my view, both defines us as a people and cultural system; and further gives us our special place in the world. It is also this very rootedness which can propel innovation using individual creativity, enabling artistic journeys which use community-knowledges. Within such an argument, those technologies and processes considered most primitive by many present standards - hand-spinning, vegetable and lac dyeing, hand-made felt, and so on, acquire a special space. These ancient technologies give India a unique space, both notionally and materially. While we, within the country might find them stale and retrogressive, their role internationally can be enormous. The second aspect of such craft-technology dialogues is related to the above discussion: How different can such craft-technology experiments be in India? When the tools of mechanised technology remain largely the same throughout the world, what is it that differentiates Indian products on aesthetics in comparison to those in Japan, Scandinavia, in the UK and Vietnam…? There is a common tendency in many attempts to contemporarise crafts in India and elsewhere, to highlight more universal forms, colours and forms to enable them to find space in international markets. The use of traditional motifs, colours, and forms are often seen as too ‘ethnic’ for global audiences. The result has been that very often, products from India may not look different from those made in other countries. Such attempts therefore do not help in finding any unique space for Indian designers, artists and their expressions; in the process they contribute to only heighten those very homogenising influences that crafts are in a position to challenge. The third aspect is the employment imperative. In such arguments it is easy to forget that a big challenge facing most countries at the moment is unemployment; and the role of such creative, skilled manufacture is enormous. The questions to be asked in such light are also on the implications for such experiments - which if introduced on a small-scale today, could take on mass-scale proportions tomorrow. What are the human costs of such displacement - economic, cultural, political - so caused? The beginning of one such success in India, perhaps the first (I, of course will be delighted to know more of such experiments!) of its kind has been shown by the remarkable work done by Jigisha Patel Singh, a fresh graduate of textile design from the National Institute of Design. Her fascination with the crafts of Kutch led her to explore technology-hand process dialogues in felt-making in Gujarat. In this, the intricate skill of hand laying layers of felted wool and dyeing were combined with the more mechanical process of felt-making itself. The result was a range of felted rugs which are rich with hand improvisations and combine the durability and steadiness of machine-made felt. While many such experiments might have been carried out in smaller ways by Indian students, what places this experiment at the vanguard is how it has shown the possibility of an assured revival of the dyeing and felt appliqué processes in Kutch, at the same time an improvement in Indian felt qualities for export and new markets which might not have absorbed hand-made felt. It has also, done away with the more mechanical part of the traditional process by focusing on the affordances of the hand to place, cut, dye and lay in layers with spontaneity and improvisations, thereby retaining those creative parts which offer scope for individuality and personal expression. The challenge before us is manifold, but can be addressed at different levels. For designers and artists, it requires a more careful consideration of the contexts of the traditions they are working under. The question of the individual placed within larger cultural constraints can be an exciting and much-needed discourse. Both hand-processes and machine-processes have their own attributes, their own capabilities and their own unique possibilities. And as much as the phenomena of finding cheaper, mechanized methods of doing labour-intensive work has its own advantages, such intentions must not hamper the chances of an even-playing field for intricate and sophisticated hand crafts. |
This is a brief case study of the structure of Aboriginal art centres in Australia. The purpose of this case study is to examine a model that could be applied to other craft centres, in India and elsewhere. It does not propose how the Art centre structure could be applied in different contexts; it instead, provides an overview of the governance, legal and organizational framework of an Aboriginal art centre. A key element of the Art Centre model is that Aboriginal artists having control over the key decision making, priorities, and strategic direction of the centre, and have a stake in administering their own affairs. Successful art centres have been best practice models of livelihoods and enterprise development that provide a co-operative structure, that effectively services it artist/members.
ABORIGINAL ART CENTRESAboriginal Art Centres are broadly defined as locally owned and managed Aboriginal Arts enterprises that support the production and marketing of diverse works of art and craft.1 They are commercially focused organizations, that reflect the values, and distinctiveness of Aboriginal cultures. Their aim is to provide access to independent incomes for Aboriginal people living in remote communities, and to share business experience. They are usually operated as non-profit co-operatives, with artists earning a percentage of each painting, or art object that is sold. The remaining amount is absorbed back into the art centre to pay for materials, staffing, and organizational costs. In remote Aboriginal communities, people have limited opportunities to access independent income, and achieve self employment, therefore, the art centre promotes economic opportunites through engagement with the market, in a way that enables artists to engage equitably with mainstream markets. They broker the gap between the marketplace and Aboriginal artists, who face obstacles related to geographic location, language, and cultural differences, in accessing the market. Art centres are mandated to provide employment opportunities for Aboriginal people. Most Aboriginal art centres have been developed under the guidance of Aboriginal councils and management committees. These committees have employed arts advisors, usually from outside the community, with skills in art production or marketing to run the centres. The first Aboriginal art centre was established at Ernabella, in northern South Australia in 1948. It was originally set up to provide employment for Pitjantjatjara and Yankunytjatjara women by applying their wool spinning skills. The centre continues to operate. In the 1970’s, the artists took up batik work on silk, for which they have subsequently become famous. Most art centres are involved in the trading of paintings, but others, such as Maningrida Arts and Culture in Arnhem Land, in the North-East of Australia sell weavings, sculptures, prints, works on canvas, and bark paintings. There are now Aboriginal art centres throughout regional and remote Australia.![]()
|
|
Excerpts from Crafts in Transition Prof. Ashoke Chatterjee 15th April 2005 IIC, N. DELHI It is interesting to listen to professionals whose basic preoccupation is what constitutes development? What sustainable development actually means? And how do we measure it? One of the remarks that stuck in my mind was made by a lady from Geneva who said these days what measures, what gets counted is what comes otherwise it slips through the cracks. I was thinking of this because year before last when we were celebrating 50 years of 'craft renaissance' a lot of issues came up from the master craftsmen and their chelas (disciples), the people who are the next generation of craftsmen. I wonder two years down the road with the political and economic changes that have taken place what really has happened to those issues raised. I would like to focus on the economic aspect as I think the cultural aspect of craft is something we have paid much more attention to over these years and have more consensus on then the so called development aspects. Let me just give you some figures that may be out of date but they are figures that I have been using. I haven't been able to find any better ones. These go back 10 years so make adjustments for that. According to the NCAER, the output by 4 million craft persons a decade ago was above Rs. 30,000 crores in output, not in revenue. I called them up yesterday (14th April 2005) and according to them the figure is about Rs. 50,000 crores output today. That is the output of 4 million artisans but how many artisans do we have in this country. And since the preoccupation of all our Governments and this one in particularly with the Government Minimum Program is poverty elimination, how many people are we talking about? How many of these people are below the poverty line? 4 million people in our country is not a very large figure, but in a single Government document, the number of artisans ranges from 4 million to 200 million. The question also needs to be asked as to who constitutes artisans. Is it those who produce the kind of products which come under purview of the Development Commissioner (Handicrafts) because those are only a fraction of the hand-skills used in this country? What about ironmongers and those who make bullock-carts. Are they artisan or not, are they craft persons or not and who looks after them. Interestingly, in the 4 million under the NCAER there is no accurate figure for the number of potters or of weavers and yet any time we celebrate crafts the pot and the loom are what we claim to celebrate. And yet we don't really seem to know how many people depend on that. I am told that today the market value, what comes out of these 4 million or more craft persons is about Rs. 65,000 crores of which about Rs. 9,000 crores is exports. Of the Rs. 10,000 crores of exports that come through the list of crafts under the Development Commissioners office only Rs. 10 crores goes to Government. So we can see how much income in generated in all kinds of different ways but we don't know how accurate these figures are. There is no one who's willing to vouch for them but there is a consensus that so called artisan sector is the largest employer in this country after agriculture. Yet there is no protection, no statistics, no comprehensive planning for this sector at all. I shouldn't say at all but I would say it is completely inadequate. I am told that over the last few days a figure was tossed around at Habitat Centre that by 2010 our present government is committed to generating another 100 million jobs. These jobs are not going to be found in the organised industries or in the urban sector and that the largest potential for this job creation is in activities which are linked to natural resources and to the management of our natural resources. This observation was made in the context of forestry and struggle between people and forest policies in this country. So I thought what we might just consider is where does this, what we are committed to and work for, after these 50 or 60 years, what impact have we been able to make on poverty and is there a larger role for us in the sector to try and get little bit more cohesion and support for this sector. I was not at recent meeting at Jodhpur on Cultural Industries which was under UNSECO's sponsorship. But an interesting document has come out there called the 'Jodhpur Consensus' and it is an approach to what is now been described as 'cultural industries' which includes crafts and craftspeople. In the context of guiding principles which emerged from Jodhpur it talks about the importance of these cultural industries not just to the economy but also to socio-economic stability and the sense of cultural identity within much of the world. And this seems to be addressed primarily to the countries of Asia and Pacific region and it points out the need for a much stronger investment in understanding these cultural industries and of supporting them into the future. Couple years ago when we had that celebration of craft renaissance there was a discussion which was kicked off by the President of India on what is actually wrong today and what was said was poverty was the main problem of artisans in our country - competition from mass manufacture and competition from life styles, inadequate access to markets, to technology and to finance, ignorance amongst the general public about craft, references made to change in taste and the waves of vulgarity coming in from both within our own society and outside and the point that was made that I think was significant is violence. How often, and we have experienced this only too tragically in Gujarat though it is not confined to Gujarat, when society explodes in our country the first targets are artisan communities. Many of them belong to minorities or to marginalized and disempowered groups and how often their tools, their looms and stocks are the first things that get put to the torch or hacked up when there is violence. So the point was made that artisans come from already marginalized groups and that they are largely unprotected. They are a silent majority amongst the work force and they are not represented. I have been thinking about the work and whatever contact I have had with the craft sector and the other sectors in recent years that perhaps if we want to get this sector recognized more intelligently, we need to link it more purposefully with some of the waves of change or of thought which are going around the world. I talked about poverty reduction and that clearly is an important aspect in everyone's thinking these days, but there is the whole issue of human rights and empowerment. If the majority of our artisans are those who are deprived of their rights, who have difficulty in accessing their rights and are not empowered then what is it that we, who are in the position perhaps to do something however modest, what should we be doing about restoring or providing to them to the first time, their rights as important drivers not only of the economy but of everything which this country stands for or should stand for. The other aspect related to human rights is democratic frameworks. Without democratic frameworks creative expression is impossible and that too comes out of this Jodhpur Consensus. They talk about the importance of democratic frameworks for creativity and not too many weeks ago I was with some of our colleagues in Pakistan and I noticed amongst the artist and designers and young people that I was talking to of their great concern that creativity in their part of the world had been stifled because of the absence of democratic frameworks, something perhaps that we take for granted. They were able to quote instance after instance where creative expression was inhibited because of a lack of the national commitment to democratic frameworks. Do we take that for granted in India and have we been able to take that more seriously in terms of addressing the needs of artisans. The other is the search for both cultural and individual identity which I think marks the whole turmoil that is taking place in the world and certainly in our country. This search for identity that preceded the independence movement, the role of crafts in that in trying to address issues of identity in what has happened since. As a footnote to that a phenomenon which perhaps as someone who's spent a lot of years in design education has struck me has been, and perhaps I am overstating it, the virulent attack taking place over the last decade on the Sari which has gone completely unanswered by society. The fashion industry has come in hammer and tongs with their expertise, with their organisation, with their knowledge and their skills and one of the things they have hammered at is to persuade the Indian woman to drop the Sari. I had an extraordinary experience awhile ago when I was asked to attend the Lakme Fashion week in Mumbai and we had a debate which turned out to be rather difficult because men have been wearing western clothes for years so who are we to talk but we did a little exercise which was great fun. I suggested to them that rather than just talking, outside the room the models were getting ready for the big ramp show rushing about in their designer clothes and trying to get themselves organized. The lady who had introduced me was a lady of middle years and very elegantly dressed in a simple Tussar silk sari and so I suggested we clear the table and I challenged anyone to go out and bring any two or three of the models and we put them on the table-converted-ramp with this lady to my right. There was no doubt in my mind as to who would win the contest. I just mentioned that because I think something is happening here which strikes me has elicited no response to this demand by an industry that we should change our sense of identity to something which has not come through democratic consensus but through market forces, telling us what we must look like, dress like and what shade of skin we should have. The other element which I think is important for us to perhaps try and link to the future of crafts in India is that of the environment. There could possibly be no more urgent concern today then what is happening to our natural resources and to what kind of a world we will leave for the next generation if we don't do something drastic to protect our natural resources and to adapt our life styles to a more responsible use of our natural resources. So if for example a 100 million jobs are to be created in the next 5 to 10 years in this country what kind of jobs will those be, what kinds of goods and services will they produce. Are we going to have another sea of plastic waste around us, of depleted forests, of poisoned water, of horrific decline in our biodiversity? Or is there is a way to find jobs and incomes and food in people stomach that can be most sustainable in terms of our natural resources and in that respect, it seems to me the craft sector has great deal to offer. It's not the crafts are not polluting, they can be, but there is surely a much greater chance of a less of an environmental foot print from the craft sector then perhaps from any other. The Jodhpur consensus about which I spoke describes cultural industries as those industries which create content, use creativity, skill, and intellectual property and produce goods and services which have social, economic & cultural meaning. They talk about cultural industries as those which create enduring resources for development. They talk about cultural industries, including crafts, as a capital asset which countries should use for their economic, social and cultural development. They ask for support to these industries not as an expenditure but as investment. I was looking quickly through some of the five year plan documents which have come through the years including the excellent one that is done for the 8th 5 year plan, some 10 or more years ago and I don't think anywhere, even in the 8th plan document has the investment in craft been seen as something more than expenditure. The Jodhpur consensus talks about cultural industry as something which brings back far more than that actually put in. It talks about the need for support crafts as wealth creation and as poverty elevation. It asks for crafts and other cultural industry to be linked to the latest driving force for poverty elimination programs around the world which is the millennium development goals of the United Nations. There is no specific millennium development goal which addresses the needs of these industries. And as someone who has been part of the effort to get, for example the millennium development goal for sanitation, what does it mean once you get a goal? It is translated into a figure, into target and though that in itself may not be the answer. Yet if you are on the table as a millennium development goal you are able to access sources of support. You are able to open certain doors. You are able to bring to the table certain issues which otherwise would not get recognised. So is there is a case from the Asia Pacific region for us to demand some kind of goal within the United Nations system that would give teeth to something like this. I conclude these reflections on the development aspects of craft with a reference to an ally that we now have and that is the system of international development accounting that was introduced more than a decade ago by the late economist of Pakistan, Mehboob Ul Haq, the Human Development Indicators in which Amritya Sen also played an important part. This I think was a watershed event because it stated that progress and development is no longer to be measured just in terms of gross domestic product or per capita income but also in terms of human well being described by a number of factors which includes cultural identity, a sense of security of both ones personal safety as well as safety of ones culture and ones place in this world. Interestingly, we have right here on the subcontinent a country, Bhutan, which decided to gear its future and do an experiment they are currently conducting which is to develop the indicators of human happiness for Bhutan. One of the factors Bhutan has put very high on that agenda is the flourishing of their craft activities linking crafts to Bhutan sense of identity in South Asia. I think there are some forces that we can use intelligently to shift the agenda to bring crafts right up to the top of the political agenda, to be able to impact these millions of artisans in our country, whether the 4 or 6 or 200 million or more after all where does the population statistics of North East India go in these figures where every woman is an artisan. They are not factored into this. So we were talking about a huge chunk of humankind in South Asia and their future which we represent and hopefully we can help and support in the years to come. So I just put this out to you and thought we might consider if there are ways in which we can use these developments, and others you might know of to get a greater sense of priority and urgency for the well being of artisans in our country. DISCUSSION RITU SETHI: Well, these were the issues that I was talking about with a colleague of mine - an economist and she said to me that "the only way the craft sector will be accounted for if there is some accounting done". ANURADHA BHASIN: I would step back and say that you talked about 5 year plans and the millennium development. Two years ago, for the first time, the annual Economic Survey introduced a chapter on the contribution of women to the economy, which so far has been ignored. Similarly a section on craft and crafts people would be invaluable as it cuts across so many sectors in the economy. ASHOKE CHATTERJEE: I am sure you notice that the only real study that we have was the one which was done by Shruti in the 1980's, 20 years ago. This study of the status of Artisans of India kept mentioning page after page that the data they were working with was outdated and inaccurate. So in the 80's we were talking about data being inaccurate. Now, 20, 25 years later we are not in any better position in fact we are worse of? As an economist what you think? ANURADHA BHASIN: The starting point could be the economic survey which actually it is very good macro study of the economy. Once you put numbers to it then it's I think one step easier to policy recommendation to bring it to the forefront. So much attention is paid to agricultural labour and agriculture and economy but according to what I heard from Ritu a huge section of them are also crafts people and they are invisible in this economic policy structure. ASHOKE CHATTERJEE: One of the debates in environment issues and so called the greens keep talking about the need that if we continue at the current rate of consumption then development will ultimately be affected where as you have Mr. George Bush saying that I will continue to consume and the American way of life cannot be attacked. The interesting thing is to go back to the 1997-1998 human development report and they had an essay on 'consumption for development' and that is a tremendous ally for us because they point out that it is an industry like crafts where the actual consumption pattern can re-enforce long term sustainable development rather than deplete it. I am little bit disappointed that over the years that essay has not really had the impact or the recognition it should have because it is basically makes our case for us. RITU SETHI: Could it also be because it has gone in to area of artistic production because as you said no one even knows the definition craft. Does it include someone who makes a cart or does it only mean someone who decorates the shoe. So is it because we don't have a definition that includes and broadens the base to include more people and that we work with Development Commission Handicraft instead of working with planning commission. Is there any issue? ASHOKE CHATTERJEE: It could be because I think there are some definitions for instance the one in the 8th plan was "Hand-crafted items made by hand often made with the use of simple tools and generally artistic and or traditional in nature. They include objects of utility and objects of decoration". I don't know any definition would really taking in to account there the entire gamut. What happens for example to people who make clothes? What happens to the people who sit every Sunday in Ahmedabad and sell handmade recycled products? Does that get included in the definition of craft? I do think that one of the problems is how we define craft? LAILA TYABJI: That I think is the problem with looking at crafts as cultural industries because they get bracketed into culture, art and aesthetics. It is a counterargument. Perhaps looking at them as small scale industries isn't a bad thing because you look at craft differently which is otherwise viewed rather romantically. ASHOKE CHATTERJEE: We should then go back to perhaps define crafts as hand skills which would then make it easier to do a head count. For instance, embroidery is done by women who work at home so their contribution is viewed as housewives and not artisans. If we want to push craft to the top of the political agenda then we need facts and figures to support our arguments so the first action is a census. |
The Impetus and My Journey
On one of many trips to Rajasthan, my family and I were taking a tour of the Amer Fort. Little did I know that this day would become a catalyst that would push me to become an educator passionate about experiential learning. As a 14-year-old standing in the Sukh Nivas (Hall of Pleasure), I learned about the water system piped through the edifice to keep the hall cool like an air-conditioner. The architects had meticulously planned this space. Summer winds blew through grass curtains kept damp through a drip system. An open water channel infused with fragrant rose and jasmine blooms flowed through the room into the garden to create an aesthetically beautiful space that brilliantly combatted the hot desert summers in the 16th century. It was a moment that would make me question the entire practice of conventional classroom education. Why did we learn about scientists from Europe but not about these brilliant architects and engineers from India? Why were we only taught the history of wars and not the history of peace when arts, architecture, poetry, literature, and technology flourished? Why did we as modern designers, manufacturers, entrepreneurs and scientists not look at these brilliant technologies of our past to find more sustainable design solutions for the present and future? Why was our education so boring and disconnected from the rich experiences all around us? Thus, started my search for educational pedagogy that would engage learners in authentic experiences. I discovered years later that my empirical observations were aligned with the work of foundational scholars of experiential learning like William James and John Dewey in the west, and thinkers like J. Krishnamurti in India. Today I draw upon theories of constructionism[1] and models in experiential education like place-based learning, inquiry-based learning, student-centered learning, project-based learning and service learning. I also draw upon my experiences in heritage management, sustainable development, community engagement, and museum education.What is Experiential Learning?
Example 1: Students were taken to a Beach Clean-up initiative in Mumbai where they spent a hot morning digging trash from the sand and seeing the impact of plastic on ocean life - digging out plastic entangled around the roots of a mangrove tree. Three years later, we still hear how students changed consumer behavior in their homes. |
2. Example 2: Silk Road Market Simulation to explore the concepts of money and trade. Credit: Ascend International School | 3. Example 2: Consumer and vendor perspectives in a real market to understand the perspective of market pricing Credit: Ascend International School |
Project: Heritage and Conservation (2013)
School: K. J. Somaiya English Medium School, (Grade 7) in Sameerwadi, Karnataka, India Program Lead: Prachi Dalal (Design & Facilitation) Content Experts: Archeological Survey of India, Bijapur Office, Ameen Hullur (Stucco), Smitha Kumar (Archaeologist), Kalus Rotzer (Architect studying water systems), Professor Iamaratwale (History), Professor Daulatkoti (Dakhani Literature), Prashant Mahajan (Natural Heritage), Debashish Nayak (Keynote speaker, Center for Heritage Management, Ahmedabad University) Context: The school was a conventional school in rural Karnataka, India. This was the students’ first experience with inquiry-based learning methods. Project Goals • To model a memorable learning experience for teachers in a rural school • To create an experiential learning experience for students. (here, I will focus on the students’ learning experience.) Learning Goals: • Create awareness about heritage and types of heritage - natural, cultural, tangible, intangible • Analyze the impact our choices on heritage resources - natural and cultural • Help students understand the challenges faced in heritage conservation • Make heritage relevant and inspire students to understand the value of heritage conservation • Build a sense of civic responsibility towards heritage • Build a sense of self-respect and pride in students’ cultural identity • Empower students to become change makers. Project Overview The 7-day program included experiences in school and an overnight 3-day trip to nearby heritage sites. Here is an overview.“Learning is effortless - provided learning is possible…Like breathing, learning is natural and continual provided it is not impeded…The solution is not to be forced to breathe, but restore the power of the lungs, remove constraints to breathing, and restore desire.” - Frank Smith (The Book of Learning & Forgetting)
REFERENCES Dewey, John. Experience and Education, The Kappa Delta Pi Lecture Series, Free Press © 1938, edition 2015, 35 Kolb, A., and Kolb, D. Experiential Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, Art. 7, 2020 Slavich, George M., and Philip G. Zimbardo. “Transformational Teaching: Theoretical Underpinnings, Basic Principles, and Core Methods.” Educational Psychology Review 24, no. 4, 2012: 569–608. The Association for Experiential Education website www.aee.org